Solitary liver lesions in children: interobserver agreement and accuracy of MRI diagnosis

Rare malignant liver tumors in children

Malignant hepatic tumors in children are rare, comprising 1.3% of all pediatric malignancies. Following hepatoblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma is the second most common. Other malignant hepatic tumors seen in childhood include those of mesenchymal origin including undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma, angiosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, as well as biliary tumors such as cholangiocarcinoma. Diagnosis can be challenging because of their rarity, and the recognition of distinctive imaging features for certain tumors such as epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and biliary rhabdomyosarcoma can focus the differential diagnosis and expedite the diagnostic process. A complete MRI examination with hepatocyte-specific contrast media and diffusion-weighted imaging helps to focus the differential diagnosis, and, although findings are often nonspecific, in some cases typical features on MRI can be helpful in diagnosis. Histopathological analysis is usually required for definitive diagnosis. Hepatic tumors tend to be aggressive, and full staging is imperative to establish disease extent. Significant proportions are not amenable to upfront surgical resection and often require a multimodality approach including neoadjuvant chemotherapy within a multidisciplinary setting. Facilitating complete surgical resection is usually required for better survival. In this review, we emphasize pathology and imaging features for rare liver tumors that are useful in reaching a prompt diagnosis. We also discuss general clinical findings, prognosis and management of these tumors.

Low b-value (50-100) diffusion-weighted images detect significantly more hyperintense liver lesions in children than T2-weighted images

BACKGROUND

Low b-value (50-100 s/mm²) diffusion-weighted images (low b-value DWI) have been shown to be superior to T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence (T2-W) in detecting liver lesions in adults. There are no such studies assessing this difference in children.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to compare the sensitivity of low b-value DWI images and T2-W images in detecting focal liver lesions in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess focal liver lesions in 50 children (22 males, 28 females; age: 2 months to 17 years [mean: 10.9 years]) was performed. Two radiologists reviewed both low b-value DWI and T2-W sequences independently on different occasions to note lesions, the smallest lesion size and the location. A consensus reading of the entire MRI examination and a correlation with follow-up, other imaging modalities and pathology in available cases were used to determine the final number of lesions as a reference standard. The average number of lesions per patient detected by both readers on each sequence was compared with each other and with the reference standard using the signed-rank test. The smallest lesions detected by each sequence were compared using the paired t-test.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy hyperintense lesions were identified on consensus review to serve as the reference standard. The average number of lesions identified by both readers on low b-value DWI was 134 (79%) and on T2-W was 95 (56%). There was excellent interobserver agreement for detection of lesions on low b-value DWI (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.96 [0.93-0.98]) and T2-W (ICC=0.85 [0.75-0.91]), with slightly better agreement on low b-value DWI. Both readers identified significantly more number of lesions on low b-value DWI compared to T2-W (Reader 1: P=0.0036, Reader 2: P=0.0001). Compared to the reference standard (mean number of lesions: 3.45), T2-W detected significantly fewer lesions (mean number of lesions: 1.91; P=0.0001) while there was no significant difference in lesion detection on low b-value DWI (mean number of lesions: 2.68; P=0.1527). Low b-value DWI and T2-W were not significantly different in identifying the smallest lesion size (Reader 1: P=0.19, Reader 2: P=0.47).

CONCLUSION

Low b-value DWI images are more sensitive than T2-W sequences in detecting hyperintense focal liver lesions in children.

Can diffusion-weighted imaging distinguish between benign and malignant pediatric liver tumors?

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of pediatric liver lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether qualitative and quantitative DWI can be used to differentiate benign and malignant pediatric liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed MRIs in children with focal liver lesions to qualitatively evaluate lesions noting diffusion restriction, T2 shine-through, increased diffusion, hypointensity on DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and intermediate signal on both, and to measure ADC values. Pathology confirmation or a combination of clinical, laboratory and imaging features, and follow-up was used to determine final diagnosis.

RESULTS

We included 112 focal hepatic lesions in 89 children (median age 11.5 years, 51 female), of which 92 lesions were benign and 20 malignant. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect for both qualitative (kappa 0.8735) and quantitative (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.96) diffusion assessment. All malignant lesions showed diffusion restriction. Most benign lesions other than abscesses were not restricted. There was significant association of qualitative restriction with malignancy and non-restriction with benignancy (Fisher exact test P<0.0001). Mean normalized ADC values of malignant lesions (1.23x10^-3 mm²/s) were lower than benign lesions (1.62x10^-3 mm²/s; Student's t-test, P<0.015). However, there was significant overlap of ADC between benign and malignant lesions, with wide range for each diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63 for predicting malignancy using an ADC cut-off value of ≤1.20x10^-3 mm²/s, yielding a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 54% for differentiating malignant from benign lesions.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative diffusion restriction in pediatric liver lesions is a good predictor of malignancy and can help to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, in conjunction with conventional MR sequences. Even though malignant lesions demonstrated significantly lower ADC values than benign lesions, the use of quantitative diffusion remains limited in its utility for distinguishing them because of the significant overlap and wide ranges of ADC values.

MRI of paediatric liver tumours: How we review and report

Liver tumours are fortunately rare in children. Benign tumours such as haemangiomas and cystic mesenchymal hamartomas are typically seen in infancy, often before 6 months of age. After that age, malignant hepatic tumours increase in frequency. The differentiation of a malignant from benign lesion on imaging can often negate the need for biopsy. Ultrasound is currently the main screening tool for suspected liver pathology, and is ideally suited for evaluation of hepatic lesions in children due to their generally small size. With increasing research, public awareness and parental anxiety regarding radiation dosage from CT imaging, MRI is now unquestionably the modality of choice for further characterisation of hepatic mass lesions.

Nevertheless the cost, length of imaging time and perceived complexity of a paediatric liver MR study can be intimidating to the general radiologist and referring clinician. This article outlines standard MR sequences utilised, reasons for their utilisation, types of mixed hepatocyte specific/extracellular contrast agents employed and imaging features that aid the interpretation of paediatric liver lesions. The two commonest paediatric liver malignancies, namely hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma are described. Differentiation of primary hepatic malignancies with metastatic disease and mimickers of malignancy such as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatic adenomas are also featured in this review..

Imaging should aim to clarify the presence of a lesion, the likelihood of malignancy and potential for complete surgical resection. Reviewing and reporting the studies should address these issues in a systematic fashion whilst also commenting upon background liver parenchymal appearances. Clinical information and adequate patient preparation prior to MR imaging studies help enhance the diagnostic yield.