The three dimensional assessment of peripheral nerve injury: An integrated clinical, neurophysiologic and sonographic approach

Ultrasound-guided-electromyography in plegic muscle: Usefulness of nerve stimulation

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

In traumatic nerve lesions (TNLs), motor unit potentials (MUPs) may be difficult to detect in early injury. Ultrasound-guided electromyography (US-EMG) can aid in identifying areas of muscle activation, but its sensitivity can be improved. In this study we compare the sensitivity of US-EMG alone with US-EMG after peripheral nerve stimulation (NC-US-EMG) to better identify active muscle regions.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 32 patients with severe TNLs were evaluated with standard EMG (ST-EMG), US-EMG, and NC-US-EMG at baseline (T0), after 2 to 3 months (T1), and after 5 to 6 months (T2).

RESULTS

NC-US-EMG was more sensitive in detecting MUPs compared with US-EMG and ST-EMG at T0 (19 patients vs 14 and 5 patients, respectively). In addition, both US-guided techniques were more sensitive than ST-EMG in detecting MUPs (ST-EMG vs US-EMG: P = .014; ST-EMG vs NC-US-EMG: P = .003). At T1, ST-EMG remained less sensitive NC-US-EMG (P = .019). No significant differences were observed among the three techniques at T2.

DISCUSSION

In the evaluation of severe TNLs, the combination of peripheral nerve stimulation and US increases the sensitivity of EMG for MUP detection at baseline and 2 to 3 months postinjury.