1
|
Scheepers MHMC, Al-Difaie Z, Brandts L, Peeters A, Winkens B, Al-Taher M, Engelen SME, Lubbers T, Havekes B, Bouvy ND, Postma AA. Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Parathyroid Localization of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 14:25. [PMID: 38201335 PMCID: PMC10802165 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate preoperative localization is crucial for successful minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Preoperative localization can be challenging in patients with recurrent and/or multigland disease (MGD). This has led clinicians to investigate multiple imaging techniques, most of which are associated with radiation exposure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers ionizing radiation-free and accurate imaging, making it an attractive alternative imaging modality. The objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the diagnostic performance of MRI in the localization of PHPT. PubMed and Embase libraries were searched from 1 January 2000 to 31 March 2023. Studies were included that investigated MRI techniques for the localization of PHPT. The exclusion criteria were (1) secondary/tertiary hyperparathyroidism, (2) studies that provided no diagnostic performance values, (3) studies published before 2000, and (4) studies using 0.5 Tesla MRI scanners. Twenty-four articles were included in the systematic review, with a total of 1127 patients with PHPT. In 14 studies investigating conventional MRI for PHPT localization, sensitivities varied between 39.1% and 94.3%. When employing more advanced MRI protocols like 4D MRI for PHPT localization in 11 studies, sensitivities ranged from 55.6% to 100%. The combination of MR imaging with functional techniques such as 18F-FCH-PET/MRI yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities ranging from 84.2% to 100% in five studies. Despite the limitations of the available evidence, the results of this review indicate that the combination of MR imaging with functional imaging techniques such as 18F-FCH-PET/MRI yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy. Further research on emerging MR imaging modalities, such as 4D MRI and PET/MRI, is warranted, as MRI exposes patients to minimal or no ionizing radiation compared to other imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max H. M. C. Scheepers
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Zaid Al-Difaie
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Mahdi Al-Taher
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.M.E.E.)
| | - Sanne M. E. Engelen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.M.E.E.)
| | - Tim Lubbers
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.M.E.E.)
| | - Bas Havekes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disease, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole D. Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.M.E.E.)
| | - Alida A. Postma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School for Mental Health and Sciences (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee SW, Shim SR, Jeong SY, Kim SJ. Direct Comparison of Preoperative Imaging Modalities for Localization of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:692-706. [PMID: 34081083 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Importance Accurate preoperative localization of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is an important and challenging issue for a successful parathyroidectomy. Although new imaging modalities have been introduced during the past decade, direct comparative studies on advanced imaging techniques are limited. Objective To compare the performance of different preoperative imaging modalities for the localization of pHPT by performing a network meta-analysis (NMA). Data Sources PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from the earliest available indexing date through September 28, 2020. Study Selection The inclusion criteria were diagnostic tests with sensitivities of 2 or more different preoperative imaging modalities for the same indivduals. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two researchers independently reviewed the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension statement of health care intervention guidelines for network meta-analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures After classifying various imaging modalities into 8 representative imaging categories, the pooled estimation between the odds ratio and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) was calculated in the sensitivity for localization of pHPT. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were obtained to calculate the probability of each imaging modality being the most effective diagnostic method. Results A total of 8495 patients from 119 direct comparative studies using 2 or more imaging modalities for localization of pHPT were included. The sensitivity of choline positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) was significantly higher than that of technetium 99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (MIBI SPECT) in both patient-based and lesion-based analyses (patient-based analysis: odds ratio, 5.22; 95% CrI, 2.36-11.80; lesion-based analysis: odds ratio, 17.70; 95% CrI, 5.79-60.10). Among 8 representative imaging modality categories, choline PET-CT showed the highest SUCRA value in both patient-based and lesion-based analyses. In patient-based analysis after 2010, choline PET-CT showed the highest SUCRA value, followed by the CT category, although MIBI SPECT had the highest SUCRA value in analysis before 2009. Conclusions and Relevance The results from this network meta-analysis suggest that choline PET-CT showed the best performance in both patient-based and lesion-based analyses and that choline PET-CT would be the best preoperative imaging modality for localization of pHPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Woo Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine and Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Shin Young Jeong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine and Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Seong-Jang Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, South Korea.,BioMedical Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kluijfhout WP, Pasternak JD, Gosnell JE, Shen WT, Duh QY, Vriens MR, de Keizer B, Hope TA, Glastonbury CM, Pampaloni MH, Suh I. 18F Fluorocholine PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Inconclusive Conventional Imaging: A Prospective Pilot Study. Radiology 2017; 284:460-467. [PMID: 28121522 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the performance of flourine 18 (18F) fluorocholine (FCH) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with hyperparathyroidism and nonlocalized disease who have negative or inconclusive results at ultrasonography (US) and technetium 99m (99mTc) sestamibi scintigraphy. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board. Between May and December 2015, 10 patients (mean age, 70.4 years; range, 58-82 years) with biochemical primary hyperparathyroidism and inconclusive results at US and 99mTc sestamibi scintigraphy were prospectively enrolled. All patients gave informed consent. Directly after administration of 3 MBq/kg of FCH, PET imaging was performed, followed by T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging before and after gadolinium enhancement. Intraoperative localization and histologic results were the reference standard for calculating sensitivity and positive predictive value. The Wilcoxon rank test was used to calculate the mean difference in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between abnormal parathyroid uptake and physiologic thyroid uptake. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed. Results MR imaging alone showed true-positive lesions in five patients and a false-positive lesion in one patient. FCH PET/MR imaging allowed correct localization of nine of 10 adenomas (90% sensitivity), without any false-positive results (100% positive predictive value). One patient had four-gland hyperplasia, of which three hyperplastic glands were not localized. The median SUVmax of the nine preoperatively identified adenomas was 4.9 (interquartile range, 2.45-7.35), which was significantly higher than the SUV, 2.7 (interquartile range, 1.6-3.8), of the thyroid (P = .008). Conclusion FCH PET/MR imaging allowed localization of adenomas with high accuracy when conventional imaging results were inconclusive and provided detailed anatomic information. More patients must be examined to confirm our initial results, and the accuracy of FCH PET/MR imaging for localization of glands in patients with four-gland hyperplasia remains to be investigated. © RSNA, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter P Kluijfhout
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Jesse D Pasternak
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Jessica E Gosnell
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Wen T Shen
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Quan-Yang Duh
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Menno R Vriens
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Bart de Keizer
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Thomas A Hope
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Christine M Glastonbury
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Miguel H Pampaloni
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| | - Insoo Suh
- From the Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., J.E.G., W.T.S., Q.Y.D., I.S.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.A.H., C.M.G., M.H.P.), University of California San Francisco, UCSF Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, Hellman Building Room C347, San Francisco, CA 94115; Departments of Surgery (W.P.K., M.R.V.) and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.d.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont, Canada (J.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kluijfhout WP, Venkatesh S, Beninato T, Vriens MR, Duh QY, Wilson DM, Hope TA, Suh I. Performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of first-time and reoperative primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 2016; 160:747-54. [PMID: 27318765 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Revised: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative imaging in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and a previous parathyroid operation is essential; however, performance of conventional imaging is poor in this subgroup. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to be a good alternative, though overall evidence remains scarce. We retrospectively investigated the performance of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with and without a previous parathyroid operation, with a separate comparison for dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS All patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging prior to parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (first time or recurrent) between January 2000 and August 2015 at a high-volume, tertiary care, referral center for endocrine operations were included. We compared the sensitivity and positive predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging with conventional ultrasound and sestamibi on a per-lesion level. RESULTS A total of 3,450 patients underwent parathyroidectomy, of which 84 patients with recurrent (n = 10) or persistent (n = 74) disease and 41 patients with a primary operation were included. Magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 79.9% and 84.7%, respectively, and performance was good in both patients with and without a previous parathyroid operation. Adding magnetic resonance imaging to the combination of ultrasound and sestamibi resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity from 75.2% to 91.5%. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging produced excellent results in the reoperative group, with sensitivity and a positive predictive value of 90.1%. CONCLUSION Technologic advances have enabled faster and more accurate magnetic resonance imaging protocols, making magnetic resonance imaging an excellent alternative modality without associated ionizing radiation. Our study shows that the sensitivity of multimodality imaging for parathyroid adenomas improved significantly with the use of conventional and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, even in the case of recurrent or persistent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter P Kluijfhout
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Shriya Venkatesh
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Toni Beninato
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Quan-Yang Duh
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - David M Wilson
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Insoo Suh
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|