Outcomes of hippocampus-sparing lesionectomy for temporal lobe epilepsy and the significance of intraoperative hippocampography

Prognostic Value of Complete Resection of the High-Frequency Oscillation Area in Intracranial EEG: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-frequency oscillations (HFOs; ripples 80-250 Hz; fast ripples [FRs] 250-500 Hz) recorded with intracranial electrodes generated excitement and debate about their potential to localize epileptogenic foci. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognostic value of complete resection of the HFOs-area (crHFOs-area) for epilepsy surgical outcome in intracranial EEG (iEEG) accessing multiple subgroups.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for original research from inception to October 27, 2022. We defined favorable surgical outcome (FSO) as Engel class I, International League Against Epilepsy class 1, or seizure-free status. The prognostic value of crHFOs-area for FSO was assessed by (1) the pooled FSO proportion after crHFOs-area; (2) FSO for crHFOs-area vs without crHFOs-area; and (3) the predictive performance. We defined high combined prognostic value as FSO proportion >80% + FSO crHFOs-area >without crHFOs-area + area under the curve (AUC) >0.75 and examined this for the clinical subgroups (study design, age, diagnostic type, HFOs-identification method, HFOs-rate thresholding, and iEEG state). Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) was compared with extra-TLE through dichotomous variable analysis. Individual patient analysis was performed for sex, affected hemisphere, MRI findings, surgery location, and pathology.

RESULTS

Of 1,387 studies screened, 31 studies (703 patients) met our eligibility criteria. Twenty-seven studies (602 patients) analyzed FRs and 20 studies (424 patients) ripples. Pooled FSO proportion after crHFOs-area was 81% (95% CI 76%-86%) for FRs and 82% (73%-89%) for ripples. Patients with crHFOs-area achieved more often FSO than those without crHFOs-area (FRs odds ratio [OR] 6.38, 4.03-10.09, p < 0.001; ripples 4.04, 2.32-7.04, p < 0.001). The pooled AUCs were 0.81 (0.77-0.84) for FRs and 0.76 (0.72-0.79) for ripples. Combined prognostic value was high in 10 subgroups: retrospective, children, long-term iEEG, threshold (FRs and ripples) and automated detection and interictal (FRs). FSO after complete resection of FRs-area (crFRs-area) was achieved less often in people with TLE than extra-TLE (OR 0.37, 0.15-0.89, p = 0.006). Individual patient analyses showed that crFRs-area was seen more in patients with FSO with than without MRI lesions (p = 0.02 after multiple correction).

DISCUSSION

Complete resection of the brain area with HFOs is associated with good postsurgical outcome. Its prognostic value holds, especially for FRs, for various subgroups. The use of HFOs for extra-TLE patients requires further evidence.

A profile on the WISE cortical strip for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

INTRODUCTION

During intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in neurosurgery, brain electrodes are placed to record electrocorticography or to inject current for direct cortical stimulation. A low impedance electrode may improve signal quality.

AREAS COVERED

We review here a brain electrode (WISE Cortical Strip, WCS®), where a thin polymer strip embeds platinum nanoparticles to create conductive electrode contacts. The low impedance contacts enable a high signal-to-noise ratio, allowing for better detection of small signals such as high-frequency oscillations (HFO). The softness of the WCS may hinder sliding the electrode under the dura or advancing it to deeper structures as the hippocampus but assures conformability with the cortex even in the resection cavity. We provide an extensive review on WCS including a market overview, an introduction to the device (mechanistics, cost aspects, performance standards, safety and contraindications) and an overview of the available pre- and post-approval data.

EXPERT OPINION

The WCS improves signal detection by lower impedance and better conformability to the cortex. The higher signal-to-noise ratio improves the detection of challenging signals. The softness of the electrode may be a disadvantage in some applications and an advantage in others.

Neuroimaging of Brain Tumor Surgery and Epilepsy

To make the best clinical judgements, surgeons need to integrate information acquired via multimodal imaging [...].

Effect of Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Intraoperative Spikes, High-Frequency Oscillations, and Phase-Amplitude Coupling in MRI-Normal Hippocampus

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sevoflurane anesthesia on spikes, high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), and phase-amplitude coupling using a modulation index in MRI-normal hippocampus, with the aim of evaluating the utility of intraoperative electrocorticography in identifying the epileptogenic hippocampus during sevoflurane administration.

METHODS

Eleven patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy with a normal hippocampus on MRI underwent extra-operative electrocorticography evaluation. Patients were assigned to the Ictal (+) or Ictal (-) group depending on whether the parahippocampal gyrus was included in the seizure onset zone. Intraoperative electrocorticography was performed under 0.5 and 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane. The rates of spikes, ripples, fast ripples (FRs), ripples on spikes, FRs on spikes, and MI HFO(3-4 Hz) were evaluated.

RESULTS

During the intraoperative electrocorticography procedure, sevoflurane administration was found to significantly increase the rate of spikes, ripples on spikes, fast ripples on spikes, and MI HFO(3-4 Hz) in the Ictal (+) group (P < 0.01). By contrast, the Ictal (-) group exhibited a paradoxical increase in the rate of ripples and fast ripple (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the administration of sevoflurane during intraoperative electrocorticography in patients with MRI-normal hippocampus can lead to a dose-dependent enhancement of epileptic biomarkers (spikes, ripples on spikes, fast ripples on spikes, and MI (HFO 3-4)) in the epileptogenic hippocampus, while paradoxically increasing the rate of ripples and fast ripple in the nonepileptogenic hippocampus. These results have significant implications for the identification of the MRI-normal hippocampus that requires surgical intervention and preservation of the nonepileptogenic hippocampus.

Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology, and Epilepsy, in 2022: Hills We Have Climbed and Hills Ahead. Neurophysiology in epilepsy

Since the discovery of the human electroencephalogram (EEG), neurophysiology techniques have become indispensable tools in our armamentarium to localize epileptic seizures. New signal analysis techniques and the prospects of artificial intelligence and big data will offer unprecedented opportunities to further advance the field in the near future, ultimately resulting in improved quality of life for many patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. This article summarizes selected presentations from Day 1 of the two-day symposium "Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology, Epilepsy, 2022: Hills We Have Climbed and the Hills Ahead". Day 1 was dedicated to highlighting and honoring the work of Dr. Jean Gotman, a pioneer in EEG, intracranial EEG, simultaneous EEG/ functional magnetic resonance imaging, and signal analysis of epilepsy. The program focused on two main research directions of Dr. Gotman, and was dedicated to "High-frequency oscillations, a new biomarker of epilepsy" and "Probing the epileptic focus from inside and outside". All talks were presented by colleagues and former trainees of Dr. Gotman. The extended summaries provide an overview of historical and current work in the neurophysiology of epilepsy with emphasis on novel EEG biomarkers of epilepsy and source imaging and concluded with an outlook on the future of epilepsy research, and what is needed to bring the field to the next level.

Intraoperative electrocorticography using high-frequency oscillations or spikes to tailor epilepsy surgery in the Netherlands (the HFO trial): a randomised, single-blind, adaptive non-inferiority trial

Background

Intraoperative electrocorticography is used to tailor epilepsy surgery by analysing interictal spikes or spike patterns that can delineate epileptogenic tissue. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) on intraoperative electrocorticography have been proposed as a new biomarker of epileptogenic tissue, with higher specificity than spikes. We prospectively tested the non-inferiority of HFO-guided tailoring of epilepsy surgery to spike-guided tailoring on seizure freedom at 1 year.

Methods

The HFO trial was a randomised, single-blind, adaptive non-inferiority trial at an epilepsy surgery centre (UMC Utrecht) in the Netherlands. We recruited children and adults (no age limits) who had been referred for intraoperative electrocorticography-tailored epilepsy surgery. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either HFO-guided or spike-guided tailoring, using an online randomisation scheme with permuted blocks generated by an independent data manager, stratified by epilepsy type. Treatment allocation was masked to participants and clinicians who documented seizure outcome, but not to the study team or neurosurgeon. Ictiform spike patterns were always considered in surgical decision making. The primary endpoint was seizure outcome after 1 year (dichotomised as seizure freedom [defined as Engel 1A–B] vs seizure recurrence [Engel 1C–4]). We predefined a non-inferiority margin of 10% risk difference. Analysis was by intention to treat, with prespecified subgroup analyses by epilepsy type and for confounders. This completed trial is registered with the Dutch Trial Register, Toetsingonline ABR.NL44527.041.13, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02207673.

Findings

Between Oct 10, 2014, and Jan 31, 2020, 78 individuals were enrolled to the study and randomly assigned (39 to HFO-guided tailoring and 39 to spike-guided tailoring). There was no loss to follow-up. Seizure freedom at 1 year occurred in 26 (67%) of 39 participants in the HFO-guided group and 35 (90%) of 39 in the spike-guided group (risk difference –23·5%, 90% CI –39·1 to –7·9; for the 48 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, the risk difference was –25·5%, –45·1 to –6·0, and for the 30 patients with extratemporal lobe epilepsy it was –20·3%, –46·0 to 5·4). Pathology associated with poor prognosis was identified as a confounding factor, with an adjusted risk difference of –7·9% (90% CI –20·7 to 4·9; adjusted risk difference –12·5%, –31·0 to 5·9, for temporal lobe epilepsy and 5·8%, –7·7 to 19·5, for extratemporal lobe epilepsy). We recorded eight serious adverse events (five in the HFO-guided group and three in the spike-guided group) requiring hospitalisation. No patients died.

Interpretation

HFO-guided tailoring of epilepsy surgery was not non-inferior to spike-guided tailoring on intraoperative electrocorticography. After adjustment for confounders, HFOs show non-inferiority in extratemporal lobe epilepsy. This trial challenges the clinical value of HFOs as an epilepsy biomarker, especially in temporal lobe epilepsy. Further research is needed to establish whether HFO-guided intraoperative electrocorticography holds promise in extratemporal lobe epilepsy.

Funding

UMCU Alexandre Suerman, EpilepsieNL, RMI Talent Fellowship, European Research Council, and MING Fund.

Is Hippocampal Resection Necessary for Low-Grade Epilepsy-Associated Tumors in the Temporal Lobe?

Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) are common in the temporal lobe and can cause drug-resistant epilepsy. Complete resection of LEATs is sufficient for seizure relief. However, hippocampal resection might result in postoperative cognitive impairment. This study aimed to clarify the necessity of hippocampal resection for seizure and cognitive outcomes in patients with temporal lobe LEATs and a normal hippocampus. The study included 32 patients with temporal lobe LEATs and without hippocampal abnormalities. All patients underwent gross total resection as treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy at our tertiary epilepsy center from 2005 to 2020, followed by at least a 12-month follow-up period. Seizure and cognitive outcomes were compared between patients who underwent additional hippocampal resection (Resected group) and those who did not (Preserved group). Among the participants, 14 underwent additional hippocampal resection and 28 (87.5%) achieved seizure freedom irrespective of hippocampal resection. The seizure-free periods were not different between the two groups. Additional hippocampal resection resulted in a significantly negative impact on the postoperative verbal index. In conclusion, additional hippocampal resection in patients with temporal lobe LEATs without hippocampal abnormalities is unnecessary because lesionectomy alone results in good seizure control. Additional hippocampal resection may instead adversely affect the postoperative language function.

Spikes and High Frequency Oscillations in Lateral Neocortical Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Can They Predict the Success Chance of Hippocampus-Sparing Resections?

Purpose

We investigated the distribution of spikes and HFOs recorded during intraoperative electrocorticography (ioECoG) and tried to elaborate a predictive model for postsurgical outcomes of patients with lateral neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) whose mesiotemporal structures are left in situ.

Methods

We selected patients with temporal lateral neocortical epilepsy focus who underwent ioECoG-tailored resections without amygdalo–hippocampectomies. We visually marked spikes, ripples (80–250 Hz), and fast ripples (FRs; 250–500 Hz) on neocortical and mesiotemporal channels before and after resections. We looked for differences in event rates and resection ratios between good (Engel 1A) and poor outcome groups and performed logistic regression analysis to identify outcome predictors.

Results

Fourteen out of 24 included patients had a good outcome. The poor-outcome patients showed higher rates of ripples on neocortical channels distant from the resection in pre- and post-ioECoG than people with good outcomes (p_pre = 0.04, p_post = 0.05). Post-ioECoG FRs were found only in poor-outcome patients (N = 3). A prediction model based on regression analysis showed low rates of mesiotemporal post-ioECoG ripples (OR_mesio = 0.13, p_mesio = 0.04) and older age at epilepsy onset (OR = 1.76, p = 0.04) to be predictors of good seizure outcome.

Conclusion

HFOs in ioECoG may help to inform the neurosurgeon of the hippocampus-sparing resection success chance in patients with lateral neocortical TLE.