Dual-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT to detect locoregional recurrence of prostate cancer: comparison between each time point of imaging and a summation scan

Standardization of acquisition protocols using PET/CT with 18F-Choline in prostate cancer

AIM

To standardize acquisition protocols for ¹⁸F-Choline PET/CT to prevent from urine interference, to determine the best time point for the whole-body study, and to assess whether "dual point" acquisition allows for differentiating malignant vs. benign lesions.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with prostate cancer were prospectively studied. Immediately after ¹⁸F-Choline injection, a pelvis study was acquired, and a whole-body was subsequently obtained 1 and 2 hours p.i. Mean SUVmax was obtained in regions and for every sequential imaging. Mean analysis (χ²) and SUV percentage change (2/1 hours; 1 hours/0 min) were obtained. Metabolic pattern dynamics were assessed: accumulative vs. clearance. Patient follow-up after therapy and directed classification whenever ethically possible were performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three prostate foci, without disturbing urinary activity was ever found on early images. Accumulative pattern in 42, with percentage increase was: 0 min/1 hour: +16.7% (χ²0.94); 1/2 hours: +10,0% (χ² 0.83). Clearance pattern in 11, with percentage decrease: 0 min/1 hour: -21.4% (χ²0.91): -7.7% (χ²0.85), corresponding in 7 to initial staging and in 4 post-radiotherapy biochemical recurrence. Every infradiaphragmatic uptake (n: 24) showed accumulative pattern, with percentage increase of +9.1% (χ²0.97), all of them depicted on early imaging. As for 12 supradiaphragmantic uptake, 8 of them showed clearance pattern with percentage decrease: -13.0% (χ²0.95). Accumulative pattern showed in 4 of them with percentage increase +13.0% (χ² 0.96), thus being assessed as invasive/malignant. Every bone uptake (n: 18) showed accumulative pattern, with percentage increase: +17.1% (χ²0.95), all of them depicted on 1 hour imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

As for prostate assessment is concerned, dual point at 0 min/1 hour proved to be the best procedure. As for supradiaphragmatic lymph-nodes detection, dual point with 1/2 hours performed best. As for infradiaphragmatic and bone involvement, as well as for inconclusive findings, the 2 hour imaging increased our diagnostic confidence.

Radium-223 for the treatment of bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer: when and why

Radium-223 dichloride (²²³Ra) is the first, recently approved, α-particle-emitting radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of patients with bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and no evidence of visceral metastases. We explored MEDLINE, relevant congresses, and websites for data on ²²³Ra and prostate cancer therapies, focusing on therapeutic strategies and timing, bone metastases, and diagnostic assessment. ²²³Ra represents the only bone-targeting agent that has significantly extended patients' overall survival while reducing pain and symptomatic skeletal events. Unlike other radiopharmaceuticals, such as strontium-89 and samarium-153 EDTMP, ²²³Ra (11.4-days half-life) has shown a high biological efficiency mainly due to its short penetration range. These features potentially allow reduced bone marrow toxicity and limit undue exposure. ²²³Ra has been validated under the product name Xofigo^® by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Patient selection, management, and treatment sequencing is recommended to be discussed in the context of a multidisciplinary environment, including oncology, urology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy physicians. No consensus has been achieved regarding the optimal timing and its administration as single agent or in combination with zoledronic acid or chemotherapy, so far. This review aims to provide a rationale for the use of ²²³Ra in treating metastases from CRPC, highlighting the crucial role of a multidisciplinary approach, the disputed inclusion and exclusion criteria on the basis of agencies regulations, and the value of diagnostics for therapy assessment.