A Comparison of The Clinical Efficacy of GON Block at The C2 Level and GON Block at The Classical Distal Occipital Level in The Treatment of Migraine

Effectiveness of combining greater occipital nerve block and pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic migraine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment targeting the greater occipital nerve (GON) has shown efficacy in treating various conditions. This double-blind, randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of combining PRF therapy with GON block (GONB) therapy in patients with chronic migraine.

METHODS

The study consisted of two groups: GONB and GONB + PRF, each comprising 16 patients with chronic migraine. Using 0.5-Hz sensorial stimulation, a 5-cm-long radiofrequency needle was inserted under ultrasound guidance in both groups. Subsequently, all patients received a GONB by administering 2 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. In the GONB + PRF group, patients underwent 4 min of PRF at 42℃, whereas the GONB group did not receive any PRF treatment. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after the procedure to evaluate the frequency and severity of migraine attacks, number of headache days, and analgesic consumption.

RESULTS

In the GONB + PRF group, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, number of migraine attacks, number of headache days, and analgesic consumption were significantly lower compared to the GONB group (P < 0.05). Significant decreases (60%) in mean VAS scores, number of migraine attacks, number of headache days, and consumption of analgesic medications were observed in the GONB + PRF group at the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups compared with the pre-treatment period (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of GONB and PRF presents a promising new treatment option for patients with chronic migraine. This approach has demonstrated efficacy in minimizing analgesic use, decreasing the frequency of migraine attacks, reducing the number of headache days and decreasing the severity of migraine attacks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05464212.

Comparison of Greater Occipital Nerve Blockade and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade in Patients with Episodic Migraine

Objectives: Compare the effects of greater occipital nerve (GON) and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks on headache intensity and duration, number of headache days, and disability in patients with episodic migraine. Methods: In this prospective single-blind randomized study, patients with episodic migraine were randomly divided into two groups: GON and SPG block groups. Patients received blocks once a week for 4 weeks, and once a month for 2 months. The number of headache days, the headache duration, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, and number of acute medical treatments were assessed before the procedures and 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after the procedures. Disability was evaluated using the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire at baseline and 3 months after treatment. This study protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06243874.). Results: 19 patients in the GON block group and 18 patients in the SPG block group were evaluated. Significant improvements in pain severity, headache duration, number of headache days, and the need for acute medical treatment were observed in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd months compared to baseline in the two groups (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements in the MIDAS scores in the third month (p < 0.001). The GON block group showed a greater reduction in headache intensity, duration, number of headache days, and MIDAS scores compared to the SPG block group in the 3rd month (p < 0.001). Conclusions: GON block reduces headache duration, intensity, the number of headache days, and the need for acute medical treatment much more than SPG block in patients with episodic migraine.

Addressing limitations of single GON blockade treatment and repetitive intervention with GON block or onabotulinum toxin A in chronic migraine- part 2 of three men in a boat study

This study investigated the effectiveness of three treatment interventions for managing migraine symptoms over a three-month assessment period: single greater occipital nerve block (GON), repetitive GON block, and single GON block combined with onabotulinium toxin A (BoNT-A) treatment. Significant improvements were observed across all treatment groups in various migraine-related parameters, including medication usage, frequency and severity of attacks, and subjective measures such as Headache Impact Test-6 scores and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores. Notably, all groups showed reductions in NSAID and triptan usage, total number of attacks with VAS>4, and number of headache days. However, slight differences in the magnitude of improvements were observed between the groups, with GON block combined with BoNT-A treatment demonstrating slightly greater reductions compared to single GON block treatment. Additionally, the integration of BoNT-A therapy alongside GON blockade appeared to confer supplementary benefits in migraine prophylaxis. These findings highlight the importance of implementing comprehensive treatment approaches to address various aspects of migraine management and improve patient outcomes.

Ultrasound-Guided Combined Greater Occipital Nerve Block at the C2 Level with Trapezius Trigger Point Injection and Supraorbital-Supratrochlear Nerve Block: More Effective on Allodynia and Disability in Chronic Migraine

Background

Chronic migraine (CM) patients with cutaneous allodynia (CA) show a poor response to treatment. Long-term studies have yet to be conducted to demonstrate the efficacy of blocks on CA. This study evaluated the improvement in allodynia and disability in CM treated with ultrasound (US)-guided blocks.

Methods

In this prospective, non-randomized comparative study, 60 CM patients with CA were evaluated for the clinical effectiveness of the therapy using the numeric rating scale (NRS), headache impact test-6 (HIT-6), brush allodynia test, and allodynia symptom checklist (ASC-12). At the first visit, tenderness in the nerve or trapezius muscle was confirmed in the intervention group. US-guided greater occipital nerve block (GONB), GONB, and trapezius muscle injection (TPI), or GONB, TPI, and peripheral trigeminal nerve block (PTNB), respectively, were performed four times once a week for a month. Initial and third-month assessments were performed.

Results

The ASC-12 scores decreased in the GONB+TPI+PTNB and GONB groups more than the GONB+TPI group (mean rank, respectively, 26.86, 27.40, 38.39; P = 0.018). The decrease in HIT-6 scores was greater in the GONB+TPI+PTNB group than in the GONB group (mean rank, respectively, 21.98, 39.95, P < 0.017) in the first month. In the third month, the GONB+TPI+PTNB group scored HIT-6 significantly lower than GONB and GONB+TPI (mean rank: 18.84, 38.73, 35.61; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

GONB+TPI+PTNB was more successful in alleviating allodynia and disability.

Efficacy of Adding a Distal Level Block to a C2 Level Greater Occipital Nerve Block under Ultrasound Guidance in Chronic Migraine

Objective

To investigate the benefit of adding a distal level greater occipital nerve (GON) block to the proximal level GON block under ultrasound guidance in patients with chronic migraine (CM) with cutaneous allodynia (CA).

Methods

Seventy-eight patients with CM were included. A single US-guided GON block was performed at proximal and distal levels in patients with CM with CA and only at the proximal level in patients with CM without CA. Thirty (38.5%) patients with bilateral pain received bilateral GON blocks, and 48 (61.5%) with unilateral pain received unilateral GON blocks. The patients were evaluated using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores before treatment and 1 and 4 weeks after treatment and through Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment.

Results

The NRS scores significantly decreased at first and fourth weeks, and the HIT-6 scores significantly decreased at fourth week (p < 0.001) compared with preintervention scores in all groups. No significant difference was found between the groups regarding the postinterventional first and fourth week when the decreases of NRS and HIT-6 scores were compared (p = 0.599). There were no significant differences in the effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral GON blocks (p > 0.001).

Conclusion

A single US-guided GON block is an effective and safe treatment option in patients with CM, providing a positive effect on pain and quality of life for 4 weeks. The addition of a distal level GON block to the proximal level GON block provides no extra benefit to patients with CM with CA.

Three men in a boat: The comparison of the combination therapy of botulinum toxin and greater occipital nerve block with bupivacaine, with botulinum toxin monotherapy in the management of chronic migraine

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the impact of the combination therapy of onabotulinum toxin A and greater occipital nerve block (GoNT-A) with onabotulinum toxin A monotherapy (BoNT-A) based on its efficacy and safety in relation to the quality of life of adult chronic migraine (CM) patients.

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic treatment of CM is still difficult and complex. Combination treatments do not have an evidence base yet.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 85 patients. For greater occipital nerve block (GONB), 4 ml of the solution prepared using 1 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 3 ml of saline on both sides were bilaterally applied to 30 patients. For BoNT-A treatment, a total of 155 units of onabotulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) was intramuscularly injected into 31 specific points around the head and neck in 27 patients. Both protocols were similarly applied to 28 patients for GoNT-A treatment. MIDAS and HIT-6 scores were evaluated to measure patients' quality of life three months after the treatment.

RESULTS

When MIDAS and HIT-6 score groups were statistically compared, both GONB and GoNT-A applications showed a statistically significant reduction compared to the BoNT-A application (p < 0.05). The decrease in the MIDAS and HIT-6 scores of GONB and GoNT-A applications did not show a statistical difference (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of BoNT-A and GONB was superior to BoNT-A applied as monotherapy. Alternately, no significant difference was found between GONB therapy and combination therapy in all data. Combination treatments were well tolerated.