Chronic intracranial artery stenosis: Comparison of whole-brain arterial spin labeling with CT perfusion

Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular treatment using different perfusion modalities: a real-world multicenter study

Background

Advanced perfusion modalities are increasingly popular for various diseases. However, few studies have focused on contrasting perfusion patterns.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the time efficiency and clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) before one-stop arterial spin labeling (ASL) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) protocols.

Methods

This study retrospectively included 326 patients with AIS who had accepted EVT within 24 h of onset from four comprehensive stroke centers between October 2017 and September 2022. After 1:1 matching of the propensity scores, 202 patients were separated into two groups: the ASL group (n = 101) and the CTP group (n = 101).

Results

Functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2; p = 0.574), onset-to-puncture time (p = 0.231), door-to-puncture time (p = 0.136), and door-to-perfusion time (p = 0.646) were not significantly different between the two groups. The proportion of EVT complications (31.7% in the ASL group vs. 14.9% in the CTP group, p = 0.005) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) at 24 h (23.8% in the ASL group vs. 9.9% in the CTP group, p = 0.008) in the CTP group were lower than the ASL group. The ischemic core volume was a common predictor of favorable outcomes in both ASL (p < 0.001) and CTP (p < 0.001) groups.

Conclusion

There were no significant differences in time efficiency and efficacy outcomes between the two groups of patients receiving one-stop ASL and CTP. The proportion of sICH at 24 h and EVT complications of patients in the CTP group was lower than the ASL group. The ischemic core volume was an independent predictor for favorable outcomes.

Perioperative cerebral blood flow measured by arterial spin labeling with different postlabeling delay in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a comparison study with CT perfusion

Background

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a non-invasive technique for measuring cerebral perfusion. Its accuracy is affected by the arterial transit time. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the accuracy of ASL in measuring the cerebral perfusion of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and (2) determine a better postlabeling delay (PLD) for pre- and postoperative perfusion imaging between 1.5 and 2.0 s.

Methods

A total of 24 patients scheduled for CEA due to severe carotid stenosis were included in this study. All patients underwent ASL with two PLDs (1.5 and 2.0 s) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) before and after surgery. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) values were measured on the registered CBF images of ASL and CTP. The correlation in measuring perioperative relative CBF (rCBF) and difference ratio of CBF (DRCBF) between ASL with PLD of 1.5 s (ASL1.5) or 2.0 s (ASL2.0) and CTP were also determined.

Results

There were no significant statistical differences in preoperative rCBF measurements between ASL1.5 and CTP (p = 0.17) and between ASL2.0 and CTP (p = 0.42). Similarly, no significant differences were found in rCBF between ASL1.5 and CTP (p = 0.59) and between ASL2.0 and CTP (p = 0.93) after CEA. The DRCBF measured by CTP was found to be marginally lower than that measured by ASL2.0_1.5 (p = 0.06) and significantly lower than that measured by ASL1.5_1.5 (p = 0.01), ASL2.0_2.0 (p = 0.03), and ASL1.5_2.0 (p = 0.007). There was a strong correlation in measuring perioperative rCBF and DRCBF between ASL and CTP (r = 0.67-0.85, p < 0.001). Using CTP as the reference standard, smaller bias can be achieved in measuring rCBF by ASL2.0 (-0.02) than ASL1.5 (-0.07) before CEA. In addition, the same bias (0.03) was obtained by ASL2.0 and ASL1.5 after CEA. The bias of ASL2.0_2.0 (0.31) and ASL2.0_1.5 (0.32) on DRCBF measurement was similar, and both were smaller than that of ASL1.5_1.5 (0.60) and ASL1.5_2.0 (0.60).

Conclusion

Strong correlation can be found in assessing perioperative cerebral perfusion between ASL and CTP. During perioperative ASL imaging, the PLD of 2.0 s is better than 1.5 s for preoperative scan, and both 1.5 and 2.0 s are suitable for postoperative scan.

Intraluminal arterial transit artifact as a predictor of intracranial large artery stenosis on 3D time of flight MR angiography: Expanding the application of arterial spin labeling MRI in ischemic stroke

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of "intraluminal arterial transit artifact" in the prediction of intracranial large artery stenosis and to determine if this finding is predictive of ischemic stroke in the territory of the involved artery.

Material and Methods

The presence of arterial transit artifact (ATA) within the lumen of an intracranial large vessel was noted on three-dimensional time of flight (3D-TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (ATA group). The patients with stenosis but with no ATA (no-ATA group), patients with total occlusion (total occlusion group), and patients with no stenosis/occlusion (normal group) were included in the analysis.

Results

There were four groups of patients included in the final analysis, the ATA group (n = 22), the no-ATA group (n = 23), the normal group (n = 25), and the total occlusion group (n = 9). Among patients with any demonstrable stenosis (n = 45), the presence of ATA within the stenotic segment was predictive of stenosis of ≥56% (Sensitivity of 100% [85.2-100, 95% CI], specificity of 100% [86.4-100, 95% CI]), with area under curve of 1.0 (0.92-.0, 95% CI). The presence of intra-arterial ATA signal was significantly associated with ischemic stroke as compared with the no-ATA group (86.36% vs. 26.08%, P = 0.0003). Intraluminal ATA was found to be an independent predictor of infarction in the territory of the involved artery.

Conclusion

Intraluminal ATA is predictive of stenosis of at least 56% in the involved artery on 3D-TOF MRA. Intraluminal ATA sign may be an independent predictor of infarction in the territory of the involved artery.

Association of periprocedural perfusion non-improvement with recurrent stroke after endovascular treatment for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Background

Predictors of recurrent stroke after endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) remain uncertain.

Objectives

Among baseline characteristics, lesion features, and cerebral perfusion changes, we try to explore which factors are associated with the risk of recurrent stroke in symptomatic ICAS after endovascular treatment.

Design

Consecutive patients with symptomatic ICAS of 70-99% receiving endovascular treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent whole-brain computer tomography perfusion (CTP) within 3 days before and 3 days after the endovascular treatment. Baseline characteristics, lesion features, and cerebral perfusion changes were collected.

Methods

Cerebral perfusion changes were evaluated with RAPID software and calculated as preprocedural cerebral blood flow (CBF) < 30%, time to maximum of the residue function (Tmax) > 6 s, and Tmax > 4 s volumes minus postprocedural. Cerebral perfusion changes were divided into periprocedural perfusion improvement (>0 ml) and non-improvement (⩽ 0 ml). Recurrent stroke within 180 days was collected. The Cox proportional hazards analysis analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with recurrent stroke.

Results

From March 2021 to December 2021, 107 patients with symptomatic ICAS were enrolled. Of the 107 enrolled patients, 30 (28.0%) patients underwent balloon angioplasty alone and 77 patients (72.0%) underwent stenting. The perioperative complications occurred in three patients. Among CBF < 30%, Tmax > 6 s, and Tmax > 4 s volumes, Tmax > 4 s volume was available to evaluate cerebral perfusion changes. Periprocedural perfusion improvement was found in 77 patients (72.0%) and non-improvement in 30 patients (28.0%). Nine patients (8.4%) suffered from recurrent stroke in 180-day follow-up. In Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age and sex, perfusion non-improvement was associated with recurrent stroke [hazards ratio (HR): 4.472; 95% CI: 1.069-18.718; p = 0.040].

Conclusion

In patients with symptomatic ICAS treated with endovascular treatment, recurrent stroke may be related to periprocedural cerebral perfusion non-improvement.

Registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100052925.

Can Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging be Used to Differentiate Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma From Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma?

BACKGROUND

Differentiating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) from nasopharyngeal lymphoma (NPL) is useful for deciding the appropriate treatment. However, the diagnostic accuracy of current imaging methods is low.

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging in the qualitative and quantitative differentiation between NPC and NPL to improve the diagnosis of malignancies in the nasopharynx.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Ninety seven patients: NPC (65 cases) and NPL (32 cases), histologically confirmed.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3T/3D fast spin echo pseudo-continuous ASL imaging with spiral readout scheme, 3D inverse recovery_- fast spoiled gradient recalled echo brain volume (BRAVO) imaging.

ASSESSMENT

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) images from ASL perfusion imaging were assessed by three radiologists. Each tumor was visually scored based on CBF images. Intratumoral CBF and intramuscular CBF values were obtained from intratumoral and lateral pterygoid muscle areas, respectively. Through dividing intratumoral CBF by intramuscular CBF, normalized CBF (nCBF) was further calculated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Fleiss's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess interobserver agreement among the three readers. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare visual scoring, and an unpaired t-test was performed to compare CBF value between the NPC and NPL groups. The area under the curve (AUC) value was used to quantify the diagnostic ability of each parameter.

RESULTS

Good interobserver agreements were validated by high Fleiss's kappa and ICC values (all >0.80). NPCs showed significantly higher visual scores than NPLs (P < 0.05). Both intratumoral CBF and nCBF in NPC were significantly higher than those in NPL (both P < 0.05). Intratumoral CBF showed the highest AUC of 0.861 (P < 0.05) in differentiating NPC (n = 65) from NPL (n = 32), while the AUCs of nCBF and visual scoring were 0.847 and 0.753, respectively.

DATA CONCLUSION

For the diagnosis of distinguishing NPC from NPL, ASL perfusion imaging demonstrated high diagnostic efficiency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Ocular Blood Flow Measurements in Diabetic Retinopathy Using 3D Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin Labeling

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing between the two broad categories of diabetic retinopathy (DR), nonproliferative DR (NPDR) and proliferative DR (PDR), is significant, as the therapeutic strategies for each are completely different.

PURPOSE

To characterize the ocular blood flow (OBF) of DR patients and evaluate the potential utility of OBF values in categorizing DR.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 41 DR patients (82 eyes) were recruited in our study. Group 1 comprised 48 eyes with NPDR, and Group 2 comprised 34 eyes with PDR.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3D pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (3D-pcASL) with two postlabeling delays (PLDs) was acquired at 3.0T MR.

ASSESSMENT

OBF values were independently obtained by two doctors from the OBF map.

STATISTICAL TESTS

OBF values and clinical characteristics were compared between the groups using two-sample t-tests and chi-square tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The consistency of OBF values reported by the two doctors was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

OBF values at PLDs of 1.5 seconds and 2.5 seconds were significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P < 0.05 for both PLDs). The OBF values of Group 2 showed a greater increase than those of Group 1 from PLD 1.5 to 2.5 seconds. The AUC of OBF at the 1.5 seconds PLD was 0.90, with a cutoff of 7.73 mL/min/100 g, and the AUC of the OBF at the 2.5 seconds PLD was 0.75, with a cutoff of 8.44 mL/min/100 g. The ICC between the two observers was 0.844 for the OBF at 1.5 seconds PLD and 0.872 for the OBF at 2.5 seconds PLD.

DATA CONCLUSION

PDR can be differentiated from NPDR by the value of OBF as measured by 3D-pcASL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.