The addition of camrelizumab is effective and safe among unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who progress after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib therapy

Efficacy and safety of second-line camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A prospective, open-label, multicentric study

OBJECTIVES

Camrelizumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) and apatinib (an angiogenesis inhibitor) are considered as potential treatments for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel, docetaxel, or pemetrexed) in patients with advanced LUAD.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with advanced LUAD underwent second-line camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, multicentric study. Follow-up with a median duration of 18.0 months was conducted.

RESULTS

There were 0 (0.0 %), 11 (37.9 %), 14 (48.4 %), and 3 (10.3 %) patients achieving complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Meanwhile, treatment response was not evaluated in 1 (3.4 %) patient. The objective response and disease control rates were 37.9 % and 86.3 %, respectively. In terms of survival, the median (95 % confidence interval) progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 (5.2-17.0) months, with 1-year and 2-year PFS rates of 40.4 % and 20.5 %, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached; the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 72.0 % and 64.8 %, respectively. Current treatment cycles ≥ 8 were associated with better PFS and OS (both P < 0.001). In addition, 21 (72.4 %) patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), which was mostly of grade I and II. The most commonly occurring TEAE was leukopenia (17.2 %), liver dysfunction (17.2 %), hypothyroidism (13.8 %), hand-foot syndrome (13.8 %), and thrombocytopenia (13.8 %).

CONCLUSION

Second-line camrelizumab combined apatinib and chemotherapy might serve as a potential treatment with acceptable safety in patients with advanced LUAD.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with/without PD-1 for unresectable HCC in a multicenter retrospective study

Background & aims

This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with donafenib and a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor (TACE+DP) and TACE combined with donafenib (TACE+D) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Methods

The clinical data of 388 patients with uHCC who received TACE+DP or TACE+D as first-line treatment at six Chinese academic centers from July 2021 to July 2022 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients in the TACE+DP group received an intravenous administration of a PD-1 inhibitor every three weeks and oral donafenib (0.2 g) twice daily until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Patients in the TACE+D group received the same dose of donafenib for 3-5 days after TACE. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The tumor response was compared between the two groups according to modified RECIST criteria. Adverse events were also analyzed between the two groups.

Results

The TACE+D group included 157 patients and the TACE+DP group included 166 patients. Patients in the TACE+DP group had a longer median OS (18.1 vs. 13.2 months, P<0.001) and longer median PFS (10.6 vs. 7.9 months, P<0.001) than those in the TACE+D group. Patients in the TACE+DP group achieved a greater objective response rate (ORR; 50.6% vs. 41.4%, P=0.019) and greater disease control rate (DCR) (89.2% vs. 82.8%, P=0.010) than those in the TACE+D group. No significant differences were found in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the TACE+DP and TACE+D groups (any grade: 92.9% vs. 94.6%, P=0.270; grade 3 or 4: 33.8% vs. 37.3%, P=0.253).

Conclusion

With favorable safety and tolerability, TACE combined with donafenib and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved PFS, OS, and ORR compared to TACE combined with donafenib.

The Synergistic Effect of Interventional Locoregional Treatments and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Immunotherapy has remarkably revolutionized the management of advanced HCC and prompted clinical trials, with therapeutic agents being used to selectively target immune cells rather than cancer cells. Currently, there is great interest in the possibility of combining locoregional treatments with immunotherapy for HCC, as this combination is emerging as an effective and synergistic tool for enhancing immunity. On the one hand, immunotherapy could amplify and prolong the antitumoral immune response of locoregional treatments, improving patients' outcomes and reducing recurrence rates. On the other hand, locoregional therapies have been shown to positively alter the tumor immune microenvironment and could therefore enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Despite the encouraging results, many unanswered questions still remain, including which immunotherapy and locoregional treatment can guarantee the best survival and clinical outcomes; the most effective timing and sequence to obtain the most effective therapeutic response; and which biological and/or genetic biomarkers can be used to identify patients likely to benefit from this combined approach. Based on the current reported evidence and ongoing trials, the present review summarizes the current application of immunotherapy in combination with locoregional therapies for the treatment of HCC, and provides a critical evaluation of the current status and future directions.