New methodology for facial nerve monitoring in extracranial surgeries of vascular malformations

An updated protocol for mandibular reconstruction in nongrowing patients with craniofacial microsomia with temporomandibular joint total prosthesis

The authors aim to present an updated protocol for mandibular reconstruction in nongrowing patients with Pruzansky/Kaban type IIb/III congenital craniofacial microsomia with customized temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prosthesis to reduce facial nerve (FN) damage and improve surgical accuracy. This is illustrated (using 3 cases) and is based on preoperative mapping of the FN using MRI for better virtual surgical planning of custom-made TMJ prosthesis. Intraoperative FN mapping and monitoring, as well as verification of the final result with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D-reconstructed images is also achieved. All 3 patients presented mild transient postoperative facial palsy due to surgical soft tissue stretching which resolved within 2 months of surgery. All patients presented proper occlusion and mouth opening without pain, with an average incisal opening of 38.8 mm (range 35.5-42 mm) at two months of follow-up. Moreover, superposition of intraoperative and preoperative 3D reconstruction images ensured surgical accuracy and avoided the need for a potential reintervention. In conclusion, the proposed surgical protocol for mandibular reconstruction with customized alloplastic TMJ prosthesis in nongrowing patients with type IIb/III Pruzansky-Kaban congenital mandibular hypoplasia may reduce FN morbidity, improve surgical accuracy and final outcomes.

Comprehensive Mapping and Dynamic Monitoring of the Temporal Branch of the Facial Nerve in Complex Cranial Reconstruction Surgery and Revision Cranioplasty

Facial nerve (FN) injury is a significant risk during complex cranial reconstruction surgeries, especially in revision cases where normal anatomy is distorted. The authors introduce a technique to mitigate FN injury, including preoperative FN mapping, intraoperative FN mapping, and continuous FN monitoring. Preoperative mapping uses a handheld ball-tip stimulator to elicit compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) in the frontalis muscle. Needle electrodes are placed above the orbital margin to record responses, starting at the stylomastoid foramen and extending until the entire temporal branch is mapped. Intraoperatively, continuous mapping is achieved using an electrified insulated suction device, allowing dynamic mapping during soft tissue dissection. Continuous monitoring involves placing stimulation electrodes near the stylomastoid foramen and recording CMAP responses from the frontalis and orbicularis oculi/orbicularis oris muscles. The authors tested this technique in 5 patients. The authors successfully mapped the temporal branch of the FN with isolated frontalis CMAP recordings in all patients. Intraoperative FN mapping and continuous monitoring were successfully performed in all cases. Two patients experienced complete cessation of FN CMAPs, which resumed upon loosening the tension on the myocutaneous flap held by fishhooks. One patient showed a 39% decrement in frontalis CMAP that did not recover. Despite these issues, all patients had intact FN function postoperatively and at follow-up. Our technique shows promise in mitigating FN injury during complex cranial reconstruction and cranioplasty revision surgery. Further research with a larger cohort is needed to confirm efficacy and statistical significance.

Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve predicts postoperative facial palsy in parotid surgery: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Facial palsy (FP) is the most significant complication of parotidectomy. Currently, the use of intermittent intraoperative neuromonitoring (iIONM) in parotid surgery facilitates nerve detection, which is paramount to nerve protection. Continuous IONM (cIONM), as applied in thyroid surgery, enables real-time information on electrophysiological nerve status through continuous nerve stimulation, thereby allowing consequent amplitude analysis. To date, the application of cIONM in parotid surgery has not been noted in literature.

METHODS

We performed parotidectomies with anterograde facial nerve visualization using cIONM in 32 consecutive patients in a prospective study (German Register of clinical studies-DRKS 00011051) during the period October 2016 to January 2020. After the facial trunk had been exposed, an atraumatic stimulation electrode was placed and the nerve was stimulated at 3 Hz, at a low threshold (0.62 ± 0.06 mA), for the entire duration of the preparation. Selected electrophysiological parameters were collected and compared to postoperative facial nerve function, measured by the House-Brackmann grading system.

RESULTS

In the post hoc analysis, a significant correlation between a drop in amplitude (< 50% of the "baseline" amplitude) and postoperative FP was recorded (p = 0.001). True positive prediction of FP was noted in 14 out of 16 patients and true negative in 10 out of 16. The sensitivity was 87.5% (AUC 0.75), with a high negative predictive value of 83.3%.

CONCLUSION

cIONM has significant value in predicting postoperative FP in parotidectomy. Future development of an acoustic/optic warning system in IONM devices could prevent nerve injury in real time.

Clarifying optimal outcome measures in intermittent and continuous laryngeal neuromonitoring

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) techniques have evolved over the past decade into intermittent IONM (I-IONM) and continuous IONM (C-IONM) modes of application. Despite many prior publications on both types of IONM, there remains uncertainty about what outcomes should be measured for each form of IONM. The primary objective of this paper is to define categories of benefit for I-IONM/C-IONM and to clarify and standardize their reporting outcomes.

METHODS

Expert review consensus statement utilizing modified Delphi methodology.

RESULTS

I-IONM provides diagnosis, classification, and prevention of nerve injury through accurate and early nerve identification. C-IONM provides real-time information on nerve functional integrity and thus may prevent some types of nerve injury but cannot assist in nerve localization. Sudden mechanisms of nerve injury cannot be predicted or prevented by either technique.

CONCLUSIONS

I-IONM and C-IONM are complementary techniques. Future studies evaluating the utility of IONM should focus on outcomes that are appropriate to the type of IONM being utilized.

Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (cIONM) in head and neck surgery-a review

Although the history of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) dates back to the 19th century, the method did not evolve further than the mere differentiation of nerves until recently. Only the development of continuous IONM (cIONM) has allowed for non-stop analysis of excitation amplitude and latency during surgical procedures, which is nowadays integrated into the software of almost all commercially available neuromonitoring devices. The objective of cIONM is real-time monitoring of nerve status in order to recognize and prevent impending nerve injury and predict postoperative nerve function. Despite some drawbacks such as false-positive/negative alarms, technical artefacts, and rare adverse effects, cIONM remains a good instrument which is still under development. Active (acIONM) and passive (pcIONM) methods of cIONM are described in literature. The main fields of cIONM implementation are currently thyroid surgery (in which the vagal nerve is continuously stimulated) and surgery to the cerebellopontine angle (in which the facial nerve is either continuously stimulated or the discharge signal of the nerve is analyzed via pcIONM). In the latter surgery, continuous monitoring of the cochlear nerve is also established.

Continuous Laryngeal Adductor Reflex Versus Intermittent Nerve Monitoring in Neck Endocrine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) techniques aim to identify and potentially prevent nerve injury during surgeries. Prior studies into the efficacy of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) IONM convey mixed results, with some claiming equivalence between IONM and no monitoring at all. The goal of the current study was to compare continuous RLN monitoring using the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) to intermittent RLN monitoring (intermittent IONM) to determine whether continuous monitoring reduces the incidence of intraoperative RLN injury during neck endocrine surgeries.

METHODS

In this observational, historical case-control study, a historical cohort of patients monitored with intermittent-IONM (group 1, n = 130) were compared to prospectively collected data from consecutive nerves-at-risk monitored continuously with the LAR (LAR-CIONM, group 2, n = 205), at a single center by a single surgeon. The test benefit ratio and relative risk reduction (RRR) for LAR-CIONM over intermittent IONM were calculated.

RESULTS

For group 1, nine nerves at risk exhibited intraoperative LOS with transient postoperative vocal fold (VF) hypomobility (n = 2) or immobility (VFI, n = 7). For group 2, two nerves at risk (0.98%) had sudden intraoperative LAR LOS following bipolar cautery, resulting in postoperative transient VFI (P = .004). In each group, there was one case of permanent postoperative VFI. The test benefit rate ratio for LAR-CIONM demonstrated a dramatic effect at 5.23, with an RRR of 81.0%.

CONCLUSION

LAR-CIONM significantly decreased rates of postoperative transient VF paralysis and paresis over intermittent IONM alone (P = .004). Surgeons should be aware of the benefits and limitations of intermittent IONM versus CIONM. Intermittent IONM, although useful in nerve mapping and intraoperative decision making, has minimal benefit for the prevention of nerve injury, whereas CIONM can potentially reduce nerve injury rates and improve patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:230-236, 2021.

[Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (cIONM) in head and neck surgery-a review. German version]

Obwohl die Geschichte des intraoperativen Neuromonitorings (IONM) bereits in das 19. Jahrhundert zurückdatiert werden kann, hat sich diese Methode bis vor Kurzem nicht von der reinen Differenzierung des Nervs weiterentwickelt. Erst das kontinuierliche IONM (cIONM) ermöglichte die durchgehende Analyse der Reizamplituden und -latenzen, welche mittlerweile ebenfalls in die Software gängiger Monitoringsysteme integriert wurde. Zielsetzung des cIONM ist ein Real-Time-Monitoring des Nervenstatus während des Eingriffs, um so drohende Nervenverletzung erkennen und verhindern zu können und die postoperative Funktion des Nervs vorhersehbar zu erhalten. Trotz einiger Nachteile wie falsch-positiver oder -negativer Alarme, technischer Artefakte und seltener Nebenwirkungen bleibt das cIONM ein gutes Hilfsmittel, das noch weiterentwickelt wird. In der Literatur sind sowohl aktive (acIONM) als auch passive (pcIONM) Reiz- und Ableitmethoden des cIONM beschrieben. Derzeit gängige Anwendungsgebiete des cIONM umfassen die Schilddrüsenchirurgie mit der kontinuierlichen Stimulation des N. vagus sowie die Chirurgie des Kleinhirnbrückenwinkels (KHBW) mit dem Monitoring des N. facialis; hierbei werden neben kontinuierlicher Stimulation auch die Entladungsmuster des Nervs analysiert. Des Weiteren ist in die Chirurgie des KHBW das kontinuierliche Monitoring des Hörnervs etabliert.

Safety of the "Saxophone®" electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Early facial nerve palsy (eFNP) is the most frequent complication of the parotidectomy. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in parotid surgery, which aims at reducing eFNP, has not evolved any further than the mere differentiation between the nerve and the surrounding tissue. Continuous IONM (cIONM), used in thyroid and posterior fossa surgery, has developed over the past years and has proved beneficial in reducing the rate of paresis in cases where a pattern of impending nerve injury is identified. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the safety of using the stimulating electrode (Saxophone^®) for cIONM in parotid surgery.

Methods

From 2016 to 2018, 40 patients who were referred for primary parotidectomy under cIONM according to our study protocol (registered at the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00011051, http://www.drks.de; http://apps.who.int/trialsearch) were included in this study. All patients with a normal preoperative facial nerve function [House–Brackman (HB)-Index 1] underwent surgery using continuous facial nerve stimulation with the Saxophone^® electrode (system AVALANCHE XT, Dr. Langer Medical, Waldkirch, Germany). A control group which underwent parotidectomies with only intermittent IONM was recruited from our records.

Results

Half of the patients in our study group suffered from eFNP. All except one regained normal facial nerve function within 6 months of surgery. There was no significant difference regarding eFNP when compared to the control group without cIONM (p = 0.11). No statistically significant correlation between the stimulation threshold (p = 0.74) or the duration of nerve stimulation and eFNP was found (p = 0.51).

Conclusion

We have demonstrated the safety of using the Saxophone^®-electrode for cIONM of the facial nerve in parotid surgery. Future development of this method could enable the recognition of impending nerve injury and thus reduce eFNP.

Preoperative Facial Nerve Mapping to Plan and Guide Pediatric Facial Vascular Anomaly Resection

Importance

Facial vascular anomalies are surgical challenges due to their vascularity and facial nerve distortion. To assist facial vascular anomaly surgical treatment, presurgical percutaneous facial nerve stimulation and recording of compound motor action potentials can be used to map the facial nerve branches. During surgery, the nerve map and continuous intraoperative motor end plate potential monitoring can be used to reduce nerve injury.

Objective

To investigate if preoperative facial nerve mapping (FNM) is associated with intraoperative facial nerve injury risk and safe surgical approach options compared with standard nerve integrity monitoring (NIM).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This investigation was a historically controlled study at a tertiary vascular anomaly center in Seattle, Washington. Participants were 92 pediatric patients with facial vascular anomalies undergoing definitive anomaly surgery (from January 1, 1999, through January 1, 2015), with 2 years' follow-up. In retrospective review, a consecutive FNM patient cohort after 2005 (FNM group) was compared with a consecutive historical cohort (1999-2005) (NIM group).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Postoperative facial nerve function and selected surgical approach. For NIM and FNM comparisons, statistical analysis calculated odds ratios of nerve injury and operative approach, and time-to-event methods analyzed operative time.

Results

The NIM group had 31 patients (median age, 3.3 years [interquartile range, 2.2-11.4 years]; 20 [65%] male), and the FNM group had 61 patients (median age, 4.4 years [interquartile range, 1.5-11.0 years]; 26 [43%] male). In both groups, lymphatic malformation resection was most common (19 of 31 [61%] in the NIM group and 32 of 61 [52%] in the FNM group), and the median anomaly volumes were similar (52.4 mL; interquartile range, 12.8-183.3 mL in the NIM group and 65.4 mL; interquartile range, 18.8-180.2 mL in the FNM group). Weakness in the facial nerve branches at 2 years after surgery was more common in the NIM group (6 of 31 [19%]) compared with the FNM group (1 of 61 [2%]) (percentage difference, 17%; 95% CI, 3%-32%). Anterograde facial nerve dissection was used more in the NIM group (27 of 31 [87%]) compared with the FNM group (28 of 61 [46%]) (percentage difference, 41%; 95% CI, 24%-58%). Treatment with retrograde dissection without identification of the main trunk of the facial nerve was performed in 21 of 61 (34%) in the FNM group compared with 0 of 31 (0%) in the NIM group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the FNM group, and patients in the FNM group were more likely to complete surgery sooner (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.00-14.36).

Conclusions and Relevance

Facial nerve mapping before facial vascular anomaly surgery was associated with less intraoperative facial nerve injury and shorter operative time. Mapping enabled direct identification of individual intralesional and perilesional nerve branches, reducing the need for traditional anterograde facial nerve dissection, and allowed for safe removal of some lesions after partial nerve dissection through transoral or direct excision.

Altered facial muscle innervation pattern in patients with postparetic facial synkinesis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Using surface electrostimulation, we aimed to use facial nerve mapping (FNM) in healthy subjects and patients with postparetic facial synkinesis (PPFS) to define functional facial target regions that can be stimulated selectively.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center prospective cohort study.

METHODS

FNM was performed bilaterally in 20 healthy subjects and 20 patients with PPFS. Single-pulse surface FNM started at the main trunk of the facial nerve and followed the peripheral branches in a distal direction. Stimulation started with 0.1 mA and increased in 0.1 mA increments. The procedure was simultaneously video recorded and evaluated offline.

RESULTS

A total of 1,873 spots were stimulated, and 1,875 facial movements were evaluated. The stimulation threshold was higher on the PPFS side (average = 9.8 ± 1.0 mA) compared to the contralateral side (4.1 ± 0.8 mA) for all stimulation sites or compared to healthy subjects (4.1 ± 0.5 mA; all P < .01). In healthy subjects, selective electrostimulation ± one unintended coactivation was possible at all sites in >80% of cases, with the exception of pulling up the corner of the mouth (65%-75%). On the PPFS side, stimulation was possible for puckering lips movements in 60%/75% (selective stimulation ± one coactivation, respectively), blinking in 55%/80%, pulling up the corner of the mouth in 50%/85%, brow raising in 5%/85, and raising the chin in 0%/35% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FNM mapping for surgical planning and selective electrostimulation of functional facial regions is possible even in patients with PPFS. FNM may be a tool for patient-specific evaluation and placement of electrodes to stimulate the correct nerve branches in future bionic devices (e.g., for a bionic eye blink).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b Laryngoscope, 130:E320-E326, 2020.