Treatment of thoracic or lumbar spinal tuberculosis complicated by resultant listhesis at the involved segment

Transverse process strut and titanium mesh cages in the stability reconstruction of thoracic single segment tuberculosis: a retrospective single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

A retrospective and comparative study of transverse process strut (TPS, Group A) compared with titanium mesh cages (TMCs, Group B) in the reconstruction of thoracic stability through the one-stage posterior approach to treat single-segment tuberculosis.

METHODS

Sixty patients from January 2013 to December 2016 were analyzed and divided into two groups. The following data of clinical and radiographical assessments were observed preoperatively, postoperatively and during follow-up (FU).

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for an average of 50.20 ± 25.10 months (Group A) and 48.70 ± 27.30 months(Group B) without significant difference. No significant differences were found in the mean of operation time in minutes, blood loss, hospitalization time, drainage and follow-up duration between the groups. The VAS, ODI, ESR and CRP were reduced significantly at the final FU compared with the preoperation values and there was no significance between the groups. Neurological deficits were improved in all patients at the final FU without significant difference between the groups(P > 0.05). The bony fusion times were 5.85 ± 1.82 months and 8.4 ± 5.1 months with significant difference(P < 0.05). Comparing with the preoperative values, the kyphosis angle significantly improved, but at the final FU the significant difference was found between the groups (P < 0.05). The loss of the angular correction and the fused segmental height in group A was lower than that in group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TPS had a better osseous fusion rate, effective maintenance of fused segment stability which is a good bone graft for surgical management of single-segment thoracic spinal tuberculosis.

One-stage posterior debridement with transverse process strut as bone graft in the surgical treatment of single-segment thoracic tuberculosis: A retrospective single-center study

This retrospective study investigated the effect of the novel bone graft transverse process strut (TPS) in single segmental thoracic spinal tuberculosis (TB) with the one-stage posterior approach of debridement, fusion, and internal instrumentation. Thirty patients treated in our department from March 2014 to October 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical time, blood loss, hospitalization time, drainage volume, and follow-up (FU) duration were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, segmental angle, and bone fusion were compared between preoperative and final FU. All the patients were followed for a mean 50.10 ± 25.10 months; the mean age, surgical time in minutes, blood loss, hospitalization time, and drainage volume were 46.23 ± 17.20 years, 195.08 ± 24.0 minutes, 280.77 ± 189.90 mL, 17.31 ± 4.23 days, 436.92 ± 193.81 mL, respectively. VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved at the final FU. The ESR and CRP returned to normal. All patients achieved bony fusion with a mean time of 5.85 ± 1.82 months and a mean segmental angle of 18.77 ± 2.49° preoperatively, which significantly decreased to 9.31 ± 1.54° at the final FU (P < .05). No complications, such as bone graft failure, pleural effusion, fistula, or wound infection were recorded except for cerebrospinal fluid leakage (one case), water electrolyte imbalance (5 cases), superficial infection (1 case), and mild intestinal obstruction (1 case). TPS as a bone graft is reliable, safe, and effective for segmental stability reconstruction for surgical management of single-segment thoracic spinal TB.

Tuberculous Spondylolisthesis: A Reappraisal of the Clinicoradiologic Spectrum and Surgical Treatment Paradigm

INTRODUCTION

Spinal tuberculosis (TB) is a common infectious disease prevalent in developing countries and an increasing issue in developed countries. The association of tuberculosis with spondylolisthesis is rarely reported in literature. The aim of our review is to analyze the clinical features and radiologic characteristics of TB spondylolisthesis and to provide a concise update on its surgical management, based on the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed after conducting a thorough search of the PubMed database. Articles were selected systematically and reviewed completely and relevant data were summarized and discussed.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were selected for the review. The most common clinical manifestation was focal back pain, followed by motor deficit. Most patients had grade 2 listhesis and associated tubercular abscess. The anterior as well as the posterior surgical approach have their own advantages and the choice of approach depends on the location of disease, ease of access, achievement of spinal stability, and avoidance of spread of contiguous infection. Although a posterior approach and fixation using pedicular screws and rods along with debridement of pus or granulation tissue is the favored approach in dorsolumbar TB, an anterior approach, corpectomy, and fusion are preferred in cervical TB.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of TB spondylolisthesis encompasses a wide spectrum of surgical options. However, the mainstay of treatment is chemotherapy. The indications for which surgical management may have an upper hand over medical management are spinal cord compression, significant instability, large tubercular abscess, painful vertebral lesions, kyphosis, and infection by multidrug-resistant TB or extreme drug-resistant TB, when medical management alone does not help. Surgery is effective in these situations by achieving radical debridement, permanent stability, prevention of further neurologic deterioration, and early recovery. Even although conservative management may help in certain cases, a posterior approach, decompression, and fusion are preferred for unstable dorsolumbar disease, whereas an anterior approach is preferred for cervical disease. Combined approaches can be considered in pediatric spinal TB for the correction of kyphotic deformity and its consequent maintenance.