The Role of Double and Triple Therapy with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Coronary Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, and Stroke

Vascular disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. A report from Polish participants in the EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry

AIMS

This study aimed to (1) define the prevalence of vascular disease (VD; coronary (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD)) and associated risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); (2) establish the relationship of VD and associated treatment patterns on adverse events in AF.

METHODS

Data from 701 Polish AF patients enrolled in the EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry in the years 2013-2016 were included in this analysis. During the one-year follow-up, the occurrence of major adverse events (MAE; all-cause death, thromboembolic event, myocardial infraction) and its components was evaluated.

RESULTS

VD was recorded in 293 (44%) patients and based on multivariate logistic analysis was associated with age >75, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, heart failure (HF). There was no significant difference in rates of MAE between patients with and without VD based on Fisher's exact test (8.8% vs 5.7%, P = .16), as well as between patients with concomitant CAD and PAD, PAD and CAD alone based on the Chi-square test (21% vs 7.5% vs 6.7%; P = .09). A higher risk of MAE was associated with HF, chronic kidney disease (in all study group), age >75, HF, diabetes (VD group),chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (non-VD group) based on the multivariate logistic analysis. Relative to patients with VD on vitamin K antagonists (VKA), those treated with non-VKA-oral anticoagulants (NOAC) had lower absolute rate of MAE according to Fisher's exact test (1.4% vs 10%, P = .02) but similar risks for thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. The concomitant use of triple therapy was associated with increased risk of MAE as compared with those on OAC alone or dual therapy based on the Chi-square test (20% vs 4.8%, 3.2%, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

VD was prevalent in almost two-fifths of AF patients. The incidence of MAE was higher in patients with VD on VKA (vs NOAC) and on triple therapy (vs dual therapy, OAC alone) within one-year follow-up.

The blood compatibility challenge. Part 4: Surface modification for hemocompatible materials: Passive and active approaches to guide blood-material interactions

Biomedical devices in the blood flow disturb the fine-tuned balance of pro- and anti-coagulant factors in blood and vessel wall. Numerous technologies have been suggested to reduce coagulant and inflammatory responses of the body towards the device material, ranging from camouflage effects to permanent activity and further to a responsive interaction with the host systems. However, not all types of modification are suitable for all types of medical products. This review has a focus on application-oriented considerations of hemocompatible surface fittings. Thus, passive versus bioactive modifications are discussed along with the control of protein adsorption, stability of the immobilization, and the type of bioactive substance, biological or synthetic. Further considerations are related to the target system, whether enzymes or cells should be addressed in arterial or venous system, or whether the blood vessel wall is addressed. Recent developments like feedback controlled or self-renewing systems for drug release or addressing cellular regulation pathways of blood platelets and endothelial cells are paradigms for a generation of blood contacting devices, which are hemocompatible by cooperation with the host system. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This paper is part 4 of a series of 4 reviews discussing the problem of biomaterial associated thrombogenicity. The objective was to highlight features of broad agreement and provide commentary on those aspects of the problem that were subject to dispute. We hope that future investigators will update these reviews as new scholarship resolves the uncertainties of today.