The efficacy of posterior hemivertebra resection with lumbosacral fixation and fusion in the treatment of congenital scoliosis: A more than 2-year follow-up study

Posterior concave reconstruction with cage in the surgical treatment of complex lumbar deformity caused by lumbosacral hemivertebrae

PURPOSE

To identify the clinical and radiological outcomes in the coronal and sagittal planes after treatment of congenital complex lumbosacral hemivertebrae (LSHV) with or without posterior concave reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients with congenital LSHV deformities treated by posterior-only hemivertebra resection. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. The patients were divided into a concave-cage group and a non-cage group. The radiographic and clinical results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty patients were categorized into the cage group (n = 14) and non-cage group (n = 26). At the end of the propensity score matching analysis, 14 patients from the cage group were matched to 14 patients in the non-cage group. The lumbosacral curve and thoracolumbar/lumbar curve improved significantly in both groups at the final postoperative follow-up (P < 0.001), and the lumbosacral curve at the final follow-up was remarkably lower in the cage than non-cage group. The correction rates of the lumbosacral curve and thoracolumbar/lumbar curve were significantly higher in the cage than non-cage group. The lower lumbar lordosis improved significantly in both groups at the final postoperative follow-up (P < 0.05), and the lower lumbar lordosis at the final follow-up and its correction were remarkably higher in the cage than non-cage group (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior column reconstruction with insertion of a concave cage may achieve a higher correction rate of large lower lumbar lordosis and lumbosacral coronal deformity, attain better sagittal balance, and have fewer complications related to implant failure than posterior-only hemivertebra resection in patients with congenital LSHV.

Analysis of the factors affecting the loss of correction effect in patients with congenital scoliosis after one stage posterior hemivertebrae resection and orthosis fusion

BACKGROUND

To analyze the factors affecting the loss of correction effect in patients with congenital scoliosis after one stage posterior hemivertebra resection, orthosis, fusion and internal fixation.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) who underwent one-stage posterior hemivertebra resection, orthosis, fusion and internal fixation were retrospectively included in Hebei Children's Hospital General demographic information of patients was collected. Preoperative and postoperative imaging indicators were compared, Including cobb Angle of the main curvature of the spine, segmental Cobb Angle, compensatory cephalic curve, compensatory curve on the caudal side, segmental kyphosis, coronal balance, sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and apical vertebra translation. Correlation analysis is used to evaluate the factors affecting the loss of judgment and correction effect, and the correlation indicators are included in the multi-factor Logistics regression.

RESULTS

In terms of radiographic indicators in the coronal plane, compared to preoperative values, significant improvements were observed in postoperative Cobb Angle of main curve (8.00°±4.62° vs. 33.30°±9.86°), Segmental Cobb angle (11.87°±6.55° vs. 31.29°±10.03°), Compensatory cephalic curve (6.22°±6.33° vs. 14.75°±12.50°), Compensatory curve on the caudal side (5.58°±3.43° vs. 12.61°±8.72°), coronal balance (10.95 mm ± 8.65 mm vs. 13.52 mm ± 11.03 mm), and apical vertebra translation (5.96 mm ± 5.07 mm vs. 16.55 mm ± 8.39 mm) (all P < 0.05). In the sagittal plane, significant improvements were observed in Segmental kyposis Angle (7.60°±9.36° vs. 21.89°±14.62°, P < 0.05) as compared to preoperative values. At the last follow-up, Segmental kyphosis Angle (6.09°±9.75° vs. 21.89°±14.62°, P < 0.05), Thoracic kyphosis (26.57°±7.68° vs. 24.06°±10.49°, P < 0.05) and Lumbar lordosis (32.12°±13.15° vs. 27.84°±16.68°, P < 0.05) had statistical significance compared with the preoperative department. The correlation analysis showed that the correction effect of the main curve Cobb angle was correlated with fixed segment length (rs=-0.318, P = 0.048), postoperative segment Cobb angle (rs=-0.600, P < 0.001), preoperative apical vertebra translation (rs = 0.440, P = 0.005), and spinal cord malformation (rs=-0.437, P = 0.005). The correction effect of segmental kyphosis was correlated with age (rs = 0.388, P = 0.037). The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that postoperative segmental Cobb angle > 10° (OR = 0.011, 95%CI:0.001-0.234, P = 0.004), associated spinal cord anomalies (OR = 24.369, 95%CI:1.057-561.793, P = 0.046), and preoperative apical translation > 10 mm (OR = 0.012, 95%CI:0.000-0.438, P = 0.016) were influential factors in the progression of the main curve Cobb angle.

CONCLUSION

The one-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and short-segment corrective fusion with internal fixation are effective means to treat congenital scoliosis. However, attention should be paid to the loss of correction and curve progression during follow-up. Patients with spinal cord malformation and a large preoperative apical vertebra translation have a greater risk of losing the correction after surgery.

Medium-term and Long-term Follow-up Surgical Outcomes of the 1-stage Posterior-only Lumbosacral Hemivertebra Resection With Short-segment Fusion in Children

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the medium-term and long-term surgical outcomes of the 1-stage posterior-only lumbosacral hemivertebra resection with short-segment fusion in children.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review included 21 children with congenital scoliosis due to lumbosacral hemivertebra who received 1-stage posterior-only hemivertebra resection with short-segment fusion from 2012 to 2016 with at least 5 years of follow-up. Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the spine were compared preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up. Radiographic evaluation included measured changes in segmental scoliosis and lordosis, compensatory scoliosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, trunk shift, and sagittal spinopelvic alignment.

RESULTS

There were 12 boys and 9 girls with a mean age of 6.5±3.2 years. The mean follow-up period was 6.7±1.3 years. The mean fusion level was 2.7±0.9 segments. The mean segmental scoliosis was 29±6 degrees preoperatively, 9±3 degrees (correction rate of 71%) postoperatively ( P <0.05), and 7±3 degrees (correction rate of 76%) at the latest follow-up. The compensatory curve of 26±12 degrees was spontaneously corrected to 14±8 degrees (correction rate of 47%) at last follow-up ( P <0.05). Trunk shift was significantly improved on both coronal (53%) and sagittal (56%) planes after surgery ( P 0.05) and stable at follow-up. The sagittal spinopelvic alignment was balanced in all cases. There were no neurological or infectious complications.

CONCLUSIONS

It is safe and effective to perform 1-stage posterior-only lumbosacral hemivertebra resection with short-segment fusion, which can significantly correct the segmental scoliosis, prevent the compensatory curve progress and improve the trunk shift. This strategy also can save motion segments and avoid long lumbar fusion. Medium-term and long-term follow-up outcomes are satisfactory.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Failure of Posterior Lower Lumbar/Lumbosacral Hemi-Vertebra Resection: An Analysis of Reasons and Revision Strategies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the causes of failed primary surgery and the revision strategies for congenital scoliosis (CS) patients with lower lumbar/lumbosacral (LL/LS) hemi-vertebra (HV).

METHODS

Fifteen CS patients with LL/LS HV (seven females and eight males) with a mean age of 20.4 ± 10.4 years undergoing revision surgery in our center were retrospectively reviewed. The radiographic parameters including Cobb angle, distance between C₇ plumb line and center sacral vertical line (C₇ PL-CSVL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were assessed at pre-revision, post-revision and the last follow-up. The causes of failure in primary operation, and radiographic and clinical outcomes of revision procedures were analyzed.

RESULTS

The revision rate of patients undergoing LL/LS HV resection and correction surgery was 11.4%. The average time interval between primary surgery and revision surgery was 18.2 ± 10.6 months. The operation duration and estimated blood loss of revision surgery were 194 ± 56 min and 326 ± 74 ml, respectively. Reasons for failed primary operations were as follows: internal fixation fracture in 10 cases, curve progression in two cases, implant loose in two cases and post-operative coronal imbalance in one case. The post-revision Cobb angle was significantly improved from 29.9° ± 8.3° to 18.7° ± 6.7° (P < 0.001) with a correction rate of 37.5% ± 12.6%. At the final follow-up, the average Cobb angle was 18.9° ± 6.2° and the correction was well maintained (P = 0.788). The C₇ PL-CSVL at pre-revision, post-revision and at last follow-up were 23.2 ± 9.3 mm, 14.8 ± 4.8 mm and 14.9 ± 5.4 mm, respectively. Significant improvements (P = 0.004) were observed after revision surgery and there was no evident loss of correction (P = 0.703). There was no significant difference in TK, LL and SVA before and after revision surgery (all P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, no significant correction loss of above coronal and sagittal parameters were observed (all P > 0.05). The revision methods were individualized according to the primary surgical procedures and the reasons for revision. The recommended revision strategies include incision of pseudarthrosis with sufficient bone graft, fixation of satellite rods, thorough residual HV excision, prolonged fusion to S₂ and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at lumbosacral region. Solid bony fusion and no implant-related complication were detected during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes of revision surgery for patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) due to lumbosacral HV were verified and implant failure with pseudarthrosis was the main reason for failed primary operation.

The Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Patients With Different 3-Dimensional Hemivertebra Morphologies Undergoing Posterior-Only Hemivertebra Resection and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with different 3-dimensional (3D) hemivertebra morphologies undergoing posterior-only hemivertebra resection and fusion.

METHODS

The files of patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) due to single hemivertebra undergoing posterior-only hemivertebra resection and fusion from January 2010 to January 2018 were reviewed. After evaluating the 3D computed tomography images, CS patients were divided into a unison hemivertebra group and a discordant hemivertebra group. Clinical outcomes, radiologic outcomes, and incidence of complications were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 42 consecutive patients with CS patients due to a single hemivertebra undergoing posterior-only hemivertebra resection and fusion were included in this study. The Cobb angle of the segmental curve was significantly improved postoperatively and at the last follow-up in both groups (all P < 0.05). At both postoperation and the last follow-up, no significant differences were found in the incidence of complications, Cobb angle of the segmental curve, correction rate of the segmental curve, or other radiologic outcomes between the unison hemivertebra group and discordant hemivertebra group (all P > 0.05). Compared with the unison hemivertebra group, increased operation time (P = 0.006) and intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.037) were found in the discordant hemivertebra group.

CONCLUSIONS

For CS patients with unison hemivertebra or discordant hemivertebra, satisfactory radiologic results were obtained by posterior-only hemivertebra resection and fusion. In terms of surgery, the radiologic outcomes of discordant hemivertebra patients were similar to those of unison hemivertebra patients, but discordant hemivertebrae could easily result in longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss.

Surgical outcomes following hemivertebrectomy in congenital scoliosis: a systematic review and observational meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hemivertebrectomy is widely used definitive correction surgery in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebrae. It may be done either as combined anterior and posterior approach or a single-stage posterior approach only. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare two techniques with regards to blood loss, operative time, deformity correction and complications.

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines among peer-reviewed journals published in English between June 2000 and June 2020. Quality appraisal of all selected articles was done and data extracted.

RESULTS

After thorough literature search and excluding, 37 studies were included for review. The commonest location of the hemivertebrae was thoracolumbar spine (51.3%), thoracic (26.2%), lumbar/lumbosacral (21.6%) followed by cervical (0.7%). Pooled data showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean operative time with posterior only approach (227 min, 95% CI 205-250) as compared to Combined Anterior Posterior Approach (CAPA) (316 min 95% CI 291-341). Significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean blood loss was observed in posterior only approach (522 ml, 95% CI 434-611) as compared to CAPA (888 ml, 95% CI 663-1113). No significant difference was noted in mean correction in either of the approaches and overall pooled mean correction rate was 66%, 95% CI 61-72.

CONCLUSION

This review and meta-analysis of two surgical techniques of hemivertebrectomy, shows that operative time and blood loss is significantly lower in posterior only approach with no difference in correction rate as compared to CAPA. There was significant correlation between age at surgery and need for revision surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Correlation between Age and Surgical Approach for Thoracic and Lumbar Hemivertebra

Objective Hemivertebra (HV) is a congenital defect of the formation of the spinal vertebra, which can result in scoliosis or kyphosis along with the related symptomatology of spine deformity. More often than not, it is linked to other abnormalities and requires attention. Its management is surgical and it is of great importance for the physician to choose the right approach at the right time, due to its deteriorative prognosis.

Methods Due to the interest of the subject, the authors investigated the world literature between 1990 and 2018 and found 45 articles, reporting thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar HV in children and its postsurgical outcome, aiming to show whether the approaches are equal in terms of the final outcome.

Results The chosen surgical method depends much on the level of the pathology. Despite this fact, after analyzing the included data, we found that the surgical techniques are unequal with regard to the purpose of achieving improvement. Age, caudal and cranial curves, segmental kyphosis, and scoliosis are factors playing a major role in this.

Conclusion If not treated, HV leads to deterioration and dysfunction. The most optimal result, however, is achieved only when the surgical approach is applied according to age and rest of the accompanying factors, which should be considered in future management planning.

The radiological outcomes of one-stage posterior-only hemivertebra resection and short segmental fusion for lumbosacral hemivertebra: a minimum of 5 years of follow-up

Background

Previous studies have reported favorable short-term outcomes after posterior-only hemivertebra resection and short fusion in patients with LSHV. However, there is a paucity of data evaluating the long-term outcomes following this procedure. The aim of the study is to evaluate the radiological outcomes following posterior-only hemivertebra resection and short fusion for the treatment of congenital scoliosis (CS) secondary to lumbosacral hemivertebra (LSHV) with a minimum of a 5-year follow-up.

Methods

A total of 23 patients treated with one-stage posterior-only LSHV resection and short fusion with a minimum of a 5-year follow-up were reviewed. Radiographic parameters including the Cobb angles of the lumbosacral curve and compensatory curve, the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt, and trunk shift were measured. The complications were recorded accordingly.

Results

The mean duration of follow-up was 88.6 ± 28.5 months, and the average age at surgery was 7.8 ± 3.5 years. Fusion levels averaged 3.0 ± 0.7 segments. The lumbosacral curve was corrected from 30.7 ± 10.4° to 6.7 ± 7.1° after surgery (P < 0.001), 7.3 ± 6.1° 2 years after surgery, and 8.1 ± 7.0° at the last follow-up. The compensatory curve was spontaneously corrected from 23.7 ± 9.4° before surgery to 8.3 ± 5.2° after surgery (P < 0.001). However, the angle slightly increased to 9.0 ± 4.8° 2 years after surgery and to 9.6 ± 6.4° at the last follow-up. Trunk shift was improved from 27.3 ± 8.6 mm before surgery to 11.7 ± 9.4 mm after surgery, and it decreased to 10.8 ± 8.2 mm 2 years after surgery and 10.4 ± 8.8 mm at the last follow-up. One patient experienced transient neurologic deficits after surgery. One patient was observed to have screw loosening at 1-year follow-up and received revision surgery.

Conclusion

One-stage posterior-only hemivertebra resection with short fusion is an effective procedure for LSHV, and the correction can be well maintained during longitudinal follow-up. Great attention should be paid to the restoration of lumbosacral horizontalization.