Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison

Investigating the number of radiation fields in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans of optic nerve sheath meningioma patients using dose gradient index

Purpose:In optic nerve radiotherapy, vital organs are very close to the target volume, they are highly sensitive to radiation and have low dose tolerance. In this regard, evaluating dose fall-off steepness around the target volume is required to assess various intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans in the treatment of the optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) patients.Materials and Methods:Thirteen ONSM patients were analyzed with three IMRT techniques, including three (IMRT-3F), five (IMRT-5F), and seven fields (IMRT-7F). These plans were studied using D_mean, D_max, D_2%, D_98%, V_100%, uniformity index (UI), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and specifically the dose gradient indices (DGIs). Results: The values of D_maxand D_meanfor IMRT-3F, IMRT-5F and IMRT-7F were (5637.42 ± 57.08, 5322.84 ± 83.86), (5670.51 ± 67.87, 5383.00 ± 58.45), and (5692.99 ± 31.65, 5405.72 ± 51.73), respectively, which were increased with increment in the number of IMRT fields from 3 to 7. The UI and HI indices were significantly different between IMRT-3F and IMRT-7F (p=0.010 and p=0.005, respectively), and CI was close to the ideal value (0.99±0.01) in IMRT-7F. The significant findings of the dose gradient indices represented smaller values in IMRT-7F, which led to a faster dose fall-off, particularly at the 70%-85% isodose levels around the target. Conclusion: Increasing the number of radiation fields in IMRT treatment plans of ONSM patients had a considerable difference in both the dosimetric parameters of the target volume and at-risk organs, as well as the dose gradient indices. Overall, IMRT-7F could be considered as a preferred technique in the treatment of this meningioma.

Optimising tumour coverage and organ at risk sparing for hypofractionated re-irradiation in glioblastoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Re-irradiation may be used for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. In some cases Planning Target Volume (PTV) under-coverage is necessary to meet organ at risk (OAR) constraints. This study aimed to develop a Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy planning solution for GBM re-irradiation including a means of assessing if target coverage would be achievable and how much PTV 'cropping' would be required to meet OAR constraints, based on PTV volume and OAR proximity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 10 PTVs, 360°, 180°, two coplanar 180° and 180° + non-coplanar 45° arc arrangements were compared using 35 Gy in 10 fractions. Using the preferred arrangement, dose fall-off was modelled to determine the separation required between PTV and OAR to ensure OAR dose constraints were met, with data presented graphically. To evaluate the graph as an aid to planning, seven cases with overlap were replanned in two treatment planning systems (TPSs).

RESULTS

There were no significant dosimetric differences between arc arrangements. 180° was preferred due to shorter treatment times. The graph, which indicated if 95% PTV coverage would be achievable based on PTV volume and OAR proximity, was employed in seven cases to guide planning in two TPSs. Plans were deliverable.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation treatment planning can be challenging, especially when PTV under-coverage is necessary. 180° was considered optimal. To assist in the planning process, graphical guidance was produced to inform planners whether PTV under-coverage would be necessary and how much PTV 'cropping' would be required to meet constraints during optimisation.