Differences in the imaging features and distribution of non-indolent and indolent mastocytosis: a single institution experience of 29 patients

Systemic Mastocytosis: Radiological Point of View

Radiological diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (SM) can be hard to establish. This difficulty is mainly due to the variable radiological features involving many organ systems (e.g., respiratory, cardiovascular, lympho-reticular, digestive systems, and most commonly skin), and above all, to the broad spectrum of skeletal findings. Skeletal involvement is the most common and prominent imaging feature in patients with SM and represents a prognostic factor as it may entail an aggressive course of the disease. Diagnosis, largely established by histological evaluation of a bone marrow trephine biopsy, supplemented by imaging modalities such as radiography, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging, requires a team approach between the hematologist, radiologist, and pathologist. The general radiologist needs to be familiar with the imaging findings because they may be the first to suggest the correct diagnosis. The primary purpose of this review article was to equip clinicians with pertinent radiological semiotics by presenting relevant radiological features that assist early diagnosis and selection of an effective treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging reveals distinct bone marrow patterns in indolent and advanced systemic mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is broadly subcategorized according to mast cell (MC) burden and organ involvement into indolent (ISM), smoldering (SSM), and advanced SM (AdvSM). However, the pattern and extent of bone involvement remains controversial. In this institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, 115 patients with different forms of SM (ISM (n = 37, 32%), SSM (n = 9, 8%), and AdvSM (n = 69, 60%)) underwent a whole-body magnetic resonance imaging including sagittal and coronal T1 and turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequences of the spine. The evaluation included the pattern and extent of pathologic bone marrow (BM) signals in the spine and extremities, osteolytic lesions, and vertebral fractures. A pathologic BM pattern was observed in 4/37 (11%), 8/9 (89%), and 66/69 (96%); affection of the appendicular skeleton in 3/37 (8%), 8/9 (89%), and 67/69 (97%); and vertebral fractures in 7/37 (19%), 0/9, and 13/69 (19%) patients with ISM, SSM, and AdvSM, respectively. In AdvSM, pathologic BM pattern included activated (62%), diffuse sclerotic (25%), and small-spotted BM (9%), respectively. Only activated/sclerotic BM was associated with significantly higher MC burden, organ damage, and inferior median survival (2.9 years, p = 0.04). Vertebral fractures resembled classical multi-segmental osteoporotic fractures in ISM but not in AdvSM in which they were only found in activated/sclerotic BM. Only one patient with AdvSM had a focal osteolytic lesion in the femur. Activated/sclerotic BM changes of the spine and affection of the appendicular skeleton are indicative for SSM or AdvSM. Osteolytic lesions, which are very rare, and osteoporotic fractures are ineligible for the diagnosis of AdvSM.