The endless history or search for the true role of alloantibodies in liver transplantation

Importance of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and leukocyte antigen/killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes in liver transplantation

Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the hypothetical state of hepatic tolerance, which is described by eventual imbalances or deregulation in the balance of cytokines, mediators, effectors, and regulatory cells in the complex milieu of the liver. In this section, we will comment on the importance of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) as well as the compatibility and pairings of HLA and killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genotypes in the evolution of liver transplantation. Thus, HLA compatibility, viral infections, and HLA-C/KIR combinations have all been linked to liver transplant rejection and survival. There have been reports of increased risk of acute and chronic rejection with ductopenia, faster graft fibrosis, biliary problems, poorer survival, and even de novo autoimmune hepatitis when DSAs are present in the recipient. Higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of the DSAs and smaller graft size were associated with poorer patient outcomes, implying that high-risk patients with preformed DSAs should be considered for selecting the graft placed and desensitization methods, according to the investigators. Similarly, in a combined kidney-liver transplant, a pretransplant with a visible expression of several DSAs revealed that these antibodies were resistant to treatment. The renal graft was lost owing to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The HLA antigens expressed by the transplanted liver graft influenced antibody elimination. Pathologists are increasingly diagnosing AMR in liver transplants, and desensitization therapy has even been employed in situations of AMR, particularly in patients with DSAs in kidney-hepatic transplants and high-class II MFI due to Luminex. In conclusion, after revealing the negative impacts of DSAs with high MFI, pretransplant virtual crossmatch techniques may be appropriate to improve evolution; however, they may extend cold ischemia periods by requiring the donor to be typed.

Risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of recipients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of 290 patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 2012 to December 2021 at our center were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were grouped into an acute rejection (AR) group and a normal (NM) group based on the confirmed histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the risk factors for acute rejection.

RESULTS

244 patients were included in the study. Acute rejection occurred in 27 (11.1%) of the patients. Warm ischemia time (P = 0.137), cold ischemia time (P = 0.064) and chronic liver failure (P = 0.001) were potential risk factors for acute rejection. Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47-27.32) was the independent risk factor. There was no significant difference in overall survival between recipients with acute rejection and those without it (P = 0.985). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival in the NM group was 98.1%, 85.7% and 78.6% respectively vs 88.9%, 82.5% and 82.5% respectively in the AR group.

CONCLUSION

Acute rejection does not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients. Only chronic liver failure was an independent risk factor for acute rejection. Our findings further illustrate that contradictions still exist on which factors influence acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Clinicopathological data of 290 liver transplant recipients at our center between January 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated to determine the risk factors for acute rejection and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients. 244 patients were included in the analysis. 27 of the 244 experienced acute rejection. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce the confounding effect. Patients were assigned to an acute rejection group (n = 27) and a normal group (n = 54). Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47-27.32) was the determined to be independent risk factor for acute rejection. Acute rejection did not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients and there was no significant difference in overall survival between the patients with acute rejection and those without it.

Current Approaches in the Allocation of Liver Transplantation

In recent decades, important advances have been made in the field of liver transplantation. One of the major problems remaining in this area is the small number of donors. Thus, recent data bring multiple updates of the indications and contraindications of this therapeutic method. The main goal is to increase the number of patients who can benefit from liver transplantation, a therapeutic method that can improve life expectancy and the quality of life of patients with end-stage liver disease. Another goal in the management of these patients is represented by the optimal care of those on the waiting list during that period. A multidisciplinary team approach is necessary to obtain the best results for both the donor and the recipient.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Literature Review

Antibody-mediated rejection is a rare complication following liver transplantation and there is a lack of a comprehensive treatment strategy to provide detailed information about the dose and duration of antibody-mediated rejection treatment. This study describes eight adult liver transplantation recipients who developed antibody-mediated rejection between 2002 and 2021 in our center, as well as a review of the literature on the reported cases of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation recipients. Our center's medical records were reviewed retrospectively to extract the necessary data on patients' characteristics, management, and outcomes. Then, a comprehensive search using Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar databases was conducted without time limitation until June, 2021. Finally, a stepwise protocol was developed for managing acute, chronic, and recurrent antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation patients, based on our own experience, reported cases in the literature, and data from kidney transplantation. By review of the literature, 24 case studies containing 64 patients were identified and their management strategies and outcomes were evaluated. Although, various combinations of corticosteroids, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and biological agents are used in the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, treatment strategies should be classified according to the type, severity, and the timing of its onset. Given the importance of early treatment, rituximab and/or bortezomib should be started as soon as possible if no improvement in liver enzymes/bilirubin is observed during the initial treatment strategy using corticosteroids, plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Donor-Specific Antibodies Against Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen are Associated with Graft Inflammation but Not with Fibrosis Long-Term After Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of Protocol Biopsies

Background

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against donor human leukocyte antigen after liver transplantation, which are associated with histological changes, have been widely studied with respect to their sustained impact on transplant function. However, their long-term impact after liver transplantation remains unclear.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis from June 2016 to July 2017 that included all patients who presented themselves for scheduled follow-up after receiving a liver transplantation between September 1989 and December 2016. In addition to a liver protocol biopsy, patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLAab) and donor-specific antibodies. Subsequently, the association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies, donor-specific antibodies, histologic and clinical features, and immunosuppression was analyzed.

Results

Analysis for human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was performed for 291 and 271 patients. A significant association between higher inflammation grades and the presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies was detected, while fibrosis stages remained unaffected. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression for inflammation showing a significant increase for presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (OR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.67–12.6; p=0.0035). Furthermore, the use of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus was significantly associated with the status of negative human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies. Viral etiology for liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and higher steatosis grades of the graft were significantly associated with a lower rate of human leukocyte antigen antibodies. The impact of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was associated with higher levels of laboratory parameters, such as transaminases and bilirubin.

Conclusion

Donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen are associated with histological and biochemical graft inflammation after liver transplantation, while fibrosis seems to be unaffected. Future studies should validate these findings for longer observation periods and specific subgroups.

Chronic Antibody-Mediated Liver Rejection: More than Meets the Eye

Understanding the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation remains an investigative priority. Acute and chronic rejection associated with DSAs have been described. However, most transplant protocols did not consider the presence of DSAs at the moment of liver transplantation (LTx) or for the follow-up. A 65-year-old man received an ABO-compatible LTx for cirrhosis. Ten years after the LTx, he presented with a progressive elevation of liver enzymes and bilirubin. The single antigen Luminex bead assay showed the presence of DSAs against several DQ2, DQ7, and DQ8 alleles. The patient received several desensitization treatments regarding the persistence of DSAs. The anatomopathological study confirms chronic rejection. Although in this case the immunohistochemical deposits of C4d were negative, the data revealed morphological criteria of chronic graft injury and DSAs’ incompatibilities explained by structural analysis. These data support an antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). It could be reasonable to establish a protocol for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing of every LTx donor and recipient as well as a periodic follow-up to assess the presence of DSAs. This will make it possible to carry out studies of donor–recipient incompatibility and to confirm the existence of probable cases of AMR.