Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization is an effective downstaging option for subsequent radical treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A cohort study

Transarterial chemoembolization plus camrelizumab is an effective and tolerable bridging therapy for patients with intermediate‑stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A pilot study

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been reported to synergize with camrelizumab in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present study aimed to explore the potential of TACE and camrelizumab as a bridging therapy prior to surgery for patients with HCC. For this purpose, 11 patients with HCC with intermediate stage disease [classified by China Liver Cancer (CNLC) staging] who received TACE combined with camrelizumab as a bridging therapy prior to surgery were enrolled in this study. The treatment response was evaluated at 2 weeks following TACE therapy and following camrelizumab treatment. The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients were calculated. The objective response and disease control rates were 72.7 and 100.0% following TACE treatment, and were 100.0 and 100.0% following camrelizumab treatment, respectively. The α-fetoprotein levels gradually decreased following TACE, camrelizumab treatment and surgical resection (all P<0.05). Of note, the CNLC stage decreased following treatment (P=0.007) and the downstaging success rate was 63.6%. In terms of survival profiles, the mean RFS (95% CI) was 14.1 (11.7-16.5) months and the 1-year RFS rate was 77.9±14.1%. Furthermore, the mean OS (95% CI) was 15.0 (13.2-16.8) months and the 1-year OS rate was 80.0±17.9%. Successful downstaging was associated with RFS (P=0.041), but not OS (P=0.221). With regard to safety, 6 (54.5%) patients experienced reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, 5 (45.5%) patients reported pain and 4 (36.4%) patients had a fever. On the whole, the present study demonstrated that TACE plus camrelizumab may be an effective and safe strategy that has potential for use as a bridging strategy prior to surgery in patients with intermediate-stage HCC.

Apatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as bridging therapy to surgical resection displays an acceptable efficacy and safety profile in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Apatinib exhibits a synergistic effect with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) by inhibiting TACE-induced neoangiogenic reaction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. But apatinib plus drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) is rarely reported as a bridging therapy to surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus DEB-TACE as a bridge to surgical resection in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one intermediate-stage HCC patients who received apatinib plus DEB-TACE as a bridging therapy to surgery were enrolled. After the bridging therapy, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated; meanwhile, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined.

RESULTS

After the bridging therapy, three (9.7%), twenty one (67.7%), seven (22.6%), and twenty four (77.4%) patients achieved CR, PR, SD, and ORR, respectively; besides, PD did not occur. The successful downstaging rate was 18 (58.1%). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) accumulating RFS was 33.0 (19.6 - 46.6) months. Besides, the median (95% CI) accumulating OS was 37.0 (24.8 - 49.2) months. HCC patients with successful downstaging showed a higher accumulating RFS rate ( P = 0.038) and similar accumulating OS rate ( P = 0.073) compared to those without successful downstaging. The overall incidence of adverse events was relatively low. Besides, all the adverse events were mild and controllable. The most frequent adverse events included pain (14 [45.2%]) and fever (9 [29.0%]).

CONCLUSION

Apatinib plus DEB-TACE as a bridging therapy to surgical resection displays good efficacy and safety profile in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

Prognostic significance of psoas muscle index in male hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Currently, the relationship between nutritional indices and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of psoas muscle index (PMI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), body mass index (BMI), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in HCC patients treated with ICIs combined with TKIs. A total of 124 male patients with HCC were included in this study. PNI, PMI, BMI, and GNRI were calculated at the beginning of treatment. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the effect of various variables. In the univariate analysis, PMI, PNI, GNRI, and ALB were found to impact the outcomes of the patients at different follow-up times. However, the predictive value of these nutritional indices was eliminated when established risk factors were considered. In the multivariate analysis that only included nutrition-related indicators, PMI emerged as an independent prognostic factor for 1-year treatment outcomes. The group with low PMI (≤5.5409 cm2/m2) was found to have a higher risk of death at one year and at the end of the follow-up period.

Neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus PD-1 inhibitor bridging to tumor resection in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is widely utilized in advanced-stage carcinomas including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while its neoadjuvant application plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Thereby, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TACE plus PD-1 inhibitor as neoadjuvant therapy bridging to surgical resection in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

METHODS

Twenty intermediate-stage HCC (China Liver Cancer (CNLC) stage II) patients treated with neoadjuvant TACE plus PD-1 inhibitor (camrelizumab or sintilimab) bridging to surgery were consecutively enrolled.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) to neoadjuvant therapy were 75.0% and 100.0%, respectively; meanwhile, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was decreased after the neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.001). Moreover, 14 (70.0%) patients had successful downstaging (patients converted to CNLC stage I). Neither median disease-free survival (DFS) nor median overall survival (OS) was reached; additionally, the 1-year accumulating DFS rate was 86.6%; meanwhile, the 1-year and 2-year accumulating OS rates were 100.0% and 76.4%, separately. Moreover, patients with successful downstaging had a prolonged DFS (P = 0.014) compared to patients with failed downstaging; meanwhile, this trend was also observed in assessing accumulating OS (P = 0.067) (without statistical significance). Main adverse events included pain (50.0%), fever (25.0%), neutropenia (25.0%), nausea and vomiting (25.0%), fatigue (25.0%), peripheral neuropathy (20.0%), anemia (15.0%), thrombopenia (15.0%), diarrhea (15.0%), anorexia (15.0%), and rash (15.0%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant TACE plus PD-1 inhibitor realizes a satisfying downstaging rate, acceptable survival profile, and tolerance in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

Callispheres® drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization might be an efficient and safety down-staging therapy in unresectable liver cancer patients

PURPOSE

The purpose was to explore the effect of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) on down-staging in unresectable liver cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients with PHC treated by TACE were retrospectively analyzed. These included 80 cases in the DEB-TACE group and 100 cases in the cTACE group. Of these, 56 had complete clinical data (DEB-TACE: 24, cTACE: 32), and 23 patients received hepatectomy after TACE as a down-staging therapy (DEB-TACE: 15, cTACE: 8). Data (including clinical characteristics, clinical efficacy, tumor response, tumor diameters, residual liver volume, and liver function indexes before and after TACE, RFS, OS, and complications were collected and compared. Treatment response was evaluated at 1 month after TACE. Tumor diameter was evaluated by abdominal computed tomography scan. The residual liver volume was evaluated by IQQA liver system, and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The conversion rate in DEB-TACE group was higher than cTACE group (18.8% vs 8%, p = 0.032). In DEB-TACE group, 17 patients achieved objective response rate (ORR) which was higher than cTACE group (70.8% vs 34.4%, p = 0.007). The tumor necrosis rate was higher in DEB-TACE group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.053). Tumor diameter was decreased after TACE compared to before TACE (DEB-TACE: 9.4 ± 3.3 vs. 5.4 ± 3.5 cm, p = 0.003; cTACE: 9.7 ± 2.6 vs. 6.9 ± 2.2, p = 0.036). As to residual liver volume, it was increased after TACE compared to before TACE (1066.2 cm³ vs. 1180.3 cm³, p = 0.007) in DEB-TACE group, while there was no significant difference in cTACE group (1046.4 cm³ vs. 1170 cm³, p = 0.339) compared by paired-sample t-test, but there was no significant difference before and after TACE when compared by unpaired-sample t-test (p > 0.05). After TACE at 1 month, the AFP level in the DEB-TACE group was significantly lower than that in the cTACE group (p = 0.003). For survival, the median RFS was 26.0 months in DEB-TACE group and 15 months in cTACE group; there was significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0465). As to OS, the median OS in DEB-TACE group was higher than that in cTACE group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.165). For safety profiles, in terms of liver function and adverse events, there was no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with cTACE, DEB-TACE might be a more efficient and safety down-staging treatment in unresectable liver cancer patients.

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) the opportunity to undergo radical resection. At present, conversion therapy for patients with uHCC remains controversial. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the most widely selected treatment for uHCC, but its efficacy as a conversion therapy remains controversial.

Methods

We compared and evaluated the conversion rate for and tumor response to TACE monotherapy or combination therapy. Meanwhile, postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients who underwent conversion therapy were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The conversion rate for triple therapy [TACE in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29–0.56], higher than any other group [TACE monotherapy: 10% (95% CI, 0.08–0.12), bigeminy therapy: 19% (95% CI, 0.06–0.36)]. Meanwhile, triple therapy yielded a better tumor response than TACE monotherapy or bigeminy therapy. Among the patients with successful surgical resection after conversion therapy, the pooled postoperative OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 90% (95% CI, 0.81–0.97), 58% (95% CI, 0.42–0.73), and 42% (95% CI, 0.26–0.60), respectively, and the major postoperative complications were biliary leakage (7%; 95% CI, 0.03–0.12) and liver failure (3%; 95% CI, 0.00–0.07).

Conclusion

TACE conversion therapies showed good conversion rates, especially the triple therapy of TACE in combination with TKIs and ICIs. Surgical resection after successful conversion therapy could maximize the outcome of patients with uHCC.

The efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization in downstaging unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma to curative therapy: a predicted regression model

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outside Milan criteria (MC) may be candidates for curative therapy after successful downstaging. We aimed to identify the predictors of successful downstaging of unresectable HCC in patient by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) outside MC. We performed a retrospective study on patients with unresectable HCC outside MC who received downstaging with TACE. Clinical and laboratory variables were recorded. We identified 101 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent initial TACE, who formed the derivation set of this study. Thirty patients who treated by TACE with the same selection criteria served as an external validation set. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify variables associated with successful downstaging. Then we did the predictive model to predict the efficiency of TACE. Of the 101 patients in the study, 26 patients (25.7%) were successfully downstaging and 75 patients (74.3%) failed downstaging. Multivariate analysis of factors to predict successful downstaging of HCC outside MC the number of tumor (P = 0.01), portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT)(p < 0.01), the size of tumor (P = 0.02), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (P = 0.01), α-fetoprotein (AFP) (P = 0.02) as significant predictors of successful downstaging. Then we constructed the predictive model. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of the predictive equation was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95). We found in our study that the number and size of tumors, PVTT, HBsAg, and AFP are good predictors of successful downstaging of unresectable HCC in patients by TACE outside the MC.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Endoscopic Therapy Is Beneficial for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Esophagogastric Varices

Background

The efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with endoscopic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices remains unclear.

Methods

The study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT05017922 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov). Eligible patients were divided into combined group (received TACE plus endoscopic therapy) and control group (only received TACE). The occurrence of death and bleeding episodes during the follow-up was recorded. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine independent predictors for the survival.

Results

Eighty-nine patients were included, 42 in the combined group, others in the control group. During the follow-up, 51 patients died, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 64.9%, 45.5%, and 34.5%. The cumulative survival was significantly higher in the combined group than in the control group (p = 0.027); the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 75.5%, 55.9%, 43.8% and 55.0%, 35.9%, 26.6%, respectively. Forty-four patients experienced bleeding, the bleeding rate was significantly higher in the control group than in the combined group (77.4% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment, hemoglobin, portal vein tumor thrombosis, and aspartate aminotransferase were independent predictors for overall survival; the first three factors were also independent predictors for bleeding-free survival. Patients who received primary prophylaxis had longer overall survival (p = 0.042) and bleeding-free survival (p = 0.029) than those who received secondary prophylaxis.

Conclusions

TACE combined with endoscopic therapy significantly improved survival and reduced bleeding rates in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices patients. Portal vein tumor thrombosis was a strong negative prognostic factor for both overall survival and bleeding-free survival. Primary prophylaxis improved survival benefits compared with secondary prophylaxis.

Chinese expert consensus on neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

The low resection and high recurrence rates in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the major challenges to improving prognosis. Neoadjuvant and conversion therapies are underlying strategies to overcome these challenges. To date, no guideline or consensus has been published on the neoadjuvant and conversion therapies in HCC. Recent studies showed that neoadjuvant therapy for resectable HCC and conversion therapy for unresectable HCC are safe, feasible, and effective. Neoadjuvant and conversion therapies have the following advantages in treating HCC: R0 resection with sufficient volume of future liver remnant, relatively simple operation, and wide applicability. Therefore, it was necessary to conduct a widely accepted consensus among the experts in China who have extensive expertise and experience in treating HCC using neoadjuvant and conversion therapies, which is important to standardize the application of neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for the management of HCC. The strategies of neoadjuvant therapy include the selection of the eligible patients, therapy regimen, cycles, effect evaluations, and multidisciplinary treatment. The management of patients with insufficient volume of future liver remnant and patients who cannot achieve R0 resection is the key to the strategies of conversion therapy. Here, we present the resultant evidence- and experience-based consensus to guide the application of neoadjuvant and conversion therapies in clinical practice.