Utility of semiquantitative parameters to differentiate benign and malignant focal hepatic lesions

Current Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

The role of imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved and expanded beyond the plain radiological confirmation of the tumor based on the typical appearance in a multiphase contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examination. The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents has enabled the diagnosis of hepatocarcinogenesis at earlier stages, while the application of ultrasound contrast agents has drastically upgraded the role of ultrasound in the diagnostic algorithms. Newer quantitative techniques assessing blood perfusion on CT and MRI not only allow earlier diagnosis and confident differentiation from other lesions, but they also provide biomarkers for the evaluation of treatment response. As distinct HCC subtypes are identified, their correlation with specific imaging features holds great promise for estimating tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. This review presents the current role of imaging and underlines its critical role in the successful management of patients with HCC.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Radiology has traditionally played a central role in HCC management, ranging from screening of high-risk patients to non-invasive diagnosis, as well as the evaluation of treatment response and post-treatment follow-up. From liver ultrasonography with or without contrast to dynamic multiple phased CT and dynamic MRI with diffusion protocols, great progress has been achieved in the last decade. Throughout the last few years, pathological, biological, genetic, and immune-chemical analyses have revealed several tumoral subtypes with diverse biological behavior, highlighting the need for the re-evaluation of established radiological methods. Considering these changes, novel methods that provide functional and quantitative parameters in addition to morphological information are increasingly incorporated into modern diagnostic protocols for HCC. In this way, differential diagnosis became even more challenging throughout the last few years. Use of liver specific contrast agents, as well as CT/MRI perfusion techniques, seem to not only allow earlier detection and more accurate characterization of HCC lesions, but also make it possible to predict response to treatment and survival. Nevertheless, several limitations and technical considerations still exist. This review will describe and discuss all these imaging modalities and their advances in the imaging of HCC lesions in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Sensitivity and specificity rates, method limitations, and technical considerations will be discussed.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly important for the detection, characterization, and follow-up of focal liver lesions. Several quantitative MRI-based methods have been proposed in addition to qualitative imaging interpretation to improve the diagnostic work-up and prognostics in patients with focal liver lesions. This includes DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient measurements, intravoxel incoherent motion, perfusion imaging, MR elastography, and radiomics. Multiple research studies have reported promising results with quantitative MRI methods in various clinical settings. Nevertheless, applications in everyday clinical practice are limited. This review describes the basic principles of quantitative MRI-based techniques and discusses the main current applications and limitations for the assessment of focal liver lesions.

How reader perception of capsule affects interpretation of washout in hypervascular liver nodules in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine whether reader perception of a capsule affects reader interpretation of washout in hypervascular liver nodules at dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, with waiver of informed consent. MRI reports for 111 hypervascular liver nodules (median 2.0 cm, range 1.0-17.8 cm) in 62 patients were reviewed, and the presence/absence of capsule and washout were recorded for one reading. A second independent study reading was also performed. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) for each nodule and liver parenchyma was measured. An objective SIR threshold was identified for nodules without capsules that correctly classified the presence/absence of washout, then applied to nodules with capsules to classify them as having / not having objective washout. Nodules were categorized as definite / not definite HCC using subjective and objective washout, based on LI-RADS, OPTN, AASLD, and EASL criteria, and proportions compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Agreement on nodule features was high for Readings 1 and 2 (κ = 0.70-0.82). For Reading 1, 71 nodules lacked capsules (43 with and 28 without subjective washout); an SIR threshold of 0.88 classified the presence/absence of washout correctly in 94% (67/71, P < 0.001). Forty nodules had capsules; although all had subjective washout (100%, 40/40), 75% (30/40) had objective washout (P < 0.05). Using objective washout caused 4.5% (3/66; LI-RADS, OPTN) and 12% (10/83; AASLD, EASL) of nodules to be recategorized from definite HCC to not definite HCC.

CONCLUSION

Reader perception of capsule affects interpretation of washout. This effect can influence nodule categorization using imaging-based diagnostic systems. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1337-1345.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic criteria by imaging techniques

Imaging plays a very important role in the diagnosis of HCC. Indeed, in high-risk patients a noninvasive diagnosis can only be obtained by imaging in presence of typical features. These features include arterial enhancement followed by washout during the portal venous and/or delayed phases on CT scan or MRI. This pattern is quite specific and has been endorsed by both Western and Asian diagnostic guidelines. However, its sensitivity is not very high, especially for small lesions. Therefore ancillary signs may be needed to increase the reliability of the diagnosis. Recent hepatobiliary MRI contrast agents seem to be interesting to improve characterization of small nodules in the cirrhotic liver.

Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to contribute to the standardization of the numeric positive enhancement integral (PEI) values in breast parenchyma, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and to evaluate the significance of the difference in PEI values between IDC and parenchyma, DCIS and parenchyma and IDC and DCIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the prospective trial, we analyzed the dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of 60 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed unilateral DCIS (n=30) and IDC (n=30) and defined the PEI values (range; mean ± SD) for the lesions and the breast parenchyma. Tumor-to-non-tumor (T/NT) ratios were calculated for DCIS and IDC and compared. PEI color maps (PEICM) were created. The differences in PEI values between IDC and parenchyma and between DCIS and parenchyma were tested according to t-test. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the differences between the mean PEI values of parenchyma, DCIS and IDC.

RESULTS

IDC showed highly statistically different PEI numeric values compared to breast parenchyma (748.7 ± 32.2 vs. 74.6 ± 17.0; p<0.0001). The same applied to the differences in the group of patients with DCIS (428.0 ± 25.0 vs. 66.0 ± 10.6; p<0.0001). The difference between IDC, DCIS and parenchyma were also considered highly statistically significant (p<0.0001) and so were the T/NT ratios for IDC and DCIS (10.1 ± 2.4 vs. 6.6 ± 1.4; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PEI numeric values may contribute to differentiation between invasive and in situ breast carcinoma.

Elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis

The objective of this paper was to evaluate the overall accuracy of elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions by liver biopsy as the gold standard. Literature databases were searched. The studies which were related to evaluate the diagnostic value of elastography for differentiation in benign and malignant liver lesions in English or Chinese were included. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed, and the areas under the curve (AUC) were also calculated to present the accuracy of the elastography for the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions. Six studies which included a total of 448 liver lesions in 384 patients were analyzed. The summary sensitivity and specificity of elastography for the differentiation of malignant liver lesions were 85% (95% CI, 80 to 89%) and 84% (95% CI, 80 to 88%), respectively. And the summary diagnostic odds ratio was 46.33 (95% CI, 15.22 to 141.02), and the SROC was 0.9328. Elastography has a high sensitivity and specificity differentiation for benign and malignant liver lesions. As a non-invasive method, it is promising to be applied to clinical practice. To estimate elastography objectively, a large, prospective, international, and multi-center study is still needed.