Effects of perioperative magnesium sulfate infusion on intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Anesthesia and Pain Management for Scoliosis Surgery: A Narrative Review

STUDY DESIGN

This was a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to summarize the current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding anesthesia and pain management for scoliosis surgery, including multimodal analgesia, and identify the best anesthetic approach to scoliosis surgery that ensures patient safety and pain relief even in the postoperative period, with minimal influence on SSEP monitoring.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal surgeries and fusions for scoliosis are associated with high pain levels. Inadequate analgesia can cause patient dissatisfaction, delay recovery, and increase the risk of chronic pain. Despite serious side effects, opioids are the mainstay of pain medication after scoliosis surgery. However, increasing emphasis on minimizing opioids and accelerating recovery has increased the adoption of multimodal analgesic therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature review was performed on standards of care, a pain management protocol, current therapeutic options, and innovative treatment options for patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. The literature was reviewed through 4 electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Embase.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 994 articles. Forty-seven relevant articles were selected based on relevance, recentness, search quality, and citations. Ten studies described the influence of different methods of anesthesia on neuromonitoring. Twenty-one researchers studied the effect of analgesics and coanalgesics on pain relief protocol. Nine studies treated regional anesthesia and its influence on pain management.

CONCLUSIONS

The most suitable anesthetic approach that does not disturb the neuromonitoring is obtained by combining total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol with regional anesthesia, particularly erector spinae plane block (ESPB), as a part of a multimodal analgesia protocol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

The Influence of Anesthesia on Neuromonitoring During Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is crucial for the safety of scoliosis surgery, providing real-time feedback on the spinal cord and nerve function, primarily through motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). The choice of anesthesia plays a crucial role in influencing the quality and reliability of these neuromonitoring signals. This systematic review evaluates how different anesthetic techniques-total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), volatile anesthetics, and regional anesthesia approaches such as Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), spinal, and epidural anesthesia-affect IONM during scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published between 2017 and 2024 that examined the impact of anesthetic techniques on neuromonitoring during scoliosis surgery. The focus was on studies reporting MEP outcomes, anesthetic protocols, and postoperative neurological and analgesic effects.

RESULTS

The search initially identified 998 articles. After applying inclusion criteria based on relevance, recency, methodological quality, and citation frequency, 45 studies were selected for detailed review.

CONCLUSION

The erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) provides distinct benefits over spinal and epidural anesthesia in scoliosis surgery, particularly in maintaining neuromonitoring accuracy, reducing hemodynamic instability, and minimizing complications. The ESPB's ability to deliver effective segmental analgesia without compromising motor function makes it a safer and more efficient option for postoperative pain management, enhancing patient outcomes.

Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays.

SUMMARY

The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.

Comparative Study of the Effects of Clonidine and Tranexamic Acid on Intraoperative Bleeding in Rhinoplasty: A Clinical Trial

Introduction

The present study was conducted to compare the effects of clonidine and tranexamic acid on the volume of bleeding and quality of the surgical field in terms of bleeding in candidates who underwent rhinoplasty.

Methods

In this two-sided clinical trial, candidates eligible for rhinoplasty were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: tranexamic acid and clonidine. The first group received tranexamic acid at a dose of 700 µg/kg of body weight 2 hours before the surgical procedure, whereas the second group received clonidine orally at a dose of 2 mg/kg of body weight, 90 minutes before surgery. Subsequently, the volume of bleeding was calculated based on the amount of blood collected via suction and in blood-soaked gauze, which was previously weighed.

Results

Among the 92 patients who underwent rhinoplasty, 82% were women. The mean age and standard deviation (SD) of individuals who underwent rhinoplasty were 29.22 ± 8.50 years. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of age, gender, and body mass index. The volume of blood collected via suction during rhinoplasty, categorized into surgery duration <63 minutes and ≤63 minutes, showed a significant difference between the 2 treatment groups.

Conclusion

The use of tranexamic acid, compared with clonidine, resulted in lesser intraoperative bleeding and better surgical field quality. Considering the superior effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing intraoperative bleeding, it is recommended to use tranexamic acid instead of clonidine in rhinoplasty.

Analgesic Effects of Preoperative Combination of Oral Pregabalin and Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Spinal Fusion Surgery: A 4-arm, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Multimodal perioperative pain management including nonopioid analgesia is a major pillar of enhanced recovery after surgery programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy of the preoperative combination of 2 nonopioid drugs, oral pregabalin and intravenous magnesium sulfate, in patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

METHODS

This 4-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 104 patients randomly allocated to receive: magnesium sulfate and pregabalin (MP), magnesium sulfate and oral placebo (M), 0.9% saline and oral pregabalin (P), and 0.9% saline and oral placebo (C). The study drugs were administered 1 hour preoperatively. The primary outcome was the cumulative morphine consumption on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale scores for leg pain at rest and with movement, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the first 48 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

Cumulative morphine consumption on postoperative day 1 was lower in group MP (19.6±8.0 mg) compared with group M (32.6±9.5 mg; P <0.001), group P (28.9±9.4 mg; P =0.001), or group C (38.8±10.3 mg; P <0.001). Multiple linear regression demonstrated a significant association between group MP and cumulative morphine consumption (B=-5.4 [95% CI, -7.1, -3.7], P <0.001). Visual analog scale scores for leg pain at rest and with movement were lower in group MP compared with other groups ( P =0.006 and <0.001). The incidence of PONV was also lowest in group MP ( P =0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative administration of oral pregabalin and intravenous magnesium sulfate resulted in reduced morphine consumption and greater analgesic effect than the use of each drug individually or placebo in patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

Effect of magnesium sulfate perioperative infusion on postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort in male patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of gastrointestinal cancer: a prospective, randomized and controlled study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic radical resection of gastrointestinal cancer is associated with a high incidence of postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD). Studies on the benefits of magnesium sulfate intravenous infusion during the perioperative period post-laparoscopic surgery are yet lacking.

METHODS

A total of 88 gastrointestinal cancer male patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical resection were randomly divided into two groups: normal saline (control) and magnesium. In the magnesium group, a 40 mg/kg loading dose of intravenous magnesium sulfate was administered for 10 min just after the induction of anesthesia, followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 15 mg/kg/h magnesium sulfate until the end of the surgery; the control group was administered the same dose of normal saline. Subsequently, 2 μg/kg sufentanil was continuously infused intravenously by a postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) device. The primary outcome was the incidence of CRBD at 0 h after the surgery. The secondary outcomes included incidence of CRBD at 1, 2, and 6 h postsurgery, the severity of CRBD at 0, 1, 2, and 6 h postsurgery. Remifentanil requirement during surgery, sufentanil requirement within 24 h postsurgery, the postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) score at 48 h after the surgery, magnesium-related side effects and rescue medication (morphine) requirement were also assessed.

RESULTS

The incidence of CRBD at 0, 1, 2, and 6 h postoperatively was lower in the magnesium group than the control group (0 h: P = 0.01; 1 h: P = 0.003; 2 h: P = 0.001; 6 h: P = 0.006). The incidence of moderate to severe CRBD was higher in the control group at postoperative 0 and 1 h (0 h: P = 0.002; 1 h: P = 0.028), remifentanil requirement during surgery were significantly lower in the magnesium group than the control group. Sufentanil requirements during the 24 h postoperative period were significantly lower in the magnesium group than the control group. The NRS score was reduced in the magnesium group compared to the control group in the early postoperative period. Magnesium-related side effects and rescue medication (morphine) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous magnesium sulfate administration reduces the incidence and severity of CRBD and remifentanil requirement in male patients undergoing radical resection of gastrointestinal cancer. Also, no significant side effects were observed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2100053073. The study was registered on 10/11/2021.

Efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion on postoperative pain and quality of recovery for septorhinoplasty: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The pain that occurs after septorhinoplasty is an important factor affecting the comfort of the patient.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of perioperative intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion on postoperative pain and quality of recovery in patients underwent septorhinoplasty surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred twenty patients who underwent septorhinoplasty were randomly divided into two groups. Magnesium group received intravenous magnesium after induction of anesthesia (30 mg/kg), then infused until the end of the surgical procedure (9 mg/kg). The placebo group received the same volume of saline infusion. The VAS score was used for postoperative pain assessment, and the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score was used for the assessment of recovery status.

RESULTS

The postoperative 30 min, 1st, 2nd, 4th (p < .001) and 24th hour (p < .05) VAS scores of the patients in the magnesium infusion group were significantly lower compared to the placebo group. Also; in terms of physical comfort (p < .001), emotional state (p < .05), psychological support, pain and total score values (p < .001), patients in magnesium group had significantly higher QoR-40 scores than those in placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative magnesium infusion, which is widely used in many surgeries to provide controlled hypotension, also contributes significantly to patient comfort with its positive effect on postoperative pain and recovery scores.

Is intravenous magnesium sulphate a suitable adjuvant in postoperative pain management? - A critical and systematic review of methodology in randomized controlled trials

A growing worldwide focus on opioid-free anaesthesia entails multimodal analgesic strategies involving non-opioids such as magnesium sulphate (MgSO4). Several systematic reviews have concluded there is beneficial analgesic effect of MgSO4 administration but do not take considerable heterogeneity among the studies into consideration. Medical literature published until June 2021 was searched in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Central and Web of Science: The final search yielded a total of 5,672 articles. We included only randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of intravenous MgSO4 on opioid consumption and acute postoperative pain when compared to either placebo or standardized analgesic treatment. The primary aim was to compare the homogeneity of essential variables and confounders. A post-hoc meta-analysis demonstrated a reduction in both postoperative morphine consumption (-6.12 mg) and pain score (-12.32 VAS points) in favour of the MgSO4-groups. Data for meta-analysis was missing from 19 studies (45%) on morphine consumption and 29 studies (69%) for pain score, the majority of which reports no effect for either morphine consumption or pain score. The calculated heterogeneity among the included studies was considerable for both outcomes; I 2=91% for morphine consumption and I 2=96% for pain score. Although we found a per se reduction in opioid consumption and pain score, methodological heterogeneity and clinical shortcomings of pre-, intra-, and post anaesthetic data precludes conclusions on clinical importance of intraoperative intravenous MgSO4. In addition, the reduction is likely less than what can be gained from using standardized analgesic treatment.

The Effect of Serum Magnesium Level on Stable Anticoagulation in Patients Using Warfarin for Various Cardiac Indications

Warfarin is a vitamin K antagonist agent that inhibits clotting factors used for long-term anticoagulation. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) in patients using warfarin is one of the primary treatment effectiveness requirements. We aim to investigate the relationship between serum magnesium levels, the international normalized ratio (INR) values, and TTR values in people using warfarin for various indications. Our study is a single-center, cross-sectional, and retrospective study that included 169 patients between 18 and 70 who used warfarin for various indications. Demographic data, biochemical analysis, and coagulation parameters, including TTR calculation, were evaluated for all patients. Those with a TTR value below 60 were defined as labile INR, and those with 60 and above as stable INR group and compared. The mean INR value was higher in the labile INR group than the stable INR group (3.7 ± 2.9, 3.2 ± 0.3, respectively; p = 0.030). The Mg values are significantly lower in the labile INR group than the stable group (1.8 ± 0.2 mg/dL, 2.0 ± 0.1 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.001). In binary multivariate logistic regression analysis, magnesium value was the most influential INR stabilization factor (p < 0.001). As a result of our study, it was concluded that magnesium levels are an influential factor in stabilizing INR. We can state that we have contributed to the literature and can be a reference for future studies.

Postoperative analgesia for complex spinal surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Complex spinal surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. The purpose of this paper is to review recent literature on postoperative pain management in adult and adolescent patients having complex spinal surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

We conducted a literature search using the Medline database for relevant publications from 2020 to 2022 on postoperative pain after complex spinal surgery. Although opioids remain the mainstay to manage pain after complex spinal surgery, they are associated with adverse effects. Multimodal analgesia may be used to reduce these adverse effects by combining different drugs targeting different parts of the pain pathway. Recent publications suggest continuous low dose fentanyl or morphine infusion, methadone, intravenous paracetamol and ibuprofen, ketorolac, ketamine, magnesium infusion, lidocaine infusion and dexmedetomidine appear to be effective and safe to manage pain after complex spinal surgery. Regional techniques including bilateral erector spinae block, interfascial plane block and intrathecal morphine also appear to be effective and safe.

SUMMARY

Pain management after complex spinal surgery remains challenging. Therefore, further studies are still required to determine the optimal multimodal analgesic regimen for these patients.

Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Pain After Iliac Venous Stenting

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of perioperative intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate (MS) on low back pain (LBP) severity after iliac venous stent implantation.

METHODS

The present study was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 97 patients who had undergone iliac venous stenting for post-thrombotic syndrome between January 1, 2019 and January 11, 2021 were considered for inclusion in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: those who had received perioperative MS infusions (group M) and those who had not (control group; group C). Group M was given an IV bolus of 20 mg/kg before anesthesia induction and an IV MS infusion of 20 mg/kg/h during the procedure. Postoperative LBP severity was evaluated using the numerical rating scale at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the procedure. The total tramadol consumption within 24 hours was measured with the help of a patient-controlled analgesia device. Moreover, additional analgesic needs and complaints of nausea and vomiting were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients were considered for inclusion in the present study. Of the 97 patients, 29 were excluded because of a lack of follow-up data, leaving 68 patients for the final analysis (group M, n = 36; group C, n = 32). The demographic data, body mass index, sedation time, procedure time, and stented side data were similar between the two groups (P > .05). The rates of atropine and ephedrine use during the procedure were similar between the two groups (P > .05). The numerical rating scale scores were significantly lower for group M at all follow-up periods (P < .001). The total tramadol consumption at 24 hours postoperatively was 191.94 ± 68.194 mg for group M and 378.75 ± 31.367 mg for group C (P < .001). Additional analgesics were used by 8 patients (22.2%) in group M and 17 patients (53.1%) in group C. Additional analgesic needs were significantly lower for group M (P = .008). Nausea and vomiting were observed in six (19.4%) and four (11.1%) patients in group M and eight (32%) and five (15.6%) patients in group C, respectively (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing iliac venous stenting, perioperative MS infusion was an effective and safe treatment option that reduced LBP severity, opioid consumption, and the need for additional analgesics in the acute postoperative period.

Postoperative pain treatment after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Patients undergoing spinal surgery are at high risk of acute and persistent postoperative pain. Therefore, adequate pain relief is crucial. This systematic review aimed to provide answers about best-proven postoperative analgesic treatment for patients undergoing lumbar 1- or 2-level fusions for degenerative spine diseases. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was opioid consumption after 24 hours postoperatively. We performed meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, and Grading of Recommendations assessment to accommodate systematic errors. Forty-four randomized controlled trials were included with 2983 participants. Five subgroups emerged: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), epidural, ketamine, local infiltration analgesia, and intrathecal morphine. The results showed a significant reduction in opioid consumption for treatment with NSAID (P < 0.0008) and epidural (P < 0.0006) (predefined minimal clinical relevance of 10 mg). Concerning secondary outcomes, significant reductions in pain scores were detected after 6 hours at rest (NSAID [P < 0.0001] and intrathecal morphine [P < 0.0001]), 6 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.003]), 24 hours at rest (epidural [P < 0.00001] and ketamine [P < 0.00001]), and 24 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.03]). The effect of wound infiltration was nonsignificant. The quality of evidence was low to very low for most trials. The results from this systematic review showed that some analgesic interventions have the capability to reduce opioid consumption compared with control groups. However, because of the high risk of bias and low evidence, it was impossible to recommend a “gold standard” for the analgesic treatment after 1- or 2-level spinal fusion surgery.

Impact of intraoperative intravenous magnesium on spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of intraoperative intravenous magnesium (IIM) on spine surgery remain uncertain, as recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) yielded conflicting results. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of IIM on spine surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on multiple electronic databases, ClinicalTrial.gov and Google Scholar on July 12th 2021, and reference lists were examined. We selected RCTs comparing the effects of IIM with placebo treatment on spine surgery. We calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confident interval (CI) under a random-effect model. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Jadad score was applied to assess the quality of each included trial. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine the confidence in effect estimates. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting each included study one by one from the pooled analysis. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021266170.

FINDINGS

Fourteen trials of 781 participants were included. Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggested that IIM reduces postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h (SMD: -1·61 mg, 95% CI: -2·63 to -0·58) and intraoperative remifentanil requirement (SMD: -2·09 ug/h, 95% CI: -3·38 to -0·81). High-quality evidence suggested that IIM reduces the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with placebo (RR: 0·43, 95% CI: 0·26 to 0·71). Besides, moderate-quality evidence suggested that recovery orientation time in the IIM group is longer than control group (SMD: 1·13 min, 95% CI: 0·83 to 1·43).

INTERPRETATION

IIM as adjuvant analgesics showed overall benefits on spine surgery in terms of reducing analgesic requirement and postoperative nausea and vomiting; however, potential risks of IIM, such as delayed anesthetic awakening, should not be ignored. Future evidence will inform the optimal strategy of IIM administration for patients undergoing spine surgery.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (Grant No :7212117).