Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrostimulation in COPD subjects on mechanical ventilation. A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Influence of Lung Function and Respiratory Muscle Strength on Quadriceps Muscle Fatigability in COPD Patients Under Long-term Oxygen Therapy

BACKGROUND

This research investigates quadriceps muscle fatigability (MF) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF) at different levels of lung obstruction [severe obstruction (SO)=FEV1 <50% and >30% versus very severe obstruction (VSO)=FEV1 ≤30%]. It explores the relationships between quadriceps MF and lung function, respiratory muscles, and oxygenation status.

METHODS

A post hoc cross-over analysis in 45 COPD patients (20 SO and 25 VSO) undergoing long-term oxygen therapy was performed. Delta change in quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) (absolute value and percentage) before and after a constant workload was calculated. Associations between quadriceps MF and lung function, respiratory muscles, and gas exchange were examined using Pearson's correlation and multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

SO patients experience a more substantial reduction in MVC compared to VSO (-15.15±9.13% vs -9.29±8.90%, p=0.0357), despite comparable resting MVC. Dyspnea is more pronounced in VSO at the beginning and end of the exercise. Correlations were found between MF and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (r=-0.4412, p=0.0056), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) (r=-0.3561, p=0.0282), and a tendency for FEV1% (r=-0.2931, p=0.0507). The regression model (R2=0.4719) indicates that lower MIP and FEV1 and high total lung capacity are significant factors in reducing quadriceps muscle fatigability after a fatiguing task.

CONCLUSION

COPD patients with more severe pulmonary obstruction and hyperinflation and lower respiratory muscle strength have lower quadriceps MF but higher dyspnea both at rest and during exercise.

Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and accessibility of NMES and compared them with usual care in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD by searching databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials published up to April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with COPD who were treated within 3 weeks of acute exacerbation onset were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tools. We pooled limb muscle strength and adverse events and performed a comparison between NMES and usual care. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Five RCTs, including 168 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis showed that limb muscle strength was significantly higher in the NMES group (four studies with 148 patients; standardized mean difference, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.30; p < 0.001). The quality of evidence was very low due to the risk of bias within the studies, imprecision of the estimates, and small number of studies. Any adverse events served as outcomes in three studies (86 patients), although no adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

NMES is safe for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and may maintain and improve limb muscle strength; however, the quality of evidence was very low.

The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hospitalised adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a treatment to prevent or reverse acquired disability in hospitalised adults. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of its effectiveness.

METHOD

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and the Cochrane library. Inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials of hospitalised adult patients comparing NMES to control or usual care. The primary outcome was muscle strength. Secondary outcomes were muscle size, function, hospital length of stay, molecular and cellular biomarkers, and adverse effects. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We used Review Manager (RevMan) software for data extraction, critical appraisal and synthesis. We assessed certainty using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool.

RESULTS

A total of 42 papers were included involving 1,452 participants. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias. NMES had a small effect on muscle strength (moderate certainty) (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.33; P < 0.00001), a moderate effect on muscle size (moderate certainty) (SMD = 0.66; P < 0.005), a small effect on walking performance (moderate certainty) (SMD = 0.48; P < 0.0001) and a small effect on functional mobility (low certainty) (SMD = 0.31; P < 0.05). There was a small and non-significant effect on health-related quality of life (very low certainty) (SMD = 0.35; P > 0.05). In total, 9% of participants reported undesirable experiences. The effects of NMES on length of hospital stay, and molecular and cellular biomarkers were unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

NMES is a promising intervention component that might help to reduce or prevent hospital-acquired disability.