Effects of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Everolimus: A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study

Sources of Interindividual Variability

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of drugs are dependent on numerous factors that influence their disposition. A dose that is efficacious and safe for one individual may result in sub-therapeutic or toxic blood concentrations in others. A significant source of this variability in drug response is drug metabolism, where differences in presystemic and systemic biotransformation efficiency result in variable degrees of systemic exposure (e.g., AUC, C_max, and/or C_min) following administration of a fixed dose.Interindividual differences in drug biotransformation have been studied extensively. It is recognized that both intrinsic factors (e.g., genetics, age, sex, and disease states) and extrinsic factors (e.g., diet , chemical exposures from the environment, and the microbiome) play a significant role. For drug-metabolizing enzymes, genetic variation can result in the complete absence or enhanced expression of a functional enzyme. In addition, upregulation and downregulation of gene expression, in response to an altered cellular environment, can achieve the same range of metabolic function (phenotype), but often in a less predictable and time-dependent manner. Understanding the mechanistic basis for variability in drug disposition and response is essential if we are to move beyond the era of empirical, trial-and-error dose selection and into an age of personalized medicine that will improve outcomes in maintaining health and treating disease.

Dose recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with renal or hepatic impairment

Renal or hepatic impairment is a common comorbidity for patients with cancer either because of the disease itself, toxicity of previous anticancer treatments, or because of other factors affecting organ function, such as increased age. Because renal and hepatic function are among the main determinants of drug exposure, the pharmacokinetic profile might be altered for patients with cancer who have renal or hepatic impairment, necessitating dose adjustments. Most anticancer drugs are dosed near their maximum tolerated dose and are characterised by a narrow therapeutic index. Consequently, selecting an adequate dose for patients who have either hepatic or renal impairment, or both, is challenging and definitive recommendations on dose adjustments are scarce. In this Review, we discuss the effect of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs. To guide clinicians in selecting appropriate dose adjustments, information from available drug labels and from the published literature were combined to provide a practical set of recommendations for dose adjustments of 160 anticancer drugs for patients with hepatic and renal impairment.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of bergenin, a main active constituent of Saxifraga stolonifera Curt., in normal and hepatic injury rats after oral administration

Bergenin, isolated from the herb of Saxifrage stolonifera Curt. (Hu-Er-Cao) has hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, antitussive, and neuroprotective activities. The aim of the present study was to establish a simple, rapid, and sensitive RP-HPLC method for determination of bergenin in rat plasma and compare its oral pharmacokinetic behaviors in normal and CCl₄-induced hepatic injury rats. With norisoboldine as an internal standard, chromatographic separation was performed on a C₁₈ analytical column with acetonitrile and water (11 : 89, V/V) containing 0.1% formic acid as the mobile phase. A good linearity was obtained over the range of 100-10 000 ng·mL^-1. The lower limit of quantification was 50 ng·mL^-1. The developed method was successfully applied to a study of the pharmacokinetic difference of bergenin (100 mg·kg^-1) between normal and hepatic injury rats after oral administration. Marked alterations of pharmacokinetic parameters in hepatic injury rats were observed. Compared to normal rats, the AUC_(0-∞) of bergenin in hepatic injury rats was elevated to 2.11-fold and C_max was increased by 130%, whereas CL value was only 55% of the normal rats, suggesting that the systemic exposure of bergenin was significantly increased under hepatic injury status.

Drug Monographs: Atezolizumab and Everolimus

The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases. Questions or suggestions for topics should be addressed to Dominic A. Solimando, Jr., President, Oncology Pharmacy Services, Inc., 4201 Wilson Blvd #110-545, Arlington, VA 22203, email: OncRxSvc@comcast.net; or J. Aubrey Waddell, Professor, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy; Oncology Pharmacist, Pharmacy Department, Blount Memorial Hospital, 907 E. Lamar Alexander Parkway, Maryville, TN 37804, e-mail: waddfour@charter.net. The authors are not employees of, under contract to, recipients of funding to review products from, or in any other way affiliated with either Genentech, Inc. or Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. The information presented in this review is based on published data and clinical expertise and includes information not included in the product labeling. Incorporation of such published data provides a more robust assessment of the drugs and assists pharmacists in evaluation of orders for off-label use of these agents.

Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management

Liver cirrhosis, the end-stage of every chronic liver disease, is not only the major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma but also a limiting factor for anticancer therapy of liver and non-hepatic malignancies. Liver cirrhosis may limit surgical and interventional approaches to cancer treatment, influence pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs, increase side effects of chemotherapy, render patients susceptible for hepatotoxicity, and ultimately result in a competitive risk for morbidity and mortality. In this review, we provide a concise overview about the impact of liver cirrhosis on the management and prognosis of patients with primary liver cancer or non-hepatic malignancies.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in patients with renal angiomyolipoma and tuberous sclerosis complex or lymphangioleiomyomatosis

AIMS

The purpose was to determine the exposure-response relationship of everolimus in patients with angiomyolipoma from the EXIST-2 trial and to analyze the correlation between exposure and plasma concentrations of angiogenic biomarkers in these patients.

METHODS

One hundred and eighteen patients with angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis (sLAM) were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to receive everolimus 10 mg (n = 79) or placebo (n = 39) once daily. Blood samples for determining everolimus concentration were collected at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24 and 48 during double-blind treatment. Plasma samples for biomarker analysis were collected at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 and at the end of treatment. Concentrations of eight angiogenic biomarkers associated with tumour growth were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Peak and trough concentrations of everolimus in blood remained stable over time and similar to those reported in other indications. Substantial pharmacodynamic effects were observed in the everolimus, but not placebo, arm for three biomarkers: After 24 weeks of treatment, reduction of vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) and collagen type IV (COL-IV) (mean fold-changes with 95% confidence intervals [CI] were 0.36 [0.33, 0.40], and 0.54 [0.51, 0.57], respectively, P < 0.001 for both), along with increased VEGF-A (mean fold-change of 1.59 [1.39, 1.80], P < 0.001), were seen. Furthermore, baseline VEGF-D and COL-IV levels were associated with angiomyolipoma size at baseline and with angiomyolipoma response to everolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that plasma angiogenic markers may provide an objective measure of patient response to everolimus.

Alternative matrices for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive agents using LC-MS/MS

Immunosuppressive drugs used in solid organ transplants typically have narrow therapeutic windows and high intra- and intersubject variability. To ensure satisfactory exposure, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a pivotal role in any successful posttransplant maintenance therapy. Currently, recommendations for optimum immunosuppressant concentrations are based on blood/plasma measurements. However, they introduce many disadvantages, including poor prediction of allograft survival and toxicity, a weak correlation with drug concentrations at the site of action and the invasive nature of the sample collection. Thus, alternative matrices have been investigated. This paper reviews tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods used for the quantification of immunosuppressant drugs utilizing nonconventional matrices, namely oral fluids, fingerprick blood and intracellular and intratissue sampling. The advantages, disadvantages and clinical application of such alternative mediums are discussed. Additionally, sample extraction techniques and basic chromatography information regarding these methods are presented in tabulated form.

Evaluating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus for treating breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aberrant activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway is a common mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted treatments in breast cancer. Data from large clinical trials have shown that the combination of everolimus , an orally bioavailable mTOR inhibitor with exemestane improves outcome of metastatic breast cancer resistant to non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. On the other hand, the addition of everolimus to trastuzumab in order to overcome resistance did not show meaningful clinical benefit in recent reported Phase III clinical trials. Everolimus has a favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in early breast cancer studies. The association of endocrine therapy and HER2-targeted agents did not influence the main PK parameters of the drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This review article focuses on the biological rationale of using everolimus in breast cancer and on latest advances in the field of everolimus-based combinations with an emphasis on the PK and pharmacodynamic parameters of the drug throughout different studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Better identification of patients who sustain benefit or who are resistant to everolimus-based combinations in the treatment of advanced breast cancer remains an unmet need. New combination strategies based on the understanding of resistance mechanisms and intracellular feedback loops should be studied further in the future.

Everolimus in Breast Cancer

Objective: To highlight the potential role of pharmacists in facilitating use of everolimus in breast cancer and increase practitioner knowledge of everolimus therapy to enhance patient outcomes. Data Sources: A PubMed (1966 to May 2013) search included the terms everolimus, breast cancer, adverse events (AEs), pharmacist, and pharmacy. Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2012 Annual Meeting were also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles published in English and directly related to everolimus clinical trials in breast cancer and other cancers were included, as were general pharmacy practice articles. Data Synthesis: Phase 3 clinical trials are currently exploring the efficacy of everolimus in combination therapy for breast cancer and the pharmacotherapeutical implications of the drug’s mechanism of action in relation to the PI3K/Akt pathway. Everolimus treatment–related topics relevant for pharmacists include drug administration, AE profile, potential drug interactions, dose adjustments, and comorbidity management. This comprehensive literature review of all components of everolimus treatment reveals the complexity of this treatment approach and the need for increased pharmacist involvement. Conclusions: Research based on the current treatment landscape and health care delivery system shows that pharmacists can greatly enhance patient care by providing teaching as part of a comprehensive cancer treatment approach. Because of their advanced knowledge of pharmacotherapy, pharmacists can directly support safe and effective use of everolimus while promoting optimal patient outcomes through a multidisciplinary approach that addresses comorbid conditions; they can also provide effective counseling and patient teaching in an ever-changing health care delivery system.

Phase I study investigating everolimus combined with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sorafenib is the only therapy shown to improve overall survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combination therapy targeting multiple signaling pathways may improve outcomes. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of everolimus given with sorafenib 400mg twice daily in patients with advanced HCC of Child-Pugh class A liver function who were naive to systemic therapy.

METHODS

Everolimus was initiated at 2.5mg once daily and increased per a Bayesian sequential dose-escalation scheme based on the dose-limiting toxicities experienced within the first 28 days of treatment. Adverse events were assessed continuously. Efficacy was evaluated using the best overall response rate per RECIST.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled; 25 were evaluable for MTD determination. One out of 12 patients treated with everolimus 2.5mg once daily and 6 out of 13 patients treated with everolimus 5.0mg once daily experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, most commonly thrombocytopenia (n=5). All patients experienced 1 adverse event, most commonly diarrhea (66.7%), hand-foot skin reaction (66.7%), and thrombocytopenia (50.0%). Best overall response was stable disease (62.5% and 42.9% in the 2.5-mg and 5.0-mg cohorts, respectively). Median time to progression and overall survival in the 2.5-mg cohort were 4.5 months and 7.4 months, respectively, and 1.8 months and 11.7 months, respectively, in the 5.0-mg cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced HCC, the everolimus MTD in combination with standard-dose sorafenib was 2.5mg once daily. The inability to achieve a biologically effective everolimus concentration at the MTD precluded phase II study of this combination.