Hippocampal spindles and barques are normal intracranial electroencephalographic entities

Interpretation of the Intracranial Electroencephalogram of the Human Hippocampus

Understanding and discriminating the normal and abnormal elements of the intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) is essential in decision-making for epilepsy surgery. The hippocampus is widely acknowledged as a key structure in decision-making processes for surgical treatment in temporal lobe epilepsy and epilepsies that involve the mesial temporal structures. This review will provide a summary of the current state of our knowledge and understanding regarding normal and abnormal features of the iEEG of the human hippocampus.

Hippocampal barques and their manifestation as 14&6 Hz positive spikes during sleep

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates variations in hippocampal barque occurrence during sleep and compares findings to respective variations of their scalp manifestation as 14&6/sec positive spikes.

METHODS

From 11 epilepsy patients, 12 non-epileptogenic hippocampi with barques were identified for this study. Using the first seizure-free whole-night sleep stereo-encephalography (sEEG) recording, we performed sleep staging and measured the occurrence of barques and 14&6/sec positive spikes variants.

RESULTS

Hippocampal barques (total count: 9,183; mean count per record: 765.2 ± 251.2) occurred predominantly during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) II sleep (total: 5,744; mean: 478.6 ± 176.1; 62.2 ± 6.0%) and slow-wave sleep (SWS) (total: 2,950; mean: 245.83 ± 92.9; 32.0 ± 6.2%), with rare to occasional occurrence in NREM I (total: 85; mean: 7.0 ± 2.8; 0.9 ± 0.4%), rapid eye movement (REM) (total: 153; mean: 12.75 ± 4.0; 1.7 ± 0.6) and wakefulness (total: 251; mean: 20.9 ± 6.3; 2.9 ± 0.9%). Barque rate increased during SWS (mean: 2.7 ± 1.0 per min) compared to NREM II (2.2 ± 1.0 per min) and other states (wakefulness: 0.1 ± 0.0 per min; NREM I: 0.3 ± 0.1 per min; REM: 0.1 ± 0.0 per min). The 14&6/sec positive spikes variant (total count: 2,406; mean: 343.7 ± 106.7) was present in NREM II (total: 2,059; mean: 249.1 ± 100.2, 84.9 ± 3.6%) and SWS (total: 347; mean: 49.5 ± 12.8, 15.0 ± 3.6%) stages, and absent from the rest of sleep and wakefulness. While all 14&6/sec positive spikes correlated with barques, only 44.7 ± 6.1% of barques manifested as 14&6/sec positive spikes.

CONCLUSIONS

Hippocampal barques are predominant in NREM II and SWS, and tend to increase their presence during SWS. Their scalp manifestation as 14&6/sec positive spikes is confounded by wakefulness, REM and NREM I stages, and "masked" by the co-occurrence of NREM II and SWS slow waves, and overlapping reactive micro-arousal elements.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study highlighted the overnight profile of hippocampal barques, in relation to the respective profile of their scalp manifestation, the 14&6/sec positive spikes variant.