Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials during correction surgery of scoliosis in neurologically asymptomatic Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis: A comparison with idiopathic scoliosis

Intra-operative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Correction Surgery with Pre-operative Neurological Deficit: Its Feasibility and High-risk Factors for Failed Monitoring

OBJECTIVE

Considering spinal deformity patients with pre-operative neurological deficit were associated with more intra-operative iatrogenic neurological complications than those without, intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been used for detecting possible iatrogenic injury timely. However, the IONM waveforms are often unreliable. To analyze the performance of intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients with pre-operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery, and to identify the high-risk factors for failed IONM.

METHODS

Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery between October 2017 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The presence or absence of SEP and MEP of target muscles were separately recorded. The P37/N50 latency and amplitude of SEP, and the MEP amplitude were measured. Any IONM alerts were also recorded. The IONM performance was compared among patients with different etiologies, levels responsible for neurological deficit, and strength of IONM-target muscles. Patients' demographics were analyzed using the descriptive statistics and were presented with mean ± standard deviation. Comparison analysis was performed using χ2 -test and statistically significant difference was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients (147 males, 123 females) with an average age of 48.4 ± 36.7 years were involved. The SEP records were available in 371 (68.7%) lower extremities while MEP records were available in 418 (77.4%). SEP alerts were reported in 31 lower extremities and MEP alerts in 22, and new neurological deficit at post-operation was observed in 11. The etiologies of neuromuscular and syndromic indicated relatively lower success rates of IONM, which were 44.1% and 40.5% for SEP, and 58.8% and 59.5% for MEP (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with pre-operative neurological deficit caused by cervical spine and muscle strength lower than grade 4 suffered from higher risk of failed IONM waveforms (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit suffered from a higher incidence of failed IONM results. The high-risk for failed IONM waveforms included the neuromuscular and syndromic etiologies, neurological deficit caused by cervical spine, muscle strength lower than grade 4 in patients with pre-operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery.

Value of multi-channel somatosensory evoked potentials recording in patients undergoing scoliosis correction surgery

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the value of intraoperative multi-channel recording of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in patients undergoing posterior instrumentation surgery with fusion.

METHODS

This study included 176 patients with scoliosis who underwent posterior correction surgery from January 2019 to June 2020. Among them, 88 patients underwent routine SSEPs monitoring via single-channel (Cz'-Fpz) cortical recording (control group), while the remaining 88 patients underwent multi-channel (Cz'-Fpz and C3'-C4') SSEPs monitoring in the cortex. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the influence of age, spinal deformity classification, and Cobb angle on waveform differentiation and the success rate of SSEPs monitoring.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that age, type of scoliosis, and Cobb angle exerted significant effects on the success rate of intraoperative SSEPs monitoring, and the SSEPs waveform differentiation rate was poorest among patients with congenital scoliosis. Intraoperative monitoring results indicated that the success rate of single-channel SSEPs monitoring was 90.9%, while that of multi-channel monitoring was 98.9% (P < 0.05). Among the intraoperative alarm cases, the incidence of adverse events after single-channel SSEPs monitoring was 66.7%, while the incidence of adverse events after multi-channel SSEPs monitoring was only 28.6%.

CONCLUSION

Multi-channel cortical SSEPs monitoring can effectively and accurately evaluate the function of the posterior column of the spinal cord. Use of multi-channel SSEP monitoring may help to improve the success rate of monitoring and reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events in patients with congenital scoliosis.

The Role of Neurophysiology in Managing Patients with Chiari Malformations

Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) includes various congenital anomalies that share ectopia of the cerebellar tonsils lower than the foramen magnum, in some cases associated with syringomyelia or hydrocephalus. CM1 can cause dysfunction of the brainstem, spinal cord, and cranial nerves. This functional alteration of the nervous system can be detected by various modalities of neurophysiological tests, such as brainstem auditory evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, electromyography and nerve conduction studies of the cranial nerves and spinal roots, as well as brainstem reflexes. The main goal of this study is to review the findings of multimodal neurophysiological examinations in published studies of patients with CM1 and their indication in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of these patients, as well as their utility in intraoperative monitoring.

The role of intraoperative extensor digitorum brevis muscle MEPs in spinal surgery

PURPOSE

Intraoperative muscle motor evoked potentials (m-MEPs) are widely used in spinal surgery with the aim of identifying a damage to spinal cord at a reversible stage. Generally, lower limb m-MEPs are recorded from abductor hallucis [AH] and the tibialis anterior [TA]. The purpose of this work is to study an unselected population by recording the m-MEPs from TA, AH and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB), with the aim of identifying the most adjustable and stable muscles responses intraoperatively.

METHODS

Transcranially electrically induced m-MEPs were intraoperative recorded in a total of 107 surgical procedures. m-MEPs were recorded by a needle electrode placed in the muscle from TA, AH and EDB muscles in the lower extremities.

RESULTS

Overall monitorability (i.e., at least 1 Lower Limb m-MEP recordable) was 100/107 (93.5%). In the remaining 100 surgeries in 3 cases, the only muscle that could be recorded at baseline was one AH, and in other 2 the EDB. Persistence (i.e., the recordability of m-MEP from baseline to the end of surgery) was 88.7% for TA, 89.8% for AH and 93.8% for EDB.

CONCLUSION

In our series, EDB m-MEPs have demonstrated a recordability superior to TA and a stability similar to AH. The explanations may be different and range from changes in the excitability of the cortical motor neuron to the different sensitivity to ischemia of the spinal motor neuron. EDB can be used alternatively or can be added to TA and AH as a target muscle of the lower limb in spinal surgery.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years

INTRODUCTION

Patients with spinal deformities undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent neurological deficit. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows early detection of SCI which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. The primary aim of this literature review was to search if there are threshold values of TcMEP and SSEP in the literature that are widely accepted as alert during IONM. The secondary aim was to update knowledge concerning IONM during scoliosis surgery.

METHOD

PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases were used to search publication from 2012 to 2022. The following keywords were used: evoked potential, scoliosis, surgery, intraoperative monitoring and neurophysiological. We included all studies dealing with SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We included 43 papers. Rates of IONM alert and neurological deficit varied from 0.56 to 64% and from 0.15 to 8.3%, respectively. Threshold values varied from a loss of 50 to 90% for TcMEP amplitude, whereas it seems that a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted for SSEP. Causes of IONM changes most frequently reported were surgical maneuver.

CONCLUSION

Concerning SSEP, a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted as an alert. For TcMEP, it seems that the use of highest threshold values can avoid unnecessary surgical procedure for the patient without increasing risk of neurological deficit.

Intra-Operative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Patients with Thoracic Spinal Stenosis: Its Feasibility and High-Risk Factors for New Neurological Deficit

OBJECTIVE

Considering the high risk of postoperative neurological complications for patients with thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS), intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been used for detecting possible iatrogenic injury timely. However, the IONM waveforms are often unreliable. This article is designed to determine the test performance of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) during surgical thoracic decompression in patients with TSS, and to investigate the risk factors associated with deteriorated neurologic function at immediate postoperation.

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion from February 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the deteriorated neurologic function (DNF) group and the improved/intact neurological function (INF) group based on the postoperative neurological status. Demographic parameters such as gender, age, height, weight, etiology and IONM data were compared between groups. Demographics and IONM data between DNF and INF groups were compared by independent t or nonparametric tests. The incidence of abnormal SEP was analyzed by Chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients (63 males, 45 females) with an average age of 53.5 ± 14.0 years were included. The SEP and MEP records were available in 94 and 98 patients, with the overall success rates being 87.0% and 90.7%, respectively. The sensibilities and specificities were 100% and 88.2% for SEP, 100% and 98.8% for MEP, respectively. There were 17 patients in DNF group and 91 patients in INF group. High weight (79.1 ± 14.6 vs 69.7 ± 15.7 kg, P = 0.024), high inter-side difference of MEP amplitude (899.1 ± 997.5 vs 492.3 ± 512.4 μV, P = 0.013) and high incidence of abnormal SEP (94.1% vs 64.8%, P = 0.024) were observed in the DNF group. Fourteen (82.4%) patients in the DNF group showed improvement in neurological status during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall success rates were 87.0% for SEP and 90.7% for MEP in patients with TSS.

Intra-Operative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Patients with Intraspinal Abnormalities Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) data of patients with intraspinal abnormalities undergoing posterior spinal fusion and to determine how intraspinal abnormalities influence IONM results.

METHODS

Patients with severe kyphoscoliosis and intraspinal abnormalities who underwent posterior spinal correction and fusion between September 2015 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Candidate intraspinal abnormalities included Chiari malformation, syringomyelia, split cord malformation, and tethered cord syndrome. Total intravenous anesthesia was administered, and no muscle relaxant or inhalation anesthesia was used for maintenance. IONM data, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP), were recorded. The P37 and N50 latencies and amplitude were recorded for SSEP, whereas only the amplitude was recorded for MEP. The possible high-risk factors for abnormal IONM results were analyzed.

RESULTS

The current study included 87 patients (40 men, 47 women) with an average age of 20.2 ± 10.4 years. The etiologies were neuromuscular in 45 patients, idiopathic in four, and congenital in 38. A total of 136 intraspinal abnormalities were detected, including Chiari malformation in 33 patients, syringomyelia in 55, split-cord malformation in 25, and tethered cord syndrome in 23. Forty patients had one intraspinal abnormality, whereas 47 patients had two or three intraspinal abnormalities. The monitorabilities were 87.4% and 97.7% for the SSEP and MEP, respectively. SSEP alerts were reported in five patients and MEP alerts in four patients, and new neurological deficits were observed in three patients postoperatively. The sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 97.3% for SSEP, and 100% and 98.8% for MEP, respectively. A significant difference in MEP amplitude between the concave and convex sides was observed, while significantly higher SSEP latency was observed on the concave side in patients with preoperative neurological deficits. There were 52 (59.8%) patients with abnormal IONM data. Preoperative neurological deficits (χ²  = 7.715, p = 0.005) and more than one intraspinal abnormality (χ²  = 9.186, p = 0.004) indicated a higher risk of abnormal IONM data.

CONCLUSIONS

IONM can be effectively used in patients with intraspinal abnormalities who undergo posterior spinal fusion. Patients with preoperative neurological deficits and more than one intraspinal abnormality have a higher risk of abnormal IONM monitoring.

Intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in patients with dystrophic neurofibromatosis type 1 scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) data in patients with dystrophic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated scoliosis, and to investigate the possible risk factors for failed IONM monitoring.

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion from September 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The latency (P37, N50) and amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in bilateral lower extremities, latency and amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP) in bilateral lower extremities and unilateral upper extremity were recorded. The neurological status, curve pattern, Cobb angle of main curve, vertebral rotatory subluxation and dystrophic features at pre-operation were assessed for each patient. The failed IONM monitoring was defined as no reliable SEP or MEP waveforms of all monitored muscles.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients (53 M, 39 F) with an average age of 14.1 ± 2.7 years were included. Failed IONM monitoring was identified in 17 patients with overall success rates being 87.0 and 94.6% for SEP and MEP. The average P37 latency, N50 latency, SEP amplitude and MEP latency showed no significant difference between concave and convex sides (p > 0.05 for all). The MEP amplitudes of lower extremities were lower on concave side than convex side (334.5 ± 291.9 µV VS 417.5 ± 380.5 µV, p = 0.030). Higher risk of failed IONM monitoring was found in patients with neurological deficit (p = 0.014) and more dystrophic features (p = 0.002) at pre-operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall success rates were 87.0% for SEP and 94.6% for MEP in patients with NF1-associated scoliosis. Neurological deficit and more dystrophic features at pre-operation indicated higher risk of failed IONM monitoring.