Can plasma D-dimer predict the result of a ventilation-perfusion scan?

Diagnosing venous thromboembolism in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

We report the imaging outcomes of all pregnant patients referred for suspected thromboembolism over a 43-month period.

METHODS

We identified 168 patients who underwent ventilation/perfusion (VQ) single-photon emission CT (SPECT), CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or a Doppler ultrasound scan of the lower legs, as well as a control group of 89 non-pregnant age- and sex-matched patients who underwent VQ SPECT during the same period. Imaging outcomes were recorded, and radiation doses were calculated for individual patients.

RESULTS

VQ SPECT and CTPA were equally likely to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE) in about one patient out of every seven patients investigated. One in three CTPA scans was of suboptimal quality. A Doppler ultrasound examination of the legs will find deep venous thrombosis much less often, in about 1 patient out of every 15 patients investigated. The prevalence of PE in pregnant patients (as diagnosed by VQ SPECT) was similar to that in the non-pregnant, age- and sex-matched control group. The effective dose and the absorbed radiation dose to the maternal breast were lower with VQ SPECT. The foetal dose is comparable for both VQ SPECT and CTPA.

CONCLUSION

VQ SPECT and CTPA provide a similar diagnostic yield for diagnosing PE during pregnancy, but VQ SPECT does so with a lower radiation dose to the mother (effective dose and breast dose).

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Ours is the first report of the diagnostic performance of VQ SPECT, rather than planar VQ scans, in pregnancy in a routine clinical setting.

Three-year clinical experience with VQ SPECT for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: diagnostic performance

Ventilation-perfusion (VQ) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) comprised the administration of SmartVent (n=386) or Technegas (n=1564) and 200 MBq (99m)Tc-MAA. 1406 scans were normal, 462 showed PE, 61 showed a singular subsegmental mismatched defect, 21 scans were non-diagnostic. 26% of scans performed with Technegas showed PE, compared to 15% with SmartVent. VQ SPECT had a sensitivity of 95.7%, specificity 98.6%, positive predictive value 95.7%, negative predictive value 98.6%. A normal VQ SPECT scan implied a more than ten-fold lower cause-specific mortality (1 in 1406) than a scan showing PE (1 in 116). NPV of a negative D-dimer was 94.3%.