1
|
Montemagno C, Cassim S, De Leiris N, Durivault J, Faraggi M, Pagès G. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Dawn of the Era of Nuclear Medicine? Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:6413. [PMID: 34203923 PMCID: PMC8232627 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), accounting for 90-95% of all pancreatic tumors, is a highly devastating disease associated with poor prognosis. The lack of accurate diagnostic tests and failure of conventional therapies contribute to this pejorative issue. Over the last decade, the advent of theranostics in nuclear medicine has opened great opportunities for the diagnosis and treatment of several solid tumors. Several radiotracers dedicated to PDAC imaging or internal vectorized radiotherapy have been developed and some of them are currently under clinical consideration. The functional information provided by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) or Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) could indeed provide an additive diagnostic value and thus help in the selection of patients for targeted therapies. Moreover, the therapeutic potential of β-- and α-emitter-radiolabeled agents could also overcome the resistance to conventional therapies. This review summarizes the current knowledge concerning the recent developments in the nuclear medicine field for the management of PDAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Montemagno
- Département de Biologie Médicale, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco; (S.C.); (J.D.); (G.P.)
- Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, CNRS UMR 7284 and IN-SERM U1081, Université Cote d’Azur, 06200 Nice, France
- LIA ROPSE, Laboratoire International Associé Université Côte d’Azur—Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
| | - Shamir Cassim
- Département de Biologie Médicale, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco; (S.C.); (J.D.); (G.P.)
- LIA ROPSE, Laboratoire International Associé Université Côte d’Azur—Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
| | - Nicolas De Leiris
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France;
- Laboratoire Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Jérôme Durivault
- Département de Biologie Médicale, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco; (S.C.); (J.D.); (G.P.)
- LIA ROPSE, Laboratoire International Associé Université Côte d’Azur—Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
| | - Marc Faraggi
- Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Nuclear Medicine Department, 98000 Monaco, Monaco;
| | - Gilles Pagès
- Département de Biologie Médicale, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco; (S.C.); (J.D.); (G.P.)
- Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, CNRS UMR 7284 and IN-SERM U1081, Université Cote d’Azur, 06200 Nice, France
- LIA ROPSE, Laboratoire International Associé Université Côte d’Azur—Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
González-Gómez R, Pazo-Cid RA, Sarría L, Morcillo MÁ, Schuhmacher AJ. Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1151. [PMID: 33801810 PMCID: PMC8000738 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by current imaging techniques is useful and widely used in the clinic but presents several limitations and challenges, especially in small lesions that frequently cause radiological tumors infra-staging, false-positive diagnosis of metastatic tumor recurrence, and common occult micro-metastatic disease. The revolution in cancer multi-"omics" and bioinformatics has uncovered clinically relevant alterations in PDAC that still need to be integrated into patients' clinical management, urging the development of non-invasive imaging techniques against principal biomarkers to assess and incorporate this information into the clinical practice. "Immuno-PET" merges the high target selectivity and specificity of antibodies and engineered fragments toward a given tumor cell surface marker with the high spatial resolution, sensitivity, and quantitative capabilities of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging techniques. In this review, we detail and provide examples of the clinical limitations of current imaging techniques for diagnosing PDAC. Furthermore, we define the different components of immuno-PET and summarize the existing applications of this technique in PDAC. The development of novel immuno-PET methods will make it possible to conduct the non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring of patients over time using in vivo, integrated, quantifiable, 3D, whole body immunohistochemistry working like a "virtual biopsy".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth González-Gómez
- Molecular Oncology Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Roberto A. Pazo-Cid
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Luis Sarría
- Digestive Radiology Unit, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Miguel Ángel Morcillo
- Biomedical Application of Radioisotopes and Pharmacokinetics Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto J. Schuhmacher
- Molecular Oncology Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
- Fundación Aragonesa para la Investigación y el Desarrollo (ARAID), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arnone A, Laudicella R, Caobelli F, Guglielmo P, Spallino M, Abenavoli E, Martini AL, Filice R, Comis AD, Cuzzocrea M, Linguanti F, Evangelista L, Alongi P. Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Diagnostic Workup of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10121042. [PMID: 33287195 PMCID: PMC7761738 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10121042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, the performance of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the diagnostic workup of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is evaluated. A comprehensive literature search up to September 2020 was performed, selecting studies with the presence of: sample size ≥10 patients and index test (i.e., “FDG” or “18F-FDG” AND “pancreatic adenocarcinoma” or “pancreas cancer” AND “PET” or “positron emission tomography”). The methodological quality was evaluated using the revised quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool and presented according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Basic data (authors, year of publication, country and study design), patients’ characteristics (number of enrolled subjects and age), disease phase, type of treatment and grading were retrieved. Forty-six articles met the adopted research criteria. The articles were divided according to the considered clinical context. Namely, besides conventional anatomical imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), molecular imaging with FDG PET/CT is an important tool in PDAC, for all disease stages. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm the cost-effectiveness of such imaging techniques by testing its real potential improvement in the clinical management of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annachiara Arnone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (E.A.); (A.L.M.); (F.L.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; (R.L.); (R.F.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Federico Caobelli
- Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Priscilla Guglielmo
- Nuclear Medicine Division, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy;
| | - Marianna Spallino
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASST “Papa Giovanni XXIII”, 24127 Bergamo, Italy;
| | - Elisabetta Abenavoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (E.A.); (A.L.M.); (F.L.)
| | - Anna Lisa Martini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (E.A.); (A.L.M.); (F.L.)
| | - Rossella Filice
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; (R.L.); (R.F.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Alessio Danilo Comis
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; (R.L.); (R.F.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Marco Cuzzocrea
- Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Flavia Linguanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (E.A.); (A.L.M.); (F.L.)
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Padova University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy;
| | - Pierpaolo Alongi
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, 90015 Cefalù, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
PET in Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, and Liver Cancers. Clin Nucl Med 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39457-8_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
5
|
Myssayev A, Myssayev A, Ideguchi R, Eguchi S, Adachi T, Sumida Y, Tobinaga S, Uetani M, Kudo T. Usefulness of FDG PET/CT derived parameters in prediction of histopathological finding during the surgery in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0210178. [PMID: 30629646 PMCID: PMC6328180 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Pancreatic cancer is the 4th most common cause of cancer death in Japan and exhibits a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 7%. The accurate diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is important for determining the optimal management strategy. Fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG PET) integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool for detecting and evaluating various cancers, and it is used for staging, detecting local recurrence and distant metastasis, measuring therapeutic effects, and predicting prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. Lately, FDG PET/CT-derived parameters, such as standardized uptake values (SUV), the metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), have been suggested as prognostic factors for various types of cancer, including pancreatic cancer. However, there is no consensus regarding the best parameters for evaluating patient prognosis, operability, etc. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences between operable and non-operable pancreatic cancer using FDG PET/CT-derived parameters, and to investigate whether volumetric parameters (TLG and the MTV) are superior to SUV-based parameters for predicting infiltration status/determining operability. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study of the cases of 48 patients with clinically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who underwent FDG PET/CT imaging before treatment. In the operable group, the surgical specimens were subjected to histopathological examinations, and the cases were separated into those exhibiting less and greater infiltration. SUVmax, SUVpeak, the tumor background ratio (TBR), TLG, and the MTV were compared between these groups as well as between the operable and non-operable groups. Results Venous infiltration showed significant associations with several metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVpeak, and the TBR). However, it did not display any significant associations with volumetric parameters, such as TLG or the MTV. None of the FDG PET/CT-derived parameters exhibited significant associations with lymphatic or neural infiltration. Significant differences in volumetric parameters, such as the MTV and TLG, were detected between the operable and non-operable subgroups. Conclusions Metabolic 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived parameters, such as SUVmax, SUVpeak, and the TBR, are useful for predicting venous infiltration status in patients with operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Altay Myssayev
- Department of Radioisotope Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Ayan Myssayev
- Public Health Department, Semey State Medical University, Semey City, Republic of Kazakhstan
| | - Reiko Ideguchi
- Department of Radioisotope Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Radioisotope Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yorihisa Sumida
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shuichi Tobinaga
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Masataka Uetani
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takashi Kudo
- Department of Radioisotope Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Radioisotope Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghaneh P, Hanson R, Titman A, Lancaster G, Plumpton C, Lloyd-Williams H, Yeo ST, Edwards RT, Johnson C, Abu Hilal M, Higginson AP, Armstrong T, Smith A, Scarsbrook A, McKay C, Carter R, Sutcliffe RP, Bramhall S, Kocher HM, Cunningham D, Pereira SP, Davidson B, Chang D, Khan S, Zealley I, Sarker D, Al Sarireh B, Charnley R, Lobo D, Nicolson M, Halloran C, Raraty M, Sutton R, Vinjamuri S, Evans J, Campbell F, Deeks J, Sanghera B, Wong WL, Neoptolemos JP. PET-PANC: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and health economic analysis study of the impact of combined modality 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. Health Technol Assess 2018; 22:1-114. [PMID: 29402376 PMCID: PMC5817411 DOI: 10.3310/hta22070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer diagnosis and staging can be difficult in 10-20% of patients. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) adds precise anatomical localisation to functional data. The use of PET/CT may add further value to the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. OBJECTIVE To determine the incremental diagnostic accuracy and impact of PET/CT in addition to standard diagnostic work-up in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. DESIGN A multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and clinical value study of PET/CT in suspected pancreatic malignancy. PARTICIPANTS Patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy. INTERVENTIONS All patients to undergo PET/CT following standard diagnostic work-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in addition to standard diagnostic work-up with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Secondary outcomes were (1) changes in patients' diagnosis, staging and management as a result of PET/CT; (2) changes in the costs and effectiveness of patient management as a result of PET/CT; (3) the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in chronic pancreatitis; (4) the identification of groups of patients who would benefit most from PET/CT; and (5) the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in other pancreatic tumours. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2013, 589 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer underwent MDCT and PET/CT, with 550 patients having complete data and in-range PET/CT. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 88.5% and 70.6%, respectively, for MDCT and 92.7% and 75.8%, respectively, for PET/CT. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax.) for a pancreatic cancer diagnosis was 7.5. PET/CT demonstrated a significant improvement in relative sensitivity (p = 0.01) and specificity (p = 0.023) compared with MDCT. Incremental likelihood ratios demonstrated that PET/CT significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in all scenarios (p < 0.0002). PET/CT correctly changed the staging of pancreatic cancer in 56 patients (p = 0.001). PET/CT influenced management in 250 (45%) patients. PET/CT stopped resection in 58 (20%) patients who were due to have surgery. The benefit of PET/CT was limited in patients with chronic pancreatitis or other pancreatic tumours. PET/CT was associated with a gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.0157 (95% confidence interval -0.0101 to 0.0430). In the base-case model PET/CT was seen to dominate MDCT alone and is thus highly likely to be cost-effective for the UK NHS. PET/CT was seen to be most cost-effective for the subgroup of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who were thought to be resectable. CONCLUSION PET/CT provided a significant incremental diagnostic benefit in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and significantly influenced the staging and management of patients. PET/CT had limited utility in chronic pancreatitis and other pancreatic tumours. PET/CT is likely to be cost-effective at current reimbursement rates for PET/CT to the UK NHS. This was not a randomised controlled trial and therefore we do not have any information from patients who would have undergone MDCT only for comparison. In addition, there were issues in estimating costs for PET/CT. Future work should evaluate the role of PET/CT in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and prognosis and response to therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. STUDY REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73852054 and UKCRN 8166. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Ghaneh
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert Hanson
- Liverpool Cancer Research UK Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Titman
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Gill Lancaster
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Catrin Plumpton
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Huw Lloyd-Williams
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Seow Tien Yeo
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Colin Johnson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Tom Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Colin McKay
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ross Carter
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon Bramhall
- Department of General Surgery, Wye Valley NHS Trust, Hereford, UK
| | - Hemant M Kocher
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Gastrointestinal and Lymphoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen P Pereira
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brian Davidson
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Chang
- Department of Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - Saboor Khan
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Ian Zealley
- Department of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Debashis Sarker
- Department of Oncology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bilal Al Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Richard Charnley
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dileep Lobo
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marianne Nicolson
- Department of Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Christopher Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael Raraty
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert Sutton
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sobhan Vinjamuri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jonathan Evans
- Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Pathology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jon Deeks
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bal Sanghera
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - Wai-Lup Wong
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - John P Neoptolemos
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Positron emission tomography modalities prevent futile radical resection of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017; 46:119-125. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
8
|
Gilbert JW, Wolpin B, Clancy T, Wang J, Mamon H, Shinagare AB, Jagannathan J, Rosenthal M. Reply to the letter to the editor 'Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: an evolving concept' by Petrucciani et al. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:2316. [PMID: 28541392 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J W Gilbert
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.,Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - B Wolpin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - T Clancy
- Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Gastrointestinal Surgical Center, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston
| | - J Wang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Gastrointestinal Surgical Center, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston
| | - H Mamon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A B Shinagare
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.,Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - J Jagannathan
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.,Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - M Rosenthal
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.,Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Metabolic activity, as defined by F-FDG uptake on PET, is a prognostic marker for multiple malignancies; however, no study has examined the prognostic value of imaging with FDG PET in stage I and II pancreatic cancer. We examined the value of PET FDG uptake in early-stage pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS We identified patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer (I-II) who had FDG PET scan performed as part of their preoperative evaluation. The patients were divided into either high or low FDG uptake according to the median primary tumor standard uptake value (SUVmax). Our primary end points were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for survival analysis. Pathologic data were compared using the Fisher exact and χ tests. RESULTS One hundred five patients were identified: 51 patients with low FDG uptake and 54 patients with high FDG uptake. Eighty-five patients (81%) had PET avid tumors, whereas 20 (19%) patients did not. High FDG uptake correlated with pathologic stage (P = 0.012). Patients with low FDG uptake had significantly better median OS than patients with high FDG uptake (28 vs. 16 months; P = 0.036). Patients with low-FDG uptake had significantly longer median RFS than patients with high FDG uptake (14 vs. 12 months; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Low FDG uptake in PET scans in patients with stage I and II pancreatic cancer correlates with improved OS and RFS. This supports the concept that glucose metabolic pathways are important in pancreatic cancer biology and that PET scan activity can be used as a prognostic biomarker after pancreatectomy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tamburrino D, Riviere D, Yaghoobi M, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9:CD011515. [PMID: 27631326 PMCID: PMC6457597 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011515.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periampullary cancer includes cancer of the head and neck of the pancreas, cancer of the distal end of the bile duct, cancer of the ampulla of Vater, and cancer of the second part of the duodenum. Surgical resection is the only established potentially curative treatment for pancreatic and periampullary cancer. A considerable proportion of patients undergo unnecessary laparotomy because of underestimation of the extent of the cancer on computed tomography (CT) scanning. Other imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), PET-CT, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have been used to detect local invasion or distant metastases not visualised on CT scanning which could prevent unnecessary laparotomy. No systematic review or meta-analysis has examined the role of different imaging modalities in assessing the resectability with curative intent in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, PET scan, and EUS performed as an add-on test or PET-CT as a replacement test to CT scanning in detecting curative resectability in pancreatic and periampullary cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) databases up to 5 November 2015. Two review authors independently screened the references and selected the studies for inclusion. We also searched for articles related to the included studies by performing the "related search" function in MEDLINE (OvidSP) and Embase (OvidSP) and a "citing reference" search (by searching the articles that cite the included articles). SELECTION CRITERIA We included diagnostic accuracy studies of MRI, PET scan, PET-CT, and EUS in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer on CT scan. We accepted any criteria of resectability used in the studies. We included studies irrespective of language, publication status, or study design (prospective or retrospective). We excluded case-control studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 (quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies - 2) tool. Although we planned to use bivariate methods for analysis of sensitivities and specificities, we were able to fit only the univariate fixed-effect models for both sensitivity and specificity because of the paucity of data. We calculated the probability of unresectability in patients who had a positive index test (post-test probability of unresectability in people with a positive test result) and in those with negative index test (post-test probability of unresectability in people with a positive test result) using the mean probability of unresectability (pre-test probability) from the included studies and the positive and negative likelihood ratios derived from the model. The difference between the pre-test and post-test probabilities gave the overall added value of the index test compared to the standard practice of CT scan staging alone. MAIN RESULTS Only two studies (34 participants) met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. Both studies evaluated the diagnostic test accuracy of EUS in assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic cancers. There was low concerns about applicability for most domains in both studies. The overall risk of bias was low in one study and unclear or high in the second study. The mean probability of unresectable disease after CT scan across studies was 60.5% (that is 61 out of 100 patients who had resectable cancer after CT scan had unresectable disease on laparotomy). The summary estimate of sensitivity of EUS for unresectability was 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.97) and the summary estimate of specificity for unresectability was 0.80 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.96). The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 18.6) and 0.2 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.8) respectively. At the mean pre-test probability of 60.5%, the post-test probability of unresectable disease for people with a positive EUS (EUS indicating unresectability) was 86.9% (95% CI 60.9% to 96.6%) and the post-test probability of unresectable disease for people with a negative EUS (EUS indicating resectability) was 20.0% (5.1% to 53.7%). This means that 13% of people (95% CI 3% to 39%) with positive EUS have potentially resectable cancer and 20% (5% to 53%) of people with negative EUS have unresectable cancer. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on two small studies, there is significant uncertainty in the utility of EUS in people with pancreatic cancer found to have resectable disease on CT scan. No studies have assessed the utility of EUS in people with periampullary cancer.There is no evidence to suggest that it should be performed routinely in people with pancreatic cancer or periampullary cancer found to have resectable disease on CT scan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deniece Riviere
- Radboud University Medical Center NijmegenDepartment of SurgeryGeert Grooteplein Zuid 10route 618Nijmegen6500 HBNetherlandsP.O. Box 9101
| | - Mohammad Yaghoobi
- McMaster University and McMaster University Health Sciences CentreDivision of Gastroenterology1200 Main Street WestHamiltonONCanada
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryPond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) frequently presents at an advanced and incurable stage of the disease. Common signs and symptoms of PDA include abdominal or back pain, jaundice, weight loss, pruritus, and nausea/vomiting. Diagnostic workup includes serum chemistries and CA19-9, primarily to monitor disease status and response to treatment. Imaging studies are performed to assess resectability and stage disease, and pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the preferred imaging studies for this purpose. Conventional staging is based on the American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) Staging System, 7th Edition and informs prognosis, while surgical staging systems focus specifically on assessing the likelihood of a complete (negative margins) resection with operative management. Herein, we review the presenting signs and symptoms, the diagnostic evaluation, and staging of PDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A McIntyre
- Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jordan M Winter
- Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gallamini A, Zwarthoed C, Borra A. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2014; 6:1821-89. [PMID: 25268160 PMCID: PMC4276948 DOI: 10.3390/cancers6041821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2014] [Revised: 07/25/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%-15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallamini
- Department of Research and Medical Innovation, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice University, Nice Cedex 2-06189 Nice, France.
| | - Colette Zwarthoed
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice University, Nice Cedex 2-06189 Nice, France.
| | - Anna Borra
- Hematology Department S. Croce Hospital, Via M. Coppino 26, Cuneo 12100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tamburrino D, Partelli S, Crippa S, Manzoni A, Maurizi A, Falconi M. Selection criteria in resectable pancreatic cancer: A biological and morphological approach. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:11210-11215. [PMID: 25170205 PMCID: PMC4145759 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2013] [Revised: 02/19/2014] [Accepted: 04/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) remains one of the most aggressive tumors with a low rate of survival. Surgery is the only curative treatment for PDA, although only 20% of patients are resectable at diagnosis. During the last decade there was an improvement in survival in patients affected by PDA, possibly explained by the advances in cancer therapy and by improve patient selection by pancreatic surgeons. It is necessary to select patients not only on the basis of surgical resectability, but also on the basis of the biological nature of the tumor. Specific preoperative criteria can be identified in order to select patients who will benefit from surgical resection. Duration of symptoms and level of carbohydrate antigen 19.9 in resectable disease should be considered to avoid R1 resection and early relapse. Radiological assessment can help surgeons to distinguish resectable disease from borderline resectable disease and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Better patient selection can increase survival rate and neoadjuvant treatment can help surgeons select patients who will benefit from surgery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Donswijk ML, Hess S, Mulders T, Lam MGEH. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. PET Clin 2014; 9:421-41, v-vi. [PMID: 26050945 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
This article discusses the current state-of-the-art application of 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG)-PET and FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Gastrointestinal malignancies include many different cell types, several common malignancies of which may be imaged by FDG-PET/CT. This review focuses on gastric carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and stroma cell tumors. The role of FDG-PET/CT in staging these malignancies is discussed, in addition to (re)staging, detection of recurrent disease, patient selection/prognostication, and response assessment, using the currently available literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Søren Hess
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Ties Mulders
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|