1
|
Mülder DT, Hahn AI, Huang RJ, Zhou MJ, Blake B, Omofuma O, Murphy JD, Gutiérrez-Torres DS, Zauber AG, O'Mahony JF, Camargo MC, Ladabaum U, Yeh JM, Hur C, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Meester R, Laszkowska M. Prevalence of Gastric Precursor Lesions in Countries With Differential Gastric Cancer Burden: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00227-1. [PMID: 38438000 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The prevalence of precursor lesions for gastric cancer (GC) and the differential burden between countries of varying GC risk is not well-understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the global prevalence of precursor lesions. METHODS We estimated the prevalence of atrophic gastritis (AG), gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM), and dysplasia in regions with low, medium, and high GC incidence. Because IM is an advanced manifestation of AG, we assessed the prevalence of less advanced precursors, regardless of the presence of more advanced lesions. Prevalence was sub-stratified by Helicobacter pylori infection, symptomatology, and period (<2000, 2000-2010, and >2010). RESULTS Among the 582 articles that underwent full-text review, 166 studies met inclusion criteria. The global prevalence estimates of AG, IM, and dysplasia were 25.4%, 16.2%, and 2.0%, respectively, on the basis of 126 studies that reported the prevalence of less advanced precursors, regardless of the presence of more advanced lesions. The prevalence of all precursor lesions was higher in high and medium compared with low GC incidence countries (P < .01). Prevalence of AG and IM was significantly higher among H pylori-infected individuals (P < .01) but not statistically different between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (P > .17). All precursors demonstrated a secular decrease in prevalence over time. CONCLUSIONS Gastric precursor lesions have differences in prevalence in regions with differential GC incidence and are associated with H pylori infection. Because of the substantial prevalence of precursor lesions in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, symptomatic evaluation may not be sufficient to identify individuals at risk. These estimates provide important insights for tailoring GC prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duco T Mülder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne I Hahn
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Margaret J Zhou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Benjamin Blake
- Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Omonefe Omofuma
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - John D Murphy
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; School of Economics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Constanza Camargo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Jennifer M Yeh
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chin Hur
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Reinier Meester
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Freenome Holdings Inc, San Francisco, California
| | - Monika Laszkowska
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Subspecialty Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McKay SC, DeSouza ML, Dunst CM, Reavis KM, Bradley DD, DeMeester SR. Missed Opportunities: the Timing and Frequency of Screening Colonoscopy in Patients That Develop Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2711-2717. [PMID: 37932595 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05874-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Screening colonoscopy (SC) is widely accepted and has been shown to decrease the rate of colorectal cancer death. Guidelines and acceptance of screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) are less established despite the fact that esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) remains the fastest increasing cancer in the USA. The aim of this study was to assess the timing and frequency of SC in patients ultimately found to have EA and to evaluate the presence of symptoms and risk factors that might have prompted an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and potentially earlier diagnosis of the EA. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who were referred to a single center with esophageal cancer between July 2016 and November 2022. Patients with any histology other than adenocarcinoma were excluded. RESULTS There were 221 patients referred with EA. Of these, a SC had been done prior to the diagnosis of EA in 108 patients (49%): 96 men and 12 women. A total of 203 SC had been done (range 1-7 per patient), and 47% of patients had more than 1 SC. The median interval from the last SC to the diagnosis of EA was 2.9 years. At the time of SC, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms or chronic acid suppression medication use was reported by 81% of patients, and 80% had an American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) indication for a screening EGD. Only 19 patients (18%) that had a SC had an EGD at any time prior to the diagnosis of EA, and in these patients, 74% had erosive esophagitis or BE. The EA in most patients was stage III or IV and associated with lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS Nearly one-half of patients ultimately diagnosed with EA had one or more SCs, and most of these patients had GERD symptoms, were using acid suppression medications or had an ASGE indication for a screening EGD. Despite this, only 18% had an EGD prior to the EA diagnosis. The addition of an EGD at the time of SC in these patients may have allowed the detection of BE or EA at an early, endoscopically curable stage and represents a missed opportunity to intervene in the natural history of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C McKay
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Melissa L DeSouza
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | - Christy M Dunst
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kevin M Reavis
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Daniel Davila Bradley
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Steven R DeMeester
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choe L, Lau J, Yip LTS, Kim G, Tan KK. Gastroscopy after positive screening for faecal immunochemical tests and colonoscopy: A systematic review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281557. [PMID: 36763684 PMCID: PMC9916633 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits based on the detection of occult blood in stool is widely advocated in numerous screening programs worldwide. However, CRC is not commonly diagnosed in positive cases. We undertook this review to determine if there is evidence to suggest the use of opportunistic oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) in patients without CRC. METHODS A systematic review encompassing three electronic databases was performed. All peer-reviewed studies of FIT-positive patients who underwent either OGD and colonoscopy concurrently or OGD post-colonoscopy were included. Only studies from 2008 to 2022 using FIT kits were included to ensure studies not previously included in an earlier review were being analysed. A forward citation search of the included articles was also conducted to ensure no relevant articles were missed. RESULTS A total of 2409 records were extracted. Only four studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included. Although the rates of abnormal OGD results were relatively high in the four studies, only 3 of 605 (0.50%) patients had gastric cancer in the entire review sample. No other malignancies were identified in all four studies. Other notable pathologies such as gastric polyps and gastritis were also reported. CONCLUSIONS There is little overall evidence to recommend UGI screening for all FIT-positive patients following a colonoscopy. However, there may be a role for clinicians to consider opportunistic OGD in this group of patients. Future research should examine patient populations from other sociocultural contexts including cost-effective analysis when considering changes in health guidelines on UGI screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Choe
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jerrald Lau
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Larry Teck-Seng Yip
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Guowei Kim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ker-Kan Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Teufel A, Quante M, Kandulski A, Hirth M, Zhan T, Eckardt M, Thieme R, Kusnik A, Yesmembetov K, Wiest I, Riemann JF, Schlitt HJ, Gockel I, Malfertheiner P, Ebert MP. [Prevention of gastrointestinal cancer]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2021; 59:964-982. [PMID: 34507375 DOI: 10.1055/a-1540-7539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Throughout the past decades, considerable progress has been made in the (early) diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. However, the prognosis for advanced stages of gastrointestinal tumors remains limited for many patients and approximately one third of all tumor patients die as a result of gastrointestinal tumors. The prevention and early detection of gastrointestinal tumors is therefore of great importance.For this reason, we summarize the current state of knowledge and recommendations for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of esophageal, stomach, pancreas, liver and colorectal cancer in the following.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Teufel
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Sektion Hepatologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim.,Klinische Kooperationseinheit Healthy Metabolism, Zentrum für Präventivmedizin und Digitale Gesundheit Baden-Württemberg, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
| | - Michael Quante
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau
| | - Arne Kandulski
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Michael Hirth
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - Tianzuo Zhan
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - Maximilian Eckardt
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - René Thieme
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - Alexander Kusnik
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - Kakharman Yesmembetov
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Stoffwechselerkrankungen und Internistische Intensivmedizin (Med. III), RWTH Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen
| | - Isabella Wiest
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | | | - Hans Jürgen Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Ines Gockel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Medizinische Fakultät Magdeburg, Magdeburg
| | - Matthias Philip Ebert
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim.,Klinische Kooperationseinheit Healthy Metabolism, Zentrum für Präventivmedizin und Digitale Gesundheit Baden-Württemberg, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
| |
Collapse
|