1
|
Syrett ED, Peterson CL, Darter BJ. The effect of impaired unilateral ankle propulsion on contralateral knee joint loading. Gait Posture 2024; 113:302-308. [PMID: 38986171 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impairments in unilateral ankle propulsion may result from restriction by an external device or pathology such as lower limb amputation. Models of gait suggest this reduction may lead to increased collisional force on the contralateral side, potentially increasing force through the knee and increasing the risk of knee pain or osteoarthritis. RESEARCH QUESTION How do restrictions in unilateral ankle propulsive force affect contralateral knee joint loading in otherwise healthy individuals? METHODS 18 individuals without impairment walked on a treadmill at 1.5 m/s for two conditions: one free of restrictions, and one where a randomized limb's ankle propulsive force was restricted using an off-the-shelf ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). Ankle propulsive power, lower extremity joint work, and ground reaction force variables were calculated for the final 3 gait cycles of each condition. Tibiofemoral joint contact force (TJCF) for the limb contralateral to the AFO was calculated through a standard OpenSim workflow utilizing the gait2392 model. Intra-limb pair-wise comparisons were made between conditions. RESULTS Compared to walking unrestricted, the limb wearing the AFO demonstrated a significant reduction in peak ankle propulsive power and positive ankle work by approximately 50 % each (p<0.01). With ankle restriction, the ipsilateral knee significantly increased positive work (p<0.01). The overall propulsion produced by that limb did not change between conditions, demonstrated by a lack of change in anterior ground reaction force impulse (p=0.11). The knee of the limb contralateral to the AFO did not display differences in any TJCF variable between conditions (all p>0.07). SIGNIFICANCE These results suggest a unilateral deficit in ankle propulsion will not increase contralateral knee joint forces in individuals who are able to use other joints of the limb to compensate for the loss of ankle function. However, further research should investigate this relationship in those who display pathologies that may prevent more proximal compensations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Daniel Syrett
- Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
| | - Carrie L Peterson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
| | - Benjamin J Darter
- Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; Department of Research, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waterval NFJ, van der Krogt MM, Veerkamp K, Geijtenbeek T, Harlaar J, Nollet F, Brehm MA. The interaction between muscle pathophysiology, body mass, walking speed and ankle foot orthosis stiffness on walking energy cost: a predictive simulation study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2023; 20:117. [PMID: 37679784 PMCID: PMC10483766 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01239-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The stiffness of a dorsal leaf AFO that minimizes walking energy cost in people with plantarflexor weakness varies between individuals. Using predictive simulations, we studied the effects of plantarflexor weakness, passive plantarflexor stiffness, body mass, and walking speed on the optimal AFO stiffness for energy cost reduction. METHODS We employed a planar, nine degrees-of-freedom musculoskeletal model, in which for validation maximal strength of the plantar flexors was reduced by 80%. Walking simulations, driven by minimizing a comprehensive cost function of which energy cost was the main contributor, were generated using a reflex-based controller. Simulations of walking without and with an AFO with stiffnesses between 0.9 and 8.7 Nm/degree were generated. After validation against experimental data of 11 people with plantarflexor weakness using the Root-mean-square error (RMSE), we systematically changed plantarflexor weakness (range 40-90% weakness), passive plantarflexor stiffness (range: 20-200% of normal), body mass (+ 30%) and walking speed (range: 0.8-1.2 m/s) in our baseline model to evaluate their effect on the optimal AFO stiffness for energy cost minimization. RESULTS Our simulations had a RMSE < 2 for all lower limb joint kinetics and kinematics except the knee and hip power for walking without AFO. When systematically varying model parameters, more severe plantarflexor weakness, lower passive plantarflexor stiffness, higher body mass and walking speed increased the optimal AFO stiffness for energy cost minimization, with the largest effects for severity of plantarflexor weakness. CONCLUSIONS Our forward simulations demonstrate that in individuals with bilateral plantarflexor the necessary AFO stiffness for walking energy cost minimization is largely affected by severity of plantarflexor weakness, while variation in walking speed, passive muscle stiffness and body mass influence the optimal stiffness to a lesser extent. That gait deviations without AFO are overestimated may have exaggerated the required support of the AFO to minimize walking energy cost. Future research should focus on improving predictive simulations in order to implement personalized predictions in usual care. Trial Registration Nederlands Trial Register 5170. Registration date: May 7th 2015. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5170.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. F. J. Waterval
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. M. van der Krogt
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K. Veerkamp
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADAPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - T. Geijtenbeek
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - J. Harlaar
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F. Nollet
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. Brehm
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rogati G, Caravaggi P, Leardini A. Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle-foot orthoses: a review study. J Foot Ankle Res 2022; 15:38. [PMID: 35585544 PMCID: PMC9118871 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-022-00547-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFO) can be prescribed to allow drop-foot patients to restore a quasi-normal gait pattern. Standard off-the-shelf AFOs are cost-effective solutions to treat most patients with foot and ankle weakness, but these devices have several limitations, especially in terms of comfort. Therefore, custom AFOs are increasingly adopted to address drop-foot when standard solutions are not adequate. While the solid ones are the most common type of AFO, providing full stability and strong resistance to ankle plantarflexion, passive dynamic AFOs (PD-AFOs) represent the ideal solution for patients with less severe ankle weakness. PD-AFOs have a flexible calf shell, which can bend during the stance phase of walking and absorb energy that can be released to support the limb in the push-off phase. The aim of this review is to assess the state-of-the-art and identify the current limitations of PD-AFOs. An extensive literature review was performed in Google Scholar to identify all studies on custom PD-AFOs. Only those papers reporting on custom PD-AFOs were included in the review. Non peer-reviewed papers, abstract shorter than three pages, lecture notes and thesis dissertations were excluded from the analysis. Particular attention was given to the customization principles and the mechanical and functional tests. For each topic, the main results from all relevant papers are reported and summarized herein. There were 75 papers that corresponded to the search criteria. These were grouped according to the following macro-topics: 16 focusing on scanning technologies and geometry acquisition; 14 on customization criteria; 19 on production techniques; 16 on mechanical testing, and 33 on functional testing. According to the present review, design and production of custom PD-AFOs are becoming increasingly feasible due to advancements in 3D scanning techniques and additive manufacturing. In general, custom PD-AFOs were shown to provide better comfort and improved spatio-temporal parameters with respect to standard solutions. However, no customization principle to adapt PD-AFO stiffness to the patient's degree of ankle impairment or mechanical/functional demand has thus far been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Rogati
- Movement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Caravaggi
- Movement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Leardini
- Movement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Development of a Novel, Passive-Dynamic, Custom AFO for Drop-Foot Patients: Design Principles, Manufacturing Technique, Mechanical Properties Characterization, and Functional Evaluation. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12094721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are medical devices prescribed to support the foot and ankle of drop-foot patients. Passive-dynamic AFOs (PD-AFOs) are an effective solution for less severe cases. While off-the-shelf PD-AFOs are rather inexpensive, they provide poor anatomical fit and do not account for the required patient-specific biomechanical support. Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and manufacturing technologies allow manufacturing PD-AFOs customized for the patient’s anatomy and functional needs. This paper aimed to report the overall procedure for designing and manufacturing a novel, fiberglass-reinforced polyamide, custom PD-AFO. The feasibility of the proposed procedure was tested in a case study. The methodology can be divided into the following steps: (i) foot and leg scanning, (ii) 3D design, and (iii) additive manufacturing via selective laser sintering. A custom PD-AFO was designed and manufactured for a 67-year-old male drop-foot patient following paraparesis in severe discarthrosis after spine stabilization surgery. AFO mechanical properties were measured via an ad hoc setup based on a servohydraulic testing machine. The functional outcome was assessed via gait analysis in three conditions: shod (no AFO), wearing an off-the-shelf PD-AFO, and wearing the patient-specific PD-AFO. As expected, wearing the PD-AFO resulted in increased ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase with respect to the shod condition. Sagittal rotations of the hip, knee, and ankle joints were similar across PD-AFO conditions, but the custom PD-AFO resulted in faster walking speed with respect to the off-the-shelf (walking speed: 0.91 m/s versus 0.85 m/s). Additionally, the patient scored the custom PD-AFO as more comfortable (VAS score: 9.7 vs. 7.3). While the present analysis should be extended to a larger cohort of drop-foot patients, the novel PD-AFO seems to offer a valid, custom solution for drop-foot patients not satisfied with standard orthotics.
Collapse
|