Complications following cranioplasty using autologous bone or polymethylmethacrylate—Retrospective experience from a single center

Subgaleal drains may be associated with decreased infection following autologous cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous bone is often the first choice in cranioplasty following a decompressive craniectomy. However, infection is a common complication, with reported rates up to 25%. While the incidence and management of infection are well documented, the risk factors associated with infection remain less clear. The current study aims to identify predictors of infection risk following autologous cranioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty using cryopreserved autologous bone flaps between 2010 and 2020. Patient demographics and factors related to both surgeries and infection rates were recorded from patient records. Logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors were implicated in the development of infection.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 126 patients underwent autologous cranioplasty. A total of 10 patients (7.9%) developed an infection following reconstruction, with half resulting in implant failure. We did not identify any significant risk factors for infection. Regression analysis identified placement of subgaleal drain following cranioplasty as a protective factor against the development of infection (OR: 0.16, p = 0.007). On average, drains remained in for 3 days, with no difference between the length of drains for those with infection vs. those without (p = 0.757).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates an infection rate of 7.9% in patients who receive an autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy, which is consistent with previous data. Half (4%) of patients who experienced an infection ultimately required removal of the implant. While it is common practice for neurosurgeons to use drains to prevent hematomas and fluid collections, we found that subgaleal drain placement following cranioplasty was associated with decreased infection, thus demonstrating another benefit of a commonly used tool.

Identifying Independent Predictors of Short-Term Postoperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty

BACKGROUND

The present study intends to identify independent predictors of short-term postoperative complications and health utilization in patients undergoing cranioplasty.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative characteristics were collected for each patient undergoing cranioplasty in the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2020. The 30-day outcomes analyzed were medical complications, wound complications, return to the operating room, extended hospital stay, and non-home discharge. Bivariate analyses were initially used to identify variables that yielded a P value less than 0.2 which were subsequently analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors of the aforementioned outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 2316 patients undergoing cranioplasty were included in the analysis. Increased operative time and totally dependent functional status significantly increased odds of returning to the operating room. Increased age, operative time, cranioplasty size >5 cm, and various comorbidities were associated with increased odds of non-home discharge. Bleeding disorders were independently associated with increased odds of wound complications. Increased age, operative time, cranioplasty size >5 cm, and several medical history features predisposed to medical complications. Demographic characteristics, including age and race, along with various operative and medical history characteristics were associated with increased odds of extended length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of risk factors can help guide preoperative risk management in cranioplasty.

Subcutaneous preservation versus cryopreservation of autologous bone grafts for cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty corrects cranial bone defects using various bone substitutes or autologous bone flaps created during a previous craniectomy surgery. These autologous bone flaps can be preserved through subcutaneous preservation (SP) or cryopreservation (CP).

AIM

We aim to compare outcomes and complications for both SP and CP techniques to enhance the current evidence about autologous bone flap preservation.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched to collect all relevant studies. Records were screened for eligibility. Data were extracted from the included studies independently. We categorized surgical site infection (SSI) as either due to Traumatic brain injury (TBI) or not to reveal potential variations in SSI incidence. The double-arm meta-analysis utilized risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) to pool categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively. Proportions with their respective 95% CIs were pooled for single-arm meta-analyses to determine outcomes related to SP technique.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving 1169 patients were analyzed. No significant difference in SSI rates was observed between SP and CP methods in patients with or without TBI. SP was linked to shorter hospital stays in two studies (194 patients). Single-arm analysis showed a 17% revision surgery rate across five studies (375 patients) and infection rates in 17 studies for SP. New bone formation occurred in 13.2% of patients, with 19.9% showing resorption.

CONCLUSION

SP and CP methods showed similar SSI rates post-craniectomy in TBI and non-TBI patients. SP was associated with reduced hospitalization time, low infection rates, and a moderate need for revision surgery.

Can Preoperative Laboratory Values Predict Short-term Postoperative Complications and Health Utilization in Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty?

BACKGROUND

Low hematocrit, low albumin, and high creatinine levels have been associated with postoperative morbidity. The present study intends to analyze the effects of preoperative laboratories on medical complications and postoperative health resource utilization in patients undergoing cranioplasty.

METHODS

Using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, demographic, clinical, and intraoperative characteristics were collected for each patient who had recorded albumin, hematocrit, or creatinine laboratory values within 90 days of the index cranioplasty. Outcomes analyzed were ≥1 medical complication, ≥1 wound complication, unplanned reoperation, 30-day readmission, and extended hospital stay (>30 d). Outcomes significant on bivariate analyses were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Significant outcomes on multivariate analyses were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

The 3 separate cohorts included 1349 patients with albumin, 2201 patients with hematocrit, and 2182 patients with creatinine levels. Upon multivariate analysis, increases in albumin and hematocrit were independently associated with decreased odds of medical complications and extended length of stay. Increases in creatinine were independently associated with increased odds of medical complications. Discriminative cutoff values were identified for albumin and hematocrit.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative laboratory values were independent predictors of medical complications and health utilization following cranioplasty in this study. Surgical teams can use these findings to optimize preoperative risk stratification.

Outcomes of Cranioplasty Reconstructions: Review of Cranioplasty Implants and Free Flap Coverage Variables that Affect Implant Exposure

BACKGROUND

Complex scalp wounds with cranial/dural involvement are challenging to reconstruct. Successful reconstruction can be achieved with cranial implants/hardware and free flap coverage. Wounds can breakdown and require revision procedures. We addressed reconstructive outcomes of different implants requiring free flaps.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors associated with implant exposure.

DESIGN

Multi-institutional retrospective review of 82 patients, 2000-2020, repaired with cranial implants and free flap coverage.

RESULTS

Implant exposure occurred in 13/82 (16%) reconstructions. Flap atrophy or thinning leading to implant exposure occurred in 11/82 (13%) reconstructions, including partial flap atrophy OR 0.05 (95% CI 0.0-0.35) and total flap atrophy OR 0.34 (95% CI 0.02-19.66). Revision surgeries that occurred subsequent to flap reconstruction were also associated with implant exposure (OR 0.02 (95% CI 0.0-0.19)). Implant exposure was not associated with radiation therapy, patient health history, implant type, flap type, or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant exposure is associated with free flap atrophy, leading to inadequate implant coverage and the need for revision surgeries. Completing reconstruction with adequate soft tissue bulk and coverage and avoiding revision surgery may decrease the risk for implant exposure over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:2954-2958, 2023.

Predictors of postoperative epidural hematomas after custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center experience of 194 consecutive cases

Cranioplasty is important for improving cosmesis and functional recovery after decompressive craniectomy. We assessed the incidence and predictors of post-cranioplasty epidural hematomas requiring surgical evacuation. A single-institution, retrospective study enrolled 194 consecutive patients who underwent a cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite between February 2008 and April 2022. Variables associated with postoperative epidural hematoma requiring surgical evacuation at the p < 0.1 level in unadjusted analysis were entered into multivariable analyses. Nine patients (4.6%) experienced postoperative epidural hematomas requiring evacuation, with time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty <6 months (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 20.75, p = 0.047), cranioplasty-to-bone shift > half of the bone thickness (aOR, 17.53, p = 0.008), >10 mm difference between pre-cranioplasty and post-cranioplasty midline brain shift contralateral to the cranioplasty (aOR, 17.26, p < 0.001), and non-resorbable duraplasty (aOR, 17.43, p = 0.011) identified as independent predictors. Seventeen patients (8.8%) experienced post-cranioplasty hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement. Twenty-six patients (13.4%) experienced postoperative infection. Sixteen patients (8.2%) had postoperative epileptic seizures. The identification of independent predictors of post-cranioplasty epidural hematomas requiring surgical evacuation will help identify at-risk patients, guide prophylactic care, and reduce morbidity of this common and important procedure.

Cranioplasty in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Investigating Cranioplasty Failure and Tumor Recurrence

OBJECTIVE

Cranioplasty with synthetic implant can be performed to restore function and form of the skull after resection of malignancy infiltrating the bone. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of implant failure and tumor recurrence in patients undergoing nonautologous cranioplasty and tumor resection.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, 48 patients were identified who had undergone cranioplasty with synthetic implants after tumor resection between 2010 and 2020. The medical records were analyzed to investigate patient demographics, surgery data, cranioplasty failure rates, and rate of tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

Cranioplasty failed in 8 patients. The median time to implant failure was 220 days with most failures occurring within 1 year (5 of 8). There was no significant difference in rate or time to failure between the different cranioplasty materials (P = 0.39). Low body mass index (P < 0.05), previous craniectomy/cranioplasty (P < 0.05), previous radiation therapy to the brain/skull (P < 0.05), and skin closure with sutures (P < 0.05) were associated with an increased risk of implant failure. Tumors recurred in 15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranioplasty surgery with synthetic implants carries a relatively high risk of failure, regardless of type of cranioplasty material used. Skin closure with staples may be beneficial in these patients.

Challenges of Epidural Hematoma Treatment after Cranioplasty: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Cranioplasty has its risks and complications as all surgical procedures. Treatment of complications are poorly known and could raise significant challenges. One of these complications is epidural fluid collection (EFC). We presented a case of recurrence EFC with deterioration of consciousness. A decompressive craniectomy was performed after rotten subdural hematoma and craniectomy so a cranioplasty was done after more than a half year of cured infection. An EFC occurred next day and one month after the cranioplasty. Due to many repetitive surgeries and head computed tomography scans a vacuum drainage system was formed. After twelve days of treatment the patient improved and the EDC disappeared with this system. We tried to search possible causes and treatment methods for EFC in literature. However, the pathogenesis is still unknown and treatment is only symptomatic.

Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimal reconstruction materials for cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy (DC) remain unclear. This systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis compares cosmetic outcomes and complications of autologous bone grafts and alloplasts used for cranioplasty following DC.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception until April 2021. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis was used to compare pooled outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of autologous bone to combined alloplasts. A frequentist network meta-analysis was subsequently conducted to compare multiple individual materials.

RESULTS

Of 2033 articles screened, 30 studies were included, consisting of 29 observational studies and one randomized control trial. Overall complications were statistically significantly higher for autologous bone compared to combined alloplasts (RR = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.14-2.13), hydroxyapatite (RR = 2.60, 95%CI = 1.17-5.78), polymethylmethacrylate (RR = 1.50 95%CI = 1.08-2.08), and titanium (Ti) (RR = 1.56 95%CI = 1.03-2.37). Resorption occurred only in autologous bone (15.1%) and not in alloplasts (0.0%). When resorption was not considered, there was no difference in overall complications between autologous bone and combined alloplasts (RR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.75-1.34), nor between any individual materials. Dehiscence was lower for autologous bone compared to combined alloplasts (RR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.19-0.79) and Ti (RR = 0.34, 95%CI = 0.15-0.76). There was no difference between autologous bone and combined alloplasts with respect to infection (RR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.56-1.30), migration (RR = 1.36, 95%CI = 0.63-2.93), hematoma (RR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.53-1.79), seizures (RR = 0.83, 95%CI = 0.29-2.35), satisfactory cosmesis (RR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.71-1.08), and reoperation (RR = 1.66, 95%CI = 0.90-3.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone resorption is only a consideration in autologous cranioplasty compared to bone substitutes explaining higher complications for autologous bone. Dehiscence is higher in alloplasts, particularly in Ti, compared to autologous bone.

Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study

Numerous materials of implants used for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy (DC) have been investigated to meet certain demanded key features, such as stability, applicability, and biocompatibility. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of biocompatible calcium-phosphate (CaP) implants for cranioplasty compared to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants. In this retrospective observational cohort study, the medical records of all patients who underwent cranioplasty between January 1st, 2015, and January 1st, 2022, were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and diagnostic data were collected. Eighty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 52 years (range 22-72 years) who received either a PMMA (43/82; 52.4%) or CaP (39/82; 47.6%) cranial implant after DC were included in the study. Indications for DC were equally distributed in both groups. Time from DC to cranioplasty was 143.8 ± 17.5 days (PMMA) versus 98.5 ± 10.4 days (CaP). The mean follow-up period was 34.9 ± 27.1 months. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients with PMMA and 6 in those with CaP implants (13/43 [30.2%] vs. 6/39 [15.4%]; p = 0.115). Revision surgery with implant removal was necessary for 9 PMMA patients and in 1 with a CaP implant (9/43 [20.9%] vs. 1/39 [2.6%]; p = 0.0336); 6 PMMA implants were removed due to surgical site infection (SSI) (PMMA 6/43 [14%] vs. CaP 0/39 [0%]; p = 0.012). In this study, a biocompatible CaP implant seems to be superior to a PMMA implant in terms of SSI and postoperative complications. The absence of SSI supports the idea of the biocompatible implant material with its ability for osseointegration.

Ten-Year Institutional Experience to Predict Risk of Calvarial Bone Flap Loss Using Long-Term Outcome Data

BACKGROUND

Calvarial bone flap (CBF) loss is a common complication following craniotomy and subsequent skull reconstruction can be challenging. Defining predictors of CBF failure not only improves patient outcomes but reduces the need for complex reconstruction often requiring plastic surgery consultation. As CBF failure can occur many years following craniotomy, this study aimed to determine risk factors of CBF loss using long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent craniotomy with CBF reinsertion between 2003 and 2013 at a tertiary academic institution. Patients were included if demographics, comorbidities, and long-term outcomes were available. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the odds of CBF failure, defined as permanent removal for bone flap-related issues. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (interquartile range: 1.8-10.8 y).

RESULTS

There were 222 patients who met inclusion criteria and underwent craniotomy with CBF reinsertion, primarily for tumor resection or intracranial pressure relief. CBF failure occurred in 76 (34.2%) patients. Up to 4 CBF reinsertions were performed in both failure and nonfailure groups. The risks of CBF loss increased with each additional CBF elevation by 17-fold (P<0.001), male sex by 3-fold (P=0.005), and tumor etiology by 3-fold (P=0.033) (C-index=0.942).

CONCLUSIONS

Each CBF reinsertion dramatically increases the risk of CBF loss. This finding may optimize patient selection and surgical planning. Early multidisciplinary discussions between plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons may avoid multiple CBF elevations and prevent the adverse sequela of high-risk calvarial reconstruction efforts.

Materials Used in Cranial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is a common neurological procedure with complication rates ranging from 20% to 50%. It is hypothesized that the risks of various complications are impacted by which material is used for cranioplasty.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate existing literature comparing rates of complications following cranioplasty using different materials including autologous bone, hydroxyapatite, methyl methacrylate (MMA), demineralized bone matrix, polyetheretherketone, titanium, or composite materials.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published between 2010 and 2020. After screening, 35 articles were included. Outcomes included infection, wound problems, poor cosmesis, overall complications, duration of surgery, and length of stay. For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to compare materials used.

RESULTS

The risk of infection was 1.62 times higher when MMA was used compared to autologous bone (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.45). Length of stay following cranioplasty was on average 3.62 days shorter when titanium was used compared autologous bone (95% CI -6.26 to -0.98). The networks constructed for other outcomes demonstrated moderate to substantial between-study heterogeneity, wide confidence intervals, and no significant differences between materials.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of existing literature on this topic is relatively poor, almost exclusively comprised of single-center retrospective studies. There is currently not strong enough evidence available to make comprehensive conclusions regarding the risk-profiles of various cranioplasty materials across multiple outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to confirm the significant results found in this analysis and to further elucidate the differential risks of various cranioplasty materials.

Evidence of linear bone flap resorption in patients undergoing autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: A 3D Slicer segmented analysis of serial CT images

OBJECTIVES

Autologous cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) carries risk of bone flap resorption (BFR). The current literature offers limited information regarding the natural progression of BFR, and the rate at which it occurs. We aim to characterize the progression of BFR over time and elucidate risk factors for accelerated BFR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent DC and autologous CP. Serial computed tomography (CT) images were used to quantify degree of BFR over time. Risk factors included age, diabetes, smoking status, flap fragmentation, defect size, and DC-CP time interval. Chi-square analyses and Student's t-tests were performed to examine differences between patients who experienced BFR and those who did not.

RESULTS

Overall, 82% of patients demonstrated evidence of clinically relevant resorption on CT. On average, the bone flap decreased in volume by 36.7% within the first year, with a linear loss in volume after multiple years of follow-up. Individuals who developed greater BFR were significantly younger (43 ± 17 vs. 56 ± 12, p=0.022), had a lower incidence of diabetes (5.9% vs. 43%, p=0.037), and had more bone flap fragments (1.4 ± 0.67 vs. 1.00 ± 0, p <0.001) than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Resorption following CP with cryopreserved bone appears to progress in a fairly linear and continuous fashion over time. Using serial CT images, we found a resorption rate of 82% at our institution. We identified several possible risk factors for resorption, including flap fragmentation, younger age, and absence of diabetes.

Cranioplasty Outcomes From 500 Consecutive Neuroplastic Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is critical to cerebral protection and restoring intracranial physiology, yet this procedure is fraught with a high risk of complications. The field of neuroplastic surgery was created to improve skull and scalp reconstruction outcomes in adult neurosurgical patients, with the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary team approach could help decrease complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcomes from a cohort of cranioplasty surgeries performed by a neuroplastic surgery team using a consistent surgical technique and approach.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 500 consecutive adult neuroplastic surgery cranioplasties that were performed between January 2012 and September 2020. Data were abstracted from a prospectively maintained database. Univariate analysis was performed to determine association between demographic, medical, and surgical factors and odds of revision surgery.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for an average of 24 months. Overall, there was a reoperation rate of 15.2% (n = 76), with the most frequent complications being infection (7.8%, n = 39), epidural hematoma (2.2%, n = 11), and wound dehiscence (1.8%, n = 9). New onset seizures occurred in 6 (1.2%) patients. Several variables were associated with increased odds of revision surgery, including lower body mass ratio, 2 or more cranial surgeries, presence of hydrocephalus shunts, scalp tissue defects, large-sized skull defect, and autologous bone flaps. Importantly, implants with embedded neurotechnology were not associated with increased odds of reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results allow for comparison of multiple factors that impact risk of complications after cranioplasty and lay the foundation for development of a cranioplasty risk stratification scheme. Further research in neuroplastic surgery is warranted to examine how designated centers concentrating on adult neuro-cranial reconstruction and multidisciplinary collaboration may lead to improved cranioplasty outcomes and decreased risks of complications in neurosurgical patients.

A Narrative Review of Cell-Based Approaches for Cranial Bone Regeneration

Current cranial repair techniques combine the use of autologous bone grafts and biomaterials. In addition to their association with harvesting morbidity, autografts are often limited by insufficient quantity of bone stock. Biomaterials lead to better outcomes, but their effectiveness is often compromised by the unpredictable lack of integration and structural failure. Bone tissue engineering offers the promising alternative of generating constructs composed of instructive biomaterials including cells or cell-secreted products, which could enhance the outcome of reconstructive treatments. This review focuses on cell-based approaches with potential to regenerate calvarial bone defects, including human studies and preclinical research. Further, we discuss strategies to deliver extracellular matrix, conditioned media and extracellular vesicles derived from cell cultures. Recent advances in 3D printing and bioprinting techniques that appear to be promising for cranial reconstruction are also discussed. Finally, we review cell-based gene therapy approaches, covering both unregulated and regulated gene switches that can create spatiotemporal patterns of transgenic therapeutic molecules. In summary, this review provides an overview of the current developments in cell-based strategies with potential to enhance the surgical armamentarium for regenerating cranial vault defects.

Different materials of cranioplasty for patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is widely applied on patients who has undergone decompress craniectomy (DC) due to intractable increased intracranial pressure and the cranioplasty materials have been on the bleeding edge of biomolecular and material science. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of different cranial implants for patients with cranial defects due to various reasons.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol has been reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. The following electronic databases will be searched from the date of database establishment to September 1, 2020: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wanfang. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized prospective studies focus on cranial implants will be included. Quality assessment will be conducted using Cochrane Collaboration's tool or risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions based on their study designs. The primary outcome will be postoperative early mortality and implant failure while various complications for secondary outcomes. Pairwise and network meta-analysis will be conducted using STATA V.14 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review does not require an ethics approval or the need to obtain informed consent. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY 202110001.

Extended Scalp Expansion for Larger Defects During Staged Cranioplasty

BACKGROUND

Secondary cranioplasty is often required following trauma, infection, radiation, or oncologic care, but is complicated by soft-tissue deficits with limited regional options. Scalp tissue expanders can provide hair-bearing, vascularized tissue for tension-free closure yielding optimal aesthetic results. However, the upper limit of safe scalp expansion has not been explored. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of extended scalp tissue expansion for challenging cranioplasties in a consecutive series.

METHODS

Patients who underwent scalp tissue expansion before cranioplasty were retrospectively identified from a single institution between the years 2017 and 2020. Patient demographics, tissue expansion characteristics, and complications during expansion and after cranioplasty were collected.

RESULTS

Six patients were identified who underwent staged scalp expansion for cranioplasty; 5 were male (83.3%) with a mean age of 43.8 ± 12.5 years. Indications for cranioplasty included 2 epilepsy-related procedures, 1 oligodendroglioma, 2 infectious processes, and 1 traumatic incident. A single expander was used in 5 cases, whereas 2 were used in the remaining case. The average expander fill volume was 434.3 ± 115 ccs with a mean expansion time of 3.3 ± 1.4 months. Expander infection occurred in 1 case and expander exposure in another, but adequate scalp expansion was still achieved in both. Successful closure over cranioplasty was obtained in 5 cases (83.3%); 1 patient ultimately required free flap reconstruction for soft-tissue coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of extended scalp defects, scalp tissue expansion remains the preferred method for recruiting large quantities of like tissue before implant cranioplasty.

Long-Term Results of Neurological Outcome, Quality of Life, and Cosmetic Outcome After Cranioplastic Surgery: A Single Center Study of 202 Patients

Objective: An increased interest in the surgical procedures of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and subsequent cranioplasty (CP) has emerged during the last decades with specific focus on mortality and complication rates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate long-term neurological and cosmetic outcomes as well as Quality of Life (QoL) after CP surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CP patients treated at our institution between 2004 and 2014 and performed a follow-up examination, with evaluation of neurological outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), QoL (SF-36 and EQ-5D-3L). Furthermore, the cosmetic results after CP were analyzed. Results: A total of 202 CP-patients were included in the present study. The main indications for DC and subsequent CP were space-occupying cerebral ischemia (32%), traumatic brain injury (TBI, 26%), intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage (32%) and infection (10%). During a mean follow-up period of 91.9 months 46/42.6% of patients had a favorable neurological outcome (mRS ≤ 3/GOS ≥ 4). Patients with ischemia had a significant worse outcome (mRS 4.3 ± 1.5) compared with patients after TBI (3.1 ± 2.3) and infectious diseases requiring CP (2.4 ± 2.3). The QoL analysis showed that <1/3rd of patients (31.2%) had a good QoL (SF-36) with a mean EQ-5D-VAS of 59 ± 26. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant worse QoL of ischemia patients compared to other groups whereas multivariate regression analysis showed no other factors which may had an impact on the QoL. The majority (86.5%) of patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result after CP and regression analysis showed no significant factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion: Long-term outcome and QoL after CP were significantly influenced by the medical condition requiring DC. Early detection and evaluation of QoL after CP may improve the patient's outcome due to an immediate initiation of targeted therapies (e.g., occupational- or physiotherapy).

Decision-Making in Adult Cranial Vault Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Define and classify different types of cranial defects 2. Compare both autologous and alloplastic options for reconstruction 3. Develop an optimal approach for cranial vault reconstruction in various clinical scenarios.

SUMMARY

Defects of the cranium result from various causes, including traumatic loss, neurosurgical intervention, skull tumors, and infection. Cranial vault reconstruction aims to restore both the structural integrity and surface morphology of the skull. To ensure a successful outcome, the choice of appropriate cranioplasty reconstruction will vary primarily based on the cause, location, and size of the defect. Other relevant factors that must be considered include adequacy of soft-tissue coverage, presence of infection, and previous or planned radiation therapy. This article presents an algorithm for the reconstruction of various cranial defects using both autologous and alloplastic techniques, with a comparison of their advantages and disadvantages.

Post-Cranioplasty Complications: Lessons From a Prospective Study Assessing Risk Factors

ABSTRACT

Complication rate related with cranioplasty is described as very high in most of relevant studies. The aim of our study was to try to identify possible factors, that could predict complications following cranioplasty. The authors hypothesized that some physical characteristics on the preoperative brain computed tomography (CT) scan can be predictive for complications.The authors carried out a prospective observational study. All patients were adults after decompressive craniectomy, planned for cranioplasty and had a brain CT scan the day before cranioplasty. Our data pool included demographics, reason of craniectomy, various radiological parameters, the time of cranioplasty after craniectomy, the type of cranioplasty bone flap, and the complications.Twenty-five patients were included in the study. The authors identified statistically significant correlation between time of cranioplasty after craniectomy and the complications, as well as between the type of cranioplasty implant and the complications. There was statistically significant correlation between complications and the distance of the free brain surface from the level of the largest skull defect dimension - free brain surface deformity (FBSD). Moreover, the correlation between FBSD and the time of cranioplasty was statistically significant.It seems that for adult patients with unilateral DC the shorter time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty lowers the risk for complications. The risk seems to be decreased further, by using autologous bone flap. Low values of the FBSD increase the risk for complications. This risk factor can be avoided, by shortening the time between craniectomy and cranioplasty.

Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty and its effect on functional outcome remains debatable. Multiple confounding factors may come into role; including the material used, surgical technique, cognitive assessment tools, and the overall complications. The aim of this study is to assess the neurological outcome and postoperative complications in patients who underwent early versus late cranioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the neurological outcome and postoperative complications in patients who underwent cranioplasty between 2005 and 2018 at a Level l trauma center. Early and late cranioplasties were defined as surgeries performed within and more than 90 days of decompressive craniectomy, respectively. The Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS), recorded within 1 week of cranioplasty, were used to assess the neurological outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 101 cases of cranioplasty were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.4 ± 13.9 years. Most patients (n = 86; 85.1%) were male. The mean GOS for all patients was 4.0 ± 1.0. The mean mRS was 2.2 ± 1.78. Hydrocephalus was noted in 18 patients (early, n = 6; late, n = 12; P = 0.48). Seizures developed in 28 patients (early, n = 12; late, n = 16; P = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

The neurological outcome in patients who underwent early versus late cranioplasty is almost identical. The differences in the rates of overall postoperative complications between early versus late cranioplasty were statistically insignificant. The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty is mainly dependent on the resolution of cerebral swelling.

Long-term complications and implant survival rates after cranioplastic surgery: a single-center study of 392 patients

Cranioplasty (CP) is a standard procedure in neurosurgical practice for patients after (decompressive) craniectomy. However, CP surgery is not standardized, is carried out in different ways, and is associated with considerable complication rates. Here, we report our experiences with the use of different CP materials and analyze long-term complications and implant survival rates. We retrospectively studied patients who underwent CP surgery at our institution between 2004 and 2014. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify risk factors for the development of complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate implant survival rates. A total of 392 patients (182 females, 210 males) with a mean age of 48 years were included. These patients underwent a total of 508 CP surgeries. The overall complication rate of primary CP was 33.2%, due to bone resorption/loosening (14.6%) and graft infection (7.9%) with a mean implant survival of 120 ± 5 months. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that young age (< 30 years) (p = 0.026, OR 3.150), the presence of multidrug-resistant bacteria (p = 0.045, OR 2.273), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt (p = 0.001, OR 3.137) were risk factors for postoperative complications. The use of titanium miniplates for CP fixation was associated with reduced complication rates and bone flap osteolysis as well as longer implant survival rates. The present study highlights the risk profile of CP surgery. Young age (< 30 years) and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus are associated with postoperative complications especially due to bone flap autolysis. Furthermore, a rigid CP fixation seems to play a crucial role in reducing complication rates.

Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases

BACKGROUND

Large skull reconstruction, with the use of customized cranial implants, restores cerebral protection, physiologic homeostasis, and one's preoperative appearance. Cranial implants may be composed of either bone or a myriad of alloplastic biomaterials. Recently, patient-specific cranial implants have been fabricated using clear polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), a visually transparent and sonolucent variant of standard opaque PMMA. Given the new enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic applications of clear PMMA, we present here a study evaluating all outcomes and complications in a consecutive patient series.

METHODS

A single-surgeon, retrospective, 3-year study was conducted on all consecutive patients undergoing large cranioplasty with clear PMMA implants (2016-2019). Patients who received clear PMMA implants with embedded neurotechnologies were excluded due to confounding variables. All outcomes were analyzed in detail and compared with previous studies utilizing similar alloplastic implant materials.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients underwent cranioplasty with customized clear PMMA implants. Twenty-one (38%) were performed using a single-stage cranioplasty method (ie, craniectomy and cranioplasty performed during the same operation utilizing a prefabricated, oversized design and labor-intense, manual modification), whereas the remaining 34 (62%) underwent a standard, 2-stage reconstruction (craniectomy with a delayed surgery for cranioplasty and minimal-to-no implant modification necessary). The mean cranial defect size was 101.8 cm. The mean follow-up time was 9 months (range, 1.5-39). Major complications requiring additional surgery occurred in 7 patients (13%) consisting of 2 (4%) cerebrospinal fluid leaks, 2 (4%) epidural hematomas, and 3 (4%) infections. In addition, 3 patients developed self-limiting or nonoperative complications including 2 (4%) with new onset seizures and 1 (2%) with delayed scalp healing.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first reported consecutive case series of cranioplasty reconstruction using customized clear PMMA implants, demonstrating excellent results with regard to ease of use, safety, and complication rates well below published rates when compared with other alloplastic materials. Clear PMMA also provides additional benefits, such as visual transparency and sonolucency, which is material specific and unavailable with autologous bone. Although these early results are promising, further studies with multicenter investigations are well justified to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common neurosurgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), as well as malignant stroke, malignancy and infection. DC necessitates subsequent cranioplasty. There are significant demographic differences between TBI and non-TBI patients undergoing cranioplasty, which may influence their relative risk profiles for infection, aseptic bone flap resorption (aBFR) and re-operation.

OBJECTIVE

Perform a meta-analysis to determine the relative infection, aBFR and re-operation risk profiles of TBI patients as compared to other indications for DC.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched until 26/11/2020. Studies detailing rates of infection, re-operation and/or aBFR in specific materials and the post-TBI population were included, while studies in paediatrics or craniosynostosis repair were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included. There was no difference in relative risk of infection between TBI and non-TBI cohorts (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57-1.17), with insignificant heterogeneity (I² = 33%). TBI was a risk factor for aBFR (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.89), with no significant heterogeneity (I² = 13%). TBI was a risk factor for re-operation in the autologous sub-group (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11) but not in the alloplastic sub-group (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.34-2.18). Heterogeneity was insignificant (I² = 11%).

CONCLUSION

TBI is a risk factor for aBFR and re-operation following cranioplasty. Use of an alloplastic graft for primary cranioplasty in these patients may partially mitigate this increased risk.

Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite being a common procedure, cranioplasty (CP) is associated with a variety of serious, at times lethal, complications. This study explored the relationship between the initial injury leading to decompressive craniectomy (DC) and the rates and types of complications after subsequent CP. It specifically compared between traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and patients undergoing CP after DC for other indications.A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using PRISMA guidelines was performed to include case-control studies, cohorts, and clinical trials reporting complication data for CP after DC. Information about the patients' characteristics and the rates of overall and specific complications in TBI and non-TBI patients was extracted, summarized, and analyzed.A total of 59 studies, including the authors' institutional experience, encompassing 9264 patients (4671 TBI vs. 4593 non-TBI) met the inclusion criteria; this total also included 149 cases from our institutional series. The results of the analysis of the published series are shown both with and without our series 23 studies reported overall complications, 40 reported infections, 10 reported new-onset seizures, 13 reported bone flap resorption (BFR), 5 reported post-CP hydrocephalus, 10 reported intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 8 reported extra-axial fluid collections (EFC). TBI was associated with increased odds of BFR (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, p < 0.01) and infection (OR 1.38, p = 0.02). No difference was detected in the odds of overall complications, seizures, hydrocephalus, ICH, or EFC.Awareness of increased risks of BFR and infection after CP in TBI patients promotes the implementation of new strategies to prevent these complications especially in this category of patients.

Security and reliability of CUSTOMBONE cranioplasties: A prospective multicentric study

BACKGROUND

Repairing bone defects generated by craniectomy is a major therapeutic challenge in terms of bone consolidation as well as functional and cognitive recovery. Furthermore, these surgical procedures are often grafted with complications such as infections, breaches, displacements and rejections leading to failure and thus explantation of the prosthesis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cumulative explantation and infection rates following the implantation of a tailored cranioplasty CUSTOMBONE prosthesis made of porous hydroxyapatite. One hundred and ten consecutive patients requiring cranial reconstruction for a bone defect were prospectively included in a multicenter study constituted of 21 centres between December 2012 and July 2014. Follow-up lasted 2 years.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients included in the study was 42±15 years old (y.o), composed mainly by men (57.27%). Explantations of the CUSTOMBONE prosthesis were performed in 13/110 (11.8%) patients, significantly due to infections: 9/13 (69.2%) (p<0.0001), with 2 (15.4%) implant fracture, 1 (7.7%) skin defect and 1 (7.7%) following the mobilization of the implant. Cumulative explantation rates were successively 4.6% (SD 2.0), 7.4% (SD 2.5), 9.4% (SD 2.8) and 11.8% (SD 2.9%) at 2, 6, 12 and 24 months. Infections were identified in 16/110 (14.5%): 8/16 (50%) superficial and 8/16 (50%) deep. None of the following elements, whether demographic characteristics, indications, size, location of the implant, redo surgery, co-morbidities or medical history, were statistically identified as risk factors for prosthesis explantation or infection.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides relevant clinical evidence on the performance and safety of CUSTOMBONE prosthesis in cranial procedures. Complications that are difficulty incompressible mainly occur during the first 6 months, but can appear at a later stage (>1 year). Thus assiduous, regular and long-term surveillances are necessary.

Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration

Background

Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-effectiveness.

Methods

This study presents a series of 16 consecutive patients who had undergone cranioplasty with customised three-dimensional (3D) template moulds for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants manufactured after 3D modelling on a specific workstation. The virtual images were transformed into a two-piece physical model using a 3D printer for the biomaterials. PMMA implant was produced intraoperatively with the custom mould. Cosmetic results were analysed by comparing pre- and postoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) images and asking if the patient was satisfied with the result.

Results

The average total time for planning and production of customised mould was 10 days. The 16 patients were satisfied with the result, and CT images presented harmonious symmetry when comparing pre- and postoperative scans. Cases of postoperative infection, bleeding, or reoperation in this series were not observed.

Conclusion

Cranioplasty with high-technology customised 3D moulds for PMMA implants can allow for an aesthetic reconstruction with a fast and cost-effective manufacturing process and possibly with low complication rates.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Silicone Elastomer Sheet during Decompressive Craniectomy: Anti-Adhesive Role in Cranioplasty

(1) Background: Cranioplasty is a surgery to repair a skull bone defect after decompressive craniectomy (DC). If the process of dissection of the epidural adhesion tissue is not performed properly, it can cause many complications. We reviewed the effect of a silicone elastomer sheet designed to prevent adhesion. (2) Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 81 consecutive patients who underwent DC and subsequent cranioplasty at our institution between January 2015 and December 2019. We then divided the patients into two groups, one not using the silicone elastomer sheet (n = 50) and the other using the silicone elastomer sheet (n = 31), and compared the surgical outcomes. (3) Results: We found that the use of the sheet shortened the operation time by 24% and reduced the estimated blood loss (EBL) by 43% compared to the control group. Moreover, the complication rate of epidural fluid collection (EFC) in the group using the sheet was 16.7%, which was lower than that in the control group (41.7%, p < 0.023). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the sheet (OR 0.294, 95% CI 0.093–0.934, p = 0.039) to be significantly related to EFC. (4) Conclusions: The technique using the silicone elastomer sheet allows surgeons to easily dissect the surgical plane during cranioplasty, which shortens the operation time, reduces EBL, and minimizes complications of EFC.

Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury-Craniectomy-Related and Cranioplasty-Related Complications in a Single Center

OBJECTIVE

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) relieves intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but it has been associated with poor clinical outcome in 2 recent randomized controlled trials. In this study, we investigated the incidence and explanatory variables for DC-related and cranioplasty (CP)-related complications after TBI.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we identified 61 patients with TBI who were treated with DC in the neurointensive care unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, between 2008 and 2018. Demography, admission status, radiology, and clinical outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (18%) were reoperated because of postoperative hemorrhage after DC. Six (10%) developed postoperative infection during neurointensive care. Twenty-eight (46%) developed subdural hygromas and 10 (16%) received a permanent cerebrospinal fluid shunt. Sixteen patients (26%) died before CP. Median time to CP was 7 months (range, 2-19 months) and 32 (71%) were operated on with autologous bone and 13 (29%) with synthetic material primarily. In 9 patients with autologous bone (29%), the CP had to be replaced because of bone resorption/infection, whereas this did not occur after synthetic material (P = 0.04). However, all 4 postoperative hemorrhages after CP occurred when synthetic material was used (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

DC and CP surgery have a high risk for complications, leading to additional neurosurgery in about one third of cases. Synthetic CP materials may decrease the risk of reoperation, but special care with hemostasis is required because of increased risk of postoperative hemorrhage. Future trials need to address these topics to further improve the outcome for these patients.

Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printing Guide for Single-Stage Skull Bone Tumor Surgery: Novel Software Workflow with Manufacturing of Prefabricated Jigs for Bone Resection and Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel system workflow to design and manufacture patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) printing jigs for single-stage skull bone tumor excision and reconstruction and to present surgical outcomes of 14 patients.

METHODS

A specific computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing software and hardware system was set up, including a virtual surgical planning subsystem and a 3D printing-associated manufacturing subsystem. Computed tomography data of the patient's skull were used for 3D rendering of the skull and tumor. The output of patient-specific designing included a 3D printing guide for tumor resection and a 3D printing model of the bone defect after tumor excision. A polymethyl methacrylate implant was fabricated preoperatively and used for repair.

RESULTS

The specific 3D printing guide was used to design intraoperative jigs and implants for 14 patients (age range, 1-72 years) with skull bone tumors. In all cases, the cutting jig allowed precise excision of tumor and bone, and implants were exact fits for the defects created. All operative results were successful, without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained for analysis. Postoperative 3D measurement of the skull symmetry index (cranial vault asymmetry index) showed significant improvement of head contour after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system described allows definitive preoperative planning and fabrication for treatment of skull bone tumors. Apparent benefits of the method include more accurate determination of surgical margins and better oncological outcomes.

The Correlative Factors and Probable Mechanism of Epidural Fluid Collection After Cranioplasty

OBJECTIVE

Epidural fluid collection (EFC) is one of the postoperative complications of cranioplasty and is easily ignored. Not only the predictive factors of EFC formation are unknown, the pathologic mechanisms are also unknown. We determined to analyze the predictive factors and the mechanism of EFC formation.

METHODS

A total of 340 patients underwent cranioplasty were retrospectively analyzed in this study. A series of factors were compared in the EFC and none-EFC groups and farther compared in the progress epidural fluid collection (PEFC) and none-PEFC subgroups to determine the predictive factors. The t test, χ test, and logistic regression analysis were used in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of EFC formation was 34.41%, and the size of skull defect, preoperative volume of collapse, intraoperative dura suspending, a pre- or intraoperative ventriculoperitoneal shunt (V-P shunt), and an postoperative air bubble in epidural space were predictive factors for EFC formation. Furthermore, the incidence of PEFC was 10.29%, the size of skull defects and intraoperative dura suspending were predictive factors for PEFC formation. The protein ratio and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ratio of effusion to serum were >0.5 and 0.6, respectively. There was no adverse prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although EFC can be treated with conservative therapy, we need to emphasize EFC incidence and development. As neurosurgeons, it is necessary to analyze the preoperative predictive factors of EFC, pay attention to the intraoperative details such as dura suspending to prevent PEFC formation, and the early intervention should be performed in the postoperative.

Reduction in the infection rate of cranioplasty with a tailored antibiotic prophylaxis: a nonrandomized study

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty carries a high risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) for a scheduled procedure, particularly with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

METHODS

The goal of this retrospective study was to measure the effect of tailored antibiotic prophylaxis on SSIs resulting from cranioplasties. The authors collected a prospective database of cranioplasties from 2009 to 2018. Risk factors for SSI were registered, as well as infection occurring during the first year postoperatively. A new protocol was initiated in 2016 consisting of antibiotic prophylaxis tailored to the colonizing flora of the skin of the scalp and decolonization of patients who were nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); infection rates were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred nine cranioplasties were identified, 64 in the old protocol and 45 in the new protocol. Of the 109 cranioplasties, 16 (14.7%) suffered an infection, 14 (21.9%) in the old protocol group and 2 (4.4%) in the new protocol group (OR for the new protocol 0.166, 95% CI 0.036-0.772). Multiple surgeries (OR 3.44), Barthel ≤ 70 (OR 3.53), and previous infection (OR 3.9) were risk factors for SSI. Of the bacteria identified in the skin of the scalp, 22.2% were resistant to routine prophylaxis (cefazoline). Only one patient was identified as a nasal carrier of MRSA and was decolonized.

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of bacteria resistant to routine prophylaxis (cefazoline) was identified in the skin of these patients' scalps. The use of tailored antibiotic prophylaxis reduced significantly the infection rate in this particular set of patients.

Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Acquired defects of the cranium represent a reconstructive challenge in patients with calvarial bone loss due to trauma, infection, neoplasia, congenital malformations, or other etiologies. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative rates of infection, local complications, and allograft failures following cranioplasty reconstruction using titanium mesh (Ti), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and Norian implants in adult patients.

METHODS

This constitutes the first systematic review of available literature on 4 different methods of alloplastic cranioplasty reconstruction, including Ti, PMMA, PEEK, and Norian implants, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale guidelines for article identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. Electronic literature search included Ovid MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database. Pearson exact test was utilized at P < 0.05 level of significance (J.M.P. v11 Statistical Software).

RESULTS

A total of 53 studies and 3591 patients (mean age, 40.1 years) were included (Ti = 1429, PMMA = 1459, PEEK = 221, Norian = 482). Polymethyl methacrylate implants were associated with a significantly higher infection rate (7.95%, P = 0.0266) compared with all other implant types (6.05%). Polyether ether ketone implants were associated with a significantly higher local complication rate (17.19%, P = 0.0307, compared with 12.23% in all others) and the highest ultimate graft failure rate (8.60%, P = 0.0450) compared with all other implant types (5.52%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study qualifies as a preliminary analysis addressing the knowledge gap in rates of infection, local surgical complication, and graft failure in alloplastic cranioplasty reconstruction with different implant types in the adult population. Longer-term randomized trials are warranted to validate associations found in this study.

Comparison of complications in cranioplasty with various materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Meta-analysis to evaluate complications in the use of autogenous bone and bone substitutes and to compare bone substitutes, specifically HA, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium materials.Methods: Search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Google scholar to identify all citations from 2010 to 2019 reporting complications regarding materials used in cranioplasty.Results: 20 of 2266 articles met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 2913 patients. The odds of overall complication were significantly higher in the autogenous bone group (n = 214/644 procedures, 33.2%) than the bone substitute groups (n = 116/436 procedures, 26.7%, CI 1.29-2.35, p < 0.05). In bone substitutes groups, there was no significant difference in overall complication rate between HA and Ti (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.47-3.14, p = 0.69). PEEK has lower overall complication rates (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.87, p = 0.01) and lower implant exposure rates (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.53, p = 0.002) than Ti, but there was no significant difference in infection rates and postoperative hematoma rates.Conclusions: Cranioplasty is associated with high overall complication rates with the use of autologous bone grafts compared with bone substitutes. PEEK has a relatively low overall complication rates in substitutes groups, but still high infection rates and postoperative hematoma rates. Thus, autologous bone grafts should only be used selectively, and prospective long-term studies are needed to further refine a better material in cranioplasty.

Biomaterial and implant induced ossification: in vitro and in vivo findings

Material-induced ossification is suggested as a suitable approach to heal large bone defects. Fiber-reinforced composite-bioactive glasses (FRC-BGs) display properties that could enhance the ossification of calvarial defects. Here, we analyzed the healing processes of a FRC-BG implant in vivo from the perspective of material-induced ossification. Histological analysis of the implant, which was removed 5 months after insertion, showed the formation of viable, noninflammatory mesenchymal tissue with newly-formed mineralized woven bone, as well as nonmineralized connective tissue with capillaries and larger blood vessels. The presence of osteocytes was detected within the newly generated bone matrix. To expand our understanding on the osteogenic properties of FRC-BG, we cultured human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AD-MSCs) in the presence of two different BGs (45S5 and S53P4) and Al2 O3 control. AD-MSCs grew and proliferated on all the scaffolds tested, as well as secreted abundant extracellular matrix, when osteogenic differentiation was appropriately stimulated. 45S5 and S53P4 induced enhanced expression of COL2A1, COL10A1, COL5A1 collagen subunits, and pro-osteogenic genes BMP2 and BMP4. The concomitant downregulation of BMP3 was also detected. Our findings show that FRC-BG can support the vascularization of the implant and the formation of abundant connective tissue in vivo. Specifically, BG 45S5 and BG S53P4 are suited to evoke the osteogenic potential of host mesenchymal stromal cells. In conclusion, FRC-BG implant demonstrated material-induced ossification both in vitro and in vivo.

Risk of Complications in Primary Versus Revision-Type Cranioplasty

INTRODUCTION

Cranioplasty (CP) is a multifaceted procedure in a heterogenous patient population, with a high risk for complication. However, no previous large-scale studies have compared outcomes in primary (ie, first attempt) CP versus revision CP (ie, following previous attempts). The authors, therefore, analyzed long-term outcomes of 506 consecutive primary and revision CPs, performed by a single surgeon.

METHODS

All CPs performed between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed under IRB protocol approval. Surgeries were categorized as either primary (no previous CP; n = 279) or revision CP (at least one previous CP; n = 227). Complications were defined as either major or minor. Subgroup analyses investigated whether or not CP complication risk directly correlated with the number of previous neuro-cranial surgeries and/or CP attempts.

RESULTS

The primary CP group experienced a major complication rate of 9% (26/279). In comparison, the revision CP group demonstrated a major complication rate of 32% (73/227). For the revision CP group, the rate of major complications rose with each additional surgery, from 4% (1 prior surgery) to 17% (2 prior surgeries) to 39% (3-4 prior surgeries) to 47% (≥5 prior surgeries).

CONCLUSION

In a review of 506 consecutive cases, patients undergoing revision CP had a 3-fold increase in incidence of major complications, as compared to those undergoing primary CP. These results provide critical insight into overall CP risk stratification and may guide preoperative risk-benefit discussions. Furthermore, these findings may support a center-of-excellence care model, particularly for those patients with a history of previous neuro-cranial surgeries and/or CP attempts.

A retrospective descriptive study of cranioplasty failure rates and contributing factors in novel 3D printed calcium phosphate implants compared to traditional materials

BACKGROUND

Failure rates with cranioplasty procedures have driven efforts to improve graft material and reduce reoperation. One promising allograft source is a 3D-printed titanium mesh with calcium phosphate filler. This study evaluated failure rates and pertinent characteristics of these novel 3D-grafts compared to traditional materials.

METHODS

Sixty patients were retrospectively identified who underwent a cranioplasty between January 2015-December 2017. Specific data points related to graft failure were collected for all surgical admissions, from the primary injury to their most recent. These included, but were not limited to, initial physical exam findings, vitals, comorbid conditions, surgery length, estimated blood loss, incision type, and need for revision. Failure rates of 3D-printed allografts were compared to traditional grafts.

RESULTS

A total of 60 subjects were identified who underwent 71 unique cranioplasty procedures (3D = 13, Synthetic = 12, Autologous = 46). There were 14 total failures, demonstrating a 19.7% overall failure rate. Specifically, 15.4% (n = 2) of 3D, 19.6% (n = 9) of autologous, and 25.0% (n = 3) of synthetic grafts required revision. Patients receiving 3D-grafts had the shortest overall mean surgery times (200.8 ± 54.3 min) and lowest infection rates (7.7%) compared to autologous (210.5 ± 47.9 min | 25.0%) and synthetic models (217.6 ± 77.3 min | 8.7%), though significance was unable to be determined. Tobacco use and trap-door incisions were associated with increased failure rates relative to straight or curved incisions in autologous grafts. Cranioplasties performed less than 3 months after craniectomy appeared to fail more often than those performed at least three months after craniectomy, for the synthetic group.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that 3D-printed cranioplasty grafts may lead to lower failure rates and shorter surgery times compared to traditional cranioplasty materials in our limited population. 3D-implants hold promise for cranial reconstruction after TBI.

Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare operative duration and total hospital costs incurred for patients undergoing elective cranioplasty with a variety of materials, including manually shaped autogenous bone graft and titanium mesh, custom patient-specific titanium mesh, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) acrylic, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants.

Methods

A single-centre retrospective chart review was used. Patient demographics, defect characteristics, total operative time, and length of hospital stay were obtained. Total costs were sourced from Sunnybrook and standardized to the 2014 to 2015 year. Bivariate and age-controlled multivariate analyses were performed with (n = 119) and without (n = 101) outliers.

Results

When outliers were removed, an age-controlled analysis revealed that autogenous implants resulted in an operative time of 178 ± 37 minutes longer than manually shaped titanium implants (P < .01). The average cost of cranioplasty was CAD$18 335 ± CAD$10 265 for manually shaped titanium implants, CAD$31 956 ± CAD$31 206 for custom patient-specific titanium implants, CAD$20 786 ± CAD$13 075 for PMMA, CAD$14 291 ± CAD$5562 for autogenous implants, and CAD$27 379 ± CAD$4945 for PEEK implants (P = .013). When outliers were removed, cranioplasty with PMMA and PEEK incurred greater costs, CAD$4442 ± CAD$2100 and CAD$13 372 ± CAD$2728, respectively, more than manually shaped titanium implants (P < .01).

Conclusions

Manually shaped titanium mesh is the most cost-effective implant choice for small cranial defects. Large unknown defects and frontal paranasal sinus defects are most effectively treated with autogenous bone or titanium mesh. Despite prolonged operative duration and inpatient admission, total costs were not significantly increased. Both PMMA and PEEK implants were significantly more costly, which may be a result of higher complications necessitating reoperation.

Sagittal Craniosynostosis with Uncommon Anatomical Pathologies in a 56-Year-Old Male Cadaver

Sagittal craniosynostosis (CS) is a pathologic condition that results in premature fusion of the sagittal suture, restricting the transverse growth of the skull leading in some cases to elevated intracranial pressure and neurodevelopmental delay. There is still much to be learned about the etiology of CS. Here, we report a case of 56-year-old male cadaver that we describe as sagittal CS with torus palatinus being an additional anomaly. The craniotomy was unsuccessful (cephalic index, CI = 56) and resulted in abnormal vertical outgrowth of the craniotomized bone strip. The histological analysis of the latter revealed atypical, noncompensatory massive bone overproduction. Exome sequencing of DNA extracted from the cadaveric tissue specimen performed on the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platform yielded 81 genetic variants identified as pathologic. Nine of those variants could be directly linked to CS with five of them targeting RhoA GTPase signaling, with a potential to make it sustained in nature. The latter could trigger upregulated calvarial osteogenesis leading to premature suture fusion, skull bone thickening, and craniotomized bone strip outgrowth observed in the present case.

Donor Site Changes in Bone Thickness, Volume, and Density Following Split Cranial Bone Graft Harvest

The calvarium can provide large amount of good quality corticocancellous autogenous bone graft. Although many studies have highlighted the advantages of the split cranial bone graft, there is no published work available in the literature about the fate of donor site of the split cranial bone graft. The present study was undertaken to assess the donor site as regards to the thickness, volume, and the density of the residual bone over a period of 12 months in the postoperative period. A total of 30 patients in the age group of 15 to 43 years were studied from January 2015 to January 2016. Postoperative computer tomography scans were taken at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperative to measure the bone thickness, volume, and density at the donor site of the split cranial bone graft harvest. The bone thickness at the donor site showed progressive increase in the thickness over the period of study and the average increase in thickness was about 12.4% at the end of 1 year. The average increase in volume at the donor site was of 2.65% after 12 months. Similarly, the average bone density increased by 3.7% at the end of 1 year. This prospective study conclusively proves that the residual bone at the donor site of the split cranial bone graft harvest site continues to grow in thickness and density over a period of 1 year.

On-Demand Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Printing of Custom Cranioplastic Prostheses

BACKGROUND

Currently, implantation of patient-specific cranial prostheses requires reoperation after a period for design and formulation by a third-party manufacturer. Recently, 3-dimensional (3D) printing via fused deposition modeling has demonstrated increased ease of use, rapid production time, and significantly reduced costs, enabling expanded potential for surgical application. Three-dimensional printing may allow neurosurgeons to remove bone, perform a rapid intraoperative scan of the opening, and 3D print custom cranioplastic prostheses during the remainder of the procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of using a commercially available 3D printer to develop and produce on-demand intraoperative patient-specific cranioplastic prostheses in real time and assess the associated costs, fabrication time, and technical difficulty.

METHODS

Five different craniectomies were each fashioned on 3 cadaveric specimens (6 sides) to sample regions with varying topography, size, thickness, curvature, and complexity. Computed tomography-based cranioplastic implants were designed, formulated, and implanted. Accuracy of development and fabrication, as well as implantation ability and fit, integration with exiting fixation devices, and incorporation of integrated seamless fixation plates were qualitatively evaluated.

RESULTS

All cranioprostheses were successfully designed and printed. Average time for design, from importation of scan data to initiation of printing, was 14.6 min and average print time for all cranioprostheses was 108.6 min.

CONCLUSION

On-demand 3D printing of cranial prostheses is a simple, feasible, inexpensive, and rapid solution that may help improve cosmetic outcomes; significantly reduce production time and cost-expanding availability; eliminate the need for reoperation in select cases, reducing morbidity; and has the potential to decrease perioperative complications including infection and resorption.

Autogenous Bone Cranioplasty: Review of a 42-Year Experience by a Single Surgeon

BACKGROUND

Autogenous bone is frequently espoused as the gold standard material for cranioplasty procedures, yet alloplastic cranioplasty continues to persist in the search, presumably, for a simpler technique. Although short-term outcomes can be successful using foreign materials, long-term follow-up in these patients often demonstrates increased rates of failure because of exposure or late infection. Autogenous bone grafts, however, integrate and revascularize, and are thus more resistant to infection than alloplastic materials.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all patients that underwent reconstructive cranioplasty for full-thickness defects, as performed by the senior author (S.A.W.) between 1975 and 2018. All procedures were performed with autogenous bone.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four patients met criteria for inclusion in the report. Cranioplasties were performed for both congenital and secondary indications. Split calvaria was used in 115 patients (74.7 percent), rib graft was used in 12 patients (7.8 percent), iliac crest graft was used in 10 patients (6.5 percent), and combinations of donor-site grafts were used in 17 patients (11.0 percent). In the entire series, none of the patients suffered from complications related to infection of either the donor site or transferred bone graft. None of the patients required secondary operations to fill in defects created by the postoperative resorption.

CONCLUSIONS

Although autologous bone is widely considered the gold standard material for cranioplasty procedures, some argue against its use, mainly citing unpredictable resorption as the purported disadvantage. However, it is less susceptible to infection, and results in fewer long-term complications than alloplastic materials. There is no alloplastic material that has matched these outcomes, and thus autogenous bone should be considered as the primary option for cranioplasty procedures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The choice of heterologous materials for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy is still difficult. The aim of this study is to examine the association between material of choice and related complications to suggest the best treatment option.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was performed for articles reporting cranioplasty comparing the following heterologous implants: titanium, poli-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA), polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and hydroxyapatite (HA). Extracted data included implant materials and incidence of the most frequent complications.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The final selection resulted in 106 papers but according to our rules only 27 studies were included in the final analysis. Among a total of 1688 custom-made prosthesis implanted, 649 were titanium (38.49%), 298 PMMA (17.56%), 233 PEEK (13.82%), and 508 were HA (30.13%). A total of 348 complications were recorded out of 1688 reported patients (20.64%). In the titanium group, 139 complications were recorded (21.42%); in the PMMA group 57 (19.26%), in the PEEK group 49 (21.03%) and in the HA group 103 (20.3%). If we examine a summary of the reported complications clearly related to cranioplasty (postoperative infections, fractures and prosthesis displacement) versus type of material in multicentric and prospective studies we can see how HA group patients have less reported infections and cranioplasty explantation after infections than PMMA, PEEK and titanium. On the contrary HA patients seem to have a higher number of prosthesis displacement again if compared with the other materials. Since these data are not derived from a statistically correct analysis they should be used only to help to differentiate the properties of the various heterologous cranioplasties.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal material for all heterologous cranioplasty has not yet been identified. The choice of material should be based on the clinical data of patients, such as the craniectomy size, presence of seizures, possibility of recovery, good long-term outcome associated with a cost analysis.

Early autologous cranioplasty: complications and identification of risk factors using virtual reality visualisation technique

Background: Cranioplasty (CP) of autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is known to be associated with a high complication rate, particularly bone flap resorption (BFR). In a retrospective study, we used a novel virtual reality (VR) visualisation technique to identify and evaluate risk factors associated with CP.Method: Twenty-five patients underwent early autologous CP. All complications were recorded. Cranial computed tomography scans were visualised via the VR software to access the fitting accuracy of the bone flap (bone flap size, gap width at trepanation cutting edge, extent of osteoclastic extension).Results: An overall complication rate of 44% was seen, and BFR was the most common (36%). Only 'osteoclastic extension of trepanation' (p = .04) was a significant risk factor for BFR. The factors 'indication for DC' (p = .09) and 'size of bone flap' (p = .09) had a tendency towards influencing the rate of BFR, while 'age' (p = .68), 'time interval between DC and CP' (p = 1.00), and 'gap width' (p = .50) were not considered to influence the BFR rate.Conclusions: DC and subsequent CP is a complication-prone procedure. Therefore, it is relevant to identify and quantify probable risk factors for the most common complications, such as BFR. Here, we found that the extent of osteoclastic extension may impair the patient's healing process. Our investigation was made considerably easier by using the novel VR visualisation technique, which allows parallax free measurements of distances in 3D space.

Use of Stock Titanium Mesh Plates in Cranioplasty

Craniofacial surgeons are often confronted with major defects of the calvarium. These most commonly are post-traumatic but could also be consequent upon neurosurgical procedures, infection, or tumor removal. There are several options available to reconstruct these defects including autogenous, heterogeneous, and alloplastic material. The goal is to have a method that is easy, cost-effective, with minimal complications, and long-lasting. In our unit we review 100 cases of the use of stock titanium mesh during a 5-year period. Complications occurred in 5 patients (5%) with 3 exposures, 1 late seroma and 1 case requiring repositioning of the plate following trauma. None of the patients required removal of the plate.

Importance of Three-Dimensional Modeling in Cranioplasty

Cranioplasty is a reconstruction operation made to protect intracranial structures. It is applied for the closure of bone defects occurring due to causes such as trauma, tumor, infection, and infarct. Many different products changing from autologous bone grafts to synthetic materials are used for cranioplasty. Three-dimensional printers that are among the popular innovations of today are used gradually more in medical area as in every field of life and they make the surgical operation easier. When customizable materials are combined with technology, the authors come across successful results and less complications. The aim of the authors' study was to show a 3-dimensional modeling method in 2 patients the authors applied cranioplasty and the advantages provided by this method for the surgeon and the patient.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Skull Implant Displacement After Cranial Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Various complications that can occur during and after cranial surgery have been investigated extensively. One of the less frequent complications has thus far received little attention, however: displacement of the skull implant after craniotomy or craniectomy. The purpose of this study is to identify prognostic factors for the development of skull implant displacement (SID).

METHODS

In this study, 9087 cranial surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively examined for the occurrence of SID. Because a first analysis of the investigated data revealed that a notable number of SIDs occurred after a cranioplasty (CP) performed after a decompressive craniectomy (DC), we focused our investigation on these cases. A total of 669 DCs and 329 subsequently performed CPs were analyzed. Several factors were analyzed unadjusted as possible factors influencing the risk for the development of SID.

RESULTS

A total of 13 implant dislocations occurred after CP (3.95%). Fixation technique is the only factor that seems to have had a significant influence, specifically not using miniplates as the fixation technique, which was associated with a higher risk of SID (P = 0.043). However, if fixation techniques are distinguished in more detail, no significant advantage of the miniplates over titanium clamps can be proven (P = 0.123). None of the remaining observed factors showed a statistically provable impact in our data.

CONCLUSIONS

A notable number of SIDs only occur after CPs that follow a DC. An advantage in successful placement was observed when fixation of the skull implant during cranioplasty was performed using miniplates.