Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of renal lesions

Kidney tumor diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging derived ADC histogram parameters combined with patient characteristics and tumor volume to discriminate oncocytoma from renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the ability to discriminate oncocytoma from RCC based on a model using whole tumor ADC histogram parameters with additional use of tumor volume and patient characteristics.

METHOD

In this prospective study, 39 patients (mean age 65 years, range 28-79; 9/39 (23%) female) with 39 renal tumors (32/39 (82%) RCC and 7/39 (18%) oncocytoma) underwent multiparametric MRI between November 2014 and June 2018. Two regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn to cover both the entire tumor volume and a part of healthy renal cortex. ROI ADC maps were calculated using a mono-exponential model and ADC histogram distribution parameters were calculated. A logistic regression model was created using ADC histogram parameters, radiographic and patient characteristics that were significantly different between oncocytoma and RCC. A ROC curve of the model was constructed and the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Furthermore, differences in intra-patient ADC histogram parameters between renal tumor and healthy cortex were calculated. A separate ROC curve was constructed to differentiate oncocytoma from RCC using statistically significant intra-patient parameter differences.

RESULTS

ADC standard deviation (p = 0.008), entropy (p = 0.010), tumor volume (p = 0.012), and patient sex (p = 0.018) were significantly different between RCC and oncocytoma. The regression model of these parameters combined had an ROC-AUC of 0.91 with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 84%. Intra-patient difference in ADC 25th percentile (p < 0.01) and entropy (p = 0.030) combined had a ROC-AUC of 0.86 with a sensitivity and specificity of 86%, and 81%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A model combining ADC standard deviation and entropy with tumor volume and patient sex has the highest diagnostic value for discrimination of oncocytoma. Although less accurate, intra-patient difference in ADC 25th percentile and entropy between renal tumor and healthy cortex can also be used. Although the results of this preliminary study do not yet justify clinical use of the model, it does stimulate further research using whole tumor ADC histogram parameters.

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the malignant potential in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas.

Methods

A systematic search of articles investigating the diagnostic performance of DWI for prediction of malignant potential in IPMNs was conducted from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1997 to 10 February 2020. QUADAS-2 tool was used to evaluate the study quality. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was then plotted, and meta-regression was also performed to explore the heterogeneity.

Results

Five articles with 307 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DWI were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.82) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.99), in evaluating the malignant potential of IPMNs. The PLR was 13.5 (95% CI: 3.1, 58.7), the NLR was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.37), and DOR was 50.0 (95% CI: 11.0, 224.0). The area under the curve (AUC) of SROC curve was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.87). The meta-regression showed that the slice thickness of DWI (p = 0.02) and DWI parameter (p= 0.01) were significant factors affecting the heterogeneity.

Conclusions

DWI is an effective modality for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant IPMNs. The slice thickness of DWI and DWI parameter were the main factors influencing diagnostic specificity.

Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of renal tumor subtypes and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of ADC for differentiation of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other renal tumor types.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published until May 1, 2019, that reported ADC values of renal tumors. Methodological quality was evaluated. For the meta-analysis on diagnostic test accuracy of ADC for differentiation of ccRCC from other renal lesions, we applied a bivariate random-effects model and compared two subgroups of ADC measurement with vs. without cystic and necrotic areas.

RESULTS

We included 48 studies (2588 lesions) in the systematic review and 13 studies (1126 lesions) in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in ADC of renal parenchyma using b values of 0-800 vs. 0-1000 (p = 0.08). ADC measured on selected portions (sADC) excluding cystic and necrotic areas differed significantly from whole-lesion ADC (wADC) (p = 0.002). Compared to ccRCC, minimal-fat angiomyolipoma, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC showed significantly lower sADC while oncocytoma exhibited higher sADC. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate ccRCC from other tumors were 80% (95% CI, 0.76-0.88) and 78% (95% CI, 0.64-0.89), respectively, for sADC and 77% (95% CI, 0.59-0.90) and 77% (95% CI, 0.69-0.86) for wADC. sADC offered a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than wADC (0.852 vs. 0.785, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values of kidney tumors that exclude cystic or necrotic areas more accurately differentiate ccRCC from other renal tumor types than whole-lesion ADC values.

KEY POINTS

• Selective ADC of renal tumors, excluding cystic and necrotic areas, provides better discriminatory ability than whole-lesion ADC to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.852 vs. 0.785, respectively (p = 0.02). • Selective ADC of renal masses provides moderate sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 78%, respectively, for differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, oncocytoma, and minimal-fat angiomyolipoma. • Selective ADC excluding cystic and necrotic areas are preferable to whole-lesion ADC as an additional tool to multiphasic MRI to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions whether the highest b value is 800 or 1000.

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors.

METHODS

Multiple b value DWIs and DKIs were performed in 180 patients with renal tumors, which were divided into clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), non-ccRCC, and benign renal tumor group. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of various diffusion parameters for predicting malignant renal tumors was compared.

RESULTS

The ADC, D, and MD values of ccRCCs were higher, while D*, f, and MK values were lower than those of benign renal tumors (all p < 0.025). The D* and f values of non-ccRCCs were lower than those of benign renal tumors (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). The difference of ADC, D, MD, and MK values between non-ccRCCs and benign renal tumors was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The ADC, D, MD, and f values of ccRCCs were higher, while MK values were lower than those of non-ccRCCs (all p < 0.001). The AUC values of ADC, D, D*, f, MK, and MD were 0.849, 0.891, 0.708, 0.656, 0.862, and 0.838 for differentiating ccRCCs from benign renal tumors, respectively. The AUC values of D* and f were 0.772 and 0.866 for discrimination between non-ccRCCs and benign renal tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

IVIM parameters are the best, while DWI and DKI parameters have similar performance in differentiating malignant and benign renal tumors.

KEY POINTS

• The D value is the best parameter for differentiating ccRCC from benign renal tumors. • The f value is the best parameter for differentiating non-ccRCC from benign renal tumors. • Conventional DWI and DKI have similar performance in differentiating malignant and benign renal tumors.