Magnetic-motor-root stimulation: Review

Novel approaches to assessing upper motor neuron dysfunction in motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: IFCN handbook chapter

Identifying upper motor neuron (UMN) dysfunction is fundamental to the diagnosis and understanding of disease pathogenesis in motor neuron disease (MND). The clinical assessment of UMN dysfunction may be difficult, particularly in the setting of severe muscle weakness. From a physiological perspective, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) techniques provide objective biomarkers of UMN dysfunction in MND and may also be useful to interrogate cortical and network function. Single, paired- and triple pulse TMS techniques have yielded novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in MND, and have provided important pathogenic insights, particularly pertaining to site of disease onset. Cortical hyperexcitability, as heralded by reduced short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and increased short interval intracortical facilitation, has been associated with the onset of lower motor neuron degeneration, along with patterns of disease spread, development of specific clinical features such as the split hand phenomenon, and may provide an indication about the rate of disease progression. Additionally, reduction of SICI has emerged as a potential diagnostic aid in MND. The triple stimulation technique (TST) was shown to enhance the diagnostic utility of conventional TMS measures in detecting UMN dysfunction in MND. Separately, sophisticated brain imaging techniques have uncovered novel biomarkers of neurodegeneration that have bene associated with progression. The present review will discuss the utility of TMS and brain neuroimaging derived biomarkers of UMN dysfunction in MND, focusing on recently developed TMS techniques and advanced neuroimaging modalities that interrogate structural and functional integrity of the corticomotoneuronal system, with an emphasis on pathogenic, diagnostic, and prognostic utility.

Factors associated with improvement in tibialis anterior weakness due to lumbar degenerative disease

BACKGROUND

The weakness of the tibialis anterior remains to be a controversial topic. There has been no study that used electrophysiological assessment of the function of the lumbar and sacral peripheral motor nerves. The aim is to evaluate surgical outcomes in patients with weakness of the tibialis anterior using neurological and electrophysiological assessments.

METHODS

We enrolled 53 patients. Tibialis anterior weakness was quantified by muscle strength, as assessed using a manual muscle test on a scale of 1 through 5, with scores <5 indicating weakness. Postoperative improvement in muscle strength was classified as excellent (5 grades recovered), good (more than one grade recovered), or fair (less than one grade recovered).

RESULTS

Surgical outcomes for tibialis anterior function were categorized as "excellent" in 31, "good" in 8, "fair" in 14 patients. Significant difference in outcomes were observed depending on diabetes mellitus status, type of surgery, and the compound muscle action potentials amplitudes of the abductor hallucis and extensor digitorum brevis (p < 0.05). Surgical outcomes were classified into two groups, patients with excellent and good outcomes (Group 1) and patients with fair outcome (Group 2). Using the forward selection stepwise method, sex and the compound muscle action potentials amplitudes of the extensor digitorum brevis were identified as significant factors for their positive association with Group 1 status. The diagnostic power of the predicted probability was as high as 0.87 in terms of area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant correlation between the prognosis of tibialis anterior weakness and sex and the compound muscle action potentials amplitude of extensor digitorum brevis, suggesting that recording the compound muscle action potentials amplitude of extensor digitorum brevis will aid the outcome assessment of future surgical interventions for tibialis anterior weakness.

Central and Peripheral Motor Conduction Studies by Single-Pulse Magnetic Stimulation

Single-pulse magnetic stimulation is the simplest type of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Muscle action potentials induced by applying TMS over the primary motor cortex are recorded with surface electromyography electrodes, and they are called motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). The amplitude and latency of MEPs are used for various analyses in clinical practice and research. The most commonly used parameter is the central motor conduction time (CMCT), which is measured using motor cortical and spinal nerve stimulation. In addition, stimulation at the foramen magnum or the conus medullaris can be combined with conventional CMCT measurements to evaluate various conduction parameters in the corticospinal tract more precisely, including the cortical-brainstem conduction time, brainstem-root conduction time, cortical-conus motor conduction time, and cauda equina conduction time. The cortical silent period is also a useful parameter for evaluating cortical excitability. Single-pulse magnetic stimulation is further used to analyze not only the central nervous system but also the peripheral nervous system, such as for detecting lesions in the proximal parts of peripheral nerves. In this review article we introduce four types of single-pulse magnetic stimulation-of the motor cortex, spinal nerve, foramen magnum, and conus medullaris-that are useful for the diagnosis, elucidation of pathophysiology, and evaluation of clinical conditions and therapeutic effects. Single-pulse magnetic stimulation is a clinically useful technique that all neurologists should learn.

Transsynaptic activation of human lumbar spinal motoneurons by transvertebral magnetic stimulation

Noninvasive spinal stimulation has been increasingly used in research on motor control and neurorehabilitation. Despite advances in percutaneous electrical stimulation techniques, magnetic stimulation is not as commonly used as electrical stimulation. Therefore, it is still under discussion what neuronal elements are activated by magnetic stimulation of the human spinal cord. In this study, we demonstrated that transvertebral magnetic stimulation (TVMS) induced transsynaptic activation of spinal motoneuron pools in the lumbar cord. In healthy humans, paired-pulse TVMS was given over an intervertebral space between the L1-L2 vertebrae with an interpulse interval of 100 ms, and the stimulus-evoked electromyographic (EMG) responses were recorded in the lower limb muscles. The results show that the evoked EMG responses after the 2nd pulse were clearly suppressed compared with the widespread responses evoked after the 1st pulse in the muscles of the lower extremity, indicating that the transsynaptic activation of spinal motoneurons by the 2nd pulse was suppressed by the effects produced by the 1st pulse. The inconsistent modulation of response suppression to stimulus intensity across individuals suggests that the TVMS-evoked EMG responses are composed of the compound potentials mediated by the direct activation of motor axons and the transsynaptic activation of motoneuron pools through sensory afferents and that the recruitment order of those fibers by TVMS may be nonhomogeneous across individuals.

Normal Values of Central, Peripheral, and Root Motor Conduction Times in a Healthy Korean Population

PURPOSE

Central, peripheral, and root motor conduction times (CMCTs, PMCTs, and RMCTs, respectively) are valuable diagnostic tools for spinal cord and motor nerve root lesions. We investigated the normal values and the effects of age and height on each motor conduction time.

METHODS

This study included 190 healthy Korean subjects who underwent magnetic stimulation of the cortex and spinous processes at the C7 and L1 levels. Recording muscles were abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi in the unilateral upper limb and extensor digitorum brevis and abductor hallucis in the contralateral lower limb. F-wave and compound motor nerve action potentials were also recorded. Central motor conduction time was evaluated as the difference between cortical motor evoked potential onset latency and PMCT using calculation and spinal stimulation methods. Root motor conduction time was computed as the difference between spinal stimulated and calculated CMCTs.

RESULTS

The average age and height of the participants were 41.21 ± 14.39 years and 164.64 ± 8.27 cm, respectively; 39.5% (75/190) patients were men. In the linear regression analyses, upper limb CMCTs showed a significant and weak positive relationship with height. Lower limb CMCTs demonstrated a significant and weak positive relationship with age and height. Peripheral motor conduction times were significantly and positively correlated with age and height. Root motor conduction times showed no significant relationship with age and height, except for abductor pollicis brevis-RMCT, which had a weak negative correlation with height.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides normal values of CMCTs, PMCTs, and RCMTs, which have potential clinical applications. When interpreting CMCTs, age and height should be considered.

Sex-specific reference values for total, central, and peripheral latency of motor evoked potentials from a large cohort

Background

Differentiating between physiologic and altered motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is crucial in clinical practice. Some physical characteristics, such as height and age, introduce sources of variability unrelated to neural dysfunction. We provided new age- and height-adjusted normal values for cortical latency, central motor conduction time (CMCT), and peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT) from a large cohort of healthy subjects.

Methods

Previously reported data from 587 participants were re-analyzed. Nervous system disorders were ruled out by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. MEP latency was determined as stimulus-to-response latency through stimulation with a circular coil over the "hot spot" of the First Dorsal Interosseous and Tibialis Anterior muscles, during mild tonic contraction. CMCT was estimated as the difference between MEP cortical latency and PMCT by radicular magnetic stimulation. Additionally, right-to-left differences were calculated. For each parameter, multiple linear regression models of increasing complexity were fitted using height, age, and sex as regressors.

Results

Motor evoked potential cortical latency, PMCT, and CMCT were shown to be age- and height-dependent, although age had only a small effect on CMCT. Relying on Bayesian information criterion for model selection, MEP cortical latency and PMCT were explained best by linear models indicating a positive correlation with both height and age. Also, CMCT to lower limbs positively correlated with height and age. CMCT to upper limbs positively correlated to height, but slightly inversely correlated to age, as supported by non-parametric bootstrap analysis. Males had longer cortical latencies and CMCT to lower limbs, as well as longer PMCT and cortical latencies to upper limbs, even when accounting for differences in body height. Right-to-left-differences were independent of height, age, and sex. Based on the selected regression models, sex-specific reference values were obtained for all TMS-related latencies and inter-side differences, with adjustments for height and age, where warranted.

Conclusion

A significant relationship was observed between height and age and all MEP latency values, in both upper and lower limbs. These set of reference values facilitate the evaluation of MEPs in clinical studies and research settings. Unlike previous reports, we also highlighted the contribution of sex.

Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee

The review provides a comprehensive update (previous report: Chen R, Cros D, Curra A, Di Lazzaro V, Lefaucheur JP, Magistris MR, et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119(3):504-32) on clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in neurological diseases. Most TMS measures rely on stimulation of motor cortex and recording of motor evoked potentials. Paired-pulse TMS techniques, incorporating conventional amplitude-based and threshold tracking, have established clinical utility in neurodegenerative, movement, episodic (epilepsy, migraines), chronic pain and functional diseases. Cortical hyperexcitability has emerged as a diagnostic aid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Single-pulse TMS measures are of utility in stroke, and myelopathy even in the absence of radiological changes. Short-latency afferent inhibition, related to central cholinergic transmission, is reduced in Alzheimer's disease. The triple stimulation technique (TST) may enhance diagnostic utility of conventional TMS measures to detect upper motor neuron involvement. The recording of motor evoked potentials can be used to perform functional mapping of the motor cortex or in preoperative assessment of eloquent brain regions before surgical resection of brain tumors. TMS exhibits utility in assessing lumbosacral/cervical nerve root function, especially in demyelinating neuropathies, and may be of utility in localizing the site of facial nerve palsies. TMS measures also have high sensitivity in detecting subclinical corticospinal lesions in multiple sclerosis. Abnormalities in central motor conduction time or TST correlate with motor impairment and disability in MS. Cerebellar stimulation may detect lesions in the cerebellum or cerebello-dentato-thalamo-motor cortical pathways. Combining TMS with electroencephalography, provides a novel method to measure parameters altered in neurological disorders, including cortical excitability, effective connectivity, and response complexity.

Short-Term Collagen Nerve Wrapping Facilitates Motor and Sensory Recovery from Nerve Degeneration in a Sciatic Nerve Injury Rat Model

Purpose

This study used a sciatic nerve injury rat model to investigate the short-term effects of a polyglycolic acid (PGA)-collagen tube for nerve injury in continuity.

Materials and Methods

Sixteen female Wistar rats (6-8 weeks) were used, and the left sciatic nerve was crushed with a Sugita aneurysm clip. Sciatic nerve model rats were randomly categorized into two groups (n = 8; control group, n = 8; nerve wrapping group). Then, we measured four sensory thresholds, magnetically stimulated the lumbar region to induce motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and evaluated the sciatic nerve histopathologically.

Results

In the sensory thresholds, there were significant differences for the main effect in 250 and 2000 Hz stimulation (p = 0.048 and 0.006, respectively). Further, a significant difference was observed with 2000 Hz stimulation at 1 week (p = 0.003). In the heat stimulation, there were significant differences for the main effect in both weeks and groups (p = 0.0002 and 0.0185, respectively). The post-hoc test showed a significant difference between groups only in 2W (p = 0.0283). Three weeks after the surgery, both 2nd and 3rd MEPs waves-related latencies in the nerve wrapping group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (p = 0.0207 and 0.0271, respectively). Histological evaluation of the sciatic nerve revealed considerable differences in the number of axons between the two groups (p = 0.0352).

Conclusion

The short-term PGA-collagen tube nerve wrapping facilitated motor and sensory recovery from nerve degeneration in the sciatic nerve injury rat model.

Neurophysiological Evaluation of Neural Transmission in Brachial Plexus Motor Fibers with the Use of Magnetic versus Electrical Stimuli

The anatomical complexity of brachial plexus injury requires specialized in-depth diagnostics. The clinical examination should include clinical neurophysiology tests, especially with reference to the proximal part, with innovative devices used as sources of precise functional diagnostics. However, the principles and clinical usefulness of this technique are not fully described. The aim of this study was to reinvestigate the clinical usefulness of motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by a magnetic field applied over the vertebrae and at Erb's point to assess the neural transmission of brachial plexus motor fibers. Seventy-five volunteer subjects were randomly chosen to participate in the research. The clinical studies included an evaluation of the upper extremity sensory perception in dermatomes C5-C8 based on von Frey's tactile monofilament method, and proximal and distal muscle strength by Lovett's scale. Finally, 42 healthy people met the inclusion criteria. Magnetic and electrical stimuli were applied to assess the motor function of the peripheral nerves of the upper extremity and magnetic stimulus was applied to study the neural transmission from the C5-C8 spinal roots. The parameters of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recorded during electroneurography and MEP induced by magnetic stimulation were analyzed. Because the conduction parameters for the groups of women and men were comparable, the final statistical analysis covered 84 tests. The parameters of the potentials generated by electrical stimulus were comparable to those of the potentials induced by magnetic impulse at Erb's point. The amplitude of the CMAP was significantly higher following electrical stimulation than that of the MEP following magnetic stimulation for all the examined nerves, in the range of 3-7%. The differences in the potential latency values evaluated in CMAP and MEP did not exceed 5%. The results show a significantly higher amplitude of potentials after stimulation of the cervical roots compared to potentials evoked at Erb's point (C5, C6 level). At the C8 level, the amplitude was lower than the potentials evoked at Erb's point, varying in the range of 9-16%. We conclude that magnetic field stimulation enables the recording of the supramaximal potential, similar to that evoked by an electric impulse, which is a novel result. Both types of excitation can be used interchangeably during an examination, which is essential for clinical application. Magnetic stimulation was painless in comparison with electrical stimulation according to the results of a pain visual analog scale (3 vs. 5.5 on average). MEP studies with advanced sensor technology allow evaluation of the proximal part of the peripheral motor pathway (between the cervical root level and Erb's point, and via trunks of the brachial plexus to the target muscles) following the application of stimulus over the vertebrae.

The effects of combined high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and cervical nerve root magnetic stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery following stroke

Introduction

Upper limb motor impairments after stroke cause patients partial or total loss of the capability of performing daily living, working, and social activities, which significantly affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients and brings a heavy burden to their families and society. As a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can act not only on the cerebral cortex, but also on peripheral nerves, nerve roots, and muscle tissues. Previous studies have shown that magnetic stimulation on the cerebral cortex and peripheral tissues has a positive effect on the recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke, however, few studies have reported the combination of the two.

Objective

This study was to investigate whether high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) combined with cervical nerve root magnetic stimulation more effectively ameliorates upper limb motor function in stroke patients. We hypothesized that the combination of the two can achieve a synergistic effect and further promotes functional recovery.

Methods

Sixty patients with stroke were randomly divided into four groups and received real or sham rTMS stimulation and cervical nerve root magnetic stimulation consecutively before other therapies, once daily over five fractions per week for a total of 15 times. We evaluated the upper limb motor function and activities of daily living of the patients at the time of pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow up.

Results

All patients completed study procedures without any adverse effects. The upper limb motor function and activities of daily living improved in patients of each group were improved after treatment (post 1) and 3 months after treatment (post 2). Combination treatment was significantly better than single treatments alone or sham.

Conclusion

Both rTMS and cervical nerve root magnetic stimulation effectively promoted upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke. The protocol combining the two is more beneficial for motor improvement and patients can easily tolerate it.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2100048558.

Non-invasive brain-spine interface: Continuous control of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation using EEG

Brain-controlled neuromodulation has emerged as a promising tool to promote functional recovery in patients with motor disorders. Brain-machine interfaces exploit this neuromodulatory strategy and could be used for restoring voluntary control of lower limbs. In this work, we propose a non-invasive brain-spine interface (BSI) that processes electroencephalographic (EEG) activity to volitionally control trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (ts-MS), as an approach for lower-limb neurorehabilitation. This novel platform allows to contingently connect motor cortical activation during leg motor imagery with the activation of leg muscles via ts-MS. We tested this closed-loop system in 10 healthy participants using different stimulation conditions. This BSI efficiently removed stimulation artifacts from EEG regardless of ts-MS intensity used, allowing continuous monitoring of cortical activity and real-time closed-loop control of ts-MS. Our BSI induced afferent and efferent evoked responses, being this activation ts-MS intensity-dependent. We demonstrated the feasibility, safety and usability of this non-invasive BSI. The presented system represents a novel non-invasive means of brain-controlled neuromodulation and opens the door towards its integration as a therapeutic tool for lower-limb rehabilitation.

Detection of C8/T1 radiculopathy by measuring the root motor conduction time

BACKGROUND

Root motor conduction time (RMCT) can noninvasively evaluate the status of the proximal root segment. However, its clinical application remains limited, and wider studies regarding its use are scarce. We aimed to investigate the association between C8/T1 level radiculopathy and RMCT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects were extracted from a general hospital's spine clinic database. A total of 48 C8/T1 root lesions from 37 patients were included, and 48 C8/T1 root levels from control subjects were matched for age, sex, and height. RMCT was measured in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle and the assessment of any delays owing to C8/T1 radiculopathy.

RESULTS

The RMCT of the C8/T1 radiculopathy group was 1.7 ± 0.6 ms, which was significantly longer than that in the control group (1.2 ± 0.8 ms; p = 0.001). The delayed RMCT was independently associated with radiculopathy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.27; p = 0.011) after adjusting for the peripheral motor conduction time, amplitude of median compound motor nerve action potential, and shortest F-wave latency. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for diagnosing C8/T1 radiculopathy using RMCT was 0.72 (0.61-0.82). The RMCT was significantly correlated with symptom duration (coefficient = 0.58; p < 0.001) but was not associated with the degree of arm pain.

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrate the clinical applicability of the RMCT by demonstrating its utility in diagnosing radiculopathy at certain spinal levels.

Activation of human spinal locomotor circuitry using transvertebral magnetic stimulation

Transvertebral magnetic stimulation (TVMS) of the human lumbar spinal cord can evoke bilateral rhythmic leg movements, as in walking, supposedly through the activation of spinal locomotor neural circuitry. However, an appropriate stimulus intensity that can effectively drive the human spinal locomotor circuitry to evoke walking-like movements has not been determined. To address this issue, TVMS was delivered over an intervertebral space of the lumbar cord (L1–L3) at different stimulus intensities (10–70% of maximum stimulator output) in healthy human adults. In a stimulus intensity-dependent manner, TVMS evoked two major patterns of rhythmic leg movements in which the left-right movement cycles were coordinated with different phase relationships: hopping-like movements, in which both legs moved in the same direction in phase, and walking-like movements, in which both legs moved alternatively in anti-phase; uncategorized movements were also observed which could not be categorized as either movement type. Even at the same stimulation site, the stimulus-evoked rhythmic movements changed from hopping-like movements to walking-like movements as stimulus intensity was increased. Different leg muscle activation patterns were engaged in the induction of the hopping- and walking-like movements. The magnitude of the evoked hopping- and walking-like movements was positively correlated with stimulus intensity. The human spinal neural circuitry required a higher intensity of magnetic stimulation to produce walking-like leg movements than to produce hopping-like movements. These results suggest that TVMS activates distinct neural modules in the human spinal cord to generate hopping- and walking-like movements.

Controversies and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Transspinal Magnetic Stimulation: A Critical Review and Exploratory Trial in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

Magnetic stimulation is a safe, non-invasive diagnostic tool and promising treatment strategy for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Although most studies address transcranial magnetic stimulation, transspinal magnetic stimulation (TsMS) has received recent attention since trials involving invasive spinal cord stimulation showed encouraging results for pain, spasticity, and Parkinson’s disease. While the effects of TsMS on spinal roots is well understood, its mechanism of action on the spinal cord is still controversial. Despite unclear mechanisms of action, clinical benefits of TsMS have been reported, including improvements in scales of spasticity, hyperreflexia, and bladder and bowel symptoms, and even supraspinal gait disorders such as freezing and camptocormia. In the present study, a critical review on the application of TsMS in neurology was conducted, along with an exploratory trial involving TsMS in three patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. The goal was to understand the mechanism of action of TsMS through H-reflex measurement at the unstimulated lumbosacral level. Although limited by studies with a small sample size and a low to moderate effect size, TsMS is safe and tolerable and presents consistent clinical and neurophysiological benefits that support its use in clinical practice.

Checklist on the Quality of the Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) Methods in Research: An International Delphi Study

An increasing number of clinical research studies have used repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in recent years to alleviate pain or improve motor function. rPMS is non-invasive, painless, and administrated over peripheral nerve, spinal cord roots, or a muscle using a coil affixed to the skin and connected to a rapid-rate magnetic stimulator. Despite the clinical impact and scientific interest, the methodological inconsistencies or incomplete details and findings between studies could make the rPMS demonstration difficult to replicate. Given the lack of guidelines in rPMS literature, the present study aimed at developing a checklist to improve the quality of rPMS methods in research. An international panel of experts identified among those who had previously published on the topic were enrolled in a two-round web-based Delphi study with the aim of reaching a consensus on the items that should be reported or controlled in any rPMS study. The consensual rPMS checklist obtained comprises 8 subject-related items (e.g., age, sex), 16 methodological items (e.g., coil type, pulse duration), and 11 stimulation protocol items (e.g., paradigm of stimulation, number of pulses). This checklist will contribute to new interventional or exploratory rPMS research to guide researchers or clinicians on the methods to use to test and publish rPMS after-effects. Overall, the checklist will guide the peer-review process on the quality of rPMS methods reported in a publication. Given the dynamic nature of a consensus between international experts, it is expected that future research will affine the checklist.

Translumbosacral Anorectal Magnetic Stimulation Test for Fecal Incontinence

BACKGROUND

Neuropathy may cause fecal incontinence and mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, but its prevalence is unclear, partly due to the lack of comprehensive testing of spino-anorectal innervation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and determine the clinical usefulness of a novel test, translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation for fecal incontinence.

DESIGN

This observational cohort study was conducted from 2012 to 2018.

SETTINGS

This study was performed at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with fecal incontinence, patients with mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, and healthy controls were included.

INTERVENTIONS

A translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation test was performed by using an anorectal probe with 4 ring electrodes and magnetic coil, and by stimulating bilateral lumbar and sacral plexuses, uses and recording 8 motor-evoked potentials at anal and rectal sites.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prevalence of lumbar and/or sacral neuropathy was examined. Secondary outcomes were correlation of neuropathy with anorectal sensorimotor function(s) and morphological changes.

RESULTS

We evaluated 220 patients: 144 with fecal incontinence, 76 with mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, and 31 healthy controls. All 8 lumbar and sacral motor-evoked potential latencies were significantly prolonged (p < 0.01) in fecal incontinence and mixed fecal incontinence/constipation groups compared with controls. Neuropathy was patchy and involved 4.0 (3.0) (median (interquartile range)) sites. Lumbar neuropathy was seen in 29% to 65% of the patients in the fecal incontinence group and 22% to 61% of the patients in the mixed fecal incontinence/constipation group, and sacral neuropathy was seen in 24% to 64% and 29% to 61% of these patients. Anal neuropathy was significantly more (p < 0.001) prevalent than rectal neuropathy in both groups. There was no correlation between motor-evoked potential latencies and anal sphincter pressures, rectal sensation, or anal sphincter defects.

LIMITATIONS

No comparative analysis with electromyography was performed.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar or sacral plexus neuropathy was detected in 40% to 75% of patients with fecal incontinence with a 2-fold greater prevalence at the anal region than the rectum. Lumbosacral neuropathy appears to be an independent mechanism in the pathogenesis of fecal incontinence, unassociated with other sensorimotor dysfunctions. Translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation has a high yield and is a safe and clinically useful neurophysiological test. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B728.

PRUEBA DE ESTIMULACIN MAGNTICA TRANSLUMBOSACRAL ANORECTAL PARA LA INCONTINENCIA FECAL

ANTECEDENTES:La neuropatía puede causar incontinencia fecal y una combinación de incontinencia fe-cal/estreñimiento, pero su prevalencia no está clara, en parte debido a la falta de pruebas comple-tas de inervación espino-anorrectal.OBJETIVO:Desarrollar y determinar la utilidad clínica de una nueva prueba, estimulación magnética trans-lumbosacral anorrectal para la incontinencia fecal.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte observacional del 2012 al 2018.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes con incontinencia fecal, combinación de incontinencia fecal/estreñimiento y controles sanos.INTERVENCIONES:Se realizó una prueba de estimulación magnética translumbosacral anorrectal utilizando una sonda anorrectal con 4 electrodos anulares y bobina magnética, y estimulando los plexos lumbares y sacros bilaterales y registrando ocho potenciales evocados motores las regiones anal y rectal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se examinó la prevalencia de neuropatía lumbar y/o sacra. Los resultados secundarios fueron la correlación de la neuropatía con las funciones sensitivomotoras anorrectales y cambios morfológi-cos.RESULTADOS:Evaluamos 220 pacientes, 144 con incontinencia fecal, 76 con combinación de incontinencia fe-cal/estreñimiento y 31 sujetos sanos. Las ocho latencias de los potenciales evocadas motoras lum-bares y sacras se prolongaron significativamente (p <0,01) en la incontinencia fecal y el grupo mixto en comparación con los controles. La neuropatía fue irregular y afectaba 4,0 (3,0) (mediana (rango intercuartílico) sitios. Se observó neuropatía lumbar en 29-65% en la incontinencia fecal y 22-61% en el grupo mixto, y neuropatía sacra en 24-64% y 29-61 % de pacientes respectivamen-te. La neuropatía anal fue significativamente más prevalente (p <0,001) que la rectal en ambos grupos. No hubo correlación entre las latencias de los potenciales evocadas motoras y las presio-nes del esfínter anal, la sensación rectal o los defectos del esfínter anal.LIMITACIONES:Sin análisis comparativo con electromiografía.CONCLUSIÓNES:Se detectó neuropatía del plexo lumbar o sacro en el 40-75% de los pacientes con incontinencia fecal con una prevalencia dos veces mayor en la región anal que en el recto. La neuropatía lumbo-sacra parece ser un mecanismo independiente en la patogenia de la incontinencia fecal, no asocia-do con otras disfunciones sensitivomotoras. La estimulación magnética translumbosacral anorrec-tal tiene un alto rendimiento, es una prueba neurofisiológica segura y clínicamente útil. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B728.

Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects

•

We studied excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation.

•

CRMS elicited direct and reflex responses in hand muscles.

•

CRMS is painless and well tolerated and, therefore, applicable to clinical studies.

Objectives

To characterize direct and reflex hand muscle responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation (CRMS) in healthy volunteers during sustained voluntary contraction.

Methods

In 18 healthy volunteers, we recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle the responses to CRMS of progressively increasing intensity and level of muscle contraction. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and the silent period (SP) were compared to those obtained with plexus, midarm and wrist stimulation. Additionally, in a smaller number of subjects, we obtained the peristimulus time histogram (psth) of single motor unit firing in the FDI, examined the effects of vibration and recorded the modulation of sustained EMG activity in muscles of the lower limbs.

Results

Increasing CRMS intensity led to larger CMAP with no relevant changes in SP1 or SP2, except for lower amplitude of the burst interrupting the silent period (BISP). Increasing the level of muscle contraction led to reduced CMAP, shorter SP duration and increased BISP amplitude. The psth analysis showed the underlying changes in the motor unit firing frequency that corresponded to the changes seen in the CMAP and the SP with surface recordings. Progressively distal stimulation led to CMAPs of shorter latency and increased amplitude, SPs of longer latency and shorter duration, and a BISP of longer latency. Vibration led to reduction of the SP. CRMS induced SPs in muscles of the lower limb.

Conclusions

CRMS induces excitatory and inhibitory responses in hand muscles, fitting with the expected behavior of mixed nerve stimulation at very proximal sites.

Significance

Characterization of the effects of CRMS on hand muscles is of physiological and potentially clinical applicability, as it is a painless and reliable procedure.

Assessment of safety of self-controlled repetitive trans-vertebral magnetic stimulation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess safety issues of self-controlled repetitive trans-vertebral magnetic stimulation (rTVMS) in humans.

METHODS

We investigated effects of self-controlled rTVMS (≤20 Hz, ≤90% intensity) on vital signs and subjective sensations in 1690 trials of 30 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with spinal cord disorders.

RESULTS

Healthy volunteers and the patients received 4595 ± 2345, and 4450 ± 2304 pulses in one day, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed in any participants, and only minor events were seen as follows. While blood pressure was unaffected in the patients, the diastolic blood pressure increased slightly after rTVMS in healthy volunteers. The peripheral capillary oxygen saturation increased after rTVMS in healthy volunteers. "Pain" or "Discomfort" was reported in approximately 10% of trials in both participants groups. Degree of the evoked sensation positively correlated with stimulus intensity and was affected by the site of stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Self-controlled rTVMS (≤20 Hz and ≤90% intensity) did not induce any serious adverse effects in healthy volunteers and patients with spinal cord disorders.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results indicate that rTVMS can be used safely in physiological investigations in healthy volunteers and also as treatment for neurological disorders.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Muscle Involvement in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

Skeletal muscle is affected in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), which is a model of multiple sclerosis that produces changes including muscle atrophy; histological features of neurogenic involvement, and increased oxidative stress. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the involvement of rat skeletal muscle and to compare them with those produced by natalizumab (NTZ). EAE was induced by injecting myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) into Dark Agouti rats. Both treatments, NTZ and TMS, were implemented from day 15 to day 35. Clinical severity was studied, and after sacrifice, the soleus and extensor digitorum longus muscles were extracted for subsequent histological and biochemical analysis. The treatment with TMS and NTZ had a beneficial effect on muscle involvement in the EAE model. There was a clinical improvement in functional motor deficits, atrophy was attenuated, neurogenic muscle lesions were reduced, and the level of oxidative stress biomarkers was lower in both treatment groups. Compared to NTZ, the best response was obtained with TMS for all the parameters analyzed. The myoprotective effect of TMS was higher than that of NTZ. Thus, the use of TMS may be an effective strategy to reduce muscle involvement in multiple sclerosis.

Difference in Pain and Discomfort of Comparable Wrist Movements Induced by Magnetic or Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerves in the Dorsal Forearm

Purpose

Both repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) and transcutaneous electrical current stimulation (TES) could elicit the limb movements; it is still unclear how subjective sensation is changed according to the amount of limb movements. We investigated the pain and discomfort induced by newly developed rPMS and TES of peripheral nerves in the dorsal forearm.

Methods

The subjects were 12 healthy adults. The stimulus site was the right dorsal forearm; thus, when stimulated, wrist dorsiflexion was induced. The rPMS was delivered by the new stimulator, Pathleader at 10 stimulus intensity levels, and TES intensity was in 1-mA increments. The duration of each stimulation was 2 s. The analysis parameters were subjective pain and discomfort, measured by a numerical rating scale. The rating scale at corresponding levels of integrated range of movement (iROM) induced by rPMS or TES was compared. The subjective values were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA with the stimulus conditions (rPMS, TES) and the seven levels of iROM (20-140 ºs).

Results

In the rPMS experiments, stimuli were administered to all subjects at all stimulus intensities. In the TES experiments, none of the subjects dropped out between 1 and 16 mA, but there were dropouts at each of the intensities as follows: 1 subject at 17 mA, 20 mA, 22 mA, 23 mA, 27 mA, 29 mA and 2 subjects at 21 mA, 24 mA, 26 mA. The main effects of the stimulus conditions and iROM were significant for pain and discomfort. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that pain and discomfort in rPMS were significantly lower compared to TES when the iROM was above 60 ºs and 80 ºs, respectively.

Conclusion

New rPMS stimulator, Pathleader, caused less pain and discomfort than TES, but this was only evident when comparatively large joint movements occurred.

A cross-sectional comparison of performance, neurophysiological and MRI outcomes of responders and non-responders to fampridine treatment in multiple sclerosis - An explorative study

OBJECTIVE

To compare baseline physical and cognitive performance, neurophysiological, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and examinetheir interrelationship inparticipants with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), already established aseither responder or non-responder to Fampridine treatment, andto examine associationswiththe expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and 12-item MS walking scale (MSWS-12).

METHODS

Baseline data from an explorative longitudinal observational study were analyzed. Participants underwent the Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FW), Six Spot Step Test (SSST), Nine-Hole Peg Test, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), neurophysiological testing, including central motor conduction time (CMCT), peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudesand electroneuronographyof the lower extremities, and brain MRI (brain volume, number and volume of T2-weighted lesions and lesion load normalized to brain volume).

RESULTS

41 responders and 8 non-responders were examined. There were no intergroup differences inphysical performance, cognitive, neurophysiological, andMRI outcomes (p > 0.05).CMCT was associated withT25FW, SSST, EDSS, and MSWS-12,(p < 0.05). SDMT was associated with the number and volume of T2-weighted lesions, and lesion load normalized to brain volume (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

No differences were identified between responders and non-responders to Fampridine treatment regarding physical and cognitive performance, neurophysiological or MRI outcomes. The results call for cautious interpretation and further large-scale studies are needed to expand ourunderstanding of underlying mechanisms discriminating Fampridine responders and non-responders.CMCT may be used as a marker of disability and walking impairment, while SDMT was associated with white matter lesions estimated by MRI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03401307.

Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy

Objective

Pre- and postoperative comparative evaluation of neurophysiological tests and clinical trials. Analysis of the diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials (MEP) induced by a magnetic field after supraspinal stimulation. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of electromyography (EMG) and MEP is achieved.

Methods

EMG, ENG, M-wave, F-wave, and MEP tests were performed on 35 patients with confirmed cervical radiculopathy in pre- and postoperative evaluations. The clinical trial consisted of evaluation of muscle strength, a sensory perception test and evaluation of tendon reflexes and pain severity.

Results

The sensitivity of the resting EMG and MEP tests is 24%-67% and 6%-27%, while their specificity is 43%-80% and 86%-100%, respectively. The postoperative evaluation revealed a statistically significant reduction in pain severity (p=0001), an increase in muscle strength in DP (p=0.0431), BB (p=0,0431), and TB (p=0.0272), and improvement of touch sensation in terms of dermatomal innervation in C5 (p=0.0001) and C6 (p=0.0044).

Conclusions

Tests comparing MRI sensitivity to neurophysiological tests show that neuroimaging is more sensitive in diagnostics of patients with cervical radiculopathy; however, clinical neurophysiology tests are more specific in reference to clinical trials.

Standard neurophysiological studies and motor evoked potentials in evaluation of traumatic brachial plexus injuries - A brief review of the literature

PURPOSE

Traumatic damage to the brachial plexus is associated with temporary or permanent motor and sensory dysfunction of the upper extremity. It may lead to the severe disability of the patient, often excluded from the daily life activity. The pathomechanism of brachial plexus injury usually results from damage detected in structures taking origin in the rupture, stretching or cervical roots avulsion from the spinal cord. Often the complexity of traumatic brachial plexus injury requires a multidisciplinary diagnostic process including clinical evaluation supplemented with clinical neurophysiology methods assessing the functional state of its structures. Their presentation is the primary goal of this paper.

METHODS

The basis for the diagnosis of brachial plexus function is a clinical examination and neurophysiology studies: electroneurography (ENG), needle electromyography (EMG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) assessing the function of individual brachial plexus elements.

CONCLUSIONS

The ENG and EMG studies clarify the level of brachial plexus damage, its type and severity, mainly using the Seddon clinical classification. In contrast to F-wave studies, the use of the MEPs in the evaluation of traumatic brachial plexus injury provides valuable information about the function of its proximal part. MEPs study may be an additional diagnostic in confirming the location and extent of the lesion, considering the pathomechanism of the damage. Clinical neurophysiology studies are the basis for determining the appropriate therapeutic program, including choice of conservative or reconstructive surgery which results are verified in prospective studies.

A significant correlation between cauda equina conduction time and cerebrospinal fluid protein in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

We investigated the relationship between the involvement of the cauda equina in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and the increment of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein. We measured cauda equina conduction time (CECT) in 14 CIDP patients using magnetic stimulation with a MATS coil. Statistical analysis revealed that CECT and CSF protein had a significant positive linear correlation. Conduction time of the peripheral nerve trunk, in contrast, had no significant linear correlation with CSF protein. We revealed that the involvement of the cauda equina and increment of CSF protein are closely related. In CIDP cases with elevated CSF protein, spinal nerves including the cauda equina are very likely involved.

Effects of differences in age and body height on normal values of central motor conduction time determined by F-waves

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect on central motor conduction time (CMCT) based on the relationship between age and height in normal subjects.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety nine normal subjects (107 men and 92 women; mean age 39.0 ± 16.4 years; mean height 164.5 ± 8.8 cm) participated in the study. The approximate ages of subjects were as follows: 82 (20-29 years old), 32 (30-39 years old), 32 (40-49 years old), 28 (50-59 years old), and 25 (≧60 years old). The heights of 9, 49, 79, 53, and 9 subjects were <150 cm, 150-160 cm, 160-170 cm, 170-180 cm, and >180 cm, respectively. CMCT- abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor hallucis (AH) were calculated by subtracting the peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT) from the onset latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. PMCT was calculated from the latencies of the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and F-waves as follows: (latency of CMAPs + latency of F-waves -1)/2.

OUTCOME MEASURES

CMCT-ADM and CMCT-AH.

RESULTS

The normative values were 5.2 ± 0.8 ms and 11.8 ± 1.3 ms for CMCT-ADM and CMCT-AH, respectively. CMCT-ADM was not significantly correlated with age (P = 0.196) and body height (P = 0.158). CMCT-AH had significantly positive, linear correlations with age and body height (CMCT-AH = 0.014 × age + 10.971, P = 0.011, R = 0.179 and CMCT-AH = 0.026 × body height + 7.158, P = 0.010, R = 0.182).

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest normative values of 3.2-7.2 ms in CMCT-ADM for subjects exerting slight effort on ADM regardless age and body height. CMCT-AH had significantly positive, linear correlations with age and body height.

Cauda Equina Conduction Time Determined by F-Waves in Normal Subjects and Patients With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Caused by Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

PURPOSE

Lumbar spinal stenosis typically presents with neurogenic intermittent claudication. The aim of this study was to investigate cauda equina conduction time (CECT) in patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis and its relationship with age and body height in normal subjects.

METHODS

The study included 172 normal subjects (group C) (mean age 44.1 ± 16.6 years; mean height 163.7 ± 8.9 cm). Forty-seven patients (group L) (mean age 71.3 ± 8.7 years; mean height 158.8 ± 11.2 cm) underwent surgery because of neurogenic intermittent claudication in cauda equina type of lumbar spinal stenosis. Motor-evoked potentials from the abductor hallucis were recorded. Magnetic stimulation was delivered at the S1 spinous process. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and F-waves were also recorded after supramaximal electric stimulation of tibial nerves. The peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT) was calculated from the latencies of CMAPs and F-waves as follows: (CMAPs + F-waves - 1)/2. The CECT was calculated by subtracting the onset latency of the motor-evoked potentials from PMCT.

RESULTS

The mean values for F-wave latencies, motor-evoked potential latencies, and CECT were 44.5 ± 3.3, 20.6 ± 1.8, and 3.4 ± 0.8 milliseconds, respectively. F-wave and motor-evoked potential latencies showed significant positive linear correlations with age and body height. However, no significant correlation was found between CECT and age (P = 0.43) or body height (P = 0.26). Mean CECT was 5.7 ± 1.5 in group L. There was a significant difference between groups C and L (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CECT value of normal subjects was 3.4 ± 0.8 milliseconds regardless of age and body height. We suggest that CECT may be a useful factor to consider when evaluating patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Spinal electro-magnetic stimulation combined with transgene delivery of neurotrophin NT-3 and exercise: novel combination therapy for spinal contusion injury

Our recent terminal experiments revealed that administration of a single train of repetitive spinal electromagnetic stimulation (sEMS; 35 min) enhanced synaptic plasticity in spinal circuitry following lateral hemisection spinal cord injury. In the current study, we have examined effects of repetitive sEMS applied as a single train and chronically (5 wk, every other day) following thoracic T10 contusion. Chronic studies involved examination of systematic sEMS administration alone and combined with exercise training and transgene delivery of neurotrophin [adeno-associated virus 10-neurotrophin 3 (AAV10-NT3)]. Electrophysiological intracellular/extracellular recordings, immunohistochemistry, behavioral testing, and anatomical tracing were performed to assess effects of treatments. We found that administration of a single sEMS train induced transient facilitation of transmission through preserved lateral white matter to motoneurons and hindlimb muscles in chronically contused rats with effects lasting for at least 2 h. These physiological changes associated with increased immunoreactivity of GluR1 and GluR2/3 glutamate receptors in lumbar neurons. Systematic administration of sEMS alone for 5 wk, however, was unable to induce cumulative improvements of transmission in spinomuscular circuitry or improve impaired motor function following thoracic contusion. Encouragingly, chronic administration of sEMS, followed by exercise training (running in an exercise ball and swimming), induced the following: 1) sustained strengthening of transmission to lumbar motoneurons and hindlimb muscles, 2) better retrograde transport of anatomical tracer, and 3) improved locomotor function. Greatest improvements were seen in the group that received exercise combined with sEMS and AAV-NT3.

Usefulness of cervical root magnetic stimulation in assessing proximal motor nerve conduction

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the reliability and utility of cervical root magnetic stimulation in exploring proximal motor conduction.

METHODS

In 20 patients with demyelinating polyneuropathy (DPN), 20 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 25 healthy subjects, evoked compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from abductor digiti minimi muscle in response to electrical stimulation up to Erb's point and magnetic stimulation up to the cervical roots.

RESULTS

In all healthy and ALS subjects, magnetic root stimulation confirmed the absence of conduction abnormalities, including those in whom supramaximal responses at Erb's point were not achieved. In the DPN group, conduction block and/or temporal dispersion was revealed by magnetic root stimulation in 9 out of 20 patients (45%), 3 more than those detected at Erb's point.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical root stimulation allowed clear distinction between motor neuronopathy and DPN. It is recommended as part of the routine evaluation of patients suspected of having DPN, especially when distal nerve studies are inconclusive.

Cauda equina conduction time in Guillain-Barré syndrome

The proximal segment of peripheral nerves is assumed to be involved in both demyelinating and axonal types of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). However, electrophysiological examinations have not yet clarified if this segment is involved. We measured cauda equina conduction time (CECT) in nine demyelinating GBS and seven axonal GBS patients. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from the abductor hallucis muscle. Electrical stimulation was given at the ankle and the knee, and magnetic stimulation was given over the first sacral (S1) and first lumbar (L1) spinous processes using a magnetic augmented translumbosacral stimulation (MATS) coil. CECT was obtained by subtracting S1-level latency from L1-level latency. CECT was prolonged in all the patients with demyelinating GBS who had leg symptoms, whereas motor conduction velocity (MCV) at the peripheral nerve trunk was normal in all the patients. In all the patients with axonal GBS having leg symptoms, CECT and MCV were normal and no conduction blocks were detected between the ankle and the neuro-foramina. The cauda equina is much more frequently involved than the peripheral nerve trunk in demyelinating GBS. In axonal GBS, usually, CECT is normal and segmental lesions are absent between the ankle and the neuro-foramina. Therefore, the CECT measurement should be very useful for directly detecting demyelinating lesions in GBS.

Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee

These guidelines provide an up-date of previous IFCN report on “Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application” (Rossini et al., 1994). A new Committee, composed of international experts, some of whom were in the panel of the 1994 “Report”, was selected to produce a current state-of-the-art review of non-invasive stimulation both for clinical application and research in neuroscience.

Since 1994, the international scientific community has seen a rapid increase in non-invasive brain stimulation in studying cognition, brain–behavior relationship and pathophysiology of various neurologic and psychiatric disorders. New paradigms of stimulation and new techniques have been developed. Furthermore, a large number of studies and clinical trials have demonstrated potential therapeutic applications of non-invasive brain stimulation, especially for TMS. Recent guidelines can be found in the literature covering specific aspects of non-invasive brain stimulation, such as safety (Rossi et al., 2009), methodology (Groppa et al., 2012) and therapeutic applications (Lefaucheur et al., 2014).

This up-dated review covers theoretical, physiological and practical aspects of non-invasive stimulation of brain, spinal cord, nerve roots and peripheral nerves in the light of more updated knowledge, and include some recent extensions and developments.

Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation alter phrenic motoneurons and respiratory neuromechanical outputs in humans? A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, crossover study

Although compelling evidence has demonstrated considerable neuroplasticity in the respiratory control system, few studies have explored the possibility of altering descending projections to phrenic motoneurons (PMNs) using noninvasive stimulation protocols. The present study was designed to investigate the immediate and long-lasting effects of a single session of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), a promising technique for modulating spinal cord functions, on descending ventilatory commands in healthy humans. Using a double-blind, controlled, randomized, crossover approach, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS delivered to the C3-C5 level on (1) diaphragm motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and (2) spontaneous ventilation, as measured by respiratory inductance plethysmography. Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS induced a progressive increase in DiMEP amplitude during stimulation that persisted for at least 15 min after current offset. Interestingly, cathodal, but not anodal, tsDCS induced a persistent increase in tidal volume. In addition, (1) short-interval intracortical inhibition, (2) nonlinear complexity of the tidal volume signal (related to medullary ventilatory command), (3) autonomic function, and (4) compound muscle action potentials evoked by cervical magnetic stimulation were unaffected by tsDCS. This suggests that tsDCS-induced aftereffects did not occur at brainstem or cortical levels and were likely not attributable to direct polarization of cranial nerves or ventral roots. Instead, we argue that tsDCS could induce sustained changes in PMN output. Increased tidal volume after cathodal tsDCS opens up the perspective of harnessing respiratory neuroplasticity as a therapeutic tool for the management of several respiratory disorders.

Motor cortical excitability in peritoneal dialysis: a single-pulse TMS study

The aim of this paper is to investigate cortical excitability in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) without any symptoms suggestive of uremic encephalopathy. We performed transcranial magnetic stimulation for 52 PD patients and 28 normal subjects. We compared the active motor threshold (AMT), resting motor threshold (RMT), root latency, central motor conduction time (CMCT), and cortical silent period (CSP) in PD patients to those in normal subjects. AMT, RMT, CMCT, and CSP were not significantly different between PD patients and normal subjects. However, root latency was significantly prolonged in PD patients compared to normal subjects. The root latency correlated linearly with HbA1c or duration of PD in the patients. The results suggest that the corticospinal tract and the cortical and spinal excitabilities are preserved but the peripheral nerves are disturbed in PD patients. The severity of peripheral neuropathy corresponds to the severity of DM and the duration of PD. We uncovered no evidence suggestive of any subclinical abnormality of the motor cortical excitability in PD patients.

Volitional walking via upper limb muscle-controlled stimulation of the lumbar locomotor center in man

Gait disturbance in individuals with spinal cord lesion is attributed to the interruption of descending pathways to the spinal locomotor center, whereas neural circuits below and above the lesion maintain their functional capability. An artificial neural connection (ANC), which bridges supraspinal centers and locomotor networks in the lumbar spinal cord beyond the lesion site, may restore the functional impairment. To achieve an ANC that sends descending voluntary commands to the lumbar locomotor center and bypasses the thoracic spinal cord, upper limb muscle activity was converted to magnetic stimuli delivered noninvasively over the lumbar vertebra. Healthy participants were able to initiate and terminate walking-like behavior and to control the step cycle through an ANC controlled by volitional upper limb muscle activity. The walking-like behavior stopped just after the ANC was disconnected from the participants even when the participant continued to swing arms. Furthermore, additional simultaneous peripheral electrical stimulation to the foot via the ANC enhanced this walking-like behavior. Kinematics of the induced behaviors were identical to those observed in voluntary walking. These results demonstrate that the ANC induces volitionally controlled, walking-like behavior of the legs. This paradigm may be able to compensate for the dysfunction of descending pathways by sending commands to the preserved locomotor center at the lumbar spinal cord and may enable individuals with paraplegia to regain volitionally controlled walking.

Cutaneous silent period recordings in demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cutaneous silent period (CSP), a spinal inhibitory reflex mainly mediated by A-delta fibres, in demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathy (PNP) and evaluate whether CSP parameters differ between patients with and without neuropathic pain.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with demyelinating PNP, 178 patients with axonal PNP and 265 controls underwent clinical examination, DN4 questionnaire, standard nerve conduction study, motor-root stimulation and CSP recordings from abductor digiti minimi. We calculated the afferent conduction time of CSP (a-CSP time) with the formula: CSP latency-root motor evoked potential latency.

RESULTS

In the demyelinating PNP group the a-CSP time was significantly longer; in the axonal PNP group, CSP duration was shorter than the demyelinating group (p=0.010) and controls (p=0.001). CSP parameters were not different between patients with and without neuropathic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The abnormality of a-CSP time in the demyelinating PNP group suggests the crucial role of A-delta fibres in the mechanism of CSP; the shorter CSP duration in the axonal PNP group supports the strong influence of the number of axons on this parameter. Our study suggests that neuropathic pain could be related to pathophysiological mechanisms differing from mere A-delta fibre loss.

SIGNIFICANCE

CSP evaluation is effective in detecting A-delta fibre dysfunction in axonal as well as demyelinating PNP.

An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists

Gastroenterologists frequently encounter pelvic floor disorders, which affect 10% to 15% of the population. The anorectum is a complex organ that collaborates with the pelvic floor muscles to preserve fecal continence and enable defecation. A careful clinical assessment is critical for the diagnosis and management of defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence. Newer diagnostic tools (eg, high-resolution manometry and magnetic resonance defecography) provide a refined understanding of anorectal dysfunctions and identify phenotypes in defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence. Conservative approaches, including biofeedback therapy, are the mainstay for managing these disorders; new minimally invasive approaches may benefit a subset of patients with fecal incontinence, but more controlled studies are needed. This mini-review highlights advances, current concepts, and controversies in the area.