1
|
Lavrov I, Latypov T, Mukhametova E, Lundstrom BN, Sandroni P, Lee K, Klassen B, Stead M. Pre-motor versus motor cerebral cortex neuromodulation for chronic neuropathic pain. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12688. [PMID: 34135363 PMCID: PMC8209192 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91872-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex (ESCC) has been used to treat intractable neuropathic pain for nearly two decades, however, no standardized approach for this technique has been developed. In order to optimize targeting and validate the effect of ESCC before placing the permanent grid, we introduced initial assessment with trial stimulation, using a temporary grid of subdural electrodes. In this retrospective study we evaluate the role of electrode location on cerebral cortex in control of neuropathic pain and the role of trial stimulation in target-optimization for ESCC. Location of the temporary grid electrodes and location of permanent electrodes were evaluated in correlation with the long-term efficacy of ESCC. The results of this study demonstrate that the long-term effect of subdural pre-motor cortex stimulation is at least the same or higher compare to effect of subdural motor or combined pre-motor and motor cortex stimulation. These results also demonstrate that the initial trial stimulation helps to optimize permanent electrode positions in relation to the optimal functional target that is critical in cases when brain shift is expected. Proposed methodology and novel results open a new direction for development of neuromodulation techniques to control chronic neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Lavrov
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
| | - Timur Latypov
- Division of Brain, Imaging, and Behaviour Systems Neuroscience, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elvira Mukhametova
- Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
| | | | - Paola Sandroni
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kendall Lee
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bryan Klassen
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matt Stead
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hagerdon KE, Villeneueve LM, O'Neal CM, Conner AK. Resolution of symptoms in idiopathic thalamic pain syndrome after implantation of a cervical and thoracic percutaneous spinal cord stimulator. Surg Neurol Int 2021; 12:50. [PMID: 33654553 PMCID: PMC7911043 DOI: 10.25259/sni_847_2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Thalamic pain syndrome is classically described as chronic pain after an infarct of the thalamus. It leads to a decrease in the quality of life, especially for patients with inadequate treatment. Supportive imaging, such as a thalamic lesion or infarct, is widely accepted as necessary to diagnose this condition. Case Description: In this case report, we describe the case of a patient who developed allodynia and hyperesthesia with a hemibody distribution characteristic of thalamic pain syndrome, despite having no clear inciting event or identifiable thalamic lesion. This patient was successfully treated with cervical and thoracic spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Conclusion: We suggest that this patient may have presented with a non-lesional thalamic pain syndrome, supported by the classic hemibody allodynia and hyperesthesia and the response to SCS. Further, we demonstrate that SCS was an effective method to control this central pain disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie E Hagerdon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Lance M Villeneueve
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Christen M O'Neal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Andrew K Conner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pacheco-Barrios K, Meng X, Fregni F. Neuromodulation Techniques in Phantom Limb Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2020; 21:2310-2322. [PMID: 32176286 PMCID: PMC7593798 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of neuromodulation techniques in adults with phantom limb pain (PLP). METHODS A systematic search was performed, comprising randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental (QE) studies that were published from database inception to February 2019 and that measured the effects of neuromodulation in adults with PLP. Hedge's g effect size (ES) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS Fourteen studies (nine RCTs and five QE noncontrolled studies) were included. The meta-analysis of RCTs showed significant effects for i) excitatory primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation in reducing pain after stimulation (ES = -1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.26 to -0.45); ii) anodal M1 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in lowering pain after stimulation (ES = -1.50, 95% CI = -2.05 to 0.95), and one-week follow-up (ES = -1.04, 95% CI = -1.64 to 0.45). The meta-analysis of noncontrolled QE studies demonstrated a high rate of pain reduction after stimulation with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (rate = 67%, 95% CI = 60% to 73%) and at one-year follow-up with deep brain stimulation (rate = 73%, 95% CI = 63% to 82%). CONCLUSIONS The evidence from RCTs suggests that excitatory M1 stimulation-specifically, anodal M1 tDCS-has a significant short-term effect in reducing pain scale scores in PLP. Various neuromodulation techniques appear to have a significant and positive impact on PLP, but due to the limited amount of data, it is not possible to draw more definite conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
| | - Xianguo Meng
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, College of Sport Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jinan, Shandong Province, P.R. China
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Corbett M, South E, Harden M, Eldabe S, Pereira E, Sedki I, Hall N, Woolacott N. Brain and spinal stimulation therapies for phantom limb pain: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-94. [PMID: 30407905 DOI: 10.3310/hta22620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many treatments exist for phantom limb pain (PLP), the evidence supporting them is limited and there are no guidelines for PLP management. Brain and spinal cord neurostimulation therapies are targeted at patients with chronic PLP but have yet to be systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE To determine which types of brain and spinal stimulation therapy appear to be the best for treating chronic PLP. DESIGN Systematic reviews of effectiveness and epidemiology studies, and a survey of NHS practice. POPULATION All patients with PLP. INTERVENTIONS Invasive interventions - deep brain stimulation (DBS), motor cortex stimulation (MCS), spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation. Non-invasive interventions - repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Phantom limb pain and quality of life. DATA SOURCES Twelve databases (including MEDLINE and EMBASE) and clinical trial registries were searched in May 2017, with no date limits applied. REVIEW METHODS Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts and full texts. Data extraction and quality assessments were undertaken by one reviewer and checked by another. A questionnaire was distributed to clinicians via established e-mail lists of two relevant clinical societies. All results were presented narratively with accompanying tables. RESULTS Seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 30 non-comparative group studies, 18 case reports and 21 epidemiology studies were included. Results from a good-quality RCT suggested short-term benefits of rTMS in reducing PLP, but not in reducing anxiety or depression. Small randomised trials of tDCS suggested the possibility of modest, short-term reductions in PLP. No RCTs of invasive therapies were identified. Results from small, non-comparative group studies suggested that, although many patients benefited from short-term pain reduction, far fewer maintained their benefits. Most studies had important methodological or reporting limitations and few studies reported quality-of-life data. The evidence on prognostic factors for the development of chronic PLP from the longitudinal studies also had important limitations. The results from these studies suggested that pre-amputation pain and early PLP intensity are good predictors of chronic PLP. Results from the cross-sectional studies suggested that the proportion of patients with severe chronic PLP is between around 30% and 40% of the chronic PLP population, and that around one-quarter of chronic PLP patients find their PLP to be either moderately or severely limiting or bothersome. There were 37 responses to the questionnaire distributed to clinicians. SCS and DRG stimulation are frequently used in the NHS but the prevalence of use of DBS and MCS was low. Most responders considered SCS and DRG stimulation to be at least sometimes effective. Neurosurgeons had mixed views on DBS, but most considered MCS to rarely be effective. Most clinicians thought that a randomised trial design could be successfully used to study neurostimulation therapies. LIMITATION There was a lack of robust research studies. CONCLUSIONS Currently available studies of the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of neurostimulation treatments do not provide robust, reliable results. Therefore, it is uncertain which treatments are best for chronic PLP. FUTURE WORK Randomised crossover trials, randomised N-of-1 trials and prospective registry trials are viable study designs for future research. STUDY REGISTRATION The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017065387. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Corbett
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | - Emily South
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | - Sam Eldabe
- James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesborough, UK
| | - Erlick Pereira
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Imad Sedki
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - Neil Hall
- James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesborough, UK
| | - Nerys Woolacott
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lamer TJ, Deer TR, Hayek SM. Advanced Innovations for Pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91:246-58. [PMID: 26848005 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 11/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain represents one of the most important public health problems in terms of both the number of patients afflicted and health care costs. Most patients with chronic pain are treated with medications as the mainstay of therapy, and yet most medically treated patients continue to report ongoing pain. Additionally, adverse effects from pain medications represent a major challenge for clinicians and patients. Spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal drug delivery systems are well-established techniques that have been utilized for over 25 years. Intrathecal drug delivery systems have proven efficacy for a wide variety of intractable pain conditions and fewer adverse effects than systemic medical therapy in patients with refractory cancer-related pain. Spinal cord stimulation is cost-effective and provides improved pain control compared with medical therapy in patients with a variety of refractory pain conditions including complex regional pain syndrome, painful diabetic neuropathy, and chronic radiculopathy. Patients who have intractable pain that has not responded to reasonable attempts at conservative pain care measures should be referred to a qualified interventional pain specialist to determine candidacy for the procedures discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim J Lamer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | | | - Salim M Hayek
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gee LE, Chen N, Ramirez-Zamora A, Shin DS, Pilitsis JG. The effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on mechanical and thermal thresholds in 6OHDA-lesioned rats. Eur J Neurosci 2015; 42:2061-9. [PMID: 26082992 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Revised: 06/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pain is a major complaint for up to 85% of Parkinson's disease patients; however, it often not identified as a symptom of Parkinson's disease. Adequate treatment of motor symptoms often provides analgesic effects in Parkinson's patients but how this occurs remains unclear. Studies have shown both Parkinson's patients and 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats exhibit decreased sensory thresholds. In humans, some show improvements in these deficits after subthalamic deep brain stimulation, while others report no change. Differing methods of testing and response criteria may explain these varying results. We examined this effect in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were unilaterally implanted with subthalamic stimulating electrodes in the lesioned right hemisphere and sensory thresholds were tested using von Frey, tail-flick and hot-plate tests. Tests were done during and off subthalamic stimulation at 50 and 150 Hz to assess its effects on sensory thresholds. The 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned animals exhibited lower mechanical (left paw, P < 0.01) and thermal thresholds than shams (hot plate, P < 0.05). Both 50 and 150 Hz increased mechanical (left paw; P < 0.01) and thermal thresholds in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats (hot-plate test: 150 Hz, P < 0.05, 50 Hz, P < 0.01). Interestingly, during von Frey testing, low-frequency stimulation provided a more robust improvement in some 6OHDA lesioned rats, while in others, the magnitude of improvement on high-frequency stimulation was greater. This study shows that subthalamic deep brain stimulation improves mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned animals at both high and low frequencies. Furthermore, we suggest considering using low-frequency stimulation when treating Parkinson's patients where pain remains the predominant complaint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy E Gee
- Center for Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, AMC Neurosurgery Group, Albany Medical Center, 47 New Scotland Ave, MC 10, Physicians Pavilion, 1st Floor, Albany, NY, 12208, USA
| | - Nita Chen
- Center for Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | | | - Damian S Shin
- Center for Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Center for Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, AMC Neurosurgery Group, Albany Medical Center, 47 New Scotland Ave, MC 10, Physicians Pavilion, 1st Floor, Albany, NY, 12208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a commonly performed procedure and has been used for the treatment of chronic pain since the early 1970s. A review of the literature was performed utilizing the PubMed database evaluating the use of DBS in the treatment of various pain syndromes. Literature over the last 30 years was included with a focus on those articles in the last 10 years dealing with pain conditions with the highest success as well as the targets utilized for treatment. DBS carries favorable results for the treatment of chronic pain, especially when other methods have not been successful such as medications, conservative measures, and extracranial procedures. Various chronic pain conditions reported in the literature respond to DBS including failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), phantom limb pain, and peripheral neuropathic pain with a higher response rate for those with nociceptive pain compared to neuropathic pain. Cephaligias have promising results, with cluster headaches carrying the best success rates. DBS plays a role in the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Although considered investigational in the USA, it carries promising success rates in a recalcitrant patient population.
Collapse
|