Benefits of subthalamic stimulation for elderly parkinsonian patients aged 70 years or older

Outcomes after deep brain stimulation for elderly versus non-elderly patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

The decision to offer deep brain stimulation (DBS) to elderly patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) presents challenges due to higher perceived risks and uncertain long-term benefits. Here, we aimed to compare the outcomes after DBS for elderly versus non-elderly patients with PD.

METHODS

We analyzed data from our institutional cohort and retrieved publicly available data through a systematic review. The exposure was age at DBS electrode insertion, which was defined as elderly (≥70 years old) and non-elderly (<70 years old). The outcomes examined were changes in the Movement Disorders Society-Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) or UPDRS part III total score, levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and adverse events.

RESULTS

The included studies and our cohort comprised a total of 527 patients, with 111 (21.1 %) classified as elderly. There was no statistically significant difference in the change in MDS-UPDRS or UPDRS part III total score and generally no statistically significant difference in the change in LEDD between the elderly and non-elderly patients. Elderly patients had a higher incidence of wound infection (elderly 5.4 % vs non-elderly 1.9 %; p = 0.087) and inadequate wound healing (elderly 3.6 % vs non-elderly 1.4 %; p = 0.230), but this difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the incidence of mortality (elderly 0 % vs non-elderly 0 %; p = 1.000), stroke (elderly 0 % vs non-elderly 0.2 %; p = 1.000), and cognitive decline between the age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the trend towards a higher risk of wound infection and inadequate wound healing, elderly patients have similar motor outcomes and levels of PD medication reduction as non-elderly patients after DBS for PD. Hence, age should not be used as the sole criterion for determining eligibility for DBS, and the decision to offer DBS to elderly patients should be personalized and made in a multidisciplinary setting, taking into consideration patient- and disease-related factors.

Prospective analysis of gross and fine electrode position and motor manifestations after STN-DBS and their correlation with electrode position

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proven to be a safe, reversible, cost-effective procedure for treatment of Parkinson's disease. Final electrode position remains a significant factor determining the outcomes of subthalamic nucleus DBS (STN-DBS). This study aims to analyze the final lead position in three-dimensional plane and its effect on gross and fine motor outcomes in cases of advanced Parkinson's disease operated for STN-DBS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS were prospectively followed for improvement in gross motor outcomes at 6 months. Improvement in dysgraphia was analyzed by Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale Part B Score. Postoperative outcomes were correlated with final electrode position.

RESULTS

A total of 64 Patients (128 leads) were analyzed. Patients who were less than 65 years of age at time of surgery had more significant reduction in UPDRS III (P=0.02). Cases with deviation of left x less than 3 mm had significant reduction in UPDRS III (P=0.05) and speech sub-scores (P=0.05). Deviation less than 2 mm in left x was associated with reduction in gait sub-scores (P=0.04). Optimal placement of right y electrode was associated with reduction in UPDRS III (P=0.02). Significant reduction in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale Part B Score was noted after DBS (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subthalamic nucleus DBS thus results in significantly improved functional outcome particularly in patients with age less than 65 years. Accurate final electrode position is associated with maximum clinical benefit and improvement in dysgraphia.

The Role of Microelectrode Recording in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

STN-DBS is a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The traditional approach is to use an awake operative technique with microelectrode recording (MER). However, more centers start using an asleep MRI-guided technique without MER.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed the literature to compare STN-DBS surgery with and without MER for differences in clinical outcome.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for randomized clinical trials and consecutive cohort studies published between 01-01-2000 and 26-08-2021, that included at least 10 PD patients who had received bilateral STN-DBS.

RESULTS

2,129 articles were identified. After abstract screening and full-text review, 26 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total of 34 study groups (29 MER and 5 non-MER). The standardized mean difference (SMD) in change in motor symptoms between baseline (OFF medication) and 6-24 months follow-up (OFF medication and ON stimulation) was 1.64 for the MER group and 1.87 for non-MER group (p = 0.59). SMD in change in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was 1.14 for the MER group and 0.65 for non-MER group (p < 0.01). Insufficient data were available for comparative analysis of PDQ-39 and complications.

CONCLUSION

The change in motor symptoms from baseline to follow-up did not differ between studies that used MER and those that did not. The postoperative reduction in LEDD from baseline to follow-up was greater in the MER-group. In the absence of high-quality studies comparing both methods, there is a clear need for a well-designed comparative trial.

Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Elderly Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is an effective adjunctive therapy for Parkinson disease. Studies have shown improvement of motor function but often exclude patients older than 75 yr.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and effectiveness of STN DBS in patients 75 yr and older.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients (52 patients >75 yr old, 52 patients <75 yr old) with STN DBS were paired and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscale III at 1 yr postoperatively, OFF medication. Secondary outcomes were changes in UPDRS I, II, and IV subscales and levodopa equivalents. Complications and all-cause mortality were assessed at 30 d and 1 yr.

RESULTS

Both cohorts had significant improvements in UPDRS III at 6 mo and 1 yr with no difference between cohorts. Change in UPDRS III was noninferior to the younger cohort. The cohorts had similar worsening in UPDRS I at 1 yr, no change in UPDRS II, similar improvement in UPDRS IV, and similar levodopa equivalent reduction. There were similar numbers of postoperative intracerebral hemorrhages (2/52 in each cohort, more severe in the older cohort) and surgical complications (4/52 in each cohort), and mortality in the older cohort was similar to an additional matched cohort not receiving DBS.

CONCLUSION

STN DBS provides substantial motor benefit and reduction in levodopa equivalents with a low rate of complications in older patients, which is also noninferior to the benefit in younger patients. STN DBS remains an effective therapy for those over 75 yr.

Surgical Management of Parkinson's Disease in the Elderly

Background

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly popular therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD). Despite the experience gained over time with DBS of either the subthalamus or the globus pallidus pars interna, there is still no consensus regarding the age limit for DBS indication.

Objectives

This narrative review of the literature discusses the issues of age and DBS, emphasizing the critical need for good quality evidence to support the surgical management of elderly patients with PD.

Methods

We searched PubMed using the terms Parkinson's Disease; Parkinson's Disease therapy; deep brain stimulation; antiparkinsonian agents therapeutic use; age factors; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; treatment outcome; and risk assessments.

Results

We identified several limitations of the available evidence, such as under-representation of older patients in DBS studies, small sample sizes in studies with older participants, heterogeneity of outcomes, and conflicting results.

Conclusions

Despite preliminary suggestions that age might affect the outcomes of DBS, the evidence to support the hypothesis of age as an independent predictor of DBS outcomes is limited and results are controversial. Ultimately, finding an age-independent biomarker predicting DBS outcome is the final goal to expand this powerful treatment to all patients age in an effective and safe manner.

Low Pulvinar Intensity in Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging May Suggest Cognitive Worsening After Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Purpose: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, deteriorating cognitive function after DBS is a considerable problem for affected patients. This study was undertaken to assess whether pulvinar findings in susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) can suggest cognitive worsening.

Methods: We examined 21 patients with PD who underwent DBS along with SWI and neuromelanin-sensitive MR imaging (NMI). We further assessed pulvinar hypointensity based on the SWI findings and also the area of the substantia nigra (SN) pars compacta in NMI. We then examined associations among cognitive changes, pulvinar hypointensity, and SN area. The cognitive function of the patient immediately before surgery was compared with function at 1 year postoperatively.

Results: Pulvinar hypointensity in SWI was found in 11 of 21 patients with PD at baseline. One year postoperatively, six of the 21 patients demonstrated a Mini-Mental State Examination score that was ≥3 points lower than the baseline score. We observed pulvinar hypointensity in SWI before DBS surgery in five of these six patients (p = 0.072). During the first postoperative year, six of 21 patients reported both transient or permanent hallucinations; we observed pulvinar hypointensity in these six patients, while 10 patients without pulvinar hypointensity had no hallucinations.

Conclusion: Pulvinar hypointensity in SWI in patients with PD may provide information that is useful for suggesting cognitive deterioration after DBS treatment.

Comparison of elderly and young patient populations treated with deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: long-term outcomes with up to 7 years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the procedure of choice for Parkinson's disease (PD). It has been used in PD patients younger than 70 years because of better perceived intra- and postoperative outcomes than in patients 70 years or older. However, previous studies with limited follow-up have demonstrated benefits associated with the treatment of elderly patients. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes in elderly PD patients treated with DBS in comparison with a younger population.

METHODS

PD patients treated with DBS at the authors' institution from 2008 to 2014 were divided into 2 groups: 1) elderly patients, defined as having an age at surgery ≥ 70 years, and 2) young patients, defined as those < 70 years at surgery. Functional and medical treatment outcomes were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III), levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), number of daily doses, and number of anti-PD medications. Study outcomes were compared using univariate analyses, 1-sample paired t-tests, and 2-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were studied, of whom 24.5% were ≥ 70 years. The most common preoperative Hoehn and Yahr stages for both groups were 2 and 3. On average, elderly patients had more comorbidities at the time of surgery than their younger counterparts (1 vs 0, p = 0.0001) as well as a higher average LEDD (891 mg vs 665 mg, p = 0.008). Both groups experienced significant decreases in LEDD following surgery (elderly 331.38 mg, p = 0.0001; and young 108.6 mg, p = 0.0439), with a more significant decrease seen in elderly patients (young 108.6 mg vs elderly 331.38 mg, p = 0.0153). Elderly patients also experienced more significant reductions in daily doses (young 0.65 vs elderly 3.567, p = 0.0344). Both groups experienced significant improvements in motor function determined by reductions in UPDRS III scores (elderly 16.29 vs young 12.85, p < 0.0001); however, reductions in motor score between groups were not significant. Improvement in motor function was present for a mean follow-up of 3.383 years postsurgery for the young group and 3.51 years for the elderly group. The average follow-up was 40.6 months in the young group and 42.2 months in the elderly group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found long-term improvements in motor function and medication requirements in both elderly and young PD patients treated with DBS. These outcomes suggest that DBS can be successfully used in PD patients ≥ 70 years. Further studies will expand on these findings.