Comparing lesion detection of infratentorial multiple sclerosis lesions between T2-weighted spin-echo, 2D-FLAIR, and 3D-FLAIR sequences

Automatic lesion detection at Multiple Sclerosis patients - Comparison of 2D- and 3D-FLAIR-datasets

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a common autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) allows a sensitive assessment of the CNS and is established for diagnostic, prognostic and (therapy-) monitoring purposes. Especially lesion counting in T2- or Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR)-weighted images plays a decisive role in clinical routine. Software-packages allowing an automatic evaluation of image data are increasingly established aiming a faster and improved workflow. These programs allow e.g. the counting, spatial attribution and volumetry of MS-lesions in FLAIR-weighted images. Research has shown that 3D-FLAIR-sequences are superior to 2D-FLAIR-sequences in visual evaluation of lesion burden in MS. An influence on the automatic analysis is expectable but not yet systematically studied. This work will therefore investigate the influence of 2D- and 3D datasets on the results of an automatic assessment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 80 Multiple Sclerosis patients underwent a clinically indicated routine MRI examination. The clinical routine protocol already including a 3D-FLAIR sequence was adapted by an additional 2D-FLAIR sequence also conform to the 2021 MAGNIMS-CMSCNAIMS consensus recommendations. To obtain a quantitative analysis for assessment of amount, dissemination and volume of the lesions, the acquired MR images were post-processed using the CE-certified Software mdbrain (mediaire, Berlin, Germany). The resulting data were statistically analysed using the paired t-test for normally distributed data and the Wilcoxon-signed-rank-test for not normally distributed data respectively. Demographic data and data such as the subtype, duration, severity and therapy of the disease were collected, pseudonymized and evaluated.

RESULTS

There is a significant difference concerning the total number and lesion volume with more lesions being detected (2D: 29.7, +/- 20.22 sd; 3D: 40.1 +/- 31.67 sd; p < 0.0001) but lower total volume (2D: 6.24 +/- 6.11 sd; 3D: 5.39 +/- 6.37 sd; p < 0.0001) when using the 3D- sequence. Especially significantly more small lesions in the unspecific white matter and infratentorial region were detected by using the 3D-FLAIR sequence (p < 0.0001) compared to the 2D-FLAIR image. Main reason for the lower total volume in the 3D-FLAIR sequence was the calculated volume for periventricular lesions which was significantly beneath the calculated volume from the 2D-FLAIR sequence (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Automatic lesion counting and volumetry is feasible with both 2D- and 3D-weightend FLAIR images. Still, it leads to partly significant differences even between two sequences that both are conform to the 2021 MAGNIMS-CMSCNAIMS consensus recommendations. This study contributes valuable insights into the impact of using different input data from the same patient for automated MS lesion evaluation.

Imaging of Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disorders

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes neuroimaging findings in demyelinating disease, the most common being multiple sclerosis. Revisions to criteria and treatment options have been ongoing, and MRI plays a pivotal role in diagnosis and disease monitoring. The common antibody-mediated demyelinating disorders with their respective classic imaging features are reviewed, as well as the differential diagnostic considerations on imaging.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The clinical criteria of demyelinating disease rely heavily on imaging with MRI. With novel antibody detection, the range of clinical demyelinating syndromes has expanded, most recently with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG antibodies. Imaging has improved our understanding of the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis and disease progression, and further research is underway. The importance of increased detection of pathology outside of the classic lesions will have an important role as therapeutic options are expanding.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

MRI has a crucial role in the diagnostic criteria and differentiation among common demyelinating disorders and syndromes. This article reviews the typical imaging features and clinical scenarios that assist in accurate diagnosis, differentiation between demyelinating diseases and other white matter diseases, the importance of standardized MRI protocols in clinical practice, and novel imaging techniques.

Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 2 - Acceleration Methods and Implications for Individual Regions

BACKGROUND

 Recently introduced MRI techniques facilitate accelerated examinations or increased resolution with the same duration. Further techniques offer homogeneous image quality in regions with anatomical transitions. The question arises whether and how these techniques can be adopted for routine diagnostic imaging.

METHODS

 Narrative review with an educational focus based on current literature research and practical experiences of different professions involved (physicians, MRI technologists/radiographers, physics/biomedical engineering). Different hardware manufacturers are considered.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

 Compressed sensing and simultaneous multi-slice imaging are novel acceleration techniques with different yet complimentary applications. They do not suffer from classical signal-to-noise-ratio penalties. Combining 3 D and acceleration techniques facilitates new broader examination protocols, particularly for clinical brain imaging. In further regions of the nervous systems mainly specific applications appear to benefit from recent technological improvements.

KEY POINTS

  · New acceleration techniques allow for faster or higher resolution examinations.. · New brain imaging approaches have evolved, including more universal examination protocols.. · Other regions of the nervous system are dominated by targeted applications of recently introduced MRI techniques..

CITATION FORMAT

· Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J et al. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 2 - Acceleration Methods and Implications for Individual Regions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8789.

The central vein sign is present in most infratentorial multiple sclerosis plaques

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is growing evidence supporting the presence of the central vein sign (CVS) in the supratentorial brain as an imaging biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis. Recently, using optimized susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN-venule), we detected CVS in 86% of supratentorial white matter lesions (WMLs) in the clinical setting on images obtained in a 3T MRI scanner. Despite the relevance of the infratentorial compartment, CVS prevalence in infratentorial MS plaques has not been investigated in detail. Our objective was to determine the proportion of MS infratentorial lesions showing CVS positivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included subjects with MS and other brain diseases showing at least one infratentorial lesion larger than 3 mm on 3D-FLAIR. Patients were scanned in a 3T MRI scanner (GE Medical Systems, discovery-MR750), applying a comprehensive protocol including post-contrast 3D-FLAIR and SWAN-venule sequences. CVS presence was confirmed by two trained raters.

RESULTS

Thirty MRIs of subjects with MS were analyzed. One hundred and one infratentorial lesions were detected on FLAIR, and 86% were centered by a vein. Fifteen MRIs from the non-MS group were analyzed, 19 lesions were visible ion FLAIR and 16% were positive for the CVS.

CONCLUSIONS

SWAN-venule detects infratentorial lesions and highlights the central vein in MS plaques at 3T MRI. As occurs in the supratentorial brain, most infratentorial lesions are perivenular.

The brainstem in multiple sclerosis: MR identification of tracts and nuclei damage

Objective

To evaluate the 3D Fast Gray Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery (FGATIR) sequence for MRI identification of brainstem tracts and nuclei damage in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods

From april to december 2020, 10 healthy volunteers and 50 patients with remitted-relapsing MS (58% female, mean age 36) underwent MR imaging in the Neuro-imaging department of the C.H.N.O. des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France. MRI was achieved on a 3 T system (MAGNETOM Skyra) using a 64-channel coil. 3D FGATIR sequence was first performed on healthy volunteers to classify macroscopically identifiable brainstem structures. Then, FGATIR was assessed in MS patients to locate brainstem lesions detected with Proton Density/T2w (PD/T2w) sequence.

Results

In healthy volunteers, FGATIR allowed a precise visualization of tracts and nuclei according to their myelin density. Including FGATIR in MR follow-up of MS patients helped to identify structures frequently involved in the inflammatory process. Most damaged tracts were the superior cerebellar peduncle and the transverse fibers of the pons. Most frequently affected nuclei were the vestibular nuclei, the trigeminal tract, the facial nerve and the solitary tract.

Conclusion

Combination of FGATIR and PD/T2w sequences opened prospects to define MS elective injury in brainstem tracts and nuclei, with particular lesion features suggesting variations of the inflammatory process within brainstem structures. In a further study, hypersignal quantification and microstructure information should be evaluated using relaxometry and diffusion tractography. Technical improvements would bring novel parameters to train an artificial neural network for accurate automated labeling of MS lesions within the brainstem.

Evaluation of Ultrafast Wave-Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging 3D-FLAIR in the Visualization and Volumetric Estimation of Cerebral White Matter Lesions

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate an ultrafast 3D-FLAIR sequence using Wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging encoding (Wave-FLAIR) compared with standard 3D-FLAIR in the visualization and volumetric estimation of cerebral white matter lesions in a clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients underwent 3T brain MR imaging, including standard 3D-FLAIR (acceleration factor = 2, scan time = 7 minutes 50 seconds) and resolution-matched ultrafast Wave-FLAIR sequences (acceleration factor  = 6, scan time = 2 minutes 45 seconds for the 20-channel coil; acceleration factor = 9, scan time  = 1 minute 50 seconds for the 32-channel coil) as part of clinical evaluation for demyelinating disease. Automated segmentation of cerebral white matter lesions was performed using the Lesion Segmentation Tool in SPM. Student t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients, relative lesion volume difference, and Dice similarity coefficients were used to compare volumetric measurements among sequences. Two blinded neuroradiologists evaluated the visualization of white matter lesions, artifacts, and overall diagnostic quality using a predefined 5-point scale.

RESULTS

Standard and Wave-FLAIR sequences showed excellent agreement of lesion volumes with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 and mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.97 (SD, 0.05) (range, 0.84-0.99). Wave-FLAIR was noninferior to standard FLAIR for visualization of lesions and motion. The diagnostic quality for Wave-FLAIR was slightly greater than for standard FLAIR for infratentorial lesions (P < .001), and there were fewer pulsation artifacts on Wave-FLAIR compared with standard FLAIR (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrafast Wave-FLAIR provides superior visualization of infratentorial lesions while preserving overall diagnostic quality and yields white matter lesion volumes comparable with those estimated using standard FLAIR. The availability of ultrafast Wave-FLAIR may facilitate the greater use of 3D-FLAIR sequences in the evaluation of patients with suspected demyelinating disease.

2021 MAGNIMS-CMSC-NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis

The 2015 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis and 2016 Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centres guidelines on the use of MRI in diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis made an important step towards appropriate use of MRI in routine clinical practice. Since their promulgation, there have been substantial relevant advances in knowledge, including the 2017 revisions of the McDonald diagnostic criteria, renewed safety concerns regarding intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents, and the value of spinal cord MRI for diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring purposes. These developments suggest a changing role of MRI for the management of patients with multiple sclerosis. This 2021 revision of the previous guidelines on MRI use for patients with multiple sclerosis merges recommendations from the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis study group, Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centres, and North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative, and translates research findings into clinical practice to improve the use of MRI for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of individuals with multiple sclerosis. We recommend changes in MRI acquisition protocols, such as emphasising the value of three dimensional-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery as the core brain pulse sequence to improve diagnostic accuracy and ability to identify new lesions to monitor treatment effectiveness, and we provide recommendations for the judicious use of gadolinium-based contrast agents for specific clinical purposes. Additionally, we extend the recommendations to the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis in childhood, during pregnancy, and in the post-partum period. Finally, we discuss promising MRI approaches that might deserve introduction into clinical practice in the near future.

Lesion load assessment among multiple sclerosis patient using DIR, FLAIR, and T2WI sequences

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the diagnostic imaging modalities employing in lesion detection in neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Advances in MRI techniques such as double inversion recovery (DIR) made it more sensitive to distinguish lesions in the brain. To investigate the lesion load on different anatomical regions of the brain with MS using DIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) sequences. A total of 97 MS patients were included in our retrospective study, confirmed by neurologist. The patients were randomly selected from the major hospital in Saudi Arabia. All images were obtained using 3T Scanner (Siemens Skyra). The images from the DIR, FLAIR, and T2WI sequence were compared on axial planes with identical anatomic position and the number of lesions was assigned to their anatomical region.

Results

Comparing the lesion load measurement at various brain anatomical regions showed a significant difference among those three methods (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

DIR is a valuable MRI sequence for better delineation, greater contrast measurements and the increasing total number of MS lesions in MRI, compared with FLAIR, and T2WI and DIR revealed more intracortical lesions as well; therefore, in MS patients, it is recommended to add DIR sequence in daily routine imaging sequences.

Sensitive Detection of Infratentorial and Upper Cervical Cord Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis with Combined 3D FLAIR and T2-Weighted (FLAIR3) Imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Infratentorial and spinal cord lesions are important for diagnosing and monitoring multiple sclerosis, but they are difficult to detect on conventional MR imaging. We sought to improve the detection of infratentorial and upper cervical cord lesions using composite FLAIR3 images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3D T2-weighted FLAIR and 3D T2-weighted images were acquired in 30 patients with MS and combined using the FLAIR3 formula. FLAIR3 was assessed against 3D T2-FLAIR by comparing the number of infratentorial and upper cervical cord lesions per subject using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Intrarater and interrater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The number of patients with and without ≥1 visible infratentorial/spinal cord lesion on 3D T2-FLAIR versus FLAIR3 was calculated to assess the potential impact on the revised MS diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

Compared with 3D T2-FLAIR, FLAIR3 detected significantly more infratentorial (mean, 4.6 ± 3.6 versus 2.0 ± 1.8, P < .001) and cervical cord (mean, 1.58 ± 0.94 versus 0.46 ± 0.45, P < .001) lesions per subject. FLAIR3 demonstrated significantly improved interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.87] versus 0.60 [95% CI, 0.40-0.76] with 3D T2-FLAIR, P = .019) and a tendency toward a higher intrarater reliability (0.86 [95% CI, 0.73-0.93] versus 0.79 [95% CI, 0.61-0.89], P = .23). In our cohort, 20%-30% (47%-67%) of the subjects with MS had  ≥ 1 infratentorial (cervical cord) lesion visible only on FLAIR3.

CONCLUSIONS

FLAIR3 provides higher sensitivity than T2-FLAIR for the detection of MS lesions in infratentorial brain parenchyma and the upper cervical cord.

Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: practical guidelines

MRI has improved the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis, but inappropriate image interpretation and application of MRI diagnostic criteria contribute to misdiagnosis. Some diseases, now recognized as conditions distinct from multiple sclerosis, may satisfy the MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis (e.g. neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, Susac syndrome), thus making the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis more challenging, especially if biomarker testing (such as serum anti-AQP4 antibodies) is not informative. Improvements in MRI technology contribute and promise to better define the typical features of multiple sclerosis lesions (e.g. juxtacortical and periventricular location, cortical involvement). Greater understanding of some key aspects of multiple sclerosis pathobiology has allowed the identification of characteristics more specific to multiple sclerosis (e.g. central vein sign, subpial demyelination and lesional rims), which are not included in the current multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria. In this review, we provide the clinicians and researchers with a practical guide to enhance the proper recognition of multiple sclerosis lesions, including a thorough definition and illustration of typical MRI features, as well as a discussion of red flags suggestive of alternative diagnoses. We also discuss the possible place of emerging qualitative features of lesions which may become important in the near future.

Three-dimensional MRI sequences in MS diagnosis and research

The most recent guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) recommend three-dimensional (3D) MRI sequences over their two-dimensional (2D) counterparts. This development has been made possible by advances in MRI scanner hardware and software. In this article, we review the 3D versions of conventional sequences, including T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), as well as more advanced scans, including double inversion recovery (DIR), FLAIR2, FLAIR*, phase-sensitive inversion recovery, and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI).