1
|
Johansson JD, Wardell K. DBSim and ELMA - Freeware for Simulations of Deep Brain Stimulation. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2022; 2022:1719-1724. [PMID: 36086324 DOI: 10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations of the electric field is a useful tool to estimate the activated tissue around Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrodes. Based on our previous research, a two-part software package named DBSim and ELMA is presented. ELMA is used to classify brain tissue into grey matter, white matter, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid and assign electric conductivities accordingly. This data is then used in DBSim to generate patient-specific simulations of the electric field around currently implemented leads Medtronic 3387 and 3389, and Abbott 6180 and 6181. The software is available for free download at https://liu.se/en/article/ne-downloads Clinical Relevance- This is a tool meant for research and educational purposes for e.g. studies on optimal target areas for DBS.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wårdell K, Nordin T, Vogel D, Zsigmond P, Westin CF, Hariz M, Hemm S. Deep Brain Stimulation: Emerging Tools for Simulation, Data Analysis, and Visualization. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:834026. [PMID: 35478842 PMCID: PMC9036439 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.834026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established neurosurgical procedure for movement disorders that is also being explored for treatment-resistant psychiatric conditions. This review highlights important consideration for DBS simulation and data analysis. The literature on DBS has expanded considerably in recent years, and this article aims to identify important trends in the field. During DBS planning, surgery, and follow up sessions, several large data sets are created for each patient, and it becomes clear that any group analysis of such data is a big data analysis problem and has to be handled with care. The aim of this review is to provide an update and overview from a neuroengineering perspective of the current DBS techniques, technical aids, and emerging tools with the focus on patient-specific electric field (EF) simulations, group analysis, and visualization in the DBS domain. Examples are given from the state-of-the-art literature including our own research. This work reviews different analysis methods for EF simulations, tractography, deep brain anatomical templates, and group analysis. Our analysis highlights that group analysis in DBS is a complex multi-level problem and selected parameters will highly influence the result. DBS analysis can only provide clinically relevant information if the EF simulations, tractography results, and derived brain atlases are based on as much patient-specific data as possible. A trend in DBS research is creation of more advanced and intuitive visualization of the complex analysis results suitable for the clinical environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Wårdell
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Teresa Nordin
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Dorian Vogel
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Peter Zsigmond
- Department of Neurosurgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Carl-Fredrik Westin
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marwan Hariz
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Ume University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Simone Hemm
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Strotzer QD, Kohl Z, Anthofer JM, Faltermeier R, Schmidt NO, Torka E, Greenlee MW, Fellner C, Schlaier JR, Beer AL. Structural Connectivity Patterns of Side Effects Induced by Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. Brain Connect 2021; 12:374-384. [PMID: 34210163 DOI: 10.1089/brain.2021.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tractography based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) models the structural connectivity of the human brain. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease, but may induce adverse effects. This study investigated the relationship between structural connectivity patterns of DBS electrodes and stimulation-induced side effects. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with Parkinson's disease treated with bilateral subthalamic DBS were examined. Overall, 168 electrode contacts were categorized as inducing or noninducing depending on their capability for inducing side effects such as motor effects, paresthesia, dysarthria, oculomotor effects, hyperkinesia, and other complications as assessed during the initial programming session. Furthermore, the connectivity of each contact with target regions was evaluated by probabilistic tractography based on DWI. Finally, stimulation sites and structural connectivity patterns of inducing and noninducing contacts were compared. Results: Inducing contacts differed across the various side effects and from those mitigating Parkinson's symptoms. Although contacts showed a largely overlapping spatial distribution within the subthalamic region, they could be distinguished by their connectivity patterns. In particular, inducing contacts were more likely connected with supplementary motor areas (hyperkinesia, dysarthria), frontal cortex (oculomotor), fibers of the internal capsule (paresthesia), and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuitry (dysarthria). Discussion: Side effects induced by DBS seem to be associated with distinct connectivity patterns. Cerebellar connections are hardly associated with side effects, although they seem relevant for mitigating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. A symptom-specific, connectivity-based approach for target planning in DBS may enhance treatment outcomes and reduce adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quirin D Strotzer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.,Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.,Institute of Radiology, and University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Zacharias Kohl
- Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Neurology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Judith M Anthofer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.,Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rupert Faltermeier
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Nils O Schmidt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Torka
- Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mark W Greenlee
- Institute of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Fellner
- Institute of Radiology, and University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Juergen R Schlaier
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.,Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Anton L Beer
- Institute of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johansson JD, Zsigmond P. Comparison between patient-specific deep brain stimulation simulations and commercial system SureTune3. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 7. [PMID: 34161929 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac0dcd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Software to visualize estimated volume of tissue activated (VTA) in deep brain stimulation assuming a homogeneous tissue surrounding such as SureTune3 has recently become available for clinical use. The objective of this study is to compare SureTune3 with homogeneous and heterogeneous patient-specific finite element method (FEM) simulations of the VTA to elucidate how well they coincide in their estimates.Approach. FEM simulations of the VTA were performed in COMSOL Multiphysics and compared with VTA from SureTune3 with variation of voltage and current amplitude, pulse width, axon diameter, number of active contacts, and surrounding homogeneous grey or white matter. Patient-specific simulations with heterogeneous tissue were also performed.Main results. The VTAs corresponded well for voltage control in homogeneous tissue, though with the smallest VTAs being slightly larger in SureTune3 and the largest VTAs being slightly larger in the FEM simulations. In current control, FEM estimated larger VTAs in white matter and smaller VTAs in grey matter compared to SureTune3 as grey matter has higher electric conductivity than white matter and requires less voltage to reach the same current. The VTAs also corresponded well in the patient-specific cases except for one case with a cyst of highly conductive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) near the active contacts.Significance. The VTA estimates without taking the surrounding tissue into account in SureTune3 are in good agreement with patient-specific FEM simulations when using voltage control in the absence of CSF-filled cyst. In current control or when CSF is present near the active contacts, the tissue characteristics are important for the VTA and needs consideration.Clinical. trial ethical approval: Local ethics committee at Linköping University (2012/434-31).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes D Johansson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Peter Zsigmond
- Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|