Colchicine for Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Colchicine for Coronary Artery Disease: A Review

Coronary artery disease is a serious threat to human health. More and more evidences indicate chronic inflammatory plays a key role in the development of this disease. Inflammation markers are gradually used in the diagnosis and treatment. Although the treatment of coronary heart disease with colchicine is still controversial, more and more studies showed that patients can benefit from this medicine. In this review, we discuss and summarize colchicine on essential pharmacology, anti-inflammatory mechanism of action, and the most important and recent clinical studies. According to these literatures, colchicine possibly will possibly become a new valuable and cheap medicine for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Effects of colchicine use on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke risk in diabetic patients with and without gout

This study aimed to determine the effect of colchicine use on the risk of stroke among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We retrospectively enrolled patients with DM between 2000 and 2013 from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database and divided them into a colchicine cohort (n = 8761) and noncolchicine cohort (n = 8761) by using propensity score matching (PSM). The event of interest was a stroke, including ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. The incidence of stroke was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models between the colchicine cohort and the comparison cohort after adjustment for several confounding factors. The subdistribution hazard model was also performed for examination of the competing risk. The colchicine cohort had a significantly lower incidence of stroke [adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)] (aHR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.55–0.67), ischemic stroke (aHR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.53–0.66), and hemorrhagic stroke (aHR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.53–0.82) compared with the noncolchicine cohort. Drug analysis indicated that patients in the colchicine cohort who received colchicine of cumulative daily defined dose (cDDD) > 14 and duration > 28 days had a lower risk of stroke and ischemic stroke compared with nonusers. The colchicine cohort (cDDD > 150, duration > 360 days) also had a lower risk of stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. The cumulative incidence of stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke in the colchicine cohort was significantly lower than that in the noncolchicine cohort (log-rank P < 0.001). However, the subdistribution hazard model reveal the colchicine was not associated with the hemorrhagic stroke in DM patients without gout (aHR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.47–1.00). Colchicine use with cDDD > 14 and duration > 28 days was associated with lower risk of stroke and ischemic stroke, and colchicine use with cDDD > 150 and duration > 360 days played an auxiliary role in the prevention of stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke in patients with DM. The colchicine for the hemorrhagic stroke in DM patients without gout seem to be null effect.

Thrombolysis in stroke patients with elevated inflammatory markers

Objective

To investigate the prognostic value of white blood cell count (WBC) on functional outcome, mortality and bleeding risk in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

Methods

In this prospective multicenter study from the TRISP registry, we assessed the association between WBC on admission and 3-month poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3–6), mortality and occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH; ECASS-II-criteria) in IVT-treated stroke patients. WBC was used as continuous and categorical variable distinguishing leukocytosis (WBC > 10 × 10⁹/l) and leukopenia (WBC < 4 × 10⁹/l). We calculated unadjusted/ adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR [95% CI]) with logistic regression models. In a subgroup, we analyzed the association of combined leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP > 10 mg/l) on outcomes.

Results

Of 10,813 IVT-treated patients, 2527 had leukocytosis, 112 leukopenia and 8174 normal WBC. Increasing WBC (by 1 × 10⁹/l) predicted poor outcome (OR_adjusted 1.04[1.02–1.06]) but not mortality and sICH. Leukocytosis was independently associated with poor outcome (OR_adjusted 1.48[1.29–1.69]) and mortality (OR_adjusted 1.60[1.35–1.89]) but not with sICH (OR_adjusted 1.17[0.94–1.45]). Leukopenia did not predict any outcome. In a subgroup, combined leukocytosis and elevated CRP had the strongest association with poor outcome (OR_adjusted 2.26[1.76–2.91]) and mortality (OR_adjusted 2.43[1.86–3.16]) when compared to combined normal WBC and CRP.

Conclusion

In IVT-treated patients, leukocytosis independently predicted poor functional outcome and death. Bleeding complications after IVT were not independently associated with leukocytosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11173-0.

The use of colchicine as an anti-inflammatory agent for stroke prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective is to evaluate the use of colchicine as an anti-inflammatory agent for stroke prevention in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

There has been a rising number of randomized controlled trials conducted in patients with coronary artery disease on the use of colchicine in reducing cardiovascular complications. Recent publications suggest colchicine reduces the risk of stroke and other cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of known trials in the current literature to characterize the clinical characteristics and outcomes of colchicine treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and SCOPUS using a suitable keyword search strategy from inception to 4 June 2021. All studies evaluating cardiovascular outcomes of colchicine treatment in patients with coronary artery disease were included.

RESULTS

The systemic review included 5 randomized controlled trials assessing a total of 11,790 patients. Majority of studies used a colchicine dosing regimen of 0.5 mg once daily, with the median follow-up duration ranging from 6 to 36 months. Meta-analytic estimates for stroke incidence highlighted a statistically significant benefit for patients that were administered colchicine compared to placebo (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81, p = 0.006), and a non-significant benefit for myocardial infarction. There was no significant association between colchicine treatment and the adverse effects of gastrointestinal symptoms and myopathy/myalgia.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of colchicine reduces the risk of stroke in patients with a history of coronary artery disease, without a significant increase in gastrointestinal and myopathy/myalgia adverse effects.

Effect of Treatment with Colchicine after Acute Coronary Syndrome on Major Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Aim

Colchicine as an anti-inflammatory drug might be effective in the treatment of atherosclerosis, an inflammatory-based condition. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of colchicine on acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods

We searched SCOPUS, PubMed, and Web of Science up to September 27, 2020. All clinical trials which evaluated the effect of colchicine on ACS patients and reported high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) serum level or gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events with at least 5-day follow-up or death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke with at least 30-day follow-up as outcomes were included.

Results

Finally, seven publications were analyzed. The results of our study revealed that colchicine has a marginally significant effect on hs-CRP attenuation. Furthermore, colchicine manifested promising results by declining the risk of stroke by 70%. However, MI and primary composite endpoint did not differ between the colchicine and noncolchicine groups. Although colchicine did not significantly increase GI adverse events in the pooled analysis, the dose-dependent effect was detected. Low-dose consumption can avoid GI side effects of colchicine.

Conclusion

Colchicine has shown some molecular and clinical promising results in ACS patients. The lack of effect of colchicine on MI and all-cause mortality can be partly attributed to the limitations of previous studies. Since colchicine is an inexpensive and easy-to-access drug that has shown to be safe in low-dose regimens in the clinical setting; it would be worthy that future large-scale well-designed clinical trials address this issue by resolving the limitations of previous investigations.

Platelets, Thromboinflammation and Neurovascular Disease

The brain and spinal cord are immune-privileged organs, but in the disease state protection mechanisms such as the blood brain barrier (BBB) are ineffective or overcome by pathological processes. In neuroinflammatory diseases, microglia cells and other resident immune cells contribute to local vascular inflammation and potentially a systemic inflammatory response taking place in parallel. Microglia cells interact with other cells impacting on the integrity of the BBB and propagate the inflammatory response through the release of inflammatory signals. Here, we discuss the activation and response mechanisms of innate and adaptive immune processes in response to neuroinflammation. Furthermore, the clinical importance of neuroinflammatory mediators and a potential translational relevance of involved mechanisms are addressed also with focus on non-classical immune cells including microglia cells or platelets. As illustrative examples, novel agents such as Anfibatide or Revacept, which result in reduced recruitment and activation of platelets, a subsequently blunted activation of the coagulation cascade and further inflammatory process, demonstrating that mechanisms of neuroinflammation and thrombosis are interconnected and should be further subject to in depth clinical and basic research.

New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Is a Risk Factor of Ischemic Stroke in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) induces atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke, and COPD with AF increased ischemic stroke (IS) in a cross-sectional study. Therefore, healthcare providers must be concerned and well-informed about this particular situation. For this study, inpatient data were obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database in 2010. We identified patients who were hospitalized with COPD (International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] is 491, 492, and 496). Patients who experienced AF (ICD-9-CM to 427.3) during the same admission or after COPD hospitalization were discharged and defined as new-onset AF. The outcome was IS (ICD-9-CM as 433–437). The factors related to IS after COPD were used for multivariate logistic regression. There were 4177/62163 (6.72%) patients with incident IS. The risk of IS after COPD hospitalization was shown to have an adjusted odds ratio of 1.749 (95% CI: 1.584–1.93, p < 0.001) for patients with new-onset AF. Other factors included advanced age, atherosclerosis factors, comorbidity severity, sepsis and lower-level hospital admission. In conclusion, COPD patients suffering from new-onset AF had an increased incidence of IS in the population observation study. New-onset AF was an omit risk factor for IS in COPD in the Chinese population.

Inflammation and ischemic heart disease: The next therapeutic target?

Inflammation plays an important role in several stages of the cardiovascular continuum. In recent decades a plethora of studies have provided new data highlighting the role of inflammation in atherogenesis and atherothrombosis in two-way interactions with various cardiovascular risk factors and further influencing these dynamic processes. The concept of targeting residual inflammatory risk among individuals with ischemic heart disease (IHD) is therefore gaining increasing attention. Recently, several landmark randomized controlled trials have assessed different pharmacological approaches that may mitigate this residual risk. The results of some of these studies, such as CANTOS with canakinumab and COLCOT and LoDoCo2 with colchicine, are promising and have provided data to support this concept. Moreover, though several aspects remain to be clarified, these trials have shown the potential of modulating inflammation as a new target to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in secondary prevention patients. In the present review, we aim to present a pragmatic overview of the complex interplay between inflammation and IHD, and to critically appraise the current evidence on this issue while presenting future perspectives on this topic of pivotal contemporary interest.

Colchicine for the prevention of ischemic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is increasingly recognized as a target to reduce residual cardiovascular risk. Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug that was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. However, its effect on stroke reduction was not consistent across studies. Therefore, the aim of this study-level meta-analysis was to evaluate the influence of colchicine on stroke in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched through October 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials using colchicine in patients with CAD. The incidence of clinical endpoints such as stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), study-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and atrial fibrillation (AF) was compared between colchicine and placebo groups.

RESULTS

A total number of 11,594 (5,806 in the colchicine arm) patients from 4 eligible studies were included in the final analysis. Stroke incidence was lower in the colchicine arm compared to placebo (rate ratio [RR] 0.48 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.78], P = 0.003) whereby no significant difference was observed in the incidence of AF (odds ratio [OR] 0.86 [95% CI, 0.69-1.06], P = 0.16). Furthermore, a significant effect of colchicine on MACE [RR 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51-0.83), P = 0.0006] and MI (RR 0.65 (95% CI, 0.54-0.95], P = 0.02) was detected, with no influence on all-cause mortality (RR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.61-1.78], P = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirms a significant influence of colchicine on stroke in CAD patients. Despite its neutral effect on AF occurrence, other mechanisms related to plaque stabilization are plausible. The concept seems to be supported by contemporaneous MI reduction and posits that anti-inflammatory properties of colchicine may translate into a reduction of stroke risk.

Dose-Dependent Association of Inflammatory Cytokines with Carotid Atherosclerosis in Transient Ischaemic Attack: Implications for Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

The 5-year recurrence risk after ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is 25-30%. Although inflammation may be a target for prevention trials, the contribution of plaque inflammation to acute cerebrovascular events remains unclear. We investigated the association of acute inflammatory cytokines and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) with recently symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis in a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Blood and Imaging markers of TIA BIO-TIA) is a multicentre prospective study of imaging and inflammatory markers in patients with TIA. Exclusion criteria were infection and other co-morbid illnesses associated with inflammation. CRP and serum cytokines (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, interferon-γ [IFN-γ] and tumour necrosis factor-α [TNF-α]) were measured. All patients had carotid imaging.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-eight TIA cases and 64 controls (TIA mimics) were included. Forty-nine (20.6%) cases had symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels increased in a dose-dependent manner across controls, TIA without carotid stenosis (CS), and TIA with CS (IL-1β, ptrend = 0.03; IL-6, ptrend < 0.0001; IL-8, ptrend = 0.01; interferon (IFN)-γ, ptrend = 0.005; TNF-α, ptrend = 0.003). Results were unchanged when DWI-positive cases were excluded. On multivariable linear regression, only age (p = 0.01) and CS (p = 0.04) independently predicted log-IL-6. On multivariable Cox regression, CRP was the only independent predictor of 90-day stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio per 1-unit increase 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.05], p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis was associated with elevated cytokines in TIA patients after controlling for other sources of inflammation. High-sensitivity CRP was associated with recurrent ischaemic stroke at 90 days. These findings implicate acute plaque inflammation in the pathogenesis of cerebral thromboembolism and support a rationale for randomized trials of anti-inflammatory therapy for stroke patients, who were excluded from coronary trials.

Inflammation and Comorbidity. Are There any Chances to Improve the Prognosis in Patients with Extremely High Cardiovascular Risk?

The review contains actual data on possible approaches aimed at improving the prognosis in a special category of patients with extremely high cardiovascular risk, as well as in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome combined with comorbidity, including multifocal atherosclerosis. Currently, there are no class I recommendations for such patients aimed at reducing the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. It is suggested that suppression of inflammation may be a new therapeutic goal in this category of patients. Given the importance of inflammation in the development and course of atherosclerosis, in recent years there have been repeated attempts to influence the various components of the pro-inflammatory cascade involved in atherogenesis, but not all of them have been successful. Special attention is given to the anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine, a drug that can improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with proven atherosclerosis. The review provides numerous pathogenetic and clinical evidence for the effectiveness of colchicine in patients with various manifestations of atherosclerosis. It is concluded that colchicine is the most promising anti-inflammatory drug that can improve the outcome of cardiovascular diseases. Thus, there is a need to initiate new clinical trial protocols aimed at studying the anti-inflammatory potential of this drug in patients with extreme cardiovascular risk.

Inflammation and ischemic heart disease: The next therapeutic target?

Inflammation plays an important role in several stages of the cardiovascular continuum. In recent decades a plethora of studies have provided new data highlighting the role of inflammation in atherogenesis and atherothrombosis in two-way interactions with various cardiovascular risk factors and further influencing these dynamic processes. The concept of targeting residual inflammatory risk among individuals with ischemic heart disease (IHD) is therefore gaining increasing attention. Recently, several landmark randomized controlled trials have assessed different pharmacological approaches that may mitigate this residual risk. The results of some of these studies, such as CANTOS with canakinumab and COLCOT and LoDoCo2 with colchicine, are promising and have provided data to support this concept. Moreover, though several aspects remain to be clarified, these trials have shown the potential of modulating inflammation as a new target to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in secondary prevention patients. In the present review, we aim to present a pragmatic overview of the complex interplay between inflammation and IHD, and to critically appraise the current evidence on this issue while presenting future perspectives on this topic of pivotal contemporary interest.

Colchicine and SARS-CoV-2: Management of the hyperinflammatory state

The global COVID-19 pandemic is currently underway. In December 2020, the European Agency of Medicine (EMA) licensed the first Sars-CoV-2 vaccine. Therapeutic management of the COVID-19 positive patient should primarily aim to avoid the severe complications and organ injury caused by generalized inflammation caused by a cytokine storm and occurring in the most severe stages of viral infection. Current knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms of SARS- CoV-2 suggests a central role for exaggerated activation of the innate immune system as an important contributor to the adverse outcomes of COVID-19. Several studies have shown that blocking the cytokine storm or acting early with prevention of it can be effective; studies are underway to evaluate agents that may be able to reduce this hyperinflammatory state. The search for effective management strategies for COVID-19 continues to evolve. The actions of colchicine, one of the oldest anti-inflammatory therapies, target multiple targets associated with excessive COVID-19 inflammation. Colchicine is easily administered, generally well tolerated, and inexpensive. This article reports the scientific and molecular rationale for the use of colchicine as monotherapy or in combination in the various stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection to modulate and control the inflammatory state. Low-dose colchicine may be considered safe and effective for the treatment and prevention of cytokine storm in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly as an adjunctive remedy to other therapeutic agents. Well-organized clinical studies are needed in this direction.

The Efficacy of Colchicine on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Prospective Comparative Study

OBJECTIVES

Inflammation plays an important role in the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease, which is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the adult population. Several clinical trials have shown that suppression of the inflammatory response can delay or decrease the atherosclerotic process. The aim of this study was to investigate carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) between patients with chronic disease history plus gout using colchicine and patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 102 patients (85 female, 17 male) were included. There were two groups in the study: Group 1 - patients with chronic diseases including cardiovascular risk factors plus gout using colchicine (0,5 mg twice a day); and Group 2 - patients with chronic diseases including cardiovascular risk factors only. All patients underwent ultrasonography for the measurement of CIMT. Additionally, the serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and the levels of lipids such as cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, HDL were measured.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 62.35±6.68 years and 64.27±5.32 years in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. There was also no statistically significant difference in the levels of lipids between groups (p>0.05). The value of CIMT and CRP in Group 1 and Group 2 were 0.98±0.20 and 0.26±0.14, 1.18±0.15 and 0.58±0.42, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between groups (p<0.05). The colchicine group was found to have a statistically significant lowering of CIMT and CRP compared to the non-colchicine group.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that colchicine in addition to statins and other standard treatments is an effective treatment for the interception of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Inflammation May be the Future of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Does Colchicine have a Current Indication?

Inflammation as a cardiovascular risk factor has attracted increasing attention . The current standard of care for decreasing the occurrence of cardiovascular events includes controlling risk factors such as hypertension and maximizing the lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, a recent study demonstrated decreased cardiovascular risk with the anti-inflammatory agent canakinumab and created more interest in decreasing cardiovascular risk by decreasing inflammation. Canakinumab is not yet approved and will undoubtedly be very expensive, so interest in an established medication such as colchicine, which is inexpensive to produce, is appropriate if evidence-based benefit is adequately confirmed. Colchicine has existing indications for gout and familial Mediterranean fever and for decreasing the incidence of postpericardiotomy syndrome. If an evidence-based benefit in decreasing cardiovascular risk can be demonstrated for colchicine, it will be of significant importance. Meta-analyses and observational studies have provided evidence to suggest that colchicine decreases cardiovascular risk because of its anti-inflammatory effects. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed, and the recently published COLCOT (Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial) showed definite benefit on cardiovascular outcomes in adults who had experienced a myocardial infarction within the previous 30 days. Sufficient evidence now supports the use of colchicine for secondary prevention in patients at the highest cardiovascular risk who continue to have cardiovascular events despite good blood pressure control and maximum LDL-C reduction. Nevertheless, more RCTs will be necessary before widespread general use of colchicine in cardiovascular disease prevention can be recommended. The current acquisition cost issues with colchicine also need to be resolved.

Selective Apheresis of C-Reactive Protein for Treatment of Indications with Elevated CRP Concentrations

Almost every kind of inflammation in the human body is accompanied by rising C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations. This can include bacterial and viral infection, chronic inflammation and so-called sterile inflammation triggered by (internal) acute tissue injury. CRP is part of the ancient humoral immune response and secreted into the circulation by the liver upon respective stimuli. Its main immunological functions are the opsonization of biological particles (bacteria and dead or dying cells) for their clearance by macrophages and the activation of the classical complement pathway. This not only helps to eliminate pathogens and dead cells, which is very useful in any case, but unfortunately also to remove only slightly damaged or inactive human cells that may potentially regenerate with more CRP-free time. CRP action severely aggravates the extent of tissue damage during the acute phase response after an acute injury and therefore negatively affects clinical outcome. CRP is therefore a promising therapeutic target to rescue energy-deprived tissue either caused by ischemic injury (e.g., myocardial infarction and stroke) or by an overcompensating immune reaction occurring in acute inflammation (e.g., pancreatitis) or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS; e.g., after transplantation or surgery). Selective CRP apheresis can remove circulating CRP safely and efficiently. We explain the pathophysiological reasoning behind therapeutic CRP apheresis and summarize the broad span of indications in which its application could be beneficial with a focus on ischemic stroke as well as the results of this therapeutic approach after myocardial infarction.

Colchicine therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation is a substantial mediator of atherosclerosis. Colchicine has anti-inflammatory effects and has been investigated in many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and Embase databases (inception through 28 February 2020) for RCTs evaluating colchicine in CAD patients. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke. Estimates were pooled using inverse-variance random-effects model. We reported effect sizes as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs with 6154 patients were included. The mean age ± SD for the patients in the colchicine group was 61.6 ± 10.8 and control group was 61.5 ± 10.7 years. At the median follow-up of 3.5 months, use of colchicine in patients with CAD was not associated with statistically significant reduction of MACE (RD -0.032; 95% CI -0.083 to 0.018; P = 0.15; I2 = 75%; low level of evidence), MI (RD -0.011; 95% CI -0.030 to 0.007; P = 0.16; I2 = 11.3%; low level of evidence), all-cause mortality (RD -0.001; 95% CI -0.009 to 0.006; P = 0.65; I2 = 0%; low level of evidence), cardiovascular mortality (RD -0.003; 95% CI -0.010 to 0.004; P = 0.34; I2 = 0%; low level of evidence), and stroke (RD -0.001, 95% CI -0.005 to 0.004; P = 0.69; I2 = 0%; very low level of evidence).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that colchicine was not associated with a significant decrease in cardiovascular endpoints and mortality in patients with CAD.

Inflammation and cardiovascular diseases: lessons from seminal clinical trials

Inflammation has been long regarded as a key contributor to atherosclerosis. Inflammatory cells and soluble mediators play critical roles throughout arterial plaque development and accordingly, targeting inflammatory pathways effectively reduces atherosclerotic burden in animal models of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Yet, clinical translation often led to inconclusive or even contradictory results. The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study (CANTOS) followed by the Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT) were the first two randomized clinical trials to convincingly demonstrate the effectiveness of specific anti-inflammatory treatments in the field of CV prevention, while other phase III trials-including the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial one using methotrexate-were futile. This manuscript reviews the main characteristics and findings of recent anti-inflammatory Phase III trials in cardiology and discusses their similarities and differences in order to get further insights into the contribution of specific inflammatory pathways on CV outcomes. CANTOS and COLCOT demonstrated efficacy of two anti-inflammatory drugs (canakinumab and colchicine, respectively) in the secondary prevention of major adverse CV events (MACE) thus providing the first confirmation of the involvement of a specific inflammatory pathway in human atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). Also, they highlighted the NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 inflammasome-related pathway as an effective therapeutic target to blunt ASCVD. In contrast, other trials interfering with a number of inflammasome-independent pathways failed to provide benefit. Lastly, all anti-inflammatory trials underscored the importance of balancing the risk of impaired host defence with an increase in infections and the prevention of MACE in CV patients with residual inflammatory risk.

Colchicine for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: A Systematic Review

Despite advancements in medical and interventional therapy, patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) continue to have residual risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. Colchicine has a unique antiinflammatory mechanism that has generated interest in its potential use as a secondary cardiovascular preventive therapy. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for long-term (6 months or more) colchicine therapy in patients with established CVD. A search of Medline and Embase from inception to February 2020 was performed. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or propensity score-matched observational studies that compared colchicine (at any dose) with placebo or no treatment. Outcomes of interest included any major adverse cardiovascular event, cardiovascular hospitalization, coronary artery restenosis, cardiovascular death, or all-cause death. Five RCTs were included. The dose of colchicine ranged from 0.5 mg/day to 0.6 mg twice/day, and follow-up ranged from ~6-36 months. Two trials (one double blind and one single blind) showed a reduction in composite outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events. One study failed to demonstrate a benefit with colchicine in restenosis or recurrent ischemia after angioplasty; however, it was conducted before the routine use of modern percutaneous coronary intervention and medical therapies. In contrast, a more recent trial found that colchicine reduced the rate of in-stent restenosis in patients who received a bare metal stent. Finally, one trial in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction did not observe a benefit in death or heart failure hospitalization with colchicine despite a reduction in inflammatory markers. No trial demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular or all-cause death, and most trials showed an increase in the rate of diarrhea with colchicine. Overall, colchicine has demonstrated promising results for the secondary prevention of CVD; however, further studies are required to confirm these findings before colchicine can be routinely recommended in practice.

Colchicine for stroke prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although clinical trials suggest that colchicine may reduce the risk of vascular events in patients with a history of coronary artery disease, its effect on the prevention of cerebrovascular events still remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on incident strokes during the follow-up of patients with a history of cardiovascular disease randomized to colchicine treatment or control (placebo or usual care).

RESULTS

Four RCTs were identified, including a total of 5553 patients (mean age 61 years, 81% males), with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 36 months. Colchicine treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of incident stroke during follow-up compared to control (risk ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.71), without heterogeneity across included studies (I²  = 0%). Based on the pooled incident stroke rate of control groups (0.9%) in the included RCTs, it was estimated that administration of low-dose colchicine to 161 patients with coronary artery disease would prevent one stroke during a follow-up of 23 months.

CONCLUSION

Colchicine treatment decreases stroke risk in patients with a history of coronary artery disease. The effect of colchicine in secondary stroke prevention is currently being evaluated in an ongoing RCT.

Colchicine causes prenatal cell toxicity and increases tetraploid risk

Background

Colchicine is a clinical medicine used for relief from gout and familial Mediterranean fever. Because of its toxic effects, intravenous injection of colchicine has been banned, but it is still widely administered orally. We assayed the toxic effects of colchicine in cultured primary chorionic villus cells and amniotic fluid cells to interpret its influence on the placenta and foetus.

Methods

Bright field record and cell count kit 8 were used to value cell viability. Flow cytometer was used to identify cells markers, cell cycle and cell apoptosis. G-banding was used for karyotype analysis for sample genetic and drug effect evaluation.

Results

Chorionic villus cells and amniotic fluid cells were characterized as mesenchymal cells that share most cell surface markers and have a similar response to colchicine. Colchicine did not induce a decline in cell viability at low concentrations but suppressed cell proliferation by arresting the cell cycle in the G2/M phase and increased the risk of tetraploid generation in a small subset of cases.

Conclusions

Our study revealed the results of a colchicine-induced toxicity test in prenatal cells and determined the anti-mitotic biologically functional dose and manner of administration that might reduce the risk of tetraploid generation.

Efficacy and safety of colchicine in inflammatory skin diseases: a retrospective, monocentric study in a large tertiary center

Introduction: Colchicine is an ancient, but rarely used drug. Little data exist on its efficacy and safety in patients suffering from skin diseases. The objective of our study was to determine whether colchicine showed favorable efficacy and safety in our patients during the last 20 years.Methods: The hospital database was searched for patients treated with colchicine in the last 20 years (January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2017). Overall, total of 41 patients were included in our study.Results: In 63.4% of all patients, either a complete response or an improvement of disease was observed. Adverse events occurred rarely.Discussion: Colchicine is an effective and safe treatment.

Effectiveness of Statins as Primary Prevention in People With Gout: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular guidelines do not give firm recommendations on statin therapy in patients with gout because evidence is lacking.

AIM

To analyze the effectiveness of statin therapy in primary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD), ischemic stroke (IS), and all-cause mortality in a population with gout.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study (July 2006 to December 2017) based on Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP^Q), a research-quality database of electronic medical records, included primary care patients (aged 35-85 years) without previous cardiovascular disease (CVD). Participants were categorized as nonusers or new users of statins (defined as receiving statins for the first time during the study period). Index date was first statin invoicing for new users and randomly assigned to nonusers. The groups were compared for the incidence of CHD, IS, and all-cause mortality, using Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusted for propensity score.

RESULTS

Between July 2006 and December 2008, 8018 individuals were included; 736 (9.1%) were new users of statins. Median follow-up was 9.8 years. Crude incidence of CHD was 8.16 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.25-10.65) and 6.56 (95% CI: 5.85-7.36) events per 1000 person-years in new users and nonusers, respectively. Hazard ratios were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.60-1.19) for CHD, 0.68 (0.44-1.05) for IS, and 0.87 (0.67-1.12) for all-cause mortality. Hazard for diabetes was 1.27 (0.99-1.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy was not associated with a clinically significant decrease in CHD. Despite higher risk of CVD in gout populations compared to general population, patients with gout from a primary prevention population with a low-to-intermediate incidence of CHD should be evaluated according to their cardiovascular risk assessment, lifestyle recommendations, and preferences, in line with recent European League Against Rheumatism recommendations.