The refractory period of fast conducting corticospinal tract axons in man and its implications for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials

The role of intraoperative extensor digitorum brevis muscle MEPs in spinal surgery

PURPOSE

Intraoperative muscle motor evoked potentials (m-MEPs) are widely used in spinal surgery with the aim of identifying a damage to spinal cord at a reversible stage. Generally, lower limb m-MEPs are recorded from abductor hallucis [AH] and the tibialis anterior [TA]. The purpose of this work is to study an unselected population by recording the m-MEPs from TA, AH and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB), with the aim of identifying the most adjustable and stable muscles responses intraoperatively.

METHODS

Transcranially electrically induced m-MEPs were intraoperative recorded in a total of 107 surgical procedures. m-MEPs were recorded by a needle electrode placed in the muscle from TA, AH and EDB muscles in the lower extremities.

RESULTS

Overall monitorability (i.e., at least 1 Lower Limb m-MEP recordable) was 100/107 (93.5%). In the remaining 100 surgeries in 3 cases, the only muscle that could be recorded at baseline was one AH, and in other 2 the EDB. Persistence (i.e., the recordability of m-MEP from baseline to the end of surgery) was 88.7% for TA, 89.8% for AH and 93.8% for EDB.

CONCLUSION

In our series, EDB m-MEPs have demonstrated a recordability superior to TA and a stability similar to AH. The explanations may be different and range from changes in the excitability of the cortical motor neuron to the different sensitivity to ischemia of the spinal motor neuron. EDB can be used alternatively or can be added to TA and AH as a target muscle of the lower limb in spinal surgery.

Stimulation parameters for motor evoked potentials during intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to find the optimal stimulation parameters for muscle recorded transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (mTc-MEP) and D-wave monitoring during spinal cord monitoring.

METHODS

A PRISMA systematic search in Medline and EMBASE and a QUADAS-2 quality evaluation was performed to identify studies that compared stimulation parameters consisting of stimulation location, number of pulses, pulse duration, interstimulus interval, double train (DTS) or recurrent train stimulation (RTS) and intertrain interval (ITI) for performing mTc-MEP and D-wave monitoring. Only studies that used total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) were included.

RESULTS

Ten studies that compared stimulation parameters for performing mTc-MEP monitoring (stimulation location n = 4, number of pulses n = 2, pulse duration n = 1, interstimulus interval n = 4, DTS n = 1, RTS n = 2, ITI n = 2) were included. No studies compared stimulation parameters (stimulation location and pulse duration) for performing D-wave monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies examined the optimal stimulation parameters for monitoring mTc-MEPs and no studies were included for D-wave monitoring. There is a need for prospective research to investigate the optimal stimulation parameters for mTc-MEP with the use of TIVA and D-wave monitoring.

SIGNIFICANCE

For mTc-MEP monitoring, a table is provided in which the recommended stimulation parameters are stated.

Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the feasibility and optimal stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of muscle recorded transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials (mTc-MEP).

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients that underwent scoliosis surgery were included. First, the feasibility of supramaximal stimulation was assessed for two settings (setting 1: pulse duration 0.075ms, interstimulus interval (ISI) 1.5ms; setting 2: pulse duration 0.300ms, ISI 3ms). Thereafter, three mTc-MEP parameters were considered for both settings; (1) elicitability, (2) amplitude, and (3) if supramaximal stimulation was achieved with ≥ 20 V below maximum output. Finally, ISIs (1ms-4ms) were optimized for setting 1.

RESULTS

Nine patients (19.15%) were excluded. Of the remaining patients, supramaximal stimulation was achieved in all patients for setting 1, and in 26 (68.42%) for setting 2. In one patient, mTc-MEPs were elicitable in more muscles for setting (1) Amplitudes were not significantly different. Stimulation voltage could be increased ≥ 20 V in all 38 patients for setting 1 and in 10 (38.46%) for setting (2) Optimal ISI's differed widely.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using setting 1 when monitoring mTc-MEPs with supramaximal stimulation, after which an individualized ISI optimization can be performed. Moreover, when using supramaximal stimulation, short ISI's (i.e. 1ms or 1.5ms) can be the optimal ISI for obtaining the highest mTc-MEP amplitude.

Latency of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation-evoked cortical activity as a potential biomarker for postoperative motor side effects

OBJECTIVE

Here, we investigate whether cortical activation predicts motor side effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and whether these potential biomarkers have utility under general anesthesia.

METHODS

We recorded scalp potentials elicited by DBS during surgery (n = 11), both awake and under general anesthesia, and in an independent ambulatory cohort (n = 8). Across a range of stimulus configurations, we measured the amplitude and timing of short- and long-latency response components and linked them to motor side effects.

RESULTS

Regardless of anesthesia state, in both cohorts, DBS settings with capsular side effects elicited early responses with peak latencies clustering at <1 ms. This early response was preserved under anesthesia in all participants (11/11). In contrast, the long-latency components were suppressed completely in 6/11 participants. Finally, the latency of the earliest response could predict the presence of postoperative motor side effects both awake and under general anesthesia (84.8% and 75.8% accuracy, awake and under anesthesia, respectively).

CONCLUSION

DBS elicits short-latency cortical activation, both awake and under general anesthesia, which appears to reveal interactions between the stimulus and the corticospinal tract.

SIGNIFICANCE

Short-latency evoked cortical activity can potentially be used to aid both DBS lead placement and post-operative programming.

Intraoperative direct cortical stimulation motor evoked potentials: Stimulus parameter recommendations based on rheobase and chronaxie

OBJECTIVE

To determine optimal interstimulus interval (ISI) and pulse duration (D) for direct cortical stimulation (DCS) motor evoked potentials (MEPs) based on rheobase and chronaxie derived with two techniques.

METHODS

In 20 patients under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, 5-pulse DCS thenar MEP rheobase and chronaxie with 2, 3, 4 and 5ms ISI were measured by linear regression of five charge thresholds at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1msD, and estimated from two charge thresholds at 0.1 and 1msD using simple arithmetic. Optimal parameters were defined by minimum threshold energy: the ISI with lowest rheobase²×chronaxie, and D at its chronaxie. Near-optimal was defined as threshold energy <25% above minimum.

RESULTS

The optimal ISI was 3 or 4 (n=7 each), 2 (n=4), or 5ms (n=2), but only 4ms was always either optimal or near-optimal. The optimal D was ∼0.2 (n=12), ∼0.1 (n=7) or ∼0.3ms (n=1). Two-point estimates closely approximated five-point measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal ISI/D varies, with 4ms/0.2ms being most consistently optimal or near-optimal. Two-point estimation is sufficiently accurate.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results endorse 4ms ISI and 0.2msD for general use. Two-point estimation could enable quick individual optimization.

Paired-Pulse TMS and Fine-Wire Recordings Reveal Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition and Facilitation of Deep Multifidus Muscle Fascicles

Objective

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) is used to probe inhibitory and excitatory networks within the primary motor cortex (M1). These mechanisms are identified for limb muscles but it is unclear whether they share properties with trunk muscles. The aim was to determine whether it was possible to test the intracortical inhibition and facilitation of the deep multifidus muscle fascicles (DM) and at which inter-stimulus intervals (ISI).

Methods

In ten pain-free individuals, TMS was applied over M1 and motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded using fine-wire electrodes in DM. MEPs were conditioned with subthreshold stimuli at ISIs of 1 to 12 ms to test short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and at 15 ms for long-interval intracortical facilitation. Short-interval facilitation (SICF) was tested using 1-ms ISI.

Results

SICI of DM was consistently obtained with ISI of 1-, 3-, 4- and 12-ms. Facilitation of DM MEP was only identified using SICF paradigm.

Conclusions

A similar pattern of MEP modulation with ISI changes for deep trunk and limb muscles implies that M1 networks share some functional properties.

Significance

The ppTMS paradigm presents a potential to determine how M1 inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms participate in brain re-organization in back pain that affects control of trunk muscles.

Feasibility and efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring in neuroendovascular surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neurophysiological monitoring for neuroendovascular procedures typically involves EEG and SSEP monitoring via cutaneous electrodes. MEP monitoring has been used less frequently because, traditionally, this has required subdural electrode placement. With the advent of transcutaneous techniques, MEP monitoring use has increased. However, little has been published regarding the use of this technique in therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures. The purpose of this study was therefore to determine whether TcMEP monitoring is feasible and efficacious in therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our data base of therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures performed with the use of TcMEP monitoring. We specifically determined the incidence of TcMEP changes compared with changes in either SSEP or EEG. We then correlated these changes to actual adverse neurologic events.

RESULTS

Although TcMEP monitoring was technically successful in all of the 140 patients in which it was attempted, we observed significant changes in TcMEP signals in only 1 patient. This patient experienced changes involving all 3 monitoring modalities after intraprocedural aneurysm rupture. In contrast, changes in SSEP tracings alone were found in 9 patients. Of these, 2 patients were known to be moribund before their procedures and neither recovered. Among the remaining 7 patients, temporary SSEP changes tended to correlate with temporary neurologic deficits, while permanent changes were associated with permanent or long-lasting deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that TcMEP monitoring is feasible in therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures. However, it appears that the addition of TcMEP monitoring provides no added benefit to SSEP and EEG monitoring alone.

Responses of human motoneurons to high-frequency stimulation of Ia afferents

This study was designed to extend to humans the findings of classical studies on anesthetized cats, which have examined the discharge of spinal motoneurons in response to high-frequency stimulus trains delivered to Ia afferents. Experiments were conducted on the monosynaptic pathway in the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and soleus muscles. Subjects maintained a rhythmic discharge of a single motor unit (SMU) in either the FCR or soleus while homonymous Ia afferents were stimulated with either a single- or multipulse train. An n@IPI stimulus train had n pulses (n = 2-4) and an interpulse interval (IPI) of 1-8 ms. For each condition and motor unit, surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was averaged, and peristimulus-time histograms (PSTHs) were constructed for the SMU. The magnitude of the EMG was high for IPI = 1 ms, low for IPI = 2-3 ms, and high for IPI = 4-8 ms. SMU responses showed a similar pattern, which indicated that the increased EMG response was due to the presence of multiple peaks in a PSTH. The key results indicate that: (1) a short, high-frequency stimulus train enhances the discharge probability of a motoneuron above that observed with a single pulse; and (2) the increased motoneuron responses are significantly greater for the FCR than for the soleus muscle.

Successful implementation of inquiry-based physiology laboratories in undergraduate major and nonmajor courses

Recent evidence has demonstrated that inquiry-based physiology laboratories improve students' critical- and analytical-thinking skills. We implemented inquiry-based learning into three physiology courses: Comparative Vertebrate Physiology (majors), Human Physiology (majors), and Human Anatomy and Physiology (nonmajors). The aims of our curricular modifications were to improve the teaching of physiological concepts, teach students the scientific approach, and promote creative and critical thinking. We assessed our modifications using formative (laboratory exams, oral presentations, and laboratory reports) and summative evaluations (surveys, laboratory notebook, and an end of semester project). Students appreciated the freedom offered by the new curriculum and the opportunity to engage in the inquiry process. Results from both forms of evaluation showed a marked improvement due to the curricular revisions. Our analyses indicate an increased confidence in students' ability to formulate questions and hypotheses, design experiments, collect and analyze data, and make conclusions. Thus, we have successfully incorporated inquiry-based laboratories in both major and nonmajor courses.

Refractoriness of sural nerve in humans

High-frequency stimulation of peripheral nerve bundles is frequently used in clinical tests and physiologic experiments to study presynaptic and postsynaptic effects. To understand the postsynaptic effects, it is important to ensure that each pulse in the train is equally effective in stimulating the presynaptic nerve bundle; however, the optimal interpulse interval (IPI) and the stimulus intensity at which each pulse is equally effective in stimulating the same number of axons are not known. The magnitude of the compound action potential produced by each pulse in a train was tested on the sural nerve of 4 healthy human subjects. The stimulus train (2–4 pulses) was applied to the sural nerve at the lateral malleolus, and neural responses were recorded from just below the knee. With 2-pulse trains, families of curves between IPIs (1–6 ms) and normalized amplitudes of the second response were plotted for different stimulus intensities. Visual inspection of the data showed that the curves fell into 2 groups: with stimulus intensities <2.5× perception threshold (Th), the test response appeared partially at longer IPIs, whereas with stimulus intensities ≥3× Th, partial recovery of the test response was earlier. The interval for complete recovery was statistically the same for low- and high-intensity stimulation. With more than 2 pulses in a stimulus train (IPI = 5 ms), the amplitude of the compound action potential (CAP) was not affected significantly. These results are important in understanding both the presynaptic and postsynaptic responses when presynaptic axon bundles are stimulated at high frequencies.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts

Recent advances in technology and the refinement of neurophysiological methodologies are significantly changing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) of the spinal cord. This review will summarize the latest achievements in the monitoring of the spinal cord during spine and spinal cord surgeries. This overview is based on an extensive review of the literature and the authors' personal experience. Landmark articles and neurophysiological techniques have been briefly reported to contextualize the development of new techniques. This background is extended to describe the methodological approach to intraoperatively elicit and record spinal D wave and muscle motor evoked potentials (muscle MEPs). The clinical application of spinal D wave and muscle MEP recordings is critically reviewed (especially in the field of Neurosurgery) and new developments such as mapping of the dorsal columns and the corticospinal tracts are presented. In the past decade, motor evoked potential recording following transcranial electrical stimulation has emerged as a reliable technique to intraoperatively assess the functional integrity of the motor pathways. Criteria based on the absence/presence of potentials, their morphology and threshold-related parameters have been proposed for muscle MEPs. While the debate remains open, it appears that different criteria may be applied for different procedures according to the expected surgery-related morbidity and the ultimate goal of the surgeon (e.g. total tumor removal versus complete absence of transitory or permanent neurological deficits). On the other hand, D wave changes--when recordable--have proven to be the strongest predictors of maintained corticospinal tract integrity (and therefore, of motor function/recovery). Combining the use of muscle MEPs with D wave recordings provides the most comprehensive approach for assessing the functional integrity of the spinal cord motor tracts during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. However, muscle MEPs may suffice to assess motor pathways during other spinal procedures and in cases where the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury is purely ischemic. Finally, while MEPs are now considered the gold standard for monitoring the motor pathways, SEPs continue to retain value as they provide specificity for assessing the integrity of the dorsal column. However, we believe SEPs should not be used exclusively--or as an alternative to motor evoked potentials--during spine surgery, but rather as a complementary method in combination with MEPs. For intramedullary spinal tumor resection, SEPs should not be used exclusively without MEPs.

Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of constant current transcranial electric stimulation (TES) parameters for eliciting muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the abductor pollicis brevis muscles (APB) and the tibialis anterior muscles (TA). The following parameters were tested intraoperatively: interstimulus interval (ISI), individual stimulation pulse duration within a train of five stimuli. Different montages of stimulating electrodes were assessed for effectiveness and focality. Further, reference values for APB and TA motor thresholds in neurosurgical patients with normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia were determined.

METHODS

Motor thresholds of contralateral muscle MEPs were determined at 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.5 ms pulse duration and ISIs of 2, 3, 4, and 5 ms using a train of five monophasic constant current pulses with C3/C4 (27 patients). The stimulating electrodes were positioned at C1, C2, C3, C4, Cz, and Cz+6 cm. Different montages were used to determine the most effective and the most focal stimulation montages for the APB and TA muscles (30 patients). Eighty-six patients with clinically normal motor function were studied for motor threshold reference values.

RESULTS

The prolongation of the pulse duration has the strongest effect to decrease the motor threshold, which proportionally increases the delivered charge. The lowest stimulation threshold to elicit muscle MEPs in the APB and TA muscles is achieved with a train of stimuli consisting of an individual stimulus pulse duration of 0.5 ms. An ISI of 4 ms gave the lowest motor thresholds, but did not reach statistical significance compared to 3 ms. The stimulating electrode montage C3/C4 (C4/C3) allows for the lowest stimulation thresholds, but the vigorous muscle contractions it has is a disadvantage. The most focal stimulating electrode montages for the contralateral APB muscles are C3/Cz and C4/Cz, respectively, and for the TA muscles Cz/Cz+6 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult neurosurgical patients with a normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia, an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor thresholds. Pragmatically, C1/C2, resp., C2/C1 montage provides monitorable responses in both APB and TA muscles at reasonable stimulation thresholds without inducing movements disturbing surgery and especially microdissection. If the most focal hemispheric stimulation for the distal upper extremity muscles is required, the use of C3 or C4 referenced to Cz is recommended.

SIGNIFICANCE

The stimulation parameters within a train of five pulses with an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor threshold. These data confirm not only studies for D wave recovery but also provide optimal stimulation parameters for intraoperative near threshold stimulation.

Intracortical circuits modulate transcallosal inhibition in humans

Previous results using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have suggested that the excitability of transcallosal (TC) connections between the hand areas of the two motor cortices is modulated by intracortical inhibitory circuits in the same way as corticospinal tract (CTS) projections to spinal motoneurons. Here we describe two further similarities in TC and CTS control using (1) an I-wave facilitation protocol and (2) preconditioning with rTMS. In experiment 1, excitability of TC pathways was measured using interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) and the ipsilateral silent period (iSP), whilst excitability of CTS pathways was measured by recording the EMG response evoked in the first dorsal interosseous muscle contralateral to the conditioning stimulus (cMEP). The intensity of the conditioning stimulus was first adjusted to threshold for evoking IHI and iSP, then pairs of conditioning stimuli were applied randomly at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from 1.3 to 4.3 ms. IHI and iSP were facilitated at ISI=1.5 ms and 3.0 ms, respectively, as was the MEP evoked by the conditioning stimuli in the contralateral hand. We suggest that TC projections receive I-wave-like facilitation similar to that seen in CTS projections. In experiment 2, short interval inhibition of the iSP (SICIiSP), and short interval intracortical inhibition of the cMEP (SICIcMEP) were examined before and after 600 pulses of 5 Hz rTMS at 90% resting motor threshold. Both SICIiSP and SICIcMEP were reduced, as was the iSP; the cMEP was unchanged. This shows that the population of inhibitory interneurons that control TC neurons respond in the same way to 5 Hz rTMS as those that control CTS neurons. Taken together, the data from the two experiments suggest that the layer III and layer V pyramidal neurons that give rise to TC and CTS pathways, respectively, are controlled by neuronal circuitry with similar properties.

Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring: Overview and Update

Amidst controversy about methodology and safety, intraoperative neurophysiology has entered a new era of increasingly routine transcranial and direct electrical brain stimulation for motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Based on literature review and illustrative clinical experience, this tutorial aims to present a balanced overview for experienced practitioners, surgeons and anesthesiologists as well as those new to the field. It details the physiologic basis, indications and methodology of current MEP monitoring techniques, evaluates their safety, explores interpretive controversies and outlines some applications and results, including aortic aneurysm, intramedullary spinal cord tumor, spinal deformity, posterior fossa tumor, intracranial aneurysm and peri-rolandic brain surgeries. The many advances in motor system assessment achieved in the last two decades undoubtedly improve monitoring efficacy without unduly compromising safety. Future studies and experience will likely clarify existing controversies and bring further advances.

Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation

OBJECTIVE

We sought an electrical modeling approach to evaluate the potential application of finite element method (FEM) modeling to predict current pathways and intensities in the brain after transcranial electrical stimulation.

METHODS

A single coronal MRI section through the head, including motor cortex, was modeled using FEM. White matter compartments with both anatomically realistic anisotropies in resistivity and with a homogeneous resistivity were modeled. Current densities in the brain were predicted for electrode sites on the scalp and after theoretical application of a conductive head restraint device.

RESULTS

Localized current densities were predicted for the model with white matter anisotropies. Differences in predicted peak current densities were related to location of stimulation sites relative to deep sulci in the brain and scalp shunting that was predicted to increase with inter-electrode proximity. A conductive head restraint device was predicted to shunt current away from the brain when a constant current source was used.

CONCLUSIONS

The complex geometry of different tissue compartments in the head and their contrasting resistivities may jointly determine the strength and location of current densities in the brain after transcranial stimulation. This might be predictable with FEM incorporating white matter anisotropies. Conductive head restraint devices during surgery may be contraindicated with constant current stimulation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Individually optimized tcMEP monitoring and localized transcranial activation in the brain might be possible through FEM modeling.