Laboratory Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection, Part II

PET/CT to detect adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: an exploratory prospective study

Metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings in total hip arthroplasties and hip resurfacing arthroplasties have recently shown a new type of complication: adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). ARMD is characterized by local severe inflammation and tissue necrosis leading to implant failures. The gluteal muscle region is important for the patient outcome after revision surgery. This prospective positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study was undertaken to evaluate the characteristics of 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸ F]fluoro-d-glucose ([¹⁸ F]FDG) and [⁶⁸ Ga]Gallium citrate ([⁶⁸ Ga]Citrate) PET/CT in ARMD patients. [¹⁸ F]FDG and [⁶⁸ Ga]Citrate PET/CT were performed in 18 hip arthroplasty patients: 12 ARMD patients (with 16 MoM hips) and six arthroplasty controls without ARMD. Tracer uptake was evaluated visually, and maximum standardized uptake (SUV_max ) was measured in the gluteal muscle region. ARMD severity was graded by metal artefact reduction sequence-magnetic resonance imaging (MARS-MRI). Periprosthetic [¹⁸ F]FDG uptake was observed in 15 of 16 hips, [⁶⁸ Ga]Citrate uptake in three of 16 hips, respectively. The distribution of tracer uptake resembled infection in three hips. In the gluteal muscle region, the SUV_max of [¹⁸ F]FDG was significantly greater in hips with moderate and severe ARMD compared with the controls (P = 0·009 for [¹⁸ F]FDG and P = 0·217 for [⁶⁸ Ga]Citrate). In patients who needed revision surgery, an intraoperative finding of gluteal muscle necrosis was associated with increased local SUV_max as detected by preoperative [¹⁸ F]FDG (P = 0·039), but not by [⁶⁸ Ga]Citrate (P = 0·301). In conclusion, the inflammatory reaction to metal debris in hip arthroplasty patients is best visualized with [¹⁸ F]FDG.

Microbiological diagnosis of device-related biofilm infections

Medical device-related infections cause undue patient distress, increased morbidity and mortality and pose a huge financial burden on healthcare services. The pathogens are frequently distributed heterogeneously in biofilms, which can persist without being effectively cleared by host immune defenses and antibiotic therapy. At present, there is no 'gold standard' available to reveal the presence of device-related biofilm infections. However, adequate sample collection and logistics, standardised diagnostic methods, and interpretation of results by experienced personnel are important steps in efficient diagnosis and treatment of these infections. The focus of this mini review is on prosthethic joint and cardiovascular implantable device infections, which exemplify permanent devices that are placed in a sterile body site. These device-related infections represent some of the most challenging in terms of both diagnosis and treatment.

Prosthetic joint infections-a clinico-microbiological perspective: Review article

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), although not very common, currently pose a very significant threat since they are associated with severe complications, high morbidity rates and substantial costs. PJIs are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. The diagnosis of implant-associated infections is very challenging since no single routinely used laboratory or clinical test has been shown to demonstrate adequate results with respect to sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. In most cases, a sum of clinical signs and symptoms, histopathology, blood tests, radiography, bone scans and microbiological testing is considered to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Treatment of PJIs is also very difficult since most of the infections are caused by biofilm-producing microorganisms which are significantly more resistant to the hosts natural defense mechanisms and antibiotic treatment. For successful management, a combination of both antibiotic and surgical treatment is most often required, and early diagnosis is of the utmost importance. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach is potentially the best option in dealing with PJI, and should include the involvement of microbiologists, orthopedic specialists, clinicians, pathologists and radiologists in order to improve decision-making processes and ensure overall success. The following review aims at briefly outlining the microbiology, diagnostic and treatment options, and preventive measures associated with such infections.

'All in a box' a concept for optimizing microbiological diagnostic sampling in prosthetic joint infections

Background

Accurate microbial diagnosis is crucial for effective management of prosthetic joint infections. Culturing of multiple intraoperative tissue samples has increased diagnostic accuracy, but new preparatory techniques and molecular methods hold promise of further improvement. The increased complexity of sampling is, however, a tough challenge for surgeons and assistants in the operation theatre, and therefore we devised and tested a new concept of pre-packed boxes with a complete assortment of swabs, vials and additional tools needed in the operating theatre for non-standard samples during a clinical study of prosthetic joint infections.

Findings

The protocol for the clinical study required triplicate samples of joint fluid, periprosthetic tissue, bone tissue, and swabs from the surface of the prosthesis. Separate boxes were prepared for percutaneous joint puncture and surgical revision; the latter included containers for prosthetic components or the entire prosthesis. During a 2-year project period 164 boxes were used by the surgeons, 98 of which contained a complete set of samples. In all, 1508 (89%) of 1685 scheduled samples were received.

Conclusion

With this concept a high level of completeness of sample sets was achieved and thus secured a valid basis for evaluation of new diagnostics. Although enthusiasm for the project may have been a contributing factor, the extended project period suggests that the ‘All in a box’ concept is equally applicable in routine clinical settings with standardized but complex diagnostic sampling.

A 7-year retrospective review from 2005 to 2011 of Propionibacterium acnes shoulder infections in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

This study evaluated the clinical factors associated with Propionibacterium acnes shoulder infection and the standard culture procedures for isolating P. acnes from shoulder specimens by a 7-year retrospective analysis. P. acnes was incriminated as the second most common pathogen in 17 of 80 patients with positive shoulder cultures. All of the 17 patients had prior shoulder implant. The cumulative rates for isolating P. acnes were 1.9%, 1.9%, 41.9%, 96.4%, and 100% at day 1 to day 5 of incubation, respectively. The standard practice of anaerobic culture was able to detect P. acnes from shoulder specimens in patients with a clinical suspicion of infection. The sensitivity and specificity of prolonged incubation remain to be determined.

Bacterial diversity in suspected prosthetic joint infections: an exploratory study using 16S rRNA gene analysis

Formation of biofilm is a prominent feature of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and constitutes a challenge to current sampling procedures and culture practices. Molecular techniques have a potential for improving diagnosis of biofilm-adapted, slow-growing and non-culturable bacteria. In this exploratory study we investigated the bacterial diversity in specimens from 22 patients clinically suspected of having PJIs. Bacteriological cultures were performed according to standard practice. A total of 55 specimens from 25 procedures ('specimen sets') were submitted to broad range 16S rRNA gene PCR, cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. More than 40 bacterial taxa within six phyla were identified in 14 specimen sets originating from 11 patients. Direct observation of biofilm was made in selected specimens by fluorescence in situ hydridization. 16S rRNA gene analysis and bacteriological cultures were concordant for 15/25 specimen sets (60%; five positive, 10 negative); additional taxa were detected in four sets by gene analysis, and discrepant results were obtained for six sets, five of which were negative on culture. Polymicrobial communities were revealed in 9/14 sets by gene analysis and 1/10 sets by culture (P < 0.05). Although our study was not conclusive, these findings are consistent with a primary role of biofilm formation in PJIs.

Optimizing culture methods for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a summary of modifications and improvements reported since 1995

Improving diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) has become an increasing challenge due to a steadily rising number of patients with prosthetic implants. Based on a systematic literature search we have ascertained the evidence base for improvement of culture diagnosis. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE using the medical subject heading (MeSH) 'prosthesis-related infections' 1995 through 2010 without further restrictions. An analogous search was conducted for ISI Web of Knowledge. A total of 1409 reports were screened for original results, obtained by methods described in sufficient detail to make replication possible. We gave priority to methods for sample preparation, culture media, culture methods and incubation time. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were calculated where possible. We found evidence to support superiority of cultures obtained from the diluent after sonication of prosthetic implants in comparison with culturing tissue biopsies. Sonication parameters and accessory steps have been studied extensively, and thresholds for significant growth have been defined. Conversely, methods for processing of soft tissue biopsies have been studied to a limited extent. Culture of synovial fluid in blood culture vials has been shown to be more sensitive (90-92 %) than intraoperative swab cultures (68-76 %) and tissue cultures (77-82 %). Formal evaluation of agar media for culturing PJI specimens seemed to be lacking. The polymicrobial nature of PJIs supports the routine use of an assortment of media suitable for recovery of fastidious, slow-growing, anaerobic and sublethally damaged bacteria. A number of studies supported an incubation period for up to 14 days. Although we identified evidence-based improvements of culture methods, there is a need for more studies especially with regard to tissue biopsies. Culturing remains an important means to identify and characterize pathogenic micro-organisms and supplements the increasing number of culture-independent assays.