MDCT findings of a Meckel's diverticulum with ectopic pancreatic tissue

Diagnostic approach to small-bowel wall thickening: Beyond Crohn's disease and cancer

Although small-bowel wall thickening is a common manifestation of Crohn's disease and tumors, many other entities can give rise to similar imaging findings. The small bowel is difficult to access by endoscopy, so radiologic imaging tests play an essential role in the diagnosis of conditions involving the small bowel. The main objectives of this paper are to explain the definition of small-bowel wall thickening, analyze the patterns of involvement seen in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with intravenous contrast administration, and provide an image-based review of the different causes of small-bowel wall thickening. The differential diagnosis must include many entities because wall thickening can result from immune-mediated, infectious, or vascular causes, as well as from toxicity and other lesser-known entities. As the imaging appearance of many of these conditions overlap, clinical and laboratory findings are necessary to support the imaging diagnosis.

Diagnostic approach to small-bowel wall thickening: beyond Crohn's disease and cancer

Although small-bowel wall thickening is a common manifestation of Crohn's disease and tumors, many other entities can give rise to similar imaging findings. The small bowel is difficult to access by endoscopy, so radiologic imaging tests play an essential role in the diagnosis of conditions involving the small bowel. The main objectives of this paper are to explain the definition of small-bowel wall thickening, analyze the patterns of involvement seen in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with intravenous contrast administration, and provide an image-based review of the different causes of small-bowel wall thickening. The differential diagnosis must include many entities because wall thickening can result from immune-mediated, infectious, or vascular causes, as well as from toxicity and other lesser-known entities. As the imaging appearance of many of these conditions overlap, clinical and laboratory findings are necessary to support the imaging diagnosis.

Ectopic pancreas in the ileum: An unusual condition and our experience

BACKGROUND

Ectopic pancreas in the ileum, including lesions within Meckel diverticulum, can cause severe manifestations and complications; yet, it was seldom reported in English literature.

AIM

This study aimed to raise awareness and provide information for better clinical management of this rare yet serious condition.

METHODS

A total of 1713 cases of small bowel resection were performed in our hospital between 2009 and 2018, among which 10 cases of ileac ectopic pancreas were identified. A comprehensive retrospective review of the 10 cases was taken.

RESULTS

Five lesions were located in the ileum wall and 5 were within Meckel diverticulum. Two lesions within Meckel diverticulum were incidental; the remaining 8 lesions were all associated with abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and anemia. Of the 5 patients with lesions in the ileum wall, computed tomography uniformly revealed ileoileal intussusceptions with masses as lead points. Capsule endoscopies were performed in 6 cases, of which 3 showed positive findings. Double-balloon enteroscopy was conducted in one case and revealed an ileal diverticulum. Therapeutically, the offending bowel segments were removed, and intussusceptions were restored except for one case in which diverticulectomy was applied. No relapse or sequela was observed in the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Ileac ectopic pancreas can be seen in the ileum wall or Meckel diverticulum. The majority of the lesions found in clinical practice present with abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and anemia. Lesions in the ileum wall often cause ileoileal intussusception. Computed tomography, capsule endoscopy, and double-balloon enteroscopy are helpful preoperative examinations. Segmental small bowel resection is the treatment of choice.

Bleeding Meckel Diverticulum: A Retrospective Analysis of Computed Tomography Enterography Findings

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the computed tomography enterography (CTE) characteristics of bleeding Meckel diverticulum.

METHODS

The CTE images of 35 patients with Meckel diverticulum and gastrointestinal bleeding were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Meckel diverticulum was visualized in 33 of 35 patients and located in the right lower abdomen (20/33), midline lower abdomen (8/33), left lower abdomen (3/33), or paramedially near the umbilicus (2/33). The Meckel diverticulum was visualized on the antimesenteric side of the ileum in 16 patients (48.5%) and pointed toward the umbilicus in 10 (30.3%). The diverticulum appeared as a blind-ended tubular (22/33 [66.7%]) or saccular (11/33 [33.3%]) bowel segment. Separated supplying vessel was identified in 15 patients (45.5%) and associated with diverticulum (P = 0.037). The ectopic tissue was pathologically confirmed in 11 (33.3%) of 33 patients and was associated with diverticular nodules (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of CTE features could aid in the preoperative assessment of bleeding Meckel diverticulum.

Unusual cause of small bowel obstruction: mesodiverticular band of Meckel's diverticulum demonstrated by CT

Small bowel obstruction resulting from the mesodiverticular band is a rare complication of Meckel’s diverticulum and usually presents a diagnostic challenge. We present a case of small bowel obstruction due to the mesodiverticular band of Meckel’s diverticulum with CT scan findings.

CT Detection of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Meckel Diverticulum

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to determine how often symptomatic Meckel diverticulum and asymptomatic Meckel diverticulum are detected on CT in patients with known Meckel diverticulum and to evaluate factors that influence detection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 85 CT examinations of 40 patients (eight pediatric patients and 32 adult patients; 29 male patients and 11 female patients; average age, 46.2 ± 23.7 [SD] years) with a pathologic diagnosis of Meckel diverticulum were retrospectively evaluated. These patients included 26 adult patients with incidentally found asymptomatic Meckel diverticulum and 14 patients (eight pediatric and six adult patients) with symptomatic Meckel diverticulum. The CT technical factors and patients' morphologic factors were compared with the detection of Meckel diverticulum using mixed-effect logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Meckel diverticulum was detected on at least one CT examination in eight of 14 (57.1%) symptomatic patients (two of four patients with bleeding, two of six patients with small-bowel obstruction, two of two patients with acute diverticulitis, one of one patient with incisional hernia, and one of one patient with inverted Meckel diverticulum) and in 13 of 23 (56.5%) total CT examinations. Asymptomatic Meckel diverticulum was detected on at least one CT examination in 11 of 26 (42.3%) patients and in 16 of 62 (25.8%) total CT examinations. The amount of peritoneal fat was related to the detection of Meckel diverticula (p = 0.02). Although not statistically significant, the subjective quality of axial CT (p = 0.05) tended to be related to detection, whereas the use of IV (p = 0.59) or positive oral (p = 0.41) contrast material was unrelated to detection. In the original CT reports, none of the asymptomatic cases of Meckel diverticulum was prospectively detected, whereas Meckel diverticulum was detected or mentioned as a possibility in 64% of the symptomatic cases.

CONCLUSION

In patients with known Meckel diverticulum, CT can detect Meckel diverticulum in up to 47.5% of all patients. Meckel diverticulum is more commonly detected in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients, and detection is related to the amount of peritoneal fat.