Neurophysiological localisation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: Validation of diagnostic criteria developed by a taskforce of the Danish Society of clinical neurophysiology

Risk factors of asymptomatic reduction of motor conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve across the elbow

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to check the risk factors for subjects with motor conduction velocity (MCV) reduction of the ulnar nerve across the elbow without symptoms/signs of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) using a database of a previous multicenter case-control study on UNE patients.

METHODS

From the previous database, we extracted all asymptomatic UNE (A-UNE) and matched for age and sex with a control and UNE groups with a ratio of 1:2. Anthropometric factors were measured and all participants filled in a questionnaire on demographic, lifestyle factors, and medical history. One-sample proportion test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 64 A-UNE, 124 UNE, and 124 controls (mean age 53 years). There were more males with A-UNE than females (74.2%). The predominantly or exclusively concerned side of A-UNE was the right. Logistic regression showed that A-UNE was associated with diabetes (OR = 2.99, 95% CI = 1.21-7.39) and width of cubital groove (CGW) (OR = 0.89, 95%  CI = 0.81-0.97).

DISCUSSION

Risk factors for A-UNE are different from UNE. The prevalence of right side in A-UNE was not due to particular elbow postures. Diabetes is a risk factor, probably because MCV reduction of the ulnar nerve across the elbow was an early manifestation of asymptomatic polyneuropathy in diabetes. A-UNE is associated with narrow CGW as already demonstrated in UNE, even if the OR was higher in UNE than in A-UNE. Only future longitudinal studies will be able to check whether the A-UNE subjects develop symptoms and signs of true mononeuropathy with time.

MRI of the ulnar nerve pre- and post-transposition: imaging features and rater agreement

OBJECTIVE

Determine the rater agreement of MRI features of the ulnar nerve pre- and post-transposition and association with recurrent symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This IRB-approved retrospective cohort analysis examined 23 subjects who underwent elbow MRI pre- and post-ulnar nerve transposition from 1999 to 2018, 10 of whom developed recurrent symptoms. Pre- and post-transposition MRIs were evaluated by two blinded radiologists for ulnar nerve cross-sectional area, signal intensity, fascicular architecture, caliber change, and perineural scar. Inter-rater agreement was estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for continuous variables and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC) for categorical variables. Binary logistic regression modeling probed associations between imaging markers and symptom recurrence.

RESULTS

The ulnar nerve, post-operatively, demonstrated statistically significant increases in size (p < 0.001), signal intensity (p = 0.021), and abrupt caliber change (p = 0.024). None of the imaging features, except for higher signal intensity of the nerve pre-transposition as demonstrated by one rater, were predictive of symptom recurrence. Inter-rater agreement for cross-sectional area measurements of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel was excellent (ICCs of 0.91 and 0.83). Substantial-to-excellent inter-rater agreement was observed pre-operatively for nerve signal intensity, caliber change, and fascicular architecture. Post-operatively, agreement on nerve signal intensity and perineural scar was excellent (ACs of 0.90 and 0.88), but only slight for caliber change (0.15).

CONCLUSION

Inter-rater agreement for qualitative and quantitative assessment of the ulnar nerve was generally robust. Post-transposition, the ulnar nerve was generally larger and more T2-hyperintense, but MRI features were not predictive of recurrent ulnar neuropathy, except for perhaps the signal intensity of the nerve pre-transposition.

Electrodiagnostic Testing of Entrapment Neuropathies: A Review of Existing Guidelines

Entrapment neuropathies cover a wide range of isolated nerve injuries along the course of the upper and lower extremity nerves. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is usually an essential part of the evaluation of entrapment neuropathies, and examinations for the most common entrapment neuropathies, carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, constitute a significant part of the daily work in EDX laboratories. Despite this, guidelines for EDX testing are generally sparse or do not exist for entrapment neuropathies, whereas a wide variety of different techniques are available to the clinical neurophysiologist. This study reviews the existing, more or less, detailed EDX criteria or practice parameters that are suggested by consensus groups in peer-reviewed journals for the most common entrapment neuropathies: carpal tunnel syndrome, ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, common peroneal (fibular) neuropathy at the fibular head, and tibial neuropathy at the tarsal tunnel. It is concluded that future research is needed to develop and refine EDX guidelines in entrapment neuropathies.

An Additional Electrodiagnostic Tool for Ulnar Neuropathy: Mixed across the Elbow

Background  Diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) remains challenging despite guidelines from national organizations. Motor testing of hand intrinsic muscles remains a common diagnostic method fraught with challenges.

Objective  The aim of the study is to demonstrate utility of an uncommon nerve conduction study (NCS), mixed across the elbow, when diagnosing UNE.

Methods  Retrospective analysis of 135 patients, referred to an outpatient University-based electrodiagnostic laboratory with suspected UNE between January 2013 and June 2019 who had motor to abductor digiti minimi (ADM), motor to first dorsal interosseus (FDI), and mixed across the elbow NCS completed. To perform the mixed across the elbow NCS, the active bar electrode was placed 10-cm proximal to the medial epicondyle between the biceps and triceps muscle bellies. The median nerve was stimulated at the wrist followed by stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the ulnar styloid. The difference between peak latencies, labeled the ulnar-median mixed latency difference (U-MLD), was used to evaluate for correlation between the nerve conduction velocities (NCV) of ADM and FDI.

Results  Pearson r -values = −0.479 and −0.543 ( p  < 0.00001) when comparing U-MLD to ADM and FDI NCV across the elbow, respectively. The negative r -value describes the inverse relationship between ulnar velocity across the elbow and increasing U-MLD.

Conclusion  Mixed across the elbow has moderate–strong correlation with ADM and FDI NCV across the elbow. All three tests measure ulnar nerve function slightly differently. Without further prospective data, the most accurate test remains unclear. The authors propose some combination of the three tests may be most beneficial when diagnosing UNE.

Evidence-based recommendations for examination and diagnostic strategies of polyneuropathy electrodiagnosis

•

The best approach for electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy (PNP) were tested in 313 patients.

•

Electrodiagnostic screening for distal symmetric PNP (DSP) should start with tibial and sural NCS.

•

Examination of lower limbs at one side is sufficient for electrodiagnostic screening of DSP.

The purpose of this report is to recommend evidence-based strategies for polyneuropathy (PNP) electrodiagnosis based on a large cohort of patients examined prospectively. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) of bilateral tibial, peroneal and sural nerves, the latter with both near-nerve-technique (NNT) and surface recordings, were done in 313 patients with clinically suspected PNP. Bilateral dorsal sural and medial plantar nerves, and unilateral median and ulnar nerves were further examined in a subgroup of patients. The final clinical diagnosis retrieved from the patientś medical records 1–6 years after the neurophysiological investigation served as diagnostic reference standard. The clinical follow-up diagnosis confirmed PNP in 219 patients. The tibial nerve was the most sensitive nerve (75%), with prolonged tibial F-wave as the most sensitive parameter (72%). Sural NNT recordings were more sensitive (66%) than surface recordings (49%) (p < 0.05), however, dorsal sural (68%) and medial planter (70%) nerves had similar sensitivities as NNT. There was no side difference in the incidence of abnormality for any nerve.

Based on these results, we recommend a strategy starting with tibial and sural NCS on one side for electrophysiological screening for distal symmetric PNP. If one of these is abnormal, we recommend examining the other lower and upper extremity nerves, including distal sensory nerves, particularly if NNT is not applicable. While one abnormal parameter is sufficient to interpret a nerve as abnormal, we recommend at least two abnormal nerves for PNP diagnosis, preferentially one being the sural nerve.

We believe that the strategies recommended in this study may improve PNP electrodiagnosis.

Clinical Findings and Electrodiagnostic Testing in Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow and Differences According to Site and Type of Nerve Damage

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and electrodiagnostic testing in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and differences according to site (humeroulnar arcade vs. retroepicondylar groove) and injury physiopathology (axonal vs. demyelinating), through prospective multicenter case-control study.

DESIGN

Cases and controls were matched by age and sex. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow diagnosis was made on symptoms. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney, χ, and analysis of variance tests.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four cases and 144 controls were enrolled. Sensory loss in the fifth finger had the highest sensitivity (70.8%) compared with clinical findings. Motor conduction velocity across elbow reached the highest sensitivity (84.7%) in localizing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow recording from at least one of the two hand muscles (first dorsal interosseous and abductor digiti minimi). Abnormal sensory action potential amplitude from the fifth finger occurred more frequently in axonal than in demyelinating forms. Differences between retroepicondylar groove and humeroulnar arcade regarded conduction block and job type.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical findings have less usefulness than electrodiagnostic testing in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow diagnosis. Motor conduction velocity across elbow recorded from both abductor digiti minimi and first dorsal interosseous increases diagnostic accuracy. Axonal forms have greater clinical and electrodiagnostic testing severity than demyelinating forms, which are more frequent in retroepicondylar groove. Manual workers prevailed in humeroulnar arcade. These findings may be helpful in prognostic and therapeutic approaches.

Upper extremity neuropathies

This chapter covers the electrodiagnostic (EDX) evaluation of upper extremity nerves and the brachial plexus. Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral nerve disorder of the upper extremity. A number of techniques are used but there is no gold standard approach for its diagnosis. Needle EMG aids in the differentiation of proximal and distal median neuropathies. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and ulnar neuropathy at or distal to the wrist can be distinguished by EDX techniques. Radial neuropathy at the spiral groove has a specific EDX pattern. EDX assessment of proximal upper extremity nerve lesions such as brachial plexopathy is a valuable tool for exploring the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of this complex disorder.