Lack of evidence for interhemispheric inhibition in the lower face primary motor cortex

Sensorimotor regulation of facial expression - An untouched frontier

Facial expression is a critical form of nonverbal social communication which promotes emotional exchange and affiliation among humans. Facial expressions are generated via precise contraction of the facial muscles, guided by sensory feedback. While the neural pathways underlying facial motor control are well characterized in humans and primates, it remains unknown how tactile and proprioceptive information reaches these pathways to guide facial muscle contraction. Thus, despite the importance of facial expressions for social functioning, little is known about how they are generated as a unique sensorimotor behavior. In this review, we highlight current knowledge about sensory feedback from the face and how it is distinct from other body regions. We describe connectivity between the facial sensory and motor brain systems, and call attention to the other brain systems which influence facial expression behavior, including vision, gustation, emotion, and interoception. Finally, we petition for more research on the sensory basis of facial expressions, asserting that incomplete understanding of sensorimotor mechanisms is a barrier to addressing atypical facial expressivity in clinical populations.

Neuroanatomical frameworks for volitional control of breathing and orofacial behaviors

Breathing is the only vital function that can be volitionally controlled. However, a detailed understanding how volitional (cortical) motor commands can transform vital breathing activity into adaptive breathing patterns that accommodate orofacial behaviors such as swallowing, vocalization or sniffing remains to be developed. Recent neuroanatomical tract tracing studies have identified patterns and origins of descending forebrain projections that target brain nuclei involved in laryngeal adductor function which is critically involved in orofacial behavior. These nuclei include the midbrain periaqueductal gray and nuclei of the respiratory rhythm and pattern generating network in the brainstem, specifically including the pontine Kölliker-Fuse nucleus and the pre-Bötzinger complex in the medulla oblongata. This review discusses the functional implications of the forebrain-brainstem anatomical connectivity that could underlie the volitional control and coordination of orofacial behaviors with breathing.

Sensorimotor integration in cranial muscles tested by short- and long-latency afferent inhibition

OBJECTIVE

To compressively investigate sensorimotor integration in the cranial-cervical muscles in healthy adults.

METHODS

Short- (SAI) and long-latency afferent (LAI) inhibition were probed in the anterior digastric (AD), the depressor anguli oris (DAO) and upper trapezius (UT) muscles. A transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse over primary motor cortex was preceded by peripheral stimulation delivered to the trigeminal, facial and accessory nerves using interstimulus intervals of 15-25 ms and 100-200 ms for SAI and LAI respectively.

RESULTS

In the AD, both SAI and LAI were detected following trigeminal nerve stimulation, but not following facial nerve stimulation. In the DAO, SAI was observed only following trigeminal nerve stimulation, while LAI depended only on facial nerve stimulation, only at an intensity suprathreshold for the compound motor action potential (cMAP). In the UT we could only detect LAI following accessory nerve stimulation at an intensity suprathreshold for a cMAP.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that integration of sensory inputs with motor output is profoundly influenced by the type of sensory afferent involved and by the functional role played by the target muscle.

SIGNIFICANCE

Data indicate the importance of taking into account the sensory receptors involved as well as the function of the target muscle when studying sensorimotor integration, both in physiological and neurological conditions.

Abnormalities in the face primary motor cortex in oromandibular dystonia

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively investigate excitability in face and hand M1 and sensorimotor integration in oromandibular dystonia (OMD) patients.

METHODS

Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short (SAI) and long (LAI) afferent inhibition were investigated in face and hand M1 using transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols in 10 OMD patients. Data were compared with those obtained in 10 patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD), in 10 patients with blepharospasm (BSP), and 10 matched healthy subjects (HS).

RESULTS

Results demonstrated that in OMD patients SICI was reduced in face M1 (p < 0.001), but not in hand M1, compared to HS. In FHD, SICI was significantly impaired in hand M1 (p = 0.029), but not in face M1. In BSP, SICI was normal in both face and hand M1 while ICF and LAI were normal in all patient groups and cortical area tested. SAI was significantly reduced (p = 0.003) only in the face M1 of OMD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In OMD, SICI and SAI were significantly reduced. These abnormalities are specific to the motor cortical area innervating the muscular district involved in focal dystonia.

SIGNIFICANCE

In OMD, the integration between sensory inflow and motor output seem to be disrupted at cortical level with topographic specificity.

Is it possible to compare inhibitory and excitatory intracortical circuits in face and hand primary motor cortex?

Abstract

Face muscles are important in a variety of different functions, such as feeding, speech and communication of non‐verbal affective states, which require quite different patterns of activity from those of a typical hand muscle. We ask whether there are differences in their neurophysiological control that might reflect this. Fifteen healthy individuals were studied. Standard single‐ and paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods were used to compare intracortical inhibitory (short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI); cortical silent period (CSP)) and excitatory circuitries (short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF)) in two typical muscles, the depressor anguli oris (DAO), a face muscle, and the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), a hand muscle. TMS threshold was higher in DAO than in FDI. Over a range of intensities, resting SICF was not different between DAO and FDI, while during muscle activation SICF was stronger in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.012). At rest, SICI was stronger in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.038) but during muscle contraction, SICI was weaker in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.034). We argue that although many of the difference in response to the TMS protocols could result from the difference in thresholds, some, such as the reduction of resting SICI in DAO, may reflect fundamental differences in the physiology of the two muscle groups.

Key points

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) single‐ and paired‐pulse protocols were used to investigate and compare the activity of facilitatory and inhibitory intracortical circuits in a face (depressor anguli oris; DAO) and hand (first dorsal interosseous; FDI) muscles. Several TMS intensities and interstimulus intervals were tested with the target muscles at rest and when voluntarily activated.

At rest, intracortical inhibitory activity was stronger in FDI than in DAO. In contrast, during muscle contraction inhibitory activity was stronger in DAO than in FDI. As many previous reports have found, the motor evoked potential threshold was higher in DAO than in FDI.

Although many of the differences in response to the TMS protocols could result from the difference in thresholds, some, such as the reduction of resting short interval intracortical inhibition in DAO, may reflect fundamental differences in the physiology of the two muscle groups.

Identifying Modulated Functional Connectivity in Corresponding Cerebral Networks in Facial Nerve Lesions Patients With Facial Asymmetry

Facial asymmetry is the major complaint of patients with unilateral facial nerve lesions. Frustratingly, although patients experience the same etiology, the extent of oral commissure asymmetry is highly heterogeneous. Emerging evidence indicates that cerebral plasticity has a large impact on clinical severity by promoting or impeding the progressive adaption of brain function. However, the precise link between cerebral plasticity and oral asymmetry has not yet been identified. In the present study, we performed functional magnetic resonance imaging on patients with unilateral facial nerve transections to acquire in vivo neural activity. We then identified the regions of interest corresponding to oral movement control using a smiling motor paradigm. Next, we established three local networks: the ipsilesional (left) intrahemispheric, contralesional (right) intrahemispheric, and interhemispheric networks. The functional connectivity of each pair of nodes within each network was then calculated. After thresholding for sparsity, we analyzed the mean intensity of each network connection between patients and controls by averaging the functional connectivity. For the objective assessment of facial deflection, oral asymmetry was calculated using FACEgram software. There was decreased connectivity in the contralesional network but increased connectivity in the ipsilesional and interhemispheric networks in patients with facial nerve lesions. In addition, connectivity in the ipsilesional network was significantly correlated with the extent of oral asymmetry. Our results suggest that motor deafferentation of unilateral facial nerve leads to the upregulated ipsilesional hemispheric connections, and results in positive interhemispheric inhibition effects to the contralesional hemisphere. Our findings provide preliminary information about the possible cortical etiology of facial asymmetry, and deliver valuable clues regarding spatial information, which will likely be useful for the development of therapeutic interventions.

Faces emotional expressions: from perceptive to motor areas in aged and young subjects

The role of age in perception and production of facial expressions is still unclear. Therefore, this work compared, in aged and young subjects, the effects of passive viewing of faces expressing different emotions on perceptive brain regions, such as occipital and temporal cortical areas and on the primary motor cortex (M1) innervating lower face muscles. Seventeen young (24.41 ± 0.71 yr) and seventeen aged (63.82 ± 0.99 yr) subjects underwent recording of event-related potentials (ERP), of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation of face M1 in the depressor anguli oris muscle and reaction time assessment. In both groups, the P100 and N170 waves, as well as short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were probed in face M1 after 300 ms from the presentation of images reporting faces expressing happy, sad, and neutral emotions. ERP data evidenced a major involvement of the right hemisphere in perceptual processing of faces, regardless of age. Compared with young subjects, the aged group showed a delayed N170 wave and a smaller P100 wave following the view of sad but not happy or neutral expressions, along with less accuracy and longer reaction times for recognition of the emotion expressed by faces. Aged subjects presented less SICI than young subjects, but facial expressions of happiness increased the excitability of face M1 with no differences between groups. In conclusion, data suggest that encoding of sad face expressions is impaired in the aged compared with the young group, whereas perception of happiness and its excitatory effects on face M1 remains preserved.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study shows that aged subjects have less visual attention and impaired perception for sad, but not for happy, face expressions. Conversely, the view of happy, but not sad, faces increases excitability in face M1 bilaterally, regardless of age. The impaired attention for sad expressions, the preserved perception of faces expressing happiness, along with the enhancing effects of the latter on face M1 excitability, likely makes the aged subjects more motivated in approaching positive emotions.

Physiological Differences in Hand and Face Areas of the Primary Motor Cortex in Skilled Wind and String Musicians

The process of learning and playing a musical instrument modulates the structural and functional organization of cortical motor networks. In the present study the excitability and short-term functional plasticity of face and hand areas of primary motor cortex (M1) were compared in woodwind musicians (WM), string musicians (SM) and non-musicians (NM) to test the hypothesis that neurophysiological adaptations to the long-term experience of playing a musical instrument are site-specific and related to the particular physiological properties of the representation area in M1. Twenty-two musicians (11 SM, 11 WM) and 11 NM participated in the study. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to probe rest and active short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI), interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) and response to paired associative stimulation (PAS). TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded from the depressor anguli oris (DAO) and the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles, respectively. Rest and active SICI were the same in all groups (all p > 0.05). WM exhibited significant IHI in the DAO (p = 0.031), in contrast to its absence in SM and NM. Compared with NM and WM, the PAS-induced increase in MEP amplitude in SM was significantly larger in hand M1 (p = 0.008) but not in face M1. In conclusion, neurophysiological adaptations differ between WM, in whom control of the embouchure is highly important, and SM who perform a large range of sequential finger movements and are site-specific in M1.

Happy faces selectively increase the excitability of cortical neurons innervating frowning muscles of the mouth

Although facial muscles are heavily involved in emotional expressions, there is still a lack of evidence about the role of face primary motor cortex (face M1) in the processing of facial recognition and expression. This work investigated the effects of the passive viewing of different facial expressions on face M1 and compared data with those obtained from the hand M1. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned to two groups undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of face or hand M1. In both groups, short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were probed in the depressor anguli oris (DAO) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles 300 ms after presentation of a picture of a face that expressed happy, sad or neutral emotions. Statistical analysis of SICI showed a non-significant effect of muscle (F_1,28 = 1.903, p = 0.179), but a significant effect of emotion (F_2,56 = 6.860, p = 0.004) and a significant interaction between muscle and emotion (F_2,56 = 5.072, p = 0.015). Post hoc analysis showed that there was a significant reduction of SICI in the DAO muscle after presentation of a face with a happy expression compared with a neutral face (p < 0.001). In the FDI, a significant difference was observed between neutral and sad expressions (p = 0.010) No clear differences in ICF were detected. The different responses of face and hand muscles to emotional stimuli may be due to their functional roles in emotional expression versus protection of the body.