1
|
Duan CW, Zhai HH, Xie H, Ma XZ, Yu DL, Yang L, Wang X, Tang YF, Zhang J, Su H, Sheng JQ, Xu JF, Jin P. Standard-definition White-light, High-definition White-light versus Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenomas: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Curr Med Sci 2024; 44:554-560. [PMID: 38842773 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-024-2882-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the performance of standard-definition white-light endoscopy (SD-WL), high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WL), and high-definition narrow-band imaging (HD-NBI) in detecting colorectal lesions in the Chinese population. METHODS This was a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial with a non-inferiority design. Patients undergoing endoscopy for physical examination, screening, and surveillance were enrolled from July 2017 to December 2020. The primary outcome measure was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), defined as the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma detected. The associated factors for detecting adenomas were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Out of 653 eligible patients enrolled, data from 596 patients were analyzed. The ADRs were 34.5% in the SD-WL group, 33.5% in the HD-WL group, and 37.5% in the HD-NBI group (P=0.72). The advanced neoplasm detection rates (ANDRs) in the three arms were 17.1%, 15.5%, and 10.4% (P=0.17). No significant differences were found between the SD group and HD group regarding ADR or ANDR (ADR: 34.5% vs. 35.6%, P=0.79; ANDR: 17.1% vs. 13.0%, P=0.16, respectively). Similar results were observed between the HD-WL group and HD-NBI group (ADR: 33.5% vs. 37.7%, P=0.45; ANDR: 15.5% vs. 10.4%, P=0.18, respectively). In the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, neither HD-WL nor HD-NBI led to a significant difference in overall adenoma detection compared to SD-WL (HD-WL: OR 0.91, P=0.69; HD-NBI: OR 1.15, P=0.80). CONCLUSION HD-NBI and HD-WL are comparable to SD-WL for overall adenoma detection among Chinese outpatients. It can be concluded that HD-NBI or HD-WL is not superior to SD-WL, but more effective instruction may be needed to guide the selection of different endoscopic methods in the future. Our study's conclusions may aid in the efficient allocation and utilization of limited colonoscopy resources, especially advanced imaging technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Wei Duan
- Chinese PLA General Hospital and Medical School, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Hui-Hong Zhai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Xian-Zong Ma
- Chinese PLA General Hospital and Medical School, Beijing, 100853, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Dong-Liang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Lang Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Yu-Fen Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Hui Su
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Jian-Qiu Sheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China.
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Jun-Feng Xu
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Peng Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China.
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reduced Adenoma Miss Rate With 9-Minute vs 6-Minute Withdrawal Times for Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 118:802-811. [PMID: 36219172 PMCID: PMC10144327 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although the 9-minute mean withdrawal time (m-WT) is often reported to be associated with the optimal adenoma detection rate (ADR), no randomized trials of screening colonoscopy have confirmed the impact of a 9-minute m-WT on adenoma miss rate (AMR) and ADR. METHODS A multicenter tandem trial was conducted in 11 centers. Seven hundred thirty-three asymptomatic participants were randomized to receive segmental tandem screening colonoscopy with a 9-minute withdrawal, followed by a 6-minute withdrawal (9-minute-first group, 9MF, n = 366) or vice versa (6-minute-first group, 6MF, n = 367). The primary outcome was the lesion-level AMR. RESULTS The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that 9MF significantly reduced the lesion-level (14.5% vs 36.6%, P < 0.001) and participant-level AMR (10.9% vs 25.9%, P < 0.001), advanced adenoma miss rate (AAMR, 5.3% vs 46.9%, P = 0.002), multiple adenomas miss rate (20.7% vs 56.5%, P = 0.01), and high-risk adenomas miss rate (14.6% vs 39.5%, P = 0.01) of 6MF without compromising detection efficiency ( P = 0.79). In addition, a lower false-negative rate for adenomas ( P = 0.002) and high-risk adenomas ( P < 0.05), and a lower rate of shortening surveillance schedule ( P < 0.001) were also found in 9MF, accompanying with an improved ADR in the 9-minute vs 6-minute m-WT (42.3% vs 33.5%, P = 0.02). The independent inverse association between m-WT and AMR remained significant even after adjusting ADR, and meanwhile, 9-minute m-WT was identified as an independent protector for AMR and AAMR. DISCUSSION In addition to increasing ADR, 9-minute m-WT also significantly reduces the AMR and AAMR of screening colonoscopy without compromising detection efficiency.
Collapse
|