Imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: current concepts and recent updates

I thought it was a hemangioma! A pictorial essay about common and uncommon liver hemangiomas' mimickers

Focal liver lesions are frequently encountered during imaging studies, and hemangiomas represent the most common solid liver lesion. Liver hemangiomas usually show characteristic imaging features that enable characterization without the need for biopsy or follow-up. On the other hand, there are many benign and malignant liver lesions that may show one or more imaging features resembling hemangiomas that radiologists must be aware of. In this article we will review the typical imaging features of liver hemangiomas and will show a series of potential liver hemangiomas' mimickers, giving radiologists some hints for improving differential diagnoses. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The knowledge of imaging features of potential liver hemangiomas mimickers is fundamental to avoid misinterpretation. KEY POINTS: Liver hemangiomas typically show imaging features that enable avoiding a biopsy. Many benign and malignant liver lesions show imaging features resembling hemangiomas. Radiologists must know the potentially misleading imaging features of hemangiomas' mimickers.

Fat in mass in primary liver lesions: are usual MRI diagnostic criteria of both malignant and benign liver lesions still applicable?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of the usual MRI diagnostic patterns of primary liver lesions applied to the diagnosis of pathologically proven fat-containing liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This monocentric IRB approved retrospective study included all patients with pathologically proven focal liver lesions and documented intra-tumoral fat on pathology and who underwent preoperative liver MRI for characterization. Both liver morphology and usual lesion MRI features were analyzed and their distribution correlated to the final pathological result (Khi-2 or Fisher exact tests, Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate). The Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp) of MRI patterns known to be associated to both Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH), and Hepatocellular Adenoma (HCA) subtypes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between March 2014 and November 2021, 66 lesions were included, corresponding to: 26 HCC, 32 HCA, 6 FNH and 2 hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML). All lesions developed on a dysmorphic liver were HCC. A non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement with a washout and an enhancing capsule had a 98% specificity for HCC diagnosis; A homogeneous dropout of signal on the opposed phase had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 89% for the diagnosis of HNF1alpha inactivated subtype of HCA (HHCA). The FNH pattern was specific at 100% for the diagnosis of FNH with a 40% Se. Finally, the accuracy of inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma (IHCA) pattern had a low 60% Se but a high 89% Sp for IHCA diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Known MRI patterns remain reliable for the accurate diagnosis of primary liver tumors on MRI even in fat-containing lesions.

Hepatospecific MR contrast agent uptake on hepatobiliary phase can be used as a biomarker of marked β-catenin activation in hepatocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of hepatospecific MR contrast agent uptake on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images to detect marked activation of the β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs).

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective IRB-approved study included all patients with a pathologically proven HCA who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI with HBP. Tumor signal intensity on HBP was first assessed visually, and lesions were classified into three distinct groups-hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense-according to the relative signal intensity to liver. Uptake was then quantified using the lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER). Finally, the accuracy of HBP analysis in depicting marked β-catenin activation in HCA was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 124 HCAs were analyzed including 12 with marked β-catenin activation (HCA B+). Visual analysis classified 94/124 (76%), 12/124 (10%), and 18/124 (14%) HCAs as being hypointense, isointense, and hyperintense on HBP, respectively. Of these, 1/94 (1%), 3/12 (25%), and 8/18 (44%) were HCA B+, respectively (p < 0.001). The LLCER of HCA B+ was higher than that of HCA without marked β-catenin activation in the entire cohort (means 4.9 ± 11.8% vs. - 19.8 ± 11.4%, respectively, p < 0.001). A positive LLCER, i.e., LLCER ≥ 0%, had 75% (95% CI 43-95%) sensitivity and 97% (95% CI 92-99%) specificity, with a LR+ of 28 (95% CI 8.8-89.6) for the diagnosis of HCA B+.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatospecific contrast uptake on hepatobiliary phase is strongly associated with marked activation of the β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular adenoma, and its use might improve hepatocellular adenoma subtyping on MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Tumor uptake on hepatobiliary phase in both the visual and quantitative analyses had a specificity higher than 90% for the detection of marked β-catenin activation in hepatocellular adenoma. • However, the sensitivity of visual analysis alone is inferior to that of LLCER quantification on HBP due to the high number of HCAs with signal hyperintensity on HBP, especially those developed on underlying liver steatosis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Liver Disease

The liver fibrosis stage is the most important clinical determinate of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic liver diseases. With newer therapies, liver fibrosis can be stabilized and possibly reversed, thus accurate diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are clinically important. Ultrasound, CT, and conventional MRI can be used to establish the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis but have limited utility for assessing earlier stages of fibrosis. Elastography-based ultrasound and MRI techniques are more useful for assessment of precirrhotic hepatic fibrosis. In patients with advanced fibrosis at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ultrasound is the surveillance modality recommended by international guidelines in nearly all circumstances. However, in patients in whom ultrasound does not assess the liver well, including those with severe steatosis or obesity, multiphase CT or MRI may have a role in surveillance for HCC. Both multiphase CT and MRI can be used for continued surveillance in patients with a history of HCC, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound may have an emerging role in this setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography Versus MRI With a Liver-Specific Contrast Agent for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Adenoma and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) with sulfur hexafluoride with MRI with the liver-specific contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumine in the diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) in a cohort of consecutive patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients referred to a tertiary center for hepatobiliary disease who had suspected HCA or FNH on MRI performed with an extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agent underwent a prospective workup including CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent. Diagnosis was definite when the findings of CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent were concordant; histopathologic examination (HPE) was performed for cases with discordant findings. Descriptive statistics and the association between categoric variables were presented as numbers and percentages and were assessed using the Fisher exact test. The primary analysis was patient based. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC and predictive values for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH were calculated separately for CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent. RESULTS. A total of 181 patients were selected for the first analysis. Findings from CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent were concordant for 132 patients (73%) and discordant for 49 (27%). HPE was performed for 26 of the 49 patients with discordant findings (53%), with findings indeterminate for two of these patients, the findings of MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent correct for 21 of the remaining 24 patients (87.5%), and the findings of CEUS correct for three of these 24 patients (12.5%) (p < 0.05). For further analysis, 156 patients with concordant findings or HPE-proven cases were included. For CEUS, the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH were 85% and 87%, respectively; the ROC AUC value was 0.856; and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 79% and 90%, respectively. For MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent, the sensitivity and specificity were 95% each, the ROC AUC value was 0.949, and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 92% and 97%, respectively, for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH. CONCLUSION. The findings of CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent showed fair agreement for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH. MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent is diagnostically correct significantly more often than CEUS in cases with discordant findings that are HPE proven.

Focal nodular hyperplasia: a weight-based, intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

We aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the enhancement pattern of focal nodular hyperplasia after gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium injection in the same patient.

METHODS

1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 16 patients with 21 focal nodular hyperplasias studied after the injection of both contrast media were evaluated. Both MRI studies were performed in all patients. A qualitative analysis was performed evaluating each lesion in all phases. For quantitative analysis we calculated signal intensity ratio, lesion-to-liver contrast ratio and liver parenchyma signal intensity gain on hepatobiliary phase. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon sign-rank test for clustered paired data and the McNemar test for paired frequencies. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

At qualitative analysis no statistically significant differences were evident during any of the contrast-enhanced phases. Signal intensity ratio (P = 0.048), lesion-to-liver contrast ratio (P = 0.032) and liver parenchyma signal intensity gain (P = 0.012) were significantly higher on hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetate disodium injection.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in the MRI findings of focal nodular hyperplasia after the injection of a weight-based dose of either gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium.

MRI for characterization of benign hepatocellular tumors on hepatobiliary phase: the added value of in-phase imaging and lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio (SIR) before and at the hepatobiliary phase MRI (HBP-MRI) after gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) injection, using several T1-weighted images (T1-WI), for the characterization of benign hepatocellular lesions.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), who underwent Gd-BOPTA-enhanced HBP-MRI from 2009 to 2017, were retrospectively identified. The lesion-to-liver SIR was visually assessed by two radiologists on HBP (post-HBP analysis) and compared with that of unenhanced sequences (pre/post-HBP analysis) on T1-WI in-phase (T1-IP), out-of-phase (T1-OP), and fat suppression (T1-FS). Lesions were classified as hyper-, iso-, or hypointense on post-HBP, and as decreasing, stable, or increasing SIR on pre/post-HBP analyses. The performance of the different T1-WI sequences for the diagnostic of FNH was evaluated on post-HBP analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine FNHs and 33 HCAs were analyzed. On post-HBP analysis, FNHs appeared hyper-/isointense in 89.7% of all T1-WI. HCAs appeared hypointense in 93.9%, 63.6%, and 69.7% of T1-IP, T1-OP, and T1-FS, respectively. FNHs exhibited an increasing SIR in 55.2-58.6%, a stable SIR in 44.8-58.6%, and a decreasing SIR in 0%, whereas HCAs exhibited a decreasing SIR in 66.7-93.9%, a stable SIR in 6.1-33.3%, and an increasing SIR in 0% (p < 0.0001). The specificity of T1-IP was significantly higher than that of T1-OP (p = 0.015) and T1-FS (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

T1-IP is the most reliable sequence due to misleading tumor/liver signal ratio in the case of fatty liver when using T1-FS or T1-OP. The pre/post-HBP lesion-to-liver SIR is accurate to classify benign hepatocellular lesions and contributes to avoid biopsy.

KEY POINTS

•The T1-weighted images in-phase should be systematically included in the HBP-MRI protocol, as it is the most reliable sequence especially in the case of fatty liver. •The comparison between lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios on unenhanced and at the hepatobiliary phase sequences is useful to classify benign hepatocellular lesions in three categories without misclassification: FNH (increasing signal intensity ratio), HCA (decreasing signal intensity ration), and indeterminate lesions (stable signal intensity ratio).

Ultrasound Imaging of Hepatocellular Adenoma Using the New Histology Classification

Hepatocellular adenoma is a rare benign liver tumor. Predisposing factors include hepatic storage diseases and some genetic conditions. A new histology-based classification has been proposed but to date, the corresponding ultrasound imaging features have not been reported. Here we review the new classification scheme and discuss the corresponding features on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma: Is hepatobiliary phase MRI (HBP-MRI) using linear gadolinium chelates always useful?

PURPOSE

To assess the value of Hepatobiliary phase MRI (HPB-MRI) to differentiate FNH and HCA, and evaluate its impact on diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic confidence, inter-observer variability, and patient clinical management.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients referred for Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included in this IRB-approved study, with a total of 119 lesions-90 FNH and 29 HCA. Two observers separately assessed in 2 distinct randomized reading sessions the performance of MRI with (HBP-MRI) or without (conventional MRI) the use of HBP images. Each lesion was ranked with a 5-point scale (from 1 Typical FNH to 5 Certainly not a FNH). Sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and inter-observer agreement for the differentiation of FNH from HCA were calculated and compared between conventional and HBP-MRI.

RESULTS

Both sensitivity (respective values of 38.9% and 97.8%), overall accuracy (respective values of 53.8% and 98.3%), and inter-observer agreement (respective values of Kappa 0.56 and 0.88) were significantly higher using HBP-MRI than with conventional MRI, with unchanged specificity (100%). The sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of FNH was significantly lower in lesions ≤ 3 cm (20% vs. 88%). Overall, HBP could have changed lesion management in 59/119 cases (49.5%), including 53 FNH and 6 HCA with no impact in 60/119 lesions (50.5%) including all 35 lesions classified as scores 1 and 2 for the diagnosis of FNH.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical impact of HBP-MRI is mostly important for smaller than 3-cm FNH, and more limited in larger FNH lesions as well as for HCA diagnosis for which conventional MRI is already accurate. The use of extracellular contrast agents upfront could limit the required use of linear HBP contrast agents for benign hepatocellular lesion characterization. On HBP, all FNH appeared hypointense compared to adjacent liver while close to 97% of HCA appeared hypointense.

Hepatocellular nodules in vascular liver diseases

Hepatocellular nodules have been recognized in vascular liver diseases for a long time and mostly described and studied in the imaging literature. Some confusions in their identification and overlap in their definitions exist, especially in this specific clinical context. Pathology descriptions report the development of nodular regenerative hyperplasia, large regenerative nodule, and focal nodular hyperplasia, as adaptive responses of the liver parenchyma to the modified blood flow. True neoplastic hepatocellular nodules such as hepatocellular adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma can also appear, mainly in Budd-Chiari syndrome, and have to be correctly diagnosed. This is more difficult for the radiologist in these diseased livers, leading more frequently to perform liver biopsies. We describe the histology of each type of well-differentiated hepatocellular nodules and provide some clues for their differential diagnosis. A review of the literature gives an historical perspective of the problem and enlightens the frequency and the subtypes of hepatocellular nodules found in the most common vascular liver diseases.

Quantitative correlation between uptake of Gd-BOPTA on hepatobiliary phase and tumor molecular features in patients with benign hepatocellular lesions

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to correlate the quantitative analysis of benign hepatocellular tumor uptake on delayed hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging with the quantitative level of OATP expression.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study, which took place between September 2009 and March 2015, included 20 consecutive patients with a proven pathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) diagnosis of FNH or HCA, including quantification of the OATP expression. The patients underwent Gd-BOPTA-enhancement MRI, including an HBP. The analysis of HBP uptake was performed using the liver-to-lesion contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER). Mean LLCER and OATP expressions were compared between FNH and HCA, and the expression of OATP was correlated with the LLCER value.

RESULTS

Of the 23 benign hepatocellular tumors, 9 (39%) were FNH and 14 (61%) were HCA, including 6 inflammatory, 2 HNF1a inactivated, 3 β-catenin-mutated and 3 unclassified HCAs. On HBP, 100% of the FNH appeared hyper- or isointense, and 79% of the adenomas appeared hypointense. The mean OATP expression of FNH (46.67 ± 26.58%) was significantly higher than that of HCA (22.14 ± 30.74%) (p = 0.0273), and the mean LLCER of FNH (10.66 ± 7.403%) was significantly higher than that of HCA (-13.5 ± 12.25%) (p < 0.0001). The mean LLCER of β-catenin-mutated HCA was significantly higher than that of other HCAs (p = 0.011). Significant correlation was found between the OATP expression and LLCER values (r = 0.661; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In benign hepatocellular tumors, the quantitative analysis of hepatobiliary contrast agent uptake on HBP is correlated with the level of OATP expression and could be used as an imaging biomarker of the molecular background of HCA and FNH.

KEY POINTS

• Gd-BOPTA uptake on HBP correlates with the OATP level in benign hepatocellular tumors • FNH and β-catenin-mutated HCA showed an increased lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER) • Increased LLCER may be explained by activation of the Wnt β-catenin pathway.

Primary benign liver lesions

Benign focal liver lesions can origin from all kind of liver cells: hepatocytes, mesenchymal and cholangiocellular line. Their features at imaging may sometimes pose difficulties in differential diagnosis with malignant primary and secondary lesions. In particular, the use of MDCT and MRI with extracellular and hepatobiliary Contrast Agents may non invasively help in correct interpretation and definition of hepatocellular or mesenchymal and inflammatory nature, allowing to choose the best treatment option. The peculiarities of main benign liver lesions at US, CT and MRI are described, with special attention to differential diagnosis and diagnostic clues.

Typical and atypical benign liver lesions: A review

Focal liver lesions are routinely encountered by clinical radiologists and represent a wide spectrum of pathology. Majority of these lesions are likely to be benign in nature, especially in the absence of chronic liver disease or primary cancer. A radiologist must be aware of common and uncommon imaging features of benign lesions across the various imaging modalities. This review discusses pathognomonic imaging features of common benign focal liver lesions seen on ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance, and adds to existing knowledge with the recent updates to have emerged in this area.

Impact of hepatobiliary phase liver MRI versus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound after an inconclusive extracellular gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of benign hepatocellular tumors

PURPOSE

To compare the added values of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in addition to inconclusive extracellular gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) to characterize benign hepatocellular tumors (BHT).

METHODS

Eighty-three BHT-46 focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and 37 hepatocellular adenomas (HCA)-with inconclusive CE-MRI in 54 patients (43 women and 11 men, mean age 42 years old ± 14.8) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent both HBP-MRI and CEUS. Two radiologists independently reviewed 2 sets of images, SET-1: CE-MRI and HBP-MRI; SET-2: CE-MRI and CEUS, and classified lesions as "definite FNH," "possible FNH," or "definitely not FNH." Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Spe) were compared between the two sets; subgroup analyses according to the lesion's size were performed.

RESULTS

Regardless of lesion size, the respective Se and Spe of both datasets were not statistically different (95.7 and 100% vs. 76.1 and 94.6% for set-1 and -2 respectively; p = 0.18). For lesions larger than 35 mm, although both sets had similar specificity (100%), sensitivity was higher for SET-1 (100% vs. 40%); p = 0.04. Tumor classifications using SET-1 and SET-2 could have changed patient management in 35/54 (64.8%) and 33/54 (61.1%) of all patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HBP-MRI or CEUS should be performed after an inconclusive CE-MRI. Both can change patient management by avoiding unnecessary biopsy or surveillance. The use of HBP-MRI should be advocated over CEUS in larger (>35 mm) lesions.

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in characterization of solid focal liver lesions: a prospective and comparative clinical study

We evaluated and compared the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with that of lesion-to-liver ADC ratios in the characterization of solid focal liver lesions (FLLs). This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Board, after waiving written informed consent. Diffusion-weighted imaging and other routine magnetic resonance imaging were performed on 142 consecutive patients with suspected liver disease. The mean ADC values and lesion-to-liver ADC ratios were compared between benign and malignant solid FLLs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. The study participants included 46 patients (28 men, 18 women; mean age, 52.5 years) with 57 solid FLLs (32 malignant and 25 benign FLLs). The mean ADC values and ADC ratios of benign solid FLLs were significantly higher than those of malignant lesions (P&lt;0.01). The difference between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the ADC values (0.699) and ADC ratios (0.752) was not significant. Our study suggests that the DA of the ADC ratio is not significantly higher than that of ADC in characterizing solid FLLs.

Liver biopsy for diagnosis of presumed benign hepatocellular lesions lacking magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic features of focal nodular hyperplasia

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The contribution of liver biopsy for the diagnosis of presumed benign hepatocellular lesions lacking the diagnostic features of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unknown. We evaluated liver biopsy and MRI performances in this setting.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging and slides of liver biopsies performed for a presumed benign hepatocellular lesion (2006-2013) without the typical features of FNH on MRI were blindly reviewed (n = 45). Eighteen lesions were surgically removed and also analyzed. The final diagnosis was the diagnosis established after surgery or on the biopsy in the absence of surgery.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis was FNH (n = 19), hepatocellular adenoma (HCA, n = 15), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 3) and indefinite (n = 4). Four lesions corresponded to non hepatocellular lesions. FNH, HNF1A mutated and inflammatory HCA were diagnosed accurately on the biopsy in 95%, 67% and 100% of the cases respectively. Diagnostic performance of liver biopsy for HNF1A mutated HCA was lower because of the lack of non-tumoral tissue. Diagnosis based on morphological analysis was certain and correct in 27 cases. Immunostaining allowed a definite diagnosis in 12 additionnal cases. Radiological diagnosis was in agreement with the histological diagnosis in 75.6% of the cases, with a very high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (100%) for the diagnosis of HNF1A mutated HCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver biopsy has a good diagnostic performance particularly for FNH and inflammatory HCA, and sampling of non-lesional tissue is highly recommended. A biopsy does not seem necessary if H-HCA is diagnosed on MRI.

Evaluation of the characteristics of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography and pathological findings

Objective

To evaluate the characteristics of enhancement of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) of the liver by analyzing the dynamic contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (MSCT) features and correlating them with pathological findings.

Patients and methods

Nine males and 16 females with pathologically confirmed FNH and complete preoperative contrast-enhanced MSCT data were recruited for this study. The imaging features of FNH on the pre- and postcontrast MSCT were analyzed by two experienced radiologists by consensus.

Results

Pathology showed central scars and abnormal blood vessels in 17 and 21 of 25 lesions, respectively, while MSCT with multiphase enhancement showed central scars in eight of the 17 lesions (47.1%) and abnormal arteries or draining veins in 13 of the 21 lesions (61.9%). Furthermore, abnormal draining veins in five lesions were found to be diagnostic, which is another important finding.

Conclusion

Multiphase scanning can provide the panorama of FNH lesions and reveal their enhancement patterns and pathological characteristics. Abnormal blood vessels within or around the lesion are demonstrated more often than central scar, and both should be observed for FNH diagnosis.

Hepatocellular adenoma: comparison between real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic computed tomography

Purpose

To investigate and compare the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of histologically proven HCA with those of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

Methods

Eighteen patients with proven hepatic adenoma by pathology were retrospectively selected from the CEUS database. Fourteen of them had undergone liver CECT exams. The basic features on unenhanced imaging and the enhancement level and specific features on contrast-enhanced imaging were retrospectively analyzed, and the differences between CEUS and CECT were compared.

Results

All the HCAs showed hyper-enhancement in the arterial phase. During the portal and late phases, 12 HCAs (12/18, 66.7 %) on CEUS and 11 (11/14, 78.6 %) on CT showed washout. On CEUS, 10 (10/18, 55.5 %) showed centripetal filling in the arterial phase and persistent peripheral rim enhancement. Five of them (61.1 %, 11/18) showed delayed central washout in the portal or late phase. However, on CECT, 2 (14.3 %, 2/14) and 4 (28.6 %, 4/14) HCAs showed persistent enhancement of the peripheral rim and central non-enhancing hemorrhage areas, respectively.

Conclusions

Compared with dynamic CT, CEUS was superior at characterizing specific dynamic features. Considering that it is radiation-free, readily availability and easy to use, CEUS is suggested as the first line imaging tool to diagnose HCA.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Two Different b-Values in Detection of Solid Focal Liver Lesions

One hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients with suspected liver disease were recruited to receive diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with two different b-values, in comparison with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). The detection rate of three MR sequences in solid focal liver lesions (FLLs) and subgroup analyses were performed. Our prospective study found that DWI600 was equivalent to DWI100 and T2WI for the detection of solid FLLs overall but was significantly more accurate in the detection of malignant solid FLLs and lesions larger than 10 mm.

Fenofibrate-induced massive regression of mutiple inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma

Inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas (IHCA), which accounts for 40% to 50% of all hepatocellular adenomas are characterized by the activation of the IL6/JAK/STAT pathway. We herein report the case of a 52-year-old woman presenting with severe multiple typical IHCA that regressed dramatically on treatment with fenofibrate, a PPAR agonist known to prevent IL6-induced inflammation experimentally and in humans. Further similar observations are needed to ascertain the potential benefit of this therapeutic approach for large or unresectable IHCA.

Focal liver lesions: Practical magnetic resonance imaging approach

With the widespread of cross-sectional imaging, a growth of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) has been observed. A reliable detection and characterization of FLL is critical for optimal patient management. Maximizing accuracy of imaging in the context of FLL is paramount in avoiding unnecessary biopsies, which may result in post-procedural complications. A tremendous development of new imaging techniques has taken place during these last years. Nowadays, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in management of liver lesions, using a radiation-free technique and a safe contrast agent profile. MRI plays a key role in the non-invasive correct characterization of FLL. MRI is capable of providing comprehensive and highly accurate diagnostic information, with the additional advantage of lack of harmful ionizing radiation. These properties make MRI the mainstay for the noninvasive evaluation of focal liver lesions. In this paper we review the state-of-the-art MRI liver protocol, briefly discussing different sequence types, the unique characteristics of imaging non-cooperative patients and discuss the role of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. A review of the imaging features of the most common benign and malignant FLL is presented, supplemented by a schematic representation of a simplistic practical approach on MRI.

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma: Role of the quantitative analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI

PURPOSE

To determine the value of quantitative analysis of the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients bearing 67 lesions (40 FNH; 27 HCA) were retrospectively included in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. The same volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) T1 -weighted sequences were performed before and after contrast injection on a 1.5T MRI, with HBP images acquired with a mean delay of 80 minutes (range 60-120 min). After a visual assessment of lesions enhancement (qualitative HBP analysis), the HBP signal intensity ratio (SIR) and the lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER) were calculated for each lesion by two observers (Mann-Whitney test). The sensitivities, specificities (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve analysis) and interobserver correlation (intraclass coefficient, ICC) of quantitative HBP analysis were determined.

RESULTS

All FNH and 44.4% of HCA appeared hyper- or isointense relative to the adjacent liver on qualitative HBP analysis. The mean SIR (P < 0.01) and LLCER (P < 0.0001) of FNH were significantly higher than that of HCA. The area under the ROC curve for the differentiation of FNH from HCA with LLCER was 0.98 for both observers. With a cutoff value of -0.3%-observer 1 with highest experience- LLCER assessment provided respective sensitivity and specificity values of 100% and 96.2% for the differentiation of FNH from HCA. The ICC was 0.7 for SIR measurements and 0.8 for LLCER measurements.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative LLCER assessment allows an accurate differentiation of FNH from HCA, even in hyper- or isointense HCA on HBP images.

Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: an emerging complication of hematopoietic SCT in children

Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a nonmalignant condition rarely affecting children previously treated for cancer, especially those who received hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Some aspects of its pathogenesis still remain unclear and a strong association with specific risk factors has not yet been identified. We report here a single institution's case series of 17 patients who underwent HSCT and were diagnosed with FNH, analyzing retrospectively their clinical features and the radiological appearance of their hepatic lesions. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to explore the role of transient elastography (FibroScan) to evaluate the degree of hepatic fibrosis in FNH patients. Our analysis showed an association of FNH with age at transplant ⩽12 years (hazard ratio (HR) 9.10); chronic GVHD (HR 2.99); hormone-replacement therapy (HR 4.02) and abdominal radiotherapy (HR 4.37). MRI proved to be a more accurate diagnostic tool compared with US. Nine out of 12 patients who underwent FibroScan showed hepatic fibrosis. Our study points out that FNH is an emerging complication of HSCT, which requires a lifelong surveillance to follow its course in cancer patients.