Laboratory Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection, Part I

Routine Diagnostic Tests for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Demonstrate a High False-Negative Rate and Are Influenced by the Infecting Organism

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as the first-line testing for evaluation of suspected periprosthetic joint infection, in addition to synovial white blood-cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear percentage. However, the sensitivity and other diagnostic measures of these tests using a standardized definition of periprosthetic joint infection and the influence of organisms on these inflammatory markers remain inadequately investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective review of an institutional database of 549 periprosthetic joint infection cases and 653 aseptic total joint arthroplasty revisions was performed. Periprosthetic joint infection was defined using major criteria from the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. The mean inflammatory marker levels were compared among organisms with Student t tests and the proportions of elevated laboratory levels were compared among organisms with chi-square analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to calculate new cutoffs, sensitivities, and specificities for each organism and overall for serum CRP and ESR and synovial WBC and polymorphonuclear percentage.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of these markers for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection was 0.85 for ESR, 0.88 for CRP, 0.83 for WBC count, and 0.78 for polymorphonuclear percentage. For ESR, antibiotic-resistant organisms had higher mean values (84.3 mm/hr) than culture-negative cases (57.4 mm/hr), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (68.3 mm/hr), and Streptococcus species (66.1 mm/hr); Staphylococcus aureus (81.0 mm/hr) was higher than culture-negative cases (57.4 mm/hr). For CRP, culture-negative cases had lower mean values (41.0 mg/L) than gram-negative organisms (87.4 mg/L), antibiotic-resistant organisms (86.0 mg/L), S. aureus (112.2 mg/L), and Streptococcus species (114.6 mg/L); S. aureus (112.2 mg/L) was higher than coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (66.0 mg/L). For WBC count, culture-negative cases had lower mean values (27,984.5 cells/mL) than S. aureus (116,250.0 cells/mL) and Streptococcus species (77,933.7 cells/mL). For polymorphonuclear percentage, there were no significant differences in mean values among all organisms.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that serological markers, namely ESR and CRP, have a higher false-negative rate than previously reported. Synovial markers similarly exhibit high false-negative rates. Furthermore, the sensitivity of these tests appears to be related to organism type. Surgeons should be aware of the high rate of false-negatives associated with low-virulence organisms and culture-negative cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Microbiological diagnosis of device-related biofilm infections

Medical device-related infections cause undue patient distress, increased morbidity and mortality and pose a huge financial burden on healthcare services. The pathogens are frequently distributed heterogeneously in biofilms, which can persist without being effectively cleared by host immune defenses and antibiotic therapy. At present, there is no 'gold standard' available to reveal the presence of device-related biofilm infections. However, adequate sample collection and logistics, standardised diagnostic methods, and interpretation of results by experienced personnel are important steps in efficient diagnosis and treatment of these infections. The focus of this mini review is on prosthethic joint and cardiovascular implantable device infections, which exemplify permanent devices that are placed in a sterile body site. These device-related infections represent some of the most challenging in terms of both diagnosis and treatment.

Prospective Comparison of Blood Culture Bottles and Conventional Swabs for Microbial Identification of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Early, accurate detection of infection is vital to successful treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, no "gold standard" diagnostic testing exists. The goal of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of a blood culture bottle system (BCBS) to commonly used culture swabs in confirming PJI in patients with high clinical suspicion.

METHODS

Patients were selected for enrollment based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines for PJI. erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were obtained before aspiration. Aspirated fluid was divided between BCBS, swab, and synovial fluid analysis. Forty-nine samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

BCBS yielded 41 positive cultures vs 19 with swab (P < .0001), particularly with respect to Staphylococcus epidermidis. There were no false positive results in the BCBS group, using strict Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines.

CONCLUSION

BCBS increased identification of pathogens in lower extremity PJI, providing clinicians with a low-cost, broadly-applicable test.

Prosthetic joint infections-a clinico-microbiological perspective: Review article

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), although not very common, currently pose a very significant threat since they are associated with severe complications, high morbidity rates and substantial costs. PJIs are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. The diagnosis of implant-associated infections is very challenging since no single routinely used laboratory or clinical test has been shown to demonstrate adequate results with respect to sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. In most cases, a sum of clinical signs and symptoms, histopathology, blood tests, radiography, bone scans and microbiological testing is considered to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Treatment of PJIs is also very difficult since most of the infections are caused by biofilm-producing microorganisms which are significantly more resistant to the hosts natural defense mechanisms and antibiotic treatment. For successful management, a combination of both antibiotic and surgical treatment is most often required, and early diagnosis is of the utmost importance. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach is potentially the best option in dealing with PJI, and should include the involvement of microbiologists, orthopedic specialists, clinicians, pathologists and radiologists in order to improve decision-making processes and ensure overall success. The following review aims at briefly outlining the microbiology, diagnostic and treatment options, and preventive measures associated with such infections.

'All in a box' a concept for optimizing microbiological diagnostic sampling in prosthetic joint infections

Background

Accurate microbial diagnosis is crucial for effective management of prosthetic joint infections. Culturing of multiple intraoperative tissue samples has increased diagnostic accuracy, but new preparatory techniques and molecular methods hold promise of further improvement. The increased complexity of sampling is, however, a tough challenge for surgeons and assistants in the operation theatre, and therefore we devised and tested a new concept of pre-packed boxes with a complete assortment of swabs, vials and additional tools needed in the operating theatre for non-standard samples during a clinical study of prosthetic joint infections.

Findings

The protocol for the clinical study required triplicate samples of joint fluid, periprosthetic tissue, bone tissue, and swabs from the surface of the prosthesis. Separate boxes were prepared for percutaneous joint puncture and surgical revision; the latter included containers for prosthetic components or the entire prosthesis. During a 2-year project period 164 boxes were used by the surgeons, 98 of which contained a complete set of samples. In all, 1508 (89%) of 1685 scheduled samples were received.

Conclusion

With this concept a high level of completeness of sample sets was achieved and thus secured a valid basis for evaluation of new diagnostics. Although enthusiasm for the project may have been a contributing factor, the extended project period suggests that the ‘All in a box’ concept is equally applicable in routine clinical settings with standardized but complex diagnostic sampling.

A 7-year retrospective review from 2005 to 2011 of Propionibacterium acnes shoulder infections in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

This study evaluated the clinical factors associated with Propionibacterium acnes shoulder infection and the standard culture procedures for isolating P. acnes from shoulder specimens by a 7-year retrospective analysis. P. acnes was incriminated as the second most common pathogen in 17 of 80 patients with positive shoulder cultures. All of the 17 patients had prior shoulder implant. The cumulative rates for isolating P. acnes were 1.9%, 1.9%, 41.9%, 96.4%, and 100% at day 1 to day 5 of incubation, respectively. The standard practice of anaerobic culture was able to detect P. acnes from shoulder specimens in patients with a clinical suspicion of infection. The sensitivity and specificity of prolonged incubation remain to be determined.

Bacterial adherence to separated modular components in joint prosthesis: a clinical study

Bacterial adherence on total joint replacement implants may lead to biofilm formation and implant-related osteoarticular infection. It is unclear if different biomaterials in the prosthetic components are more prone to facilitate this bacterial adherence, although ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) component exchange in modular systems has been clinically utilized in the early management of these infections. To clarify if the amount of clinically adhered microorganisms was related to the material or the component, we investigated retrieved implants from infected joint replacements. Thirty-two patients were revised after confirmed implant-related infection through positive cultures. Eighty-seven total joint components (hip and knee) were obtained and separately sonicated following a previously published protocol. Cultures were quantified, and detected colony forming units (CFU) were adjusted according to the component surface and compared based on the component material and location. Variable adherence of bacteria to chrome cobalt alloys, UHMWPE, hydroxyapatite coated components, and titanium alloys. The commonest isolated organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (23 of 87 components) and Staphylococcus aureus (10 of 87). Twelve components did not show any microorganism adhered despite location in an infected joint, with positive cultures in other components. A mixed linear model adjusted for random effects (the random effect being the infected patient) obtained convergence for the CFU/mm(2) variable, but could not confirm a significantly higher adherence to a particular component or to a particular biomaterial. Therefore, the bacterial adherence primarily depends on the infective microorganism and the response of each individual patient, rather than materials or components.

Optimizing culture methods for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a summary of modifications and improvements reported since 1995

Improving diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) has become an increasing challenge due to a steadily rising number of patients with prosthetic implants. Based on a systematic literature search we have ascertained the evidence base for improvement of culture diagnosis. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE using the medical subject heading (MeSH) 'prosthesis-related infections' 1995 through 2010 without further restrictions. An analogous search was conducted for ISI Web of Knowledge. A total of 1409 reports were screened for original results, obtained by methods described in sufficient detail to make replication possible. We gave priority to methods for sample preparation, culture media, culture methods and incubation time. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were calculated where possible. We found evidence to support superiority of cultures obtained from the diluent after sonication of prosthetic implants in comparison with culturing tissue biopsies. Sonication parameters and accessory steps have been studied extensively, and thresholds for significant growth have been defined. Conversely, methods for processing of soft tissue biopsies have been studied to a limited extent. Culture of synovial fluid in blood culture vials has been shown to be more sensitive (90-92 %) than intraoperative swab cultures (68-76 %) and tissue cultures (77-82 %). Formal evaluation of agar media for culturing PJI specimens seemed to be lacking. The polymicrobial nature of PJIs supports the routine use of an assortment of media suitable for recovery of fastidious, slow-growing, anaerobic and sublethally damaged bacteria. A number of studies supported an incubation period for up to 14 days. Although we identified evidence-based improvements of culture methods, there is a need for more studies especially with regard to tissue biopsies. Culturing remains an important means to identify and characterize pathogenic micro-organisms and supplements the increasing number of culture-independent assays.