The validity and usability of an eight marker model for avatar-based biofeedback gait training

Visual Cue Based Corrective Feedback for Motor Skill Training in Mixed Reality: A Survey

When learning a motor skill it is helpful to get corrective feedback from an instructor. This will support the learner to execute the movement correctly. With modern technology, it is possible to provide this feedback via mixed reality. In most cases, this involves visual cues to help the user understand the corrective feedback. We analyzed recent research approaches utilizing visual cues for feedback in mixed reality. The scope of this article is visual feedback for motor skill learning, which involves physical therapy, exercise, rehabilitation etc. While some of the surveyed literature discusses therapeutic effects of the training, this article focuses on visualization techniques. We categorized the literature from a visualization standpoint, including visual cues, technology and characteristics of the feedback. This provided insights into how visual feedback in mixed reality is applied in the literature and how different aspects of the feedback are related. The insights obtained can help to better adjust future feedback systems to the target group and their needs. This article also provides a deeper understanding of the characteristics of the visual cues in general and promotes future, more detailed research on this topic.

Review of Real-Time Biomechanical Feedback Systems in Sport and Rehabilitation

Real-time biomechanical feedback (BMF) is a relatively new area of research. The potential of using advanced technology to improve motion skills in sport and accelerate physical rehabilitation has been demonstrated in a number of studies. This paper provides a literature review of BMF systems in sports and rehabilitation. Our motivation was to examine the history of the field to capture its evolution over time, particularly how technologies are used and implemented in BMF systems, and to identify the most recent studies showing novel solutions and remarkable implementations. We searched for papers in three research databases: Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. The initial search yielded 1167 unique papers. After a rigorous and challenging exclusion process, 144 papers were eventually included in this report. We focused on papers describing applications and systems that implement a complete real-time feedback loop, which must include the use of sensors, real-time processing, and concurrent feedback. A number of research questions were raised, and the papers were studied and evaluated accordingly. We identified different types of physical activities, sensors, modalities, actuators, communications, settings and end users. A subset of the included papers, showing the most perspectives, was reviewed in depth to highlight and present their innovative research approaches and techniques. Real-time BMF has great potential in many areas. In recent years, sensors have been the main focus of these studies, but new types of processing devices, methods, and algorithms, actuators, and communication technologies and protocols will be explored in more depth in the future. This paper presents a broad insight into the field of BMF.

Virtual Environment Rehabilitation for Patients with Motor Neglect Trial (VERMONT): A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

BACKGROUND

Motor neglect occurs in patients with chronic pain conditions. Virtual environments (VE) help rehabilitation through biofeedback and improving motivation.

AIM

To assess the feasibility of a VE for patients with motor neglect with chronic pain.

METHODS

10 subjects with chronic pain (Fibromyalgia, Sciatica, and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) underwent a treadmill task three times per week for two weeks. Groups were randomized to receive real-time biofeedback from the VE (intervention) or shown still images (control). Primary outcomes were: (i) distance walked at baseline compared to the final 5 min cycle of week 2; (ii) the Lower Extremity Functional Index (LEFI) questionnaire. A satisfaction questionnaire was used. Follow up was to 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Total distance walked was significantly higher in the intervention group (p < 0.05), and 33% (2/6) of the intervention group had a clinically important LEFI improvement compared to 0/4 in the control group at week 2. No secondary outcome measures demonstrated any significant differences. The intervention received high satisfaction scores, significantly greater than the control group at week 24. No harms were recorded.

DISCUSSION

This feasibility study showed that VE and treadmill-walking improved walking distances and function for subjects with motor neglect. This is a promising novel approach and requires further validation through larger study.