Deconstructing the Pharmacovigilance Hype Cycle

Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining for the Pharmacovigilance of Drug-Drug Interactions

Despite increasing mechanistic understanding, undetected and underrecognized drug-drug interactions (DDIs) persist. This elusiveness relates to an interwoven complexity of increasing polypharmacy, multiplex mechanistic pathways, and human biological individuality. This persistent elusiveness motivates development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches to enhancing DDI detection and prediction capabilities. The literature is vast and roughly divided into "prediction" and "detection." The former relatively emphasizes biological and chemical knowledge bases, drug development, new drugs, and beneficial interactions, whereas the latter utilizes more traditional sources such as spontaneous reports, claims data, and electronic health records to detect novel adverse DDIs with authorized drugs. However, it is not a bright line, either nominally or in practice, and both are in scope for pharmacovigilance supporting signal detection but also signal refinement and evaluation, by providing data-based mechanistic arguments for/against DDI signals. The wide array of intricate and elegant methods has expanded the pharmacovigilance tool kit. How much they add to real prospective pharmacovigilance, reduce the public health impact of DDIs, and at what cost in terms of false alarms amplified by automation bias and its sequelae are open questions. (Clin Ther. 2023;45:XXX-XXX) © 2023 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a gastrointestinal chronic disease with an unpredictable disease course. Computational methods such as machine learning (ML) have the potential to stratify IBD patients for the provision of individualized care. The use of ML methods for IBD was surveyed, with an additional focus on how the field has changed over time.

METHODS

On May 6, 2021, a systematic review was conducted through a search of MEDLINE and Embase databases, with the search structure ("machine learning" OR "artificial intelligence") AND ("Crohn* Disease" OR "Ulcerative Colitis" OR "Inflammatory Bowel Disease"). Exclusion criteria included studies not written in English, no human patient data, publication before 2001, studies that were not peer reviewed, nonautoimmune disease comorbidity research, and record types that were not primary research.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight (of 409) records met the inclusion criteria. Random forest methods were most prevalent, and there was an increase in neural networks, mainly applied to imaging data sets. The main applications of ML to clinical tasks were diagnosis (18 of 78), disease course (22 of 78), and disease severity (16 of 78). The median sample size was 263. Clinical and microbiome-related data sets were most popular. Five percent of studies used an external data set after training and testing for additional model validation.

DISCUSSION

Availability of longitudinal and deep phenotyping data could lead to better modeling. Machine learning pipelines that consider imbalanced data and that feature selection only on training data will generate more generalizable models. Machine learning models are increasingly being applied to more complex clinical tasks for specific phenotypes, indicating progress towards personalized medicine for IBD.

Identifying Actionability as a Key Factor for the Adoption of 'Intelligent' Systems for Drug Safety: Lessons Learned from a User-Centred Design Approach

Introduction

Information technology (IT) plays an important role in the healthcare landscape via the increasing digitization of medical data and the use of modern computational paradigms such as machine learning (ML) and knowledge graphs (KGs). These ‘intelligent’ technical paradigms provide a new digital ‘toolkit’ supporting drug safety and healthcare processes, including ‘active pharmacovigilance’. While these technical paradigms are promising, intelligent systems (ISs) are not yet widely adopted by pharmacovigilance (PV) stakeholders, namely the pharma industry, academia/research community, drug safety monitoring organizations, regulatory authorities, and healthcare institutions. The limitations obscuring the integration of ISs into PV activities are multifaceted, involving technical, legal and medical hurdles, and thus require further elucidation.

Objective

We dissect the abovementioned limitations by describing the lessons learned during the design and implementation of the PVClinical platform, a web platform aiming to support the investigation of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs), emphasizing the use of knowledge engineering (KE) as its main technical paradigm.

Results

To this end, we elaborate on the related ‘business processes’ (i.e. operational processes) and ‘user goals’ identified as part of the PVClinical platform design process based on Design Thinking principles. We also elaborate on key challenges restricting the adoption of such ISs and their integration in the clinical setting and beyond.

Conclusions

We highlight the fact that beyond providing analytics and useful statistics to the end user, ‘actionability’ has emerged as the operational priority identified through the whole process. Furthermore, we focus on the needs for valid, reproducible, explainable and human-interpretable results, stressing the need to emphasize on usability.

Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: Scoping Points to Consider

Artificial intelligence (AI), a highly interdisciplinary science, is an increasing presence in pharmacovigilance (PV). A better understanding of the scope of artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance (AIPV) may be advantageous to more sharply defining, for example, which terms, methods, tasks, and data sets are suitably subsumed under the application of AIPV. Accordingly, this article explores relevant points to consider regarding defining the scope of AIPV and offers a potential working definition of the scope of AIPV.

Adverse Drug Reaction Case Safety Practices in Large Biopharmaceutical Organizations from 2007 to 2017: An Industry Survey

INTRODUCTION

Drug safety remains a top global public health concern. An increase in the number of data sources available has increased the complexity of pharmacovigilance operations, so the US FDA has created draft guidance focusing on optimizing drug safety data for well-characterized medicines. However, to date, no data demonstrating changes in reports have been presented.

OBJECTIVES

This study provided data assessing changes in individual case safety reports (ICSRs) and aggregate reports (ARs) for large biopharmaceutical companies from 2007 to 2017. This study also evaluated current trends on the use of advanced machine and deep learning in order to process all data captured for ICSRs as well as opinions from industry thought leaders on creating a sustainable case-processing operation.

METHODOLOGY

Using data captured from Navitas Life Science's annual pvnet^® benchmark, we calculated workload indicators characterizing pharmacovigilance operations for large biopharmaceutical organizations. Workload indicators included the number of ICSRs by organization, the number of ARs, and the number and types of data sources used. We also conducted structured in-depth interviews with seven biopharmaceutical executives to discover the reasons for changes in workload indicators across time as well as current strategies for increasing efficiencies in drug safety reporting.

RESULTS

The median number of ICSRs increased from 84,960 cases in 2007 to over 200,000 cases in 2017; this increase was largely attributable to an increase in both nonserious cases and follow-up cases. Member companies reported using 12 ± 3 data sources for case identification. The number of ARs also increased from a median of 70 reports in 2007 to 258 reports in 2017. To address these increases, 61% of the biopharmaceutical organizations we surveyed planned to adopt machine learning for full ICSR processing; however, as of 2018, none of the organizations surveyed had mechanisms in place.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that pharmacovigilance departments are currently burdened by ever-increasing case volumes. With increased guidance from regulatory agencies, as well as improvements in artificial intelligence and natural language processing, biopharmaceutical organizations must determine the most resource-efficient and sustainable methods to process the growing volume of cases.