Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation for the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis: Optimization of stimulation parameters

275th ENMC international workshop: Seronegative myasthenia gravis: An update paradigm for diagnosis and management, 9-11 February 2024, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

The 275th ENMC workshop on the diagnosis and management of seronegative myasthenia gravis (SNMG) was held on February 9-11, 2024. The participants included experts in the field of adult and pediatric MG together with patient representatives. This workshop aimed to redefine SNMG in view of recent diagnostic and therapeutic updates and to identify patient unmet needs. The workshop has highlighted considerable challenges in the SNMG diagnostic work-up. To date, SNMG confirmation is often controversial, given the absence of specific diagnostic tests; no recommendations from international panels of experts are available in literature; myopathies, congenital myasthenic syndromes and functional disorders are the commonest misdiagnoses. Improving the disease diagnosis is crucial to avoid long delays in receiving appropriate treatment. To this purpose, a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm achieved consensus. Moreover, a remarkable variability in SNMG response to therapy and long-term prognosis has also been highlighted.

Accuracy of Repetitive Ocular Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials to Diagnose Myasthenia Gravis in Patients With Ptosis or Diplopia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We developed repetitive ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (roVEMP) as an electrophysiologic test that allows us to elicit the characteristic decrement of extraocular muscles in patients with ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). Case-control studies demonstrated that roVEMP reliably differentiates patients with OMG from healthy controls. We now aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of roVEMP for OMG diagnosis in patients with ptosis and/or diplopia.

METHODS

In this blinded prospective diagnostic accuracy trial, we compared roVEMP in 89 consecutive patients presenting with ptosis and/or diplopia suspicious of OMG with a multimodal diagnostic approach, including clinical examination, antibodies, edrophonium testing, repetitive nerve stimulation of accessory and facial nerves, and single-fiber EMG (SFEMG). We calculated the roVEMP decrement as the ratio between the mean of the first 2 responses compared with the mean of the sixth-ninth responses in the train and used cutoff of >9% (unilateral decrement) in a 30 Hz stimulation paradigm.

RESULTS

Following a complete diagnostic work-up, 39 patients (44%) were diagnosed with ocular MG, while 50 patients (56%) had various other neuro-ophthalmologic conditions, but not MG (non-MG). roVEMP yielded 88.2% sensitivity, 30.2% specificity, 50% positive predictive value (PPV), and 76.5% negative predictive value (NPV). For comparison, SFEMG resulted in 75% sensitivity, 56% specificity, 55.1% PPV, and 75.7% NPV. All other diagnostic tests (except for the ice pack test) also yielded significantly higher positive results in patients with MG compared with non-MG.

DISCUSSION

The study revealed a high sensitivity of 88.2% for roVEMP in OMG, but specificity and PPV were too low to allow for the OMG diagnosis as a single test. Thus, differentiating ocular MG from other neuro-ophthalmologic conditions remains challenging, and the highest diagnostic accuracy is still obtained by a multimodal approach. In this study, roVEMP can complement the diagnostic armamentarium for the diagnosis of MG.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class I evidence that in patients with diplopia and ptosis, roVEMP alone does not accurately distinguish MG from non-MG disorders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03049956.

Test-Retest Reliability of Repetitive Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Myasthenia Gravis Patients and Healthy Control Subjects

PURPOSE

Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (ROVEMP) are a novel diagnostic test to quantify neuromuscular transmission deficits in extraocular muscles in myasthenia gravis. We aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability of the ROVEMP and the effect of amplitude and age.

METHODS

We performed the ROVEMP test twice in 19 patients with myasthenia gravis (52.7 ± 19.8 years) and in 15 healthy control subjects (46.5 ± 16 years). The Bland-Altman level of agreement was determined. The relationship between test-retest reliability and signal quality, participant age and signal amplitude was studied.

RESULTS

Limits of agreement were from -179.9 to 139.3 in myasthenia gravis patients and from -56.9 to 89.5 in healthy control subjects. Difference between measurements correlated with signal amplitude ( r = -0.50, P < 0.001). Combining the primary cohort with previously published data from 114 subjects, we found a significant negative correlation between age and reference amplitude ( r = -0.163, P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in our hands, the test-retest reliability of the ROVEMP is not optimal. Measurements with higher reference amplitude had a better quality, higher reproducibility, and increased diagnostic yield. We caution against the use of ROVEMP measurements of lower amplitude in clinical practice. In addition, given the correlation between age and amplitude, age matching of healthy control subjects and patients is essential in future studies.

Myasthenia Gravis-An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is a comprehensive analysis of the parameters of exogenous evoked potentials (visual, brainstem auditory, and somatosensory) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), a prototype of both neuromuscular junction disease and autoimmune disease. The study also seeks to isolate electrophysiological changes that may indicate disorders within the central and/or peripheral nervous system.

METHODS

A total of forty-two consecutive patients with myasthenia gravis (24 women, 18 men) were included in the study. All of the patients underwent EP examination. MR images were also analyzed.

RESULTS

In the group of MG patients, the latency of P100 (113.9 ± 13.9; p < 0.0001) VEP, wave III (3.92 ± 0.29; p = 0.015), wave V (5.93 ± 0.32; <0.0001), interlatency III-V (2.00 ± 0.12; p < 0.0001), interlatency I-V (4.20 ± 0.28; p < 0.001) BAEP, and all components of SEP (N9, P10, N13, P16, N20, P22) were significantly longer. Mean wave I and V amplitude BAEP were relatively lower.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study suggest the presence of disturbances in the bioelectric activities of the central and peripheral nervous system in MG patients.

Controversies in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) with symptoms limited to eye muscles [ocular MG (OMG)] is a rare disease. OMG incidence varies according to ethnicity and age of onset. In recent years, both an increase in incidence rate, particularly in the elderly, and a lower risk for secondary generalization may have contributed to the growing disease prevalence in Western countries. OMG should be considered in patients with painless ptosis and extrinsic ophthalmoparesis. Though asymmetric muscle involvement and symptom fluctuations are typical, in some cases, OMG can mimic isolated cranial nerve paresis, internuclear ophthalmoplegia, and conjugate gaze palsy. Diagnostic confirmation can be challenging in patients negative for anti-acetylcholine receptor and anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies on standard radioimmunoassay. Early treatment is aimed at relieving symptoms and at preventing disease progression to generalized MG. Despite the absence of high-level evidence, there is general agreement on the efficacy of steroids at low to moderate dosage; immunosuppressants are considered when steroid high maintenance doses are required. The role of thymectomy in non-thymoma patients is controversial. Prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive therapy has a negative impact on the health-related quality of life in a proportion of these patients. OMG is currently excluded from most of the treatments recently developed in generalized MG.

Diagnosing Myasthenia Gravis With Repetitive Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials

Timely and accurate diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, particularly in patients with fluctuating, isolated ocular involvement, remains challenging. Serological antibody testing and repetitive nerve stimulation of peripheral muscles usually have low sensitivity in these patients. Edrophonium testing may cause adverse events, single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) is time-consuming and both tests are often unavailable outside specialized institutions. Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (roVEMP) stimulation has recently been introduced to facilitate the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. Similar to repetitive nerve stimulation, roVEMPs detect muscle decrements with the benefit of being non–invasive and allowing for direct measurement of the extraocular muscles. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of the diagnostic value of roVEMP for myasthenia. Prospective clinical trials have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. RoVEMPs are of particular interest in challenging myasthenia subgroups with isolated ocular involvement, negative serology, and/or negative conventional electrophysiological results. Optimal roVEMP repetition rates of 20–30 Hz have been identified. This promising novel diagnostic tool merits further attention and investigation to establish its value as a clinical test for myasthenia.

Diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an update on the most recent advances in diagnostic procedures and therapeutic approaches for myasthenia gravis, spanning from autoantibody and neuroelectrophysiological tests as diagnostic tools, to innovative and promising treatments based on biological drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel studies performed by cell-based assays (CBAs) indicate an improvement in the chance of identifying serum autoantibodies in myasthenic patients. Clinical trials on the use of biological drugs were recently concluded, providing important data on safety and efficacy of eculizumab, efgartigimod and amifampridine phosphate: the first, a complement blocker, showed long-term safety and efficacy in acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-positive myasthenic patients with refractory generalized disease; the second, the neonatal Fc receptor blocker, was well tolerated and clinically effective in both AChR-specific and muscle-specific kinase receptor (MuSK)-positive patients; the third, a blocker of presynaptic potassium channels, was found to be well tolerated and effective in MuSK-positive patients.

SUMMARY

CBAs can lead to a significant reduction of seronegative patients, improving myasthenia gravis diagnostic process. New biological drugs offer innovative approaches to treat myasthenic patients with generalized disease, promising to change the paradigm of treatment and to significantly enhance therapeutic success within a precision medicine framework.

Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

To validate the repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (RoVEMP) test for diagnostic use in myasthenia gravis (MG) and to investigate its value in diagnostically challenging subgroups.

METHODS

The RoVEMP test was performed in 92 patients with MG, 22 healthy controls, 33 patients with a neuromuscular disease other than MG (neuromuscular controls), 4 patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and 2 patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome.

RESULTS

Mean decrement was significantly higher in patients with MG (28.4% ± 32.2) than in healthy controls (3.2% ± 13.9; p < 0.001) or neuromuscular controls (3.8% ± 26.9; p < 0.001). With neuromuscular controls as reference, a cutoff of ≥14.3% resulted in a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 82%. The sensitivity of the RoVEMP test was 80% in ocular MG and 63% in generalized MG. The RoVEMP test was positive in 6 of 7 patients with seronegative MG (SNMG) with isolated ocular weakness. Of 10 patients with SNMG with negative repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) results, 73% had an abnormal RoVEMP test. The magnitude of decrement was correlated with the time since the last intake of pyridostigmine (B = 5.40; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The RoVEMP test is a new neurophysiologic test that, in contrast to RNS and single-fiber EMG, is able to measure neuromuscular transmission of extraocular muscles, which are the most affected muscles in MG. Especially in diagnostically challenging patients with negative antibody tests, negative RNS results, and isolated ocular muscle weakness, the RoVEMP test has a clear added value in supporting the diagnosis of MG.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that RoVEMP distinguishes MG from other neuromuscular diseases.