Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study

Evidence-based recommendations for examination and diagnostic strategies of polyneuropathy electrodiagnosis

•

The best approach for electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy (PNP) were tested in 313 patients.

•

Electrodiagnostic screening for distal symmetric PNP (DSP) should start with tibial and sural NCS.

•

Examination of lower limbs at one side is sufficient for electrodiagnostic screening of DSP.

The purpose of this report is to recommend evidence-based strategies for polyneuropathy (PNP) electrodiagnosis based on a large cohort of patients examined prospectively. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) of bilateral tibial, peroneal and sural nerves, the latter with both near-nerve-technique (NNT) and surface recordings, were done in 313 patients with clinically suspected PNP. Bilateral dorsal sural and medial plantar nerves, and unilateral median and ulnar nerves were further examined in a subgroup of patients. The final clinical diagnosis retrieved from the patientś medical records 1–6 years after the neurophysiological investigation served as diagnostic reference standard. The clinical follow-up diagnosis confirmed PNP in 219 patients. The tibial nerve was the most sensitive nerve (75%), with prolonged tibial F-wave as the most sensitive parameter (72%). Sural NNT recordings were more sensitive (66%) than surface recordings (49%) (p < 0.05), however, dorsal sural (68%) and medial planter (70%) nerves had similar sensitivities as NNT. There was no side difference in the incidence of abnormality for any nerve.

Based on these results, we recommend a strategy starting with tibial and sural NCS on one side for electrophysiological screening for distal symmetric PNP. If one of these is abnormal, we recommend examining the other lower and upper extremity nerves, including distal sensory nerves, particularly if NNT is not applicable. While one abnormal parameter is sufficient to interpret a nerve as abnormal, we recommend at least two abnormal nerves for PNP diagnosis, preferentially one being the sural nerve.

We believe that the strategies recommended in this study may improve PNP electrodiagnosis.

Neurophysiological localisation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: Validation of diagnostic criteria developed by a taskforce of the Danish Society of clinical neurophysiology

OBJECTIVE

This study validates consensus criteria for localisation of ulnar neuropathy at elbow (UNE) developed by a taskforce of the Danish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology and compares them to the existing criteria from the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). The Danish criteria are based on combinations of conduction slowing in the segments of the elbow and forearm expressed in Z-scores, and difference between the segments in m/s. Examining fibres to several muscles and sensory fibres can increase the certainty of the localisation.

METHODS

Diagnostic accuracy for UNE was evaluated on 181 neurophysiological studies of the ulnar nerve from 171 peer-reviewed patients from a mixed patient-group. The diagnostic reference standard was the consensus diagnosis based on all available clinical, laboratory, and electrodiagnostic information reached by a group of experienced Danish neurophysiologists.

RESULTS

The Danish criteria had high specificity (98.4%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (95.2%) and fair sensitivity (76.9%). Compared to the AANEM criteria, the Danish criteria had higher specificity (p<0.001) and lower sensitivity (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The Danish consensus criteria for UNE are very specific and have high PPV.

SIGNIFICANCE

The Danish criteria for UNE are reliable and well suited for use in different centres as they are based on Z-scores.

Impact of medical audit on electrodiagnostic medicine in polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate whether experienced physicians' electrodiagnostic practice and criteria can be influenced by international collaboration involving peer review medical audit.

METHODS

Data was obtained from the ESTEEM project, an ongoing collaboration since 1991 among European neurophysiologists concerned with quality improvement in electrodiagnostic medicine. Three sets of the physicians' polyneuropathy examinations performed with intervals of 2-4 years were analysed.

RESULTS

Changes towards increased homogeneity among the physicians were found in (1) the average number of studies performed per patient and the number of abnormal studies required for accepting the diagnosis of polyneuropathy, with the most pronounced changes seen for abnormal motor nerve segments, abnormal F-wave studies, and electromyographic studies, and (2) the agreement on pathophysiological interpretation of nerve conduction studies and classification of polyneuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes towards increased homogeneity contributed to years of participation in peer review medical audit, were seen among a group of experienced physicians. Peer review medical audit as carried out here is however difficult to scale up. Therefore guidelines or minimal criteria should ideally supplement a medical audit process to disseminate the results obtained to a larger audience.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results support the role of international peer review medical audit in quality improvement of electrodiagnostic medicine.

Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To present criteria for pathophysiological interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and for pathophysiological classification of polyneuropathies suggested by a group of European neurophysiologists.

METHODS

Since 1992 seven neurophysiologists from six European countries have collected random samples of their electrodiagnostic examinations for peer review medical audit in the ESTEEM (European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electrodiagnostic Methods) project. Based on existing criteria in the literature, the experience with a patient material of 572 peer reviewed electrodiagnostic examinations, and productive discussions between the physicians at workshops, the collaboration has produced a set of criteria now routinely used at the centres involved in the project.

RESULTS

The first part of the paper considers pathophysiology of individual nerve segments. For interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, figures showing change in amplitude versus change in conduction velocity/distal latency and change in F-wave frequency versus change in F-wave latency are presented. The suggested boundaries delimit areas corresponding to normal, axonal, demyelinated, or neuropathic nerve segments. Criteria for motor conduction block in upper and lower extremities are schematically depicted using the parameters CMAP amplitude and CMAP duration. The second part of the paper suggests criteria for classification of polyneuropathies into axonal, demyelinating, or mixed using the above-mentioned criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The suggested criteria are developed during many years of collaboration of different centres and may be useful for standardization in clinical neurophysiology.

SIGNIFICANCE

Consistent interpretation of nerve conduction studies is an important step in optimising diagnosis and treatment of nerve disorders.