MR evaluation of biliary-enteric anastomotic stricture: does contrast-enhanced T1W MRC provide additional information?

Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon

Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography Diagnosing Post-cholecystectomy Biliary Injuries

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of contrasted magnetic resonance cholangiography for detecting bile duct lesions following cholecystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective case series study was conducted that included patients over 18 years of age with suspected bile duct injury after cholecystectomy, who underwent contrasted magnetic resonance cholangiography, and who also had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, surgery, or subsequent clinical follow-up. The images were interpreted by two radiologists who assigned the type of lesion according to the Strasberg classification. Qualitative variables were represented by frequencies and proportions, while quantitative variables were described using measures of central tendency and dispersion. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were assessed, along with interobserver variability, using the kappa index.

RESULTS

We included 20 patients with a median age of 51.5 years (interquartile range: 35), and 14 (70%) were women. In all 20 patients, lesions were identified on magnetic resonance cholangiography, of which 19 were confirmed with the gold standard for a positive predictive value of 100% (hepatobiliary-specific contrast agents) and 92% (extracellular contrast). The most frequent lesions were Strasberg E2 and E4 in five patients each. The kappa index was 1 in determining the presence or absence of bile duct injury and 0.9 in the Strasberg classification.

CONCLUSION

Contrasted magnetic resonance cholangiography is a method with high positive predictive value and almost perfect interobserver agreement for diagnosing bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy.

The role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of postoperative bile duct injury: pictorial essay

Iatrogenic lesion of the bile ducts is a relatively common occurrence during liver surgery, increasing morbidity and mortality rates. T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) with administration of hepatobiliary-specific contrast medium (gadoxetic acid) are fundamental to the diagnostic imaging approach in patients with such lesions. Here, we present a review of the literature and suggest an imaging approach to biliary tract injury, focusing on clinical cases in which fMRC had an impact on the decision-making process for the management of the affected patients.

Use of choledochoscopy to treat anastomotic stricture after cholangiojejunostomy through a preset subcutaneous intestinal loop: a study of 30 cases

Objective

This study was performed to summarize our experience in applying choledochofiberscopy to the treatment of anastomotic stricture after cholangiojejunostomy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent choledochofiberscopy for the treatment of anastomotic stricture via balloon dilatation and were followed up for at least 6 to 12 months.

Results

A 6- to 12-month follow-up was performed in the above-mentioned 30 patients after trans-choledochofiberscopic balloon dilation and stone removal. Among these patients, 19 did not develop recurrent fever or abdominal pain, and the serum levels of direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase returned to normal or near normal, with a total success rate of 63%. Eleven patients developed restenosis and recurrence of intrahepatic stones, with a stenosis rate of 37%. Among these 11 patients, 6 underwent trans-choledochofiberscopic balloon dilatation for stone removal, and they recovered uneventfully; the remaining 5 patients were transferred for surgical reoperations for treatment of stenosis following repeated dilatation, with a failure rate of 17%.

Conclusion

Choledochofiberscopy for the treatment of anastomotic stricture after cholangiojejunostomy has the following advantages: minimal trauma, minimal pain, rapid effect, low risk, repeatable treatment procedures, and no serious complications. This is a safe and effective method of treatment.

Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MR Cholangiography for Evaluation of Biliary-Enteric Anastomoses: Added Value Beyond Conventional T2-Weighted Images

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate image quality and reader confidence in MR cholangiography of bile ducts using conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography alone in comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR cholangiography in a series of patients with biliary-enteric anastomosis (BEA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty patients with BEA and clinically and sonographically suspected complications underwent 1.5-T MRI. After acquisition of T1- and T2-weighted images, conventional MR cholangiography was performed using 3D fast relaxation fast spin-echo (FRFSE) and single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted sequences (image set 1). In each patient, a 3D fat-suppressed Liver Acquisition with Volume Acceleration (LAVA) sequence was performed before and 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40 minutes after IV administration of 0.1 mL/kg of gadoxetate disodium (Primovist) (image set 2). Two radiologists in consensus evaluated image quality in the anatomic segments of the biliary tract and recorded diagnostic confidence scores for image set 1 alone and image sets 1 and 2 together. MRI findings were compared with postsurgical specimen if surgery was performed, conventional cholangiography, or 12 months of imaging follow-up. RESULTS. A significant improvement in image quality for visualization of all biliary segments was found using gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR cholangiography in comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography alone. Readers judged diagnostic confidence of image set 1 alone and image sets 1 and 2 together as very confident in three and 37 cases, confident in 30 and 11, not confident in 14 and one, and not confident at all in three and 1, respectively. Concordance between image set 1 alone and image sets 1 and 2 together and the reference standard results was present in 23 of 50 cases (46%) and 47 of 50 cases (94%), respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR cholangiography can improve image quality for visualization of the biliary tract and further enhanced the diagnostic performance of conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography in the evaluation of patients with BEA.

Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of post-transplant biliary complications

OBJECTIVES

Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) are common. This study aimed to ascertain the value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) to evaluate anastomotic strictures (AS), non-anastomotic strictures (NAS) and biliary casts (BC).

METHODS

Sixty liver-transplanted patients with suspicion of biliary complications and T2w-MRCP and T1w-MRC followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) were analysed. Two readers reviewed the MRCs and rated image quality (IQ) and likelihood for AS/NAS/BC on Likert scales. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated, ROC curve analysis performed, and inter-reader variability assessed. The subjective added value of T1w-MRC was rated.

RESULTS

IQ was high for all sequences without significant differences (2.83-2.88). In 39 patients ERCP/PTC detected a complication. Sensitivity and specificity for AS were 64-96 using T2w-MRCP, increasing to 79-100 using all sequences. Use of all sequences increased the sensitivity of detecting NAS/BC from 72-92% to 88-100% and 67-89% to 72-94%, respectively. Kappa values were substantial (0.45-0.62). T1w-MRC was found to be helpful in 75-83.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining T1w-MRC and T2w-MRCP increased sensitivity and specificity and diagnostic confidence in patients after LT with suspected biliary complications. T1w-MRC is a valuable tool for evaluating post-transplant biliary complications.

KEY POINTS

• T1w-MRC is a valuable tool for evaluating post-transplant biliary complications. • Adding T1w-MRC to T2w-MRC increases diagnostic confidence for detection of biliary complications. • A combination of T1w-MRC and T2w-MRCP leads to the best results.

Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography: Practical Tips and Clinical Indications for Biliary Disease Management

Since its introduction, MRCP has been improved over the years due to the introduction of several technical advances and innovations. It consists of a noninvasive method for biliary tree representation, based on heavily T2-weighted images. Conventionally, its protocol includes two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo images, acquired with thin sections or with multiple thick slabs. In recent years, three-dimensional T2-weighted fast-recovery fast spin-echo images have been added to the conventional protocol, increasing the possibility of biliary anatomy demonstration and leading to a significant benefit over conventional 2D imaging. A significant innovation has been reached with the introduction of hepatobiliary contrasts, represented by gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine: they are excreted into the bile canaliculi, allowing the opacification of the biliary tree. Recently, 3D interpolated T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo images have been proposed for the evaluation of the biliary tree, obtaining images after hepatobiliary contrast agent administration. Thus, the acquisition of these excretory phases improves the diagnostic capability of conventional MRCP—based on T2 acquisitions. In this paper, technical features of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography are briefly discussed; main diagnostic tips of hepatobiliary phase are showed, emphasizing the benefit of enhanced cholangiography in comparison with conventional MRCP.

Biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation: May contrast-enhanced MR Cholangiography provide additional information?

PURPOSE

To assess whether contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Cholangiography may provide additional information in the evaluation of biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplant recipients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty liver transplant patients with suspicion of biliary adverse events underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T scanner. After acquisition of axial T1-/T2-weighted images and conventional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography (image set 1), 3D gradient-echo T1-weighted fat-suppressed LAVA (Liver Acquisition with Volume Acceleration) sequences were obtained about 30 min after intravenous infusion of mangafodipir trisodium (Mn-DPDP,Teslascan(®)) (image set 2). The diagnostic value of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR Cholangiography in the detection of biliary complications was tested by separate analysis results of image set 1 alone and image set 1 and 2 together. MRI results were correlated with direct cholangiography in 46 patients, surgery in 14 and/or clinical-radiological follow-up in the remaining 20 cases.

RESULTS

The level of confidence in the assessment of biliary adverse events was significantly increased by the administration of mangafodipir trisodium (p < 0.05). Particularly, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted LAVA sequences tended to out-perform conventional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography in the delineation of anastomotic and non-anastomotic biliary strictures and in the diagnosis of biliary leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Cholangiography may improve the level of diagnostic confidence provided by conventional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Postoperative biliary adverse events following orthotopic liver transplantation: Assessment with magnetic resonance cholangiography

Biliary adverse events following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are relatively common and continue to be serious causes of morbidity, mortality, and transplant dysfunction or failure. The development of these adverse events is heavily influenced by the type of anastomosis during surgery. The low specificity of clinical and biologic findings makes the diagnosis challenging. Moreover, direct cholangiographic procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography present an inadmissible rate of adverse events to be utilized in clinically low suspected patients. Magnetic resonance (MR) maging with MR cholangiopancreatography is crucial in assessing abnormalities in the biliary system after liver surgery, including liver transplant. MR cholangiopancreatography is a safe, rapid, non-invasive, and effective diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of biliary adverse events after liver transplantation, since it plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and management of these events. On the basis of a recent systematic review of the literature the summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of MR cholangiopancreatography for diagnosis of biliary adverse events following OLT were 0.95 and 0.92, respectively. It can provide a non-invasive method of imaging surgical reconstruction of the biliary anastomoses as well as adverse events including anastomotic and non-anastomotic strictures, biliary lithiasis and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in liver transplant recipients. Nevertheless, conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography can be implemented with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography using hepatobiliary contrast agents (in particular using Gd-EOB-DTPA) in order to improve the diagnostic accuracy in the adverse events’ detection such as bile leakage and strictures, especially in selected patients with biliary-enteric anastomosis.

Biliary-enteric anastomoses: spectrum of findings on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography

Biliary-enteric anastomosis is a common surgical procedure performed for the management of a variety of benign and malignant diseases. This procedure presents a high risk of developing complications such as anastomotic leak, hemorrhage, cholangitis, stones, stricture formation, that have been reported as ranging from 3 % to 43 %. Because the endoscopic approach of the biliary tract is generally precluded in this setting, there is clearly a role for a non-invasive imaging technique to follow up these patients and to detect the possible complications. T2-weighted MR cholangiography has been shown to be effective in the evaluation of patients with biliary-enteric anastomosis. Some of these patients may have mild duct dilatation in spite of a patent anastomosis, and stenosis should be considered only when duct dilatation is associated with narrowing of the anastomotic site. T2-weighted MRC depicts the site of biliary-enteric anastomosis, the cause of obstruction, and the status of the biliary ducts upstream. However, the disadvantages of conventional MRC are that it lacks functional information and so, differentiation between obstructive and non-obstructive dilatation of the bile ducts is often extremely difficult. T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography using Gd-EOB-DTPA is a recently emerging technique that is useful for delineating the anatomy of biliary-enteric anastomoses and detecting complications such as strictures, intraductal stones, and biliary leaks; besides, this technique can provide functional information that are extremely promising in the grading of biliary obstruction. We present the spectrum of findings of biliary-enteric anastomoses on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography focusing on the main clinical applications.

MR imaging of the biliary system

Although ultrasound, computed tomography, and cholescintigraphy play essential roles in the evaluation of suspected biliary abnormalities, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography can be used to evaluate inconclusive findings and provide a comprehensive noninvasive assessment of the biliary tract and gallbladder. This article reviews standard MR and MR cholangiopancreatography techniques, clinical applications, and pitfalls. Normal biliary anatomy and variants are discussed, particularly as they pertain to preoperative planning. A spectrum of benign and malignant biliary processes is reviewed, emphasizing MR findings that aid in characterization.

MRI assessment of biliary ductal obstruction: is there added value of T1-weighted gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MR cholangiography?

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present study was to determine the added value of gadolium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (gadoxetate disodium)-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) to standard liver MRI including T2-weighted MRCP in assessment of biliary ductal obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients (mean age, 48.1 ± 16.7 years) (40 total examinations) who underwent liver MRI (including T2-weighted MRCP and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC) for suspicion of biliary disease were included in this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Three blinded radiologists first evaluated MR images without gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC for presence and significance of biliary obstruction, underlying cause for obstruction, and confidence in final diagnosis. After inclusion of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC, readers again determined presence and significance of biliary obstruction and confidence in final diagnosis. Reference standard was established using MRI along with ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, intraoperative cholangiography, or a combination thereof.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity across all readers in diagnosing significance of obstruction was 60% without gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC and 91% with gadoxetate disodium- enhanced MRC (p < 0.001). Across all readers, assessment of significance of obstruction was changed when adding gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC in 40 of 120 cases (33%); significance of obstruction was correctly changed in 35 of 40 cases (87.5%). Biliary obstruction was graded of unknown significance in 27 of 120 cases (22.5%) across all readers when gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC was not reviewed. Significance of biliary obstruction was classified correctly after adding gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC in 25 of these 27 cases (93%). Confidence in final diagnosis was significantly higher with addition of gadoxetate di-sodium-enhanced MRC for two of three readers (p < 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Addition of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC to liver MRI significantly improves sensitivity in assessing significance of biliary obstruction and can improve reader confidence in establishing a final diagnosis. This added information could have a substantial impact in the determination of the most appropriate therapeutic options.