1
|
Chakroun K, Wiehler A, Wagner B, Mathar D, Ganzer F, van Eimeren T, Sommer T, Peters J. Dopamine regulates decision thresholds in human reinforcement learning in males. Nat Commun 2023; 14:5369. [PMID: 37666865 PMCID: PMC10477234 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41130-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Dopamine fundamentally contributes to reinforcement learning, but recent accounts also suggest a contribution to specific action selection mechanisms and the regulation of response vigour. Here, we examine dopaminergic mechanisms underlying human reinforcement learning and action selection via a combined pharmacological neuroimaging approach in male human volunteers (n = 31, within-subjects; Placebo, 150 mg of the dopamine precursor L-dopa, 2 mg of the D2 receptor antagonist Haloperidol). We found little credible evidence for previously reported beneficial effects of L-dopa vs. Haloperidol on learning from gains and altered neural prediction error signals, which may be partly due to differences experimental design and/or drug dosages. Reinforcement learning drift diffusion models account for learning-related changes in accuracy and response times, and reveal consistent decision threshold reductions under both drugs, in line with the idea that lower dosages of D2 receptor antagonists increase striatal DA release via an autoreceptor-mediated feedback mechanism. These results are in line with the idea that dopamine regulates decision thresholds during reinforcement learning, and may help to bridge action selection and response vigor accounts of dopamine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karima Chakroun
- Institute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Antonius Wiehler
- Motivation, Brain and Behavior Lab, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Ben Wagner
- Chair of Cognitive Computational Neuroscience, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - David Mathar
- Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Ganzer
- Integrated Psychiatry Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Thilo van Eimeren
- Multimodal Neuroimaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tobias Sommer
- Institute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Peters
- Institute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
- Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weitzel J, Langer K, Rose O. Effects of Generic Exchange of Levodopa Medication in Patients With Parkinson Disease. J Patient Saf 2022; 18:704-710. [PMID: 35532994 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Generic exchange is common practice in most healthcare systems. This study investigated how patients with Parkinson disease (PD) perceived a switch of their levodopa medication and the resulting effects on their PD symptoms. METHODS A questionnaire was developed, piloted, and finally distributed to 13,857 members of the national PD patient support group. It was designed to be completed by patients and their pharmacies. χ 2 tests for independence statistics with or without Monte Carlo simulation were performed. Cramér φ and Cramér V were calculated. McNemar test was used to investigate whether a generic switch of a levodopa-containing medication had an impact on PD symptoms. RESULTS Analyses were done with 410 finalized respondents of 13,857 distributed questionnaires. More than half of the responders were 75 years or older and rated themselves Hoehn and Yahr stages 3 to 5. Most patients were confused by a change of their medication. A total of 54.7% of the switchers (n = 148) reported swallowing difficulties with medication, which was significantly more frequent than with nonswitchers (37.3% of 204, P = 0.001). Adverse effects related to the switch were reported by 26.6% of all switchers (switchback rate, 20.5%). The patients at higher Hoehn and Yahr stages were affected to a greater extend. CONCLUSIONS Patients, who experienced any brand switch of their levodopa medication, frequently expressed distrust and confusion. Swallowing difficulties and negative effects on their symptoms were problems, which were more pronounced in advanced disease stages. It remains unclear whether the detrimental impact on therapy was caused by the brand switch or by a nocebo effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Weitzel
- From the Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Muenster
| | - Klaus Langer
- From the Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Muenster
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chakroun K, Mathar D, Wiehler A, Ganzer F, Peters J. Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making. eLife 2020; 9:e51260. [PMID: 32484779 PMCID: PMC7266623 DOI: 10.7554/elife.51260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Involvement of dopamine in regulating exploration during decision-making has long been hypothesized, but direct causal evidence in humans is still lacking. Here, we use a combination of computational modeling, pharmacological intervention and functional magnetic resonance imaging to address this issue. Thirty-one healthy male participants performed a restless four-armed bandit task in a within-subjects design under three drug conditions: 150 mg of the dopamine precursor L-dopa, 2 mg of the D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol, and placebo. Choices were best explained by an extension of an established Bayesian learning model accounting for perseveration, directed exploration and random exploration. Modeling revealed attenuated directed exploration under L-dopa, while neural signatures of exploration, exploitation and prediction error were unaffected. Instead, L-dopa attenuated neural representations of overall uncertainty in insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Our results highlight the computational role of these regions in exploration and suggest that dopamine modulates how this circuit tracks accumulating uncertainty during decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karima Chakroun
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - David Mathar
- Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Antonius Wiehler
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière - ICM, Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - CENIR, Sorbonne Universités, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-SalpêtrièreParisFrance
| | - Florian Ganzer
- German Center for Addiction Research in Childhood and Adolescence, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Jan Peters
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
- Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of CologneCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effects of generic exchange of solid oral dosage forms in neurological disorders: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pharm 2020; 42:393-417. [PMID: 32274633 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01023-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Generic drug exchange is common practice in most healthcare systems. While generics certainly contribute to economic savings, the altered drug formulation might be associated with potential therapeutic problems. Given the narrow therapeutic windows in neurologic indications, any detrimental effect on the therapy can lead to significant consequences. Aim of the review This review aims to investigate potential problems related to a switch from brand-name to generic or from generic to generic drug products in patients with neurologic diseases. Method The review was conducted following the PICO framework and the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched for articles published in English and German language between January 1, 1995 and October 17, 2018. Studies included in this review were randomized controlled studies, reviews, systematic reviews, overviews, cohort studies and case-control studies. Studies excluded were letters, comments, authors view, congress or seminar papers and studies with a focus on economic impact or costs. Results were synthesized qualitatively. The primary outcomes were pharmacokinetic parameters such as the area under the curve (AUC), the peak serum concentration (cmax) or the time at which cmax is observed (tmax). Results The search identified 67 studies with a great variety of endpoints and study designs. The leading indication was epilepsy. Two small RCTs were found on lamotrigine switch. Analysis of the other studies found no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters when switching to generic drugs. A more heterogeneous picture was revealed regarding hospitalizations, breakthrough seizures, failure of therapy, adherence and patient concerns. Conclusion While most reports were of poor quality, lamotrigine was the drug with the best available data. Summarizing the results of the available studies, pharmacokinetic parameters of antiepileptic drugs show low deviation. In contrast, data on clinical parameters are less consistent. Some studies found increased seizure frequencies and adverse-drug events, while others showed no complications. Adherence and patient satisfaction seemed to be impaired. In daily practice, generic exchange in epilepsy should be a carefully balanced decision, conducted with great caution. Further research is needed, especially regarding neurologic indications other than epilepsy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Torti M, Alessandroni J, Bravi D, Casali M, Grassini P, Fossati C, Ialongo C, Onofrj M, Radicati FG, Vacca L, Bonassi S, Stocchi F. Clinical and pharmacokinetics equivalence of multiple doses of levodopa benserazide generic formulation vs the originator (Madopar). Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 85:2605-2613. [PMID: 31378952 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS While several generic preparations of levodopa/carbidopa and levodopa/benserazide (LBD) are currently available, pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence and therapeutic equivalence studies with levodopa generics are not available in Italy. Lack of data on generic formulations is a critical factor for their limited use in this country and often lead patients to refuse the generic version of the branded drug. METHODS An experimental, 2-centre, randomized, double-blind, 2-sequence, noninferiority cross-over study was designed to evaluate both the PK equivalence and clinical equivalence of multiple doses of the generic preparation of LDB, Teva Italia, compared to the originator (Madopar). Forty-three out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease on LDB, were recruited and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study sequences: generic-originator or originator-generic. Clinical evaluations were performed at the end of each study period. A PK study with an LDB fixed dose (100 + 25 mg) was performed in a subpopulation of 14 subjects. RESULTS Clinical data showed a reduction of 0.49 and 1.54 in the mean UPDRS III scores for the LDB and the originator, respectively. The 95% CIs [-2.21: 0.11] of the mean difference original vs LDB are smaller than the clinically significant difference of 3 UPDRS III points, supporting the conclusion that the treatment with LDB is not inferior to the originator. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to area under the curve to last dose, half-life, maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration and last observed concentration. CONCLUSION These findings prove the therapeutic clinical equivalence as well the PK equivalence of the generic LDB and the originator (Madopar).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Torti
- Center for Parkinson's Disease, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.,San Raffaele Cassino, Rome, Italy
| | - Jhessica Alessandroni
- BioBIM - Multidisciplinary Interistitutional BioBank San Raffaele Pisana -Research Center, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Bravi
- Center for Parkinson's Disease, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - Miriam Casali
- Center for Parkinson's Disease, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Grassini
- Center for Parkinson's Disease, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Fossati
- Center for Parkinson's Disease, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.,Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro de Bosis 15, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristiano Ialongo
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer", Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Onofrj
- Neurology Department, Università "G. D'Annunzio" di Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Laura Vacca
- Center for Parkinson's Disease, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.,Casa di Cura Privata Policlinico (CCPP), Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Bonassi
- IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Italy (Statistical Analysis) And Department of Human Sciences and Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Stocchi
- Center for Parkinson's Disease, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.,San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Petzold J, Kienast A, Lee Y, Pooseh S, London ED, Goschke T, Smolka MN. Baseline impulsivity may moderate L-DOPA effects on value-based decision-making. Sci Rep 2019; 9:5652. [PMID: 30948756 PMCID: PMC6449394 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42124-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Research has indicated a major role of dopamine in decision-making processes, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown due to inconsistency in effects of dopaminergic drugs. To clarify the impact of dopamine on impulsive choice, we administered 150 mg L-DOPA to 87 healthy adults in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, evaluating performance in four value-based decision-making tasks. We predicted that baseline impulsivity would moderate L-DOPA effects. In support of our hypothesis, L-DOPA had no main effect on impulsive choice, but reduced risk-seeking for gains in more-impulsive subjects. Because L-DOPA effects may be influenced by body weight, we repeated our analyses on data from half of the sample (n = 44) with lower weight, anticipating a stronger effect. In addition to the effect on risk-seeking for gains, low-weight participants also exhibited baseline-dependent effects of L-DOPA on loss aversion and delay discounting. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis of an inverted U-shaped dopamine function in which both low and high extremes of dopamine signaling are associated with high-impulsive choice. Consideration of differential baseline impulsivity and body weight may resolve previous seemingly paradoxical pharmacological results and might deepen our understanding of dopaminergic mechanisms underlying impulsivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Petzold
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Annika Kienast
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ying Lee
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Shakoor Pooseh
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modeling, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Edythe D London
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and the Brain Research Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Thomas Goschke
- Department of Psychology and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael N Smolka
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sensitive LC–MS/MS method for quantitation of levodopa and carbidopa in plasma: application to a pharmacokinetic study. Bioanalysis 2018; 10:1567-1576. [DOI: 10.4155/bio-2018-0112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The combination of levodopa with carbidopa has been used for treatment of Parkinson's disease being an important therapy in dopamine level control in the brain. Both are very polar compounds becoming a challenge for analysis by LC–MS/MS.Materials & methods: In this work, it was developed and validated a sensitive bioanalytical method by UHPLC–MS/MS for simultaneous levodopa and carbidopa quantification in human plasma using a fast protein precipitation method. Moreover, the bioanalytical method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers. Results/Conclusion: The results demonstrated a sensitive and adequate method for application to pharmacokinetic/bioequivalence studies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chi J, Ling Y, Jenkins R, Li F. Quantitation of levodopa and carbidopa in rat plasma by LC–MS/MS: The key role of ion-pairing reversed-phase chromatography. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2017; 1054:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Model-based dietary optimization for late-stage, levodopa-treated, Parkinson's disease patients. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 2016; 2:16013. [PMID: 28725472 PMCID: PMC5516849 DOI: 10.1038/npjsba.2016.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2015] [Revised: 03/10/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Levodopa has been the gold standard for Parkinson’s disease treatment for more than 40 years. Its bioavailability is hindered by dietary amino acids, leading to fluctuations in the motor response particularly in late-stage (stage 3 and 4 on Hoehn and Yahr scale) patients. The routine dietary intervention consists of low-protein (<0.8 g/kg) diets or the redistribution of daily protein allowance to the last meal. Computational modeling was used to examine the fluctuation of gastrointestinal levodopa absorption under consideration of the diet by (i) identifying the group of patients that could benefit from dietary interventions, (ii) comparing existing diet recommendations for their impact on levodopa bioavailability, and (iii) suggesting a mechanism-based dietary intervention. We developed a multiscale computational model consisting of an ordinary differential equations-based advanced compartmentalized absorption and transit (ACAT) gut model and metabolic genome-scale small intestine epithelial cell model. We used this model to investigate complex spatiotemporal relationship between dietary amino acids and levodopa absorption. Our model predicted an improvement in bioavailability, as reflected by blood concentrations of levodopa with protein redistribution diet by 34% compared with a low-protein diet and by 11% compared with the ante cibum (a.c.) administration. These results are consistent with the reported better outcome in late-stage patients. A systematic analysis of the effect of different amino acids in the diet suggested that a serine-rich diet could improve the bioavailability by 22% compared with the a.c. administration. In addition, the slower gastric emptying rate in PD patients exacerbates the loss of levodopa due to competition. Optimizing dietary recommendations in quantity, composition, and intake time holds the promise to improve levodopa efficiency and patient’s quality of life based on highly detailed, mechanistic models of gut physiology endowed with improved extrapolative properties, thus paving the way for precision medical treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Simultaneous determination of levodopa, carbidopa, entacapone, tolcapone, 3-O-methyldopa and dopamine in human plasma by an HPLC-MS/MS method. Bioanalysis 2015; 7:207-20. [PMID: 25587837 DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we developed and validated a HPLC-MS/MS method capable of simultaneously determining levodopa, carbidopa, entacapone, tolcapone, 3-O-methyldopa and dopamine in human plasma. RESULTS & METHODOLOGY: Chromatographic separation was achieved using a C8 column with a mobile phase consisting of a gradient of water and acetonitrile:methanol (90:10 v/v), both containing 0.1% formic acid. The developed method was selective, sensitive (LD<7.0 ng ml(-1)), linear (r>0.99), precise (RSD<11.3%), accurate (RE<11.8%) and free of residual and matrix effects. The developed method was successfully applied in plasma patients with Parkinson's disease using Stalevo®. CONCLUSION The new method can be used for the clinical monitoring of these substances and applied to adjustments in drug dosages.
Collapse
|