Association between mesenteric panniculitis and non-neoplastic disorders

Mesenteric panniculitis: A comprehensive description of a rare disease

Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is a rare disease characterized by chronic inflammation and fibrosis of the mesenteric adipose tissue. It is a benign disease that is influenced by many factors, mainly abdominal trauma and surgery. At present, the pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of MP are still not clear. Most patients with MP are asymptomatic, few will present gastrointestinal symptoms, especially abdominal pain. The diagnosis of MP mainly relies on imaging, such as CT. Medicine treatment is unnecessary for asymptomatic patients, and the curative effect of glucocorticoids is effective in patients with symptom. In the absence of severe intestinal obstruction, surgical treatment should not be considered. The purpose of this paper is to systematically introduce and summarize the epidemiology, etiology, histopathology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of MP, so as to improve the understanding of this disease.

Association between mesenteric panniculitis and urolithiasis

BACKGROUND

Mesenteric panniculitis is a rare condition and refers to benign and nonspecific inflammation of mesenteric fat.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis of a greater prevalence of mesenteric panniculitis in patients with urolithiasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, abdominopelvic CT scans of 500 patients were reviewed for the presence of urolithiasis and mesenteric panniculitis. The inclusion criteria were patients who were referred with acute abdominal pain and were suspected of having urolithiasis or other urinary conditions and who had undergone abdominopelvic CT scan. Subcutaneous fat thickness was measured, and pain intensity was recorded by patient evaluation.

RESULTS

Mesenteric panniculitis was found in 10 patients, all of whom (100%) had urinary stones (ureter or kidney or both), and none of them had previous surgeries or known malignancies. The prevalence of panniculitis was significantly greater in the group with urolithiasis. In the urolithiasis group, subcutaneous fat thickness was greater in patients with panniculitis, although the difference was not statistically significant. In the subgroup analysis, pain intensity was not significantly greater in patients with panniculitis.

CONCLUSION

Mesenteric panniculitis is more prevalent among patients with urolithiasis, but it seems that it does not change the intensity of the pain.

Mesenteric panniculitis: a clinical conundrum

Mesenteric panniculitis is encountered frequently during abdominopelvic CT scanning, often as an incidental finding. The observation is problematic because an association with malignancy has been raised in the literature. This review will describe the CT appearances and examine the available evidence regarding the significance of this finding.Ultimately, the literature remains unclear regarding how these patients should be managed, if at all.

Mesenteric panniculitis is associated with cardiovascular risk-factors: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the prevalence of cardiovascular risk-factors in patients with mesenteric panniculitis.

AIMS

To determine whether cardiovascular risk-factors and mesenteric panniculitis are associated.

METHODS

Retrospective, matched case-control study of patients referred to Meir Medical Center, Israel, 2014-2019, who underwent computerized tomography scan, were diagnosed mesenteric panniculitis by radiologic criteria. They were compared to two, matched case-control groups: hospitalized patients without mesenteric panniculitis and the general population based on Israeli Ministry of Health surveys. Patients with active malignancy, IBD or significant intra-abdominal morbidity were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 376 patients with mesenteric panniculitis diagnosed by computerized tomography, 187 were included. Compared to hospital patients, they had higher incidence of dyslipidemia (77.5%/56.7%), hypertension (52.4%/40.6%), obesity (body mass index>30) (60.4%/30.5%) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (42.2%/16.6%). Similar differences were observed compared to the general population. In multivariable logistic regression, dyslipidemia, obesity, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease were independent predictors for mesenteric panniculitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mesenteric panniculitis have more cardiovascular risk-factors compared to a case-control group and to the general population. This suggests that mesenteric panniculitis is clinically significant and may be part of the metabolic morbidity burden. This association should be further explored.