Advanced Therapies and Regulatory Framework in Different Areas of the Globe: Past, Present, and Future

Challenges and opportunities for access to Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Brazil

BACKGROUND AIMS

The marketing authorization of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) in Brazil is recent. The features of these therapies impose specialized regulatory action and are consequently challenging for developers. The goal of this study was to identify the industry's experience in clinical development, marketing authorization and access to ATMPs through the Unified Health System (SUS, acronym in Portuguese), from a regulatory perspective.

METHODS

A survey containing structured questions was conducted among research participants who work at companies that commercialize ATMPs. A descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

We invited 15 foreign pharmaceutical companies, of which 10 agreed to participate. Overall, participants assessed that Brazil has a well-established regulatory system, especially the sanitary registration by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), which ensures the quality, safety, and efficacy of the products. The Agency's good interaction with the regulated sector, the harmonization of sanitary and ethical assessment systems with other countries, and the analysis time in the biosafety assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) stand out as positive in industry's evaluation. On the other hand, it is important to advance the pricing regulation for these products since Brazilian regulations do not establish specific criteria for ATMP. One of the biggest challenges is the difficulty for the SUS in reimbursing these very high-cost therapies, especially using current Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the increasing number of approvals of cell and gene therapies in Brazil in the coming years, a close dialogue between the industry and the public sector is recommended to advance regulatory improvements (pricing and HTA). Additionally, the construction of policies to promote the national Health Economic-Industrial Complex, based on a mission-oriented vision that encourages innovative models of financing, especially those that consider risk-sharing and co-financing technologies, will help provide the population with universal, equitable and sustainable access to ATMP in the SUS.

Comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in corneal 3D bioprinting, including regulatory aspects

The global shortage of corneal transplants has spurred an urgency in the quest for efficient treatments. This systematic review not only provides a concise overview of the current landscape of corneal morphology, physiology, diseases, and conventional treatments but crucially delves into the forefront of tissue engineering for corneal regeneration. Emphasizing cellular and acellular components, bioprinting techniques, and pertinent biological assays, it explores optimization strategies for manufacturing and cost-effectiveness. To bridge the gap between research and industrial production, the review outlines the essential regulatory strategy required in Europe, encompassing relevant directives, frameworks, and governing bodies. This comprehensive regulatory framework spans the entire process, from procuring initial components to marketing and subsequent product surveillance. In a pivotal shift towards the future, the review culminates by highlighting the latest advancements in this sector, particularly the integration of tissue therapy with artificial intelligence. This synergy promises substantial optimization of the overall process, paving the way for unprecedented breakthroughs in corneal regeneration. In essence, this review not only elucidates the current state of corneal treatments and tissue engineering but also outlines regulatory pathways and anticipates the transformative impact of artificial intelligence, providing a comprehensive guide for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in the field.

Navigating Gene Therapy Access: The Case of Bulgaria in the Context of the EU Regulatory Landscape

Gene therapies (GTs) have recently emerged as revolutionary personalized therapeutic options. Despite their promising potential, challenges such as uncertainty regarding long-term health benefits and safety, along with extreme price tags, pose significant obstacles to patient access. Within the EU, the European Medicines Agency plays a pivotal role with regards to GT market authorization. However, national authorities are responsible for pricing and reimbursement, which results in fragment patient access within the EU. This study aimed to provide an overview of the complex landscape of post-market authorization accessibility for GT products in Bulgaria, comparing it with neighboring EU countries. We applied a mixed-methods approach, including desk research, public data requests, and list price comparisons. As of 1 April 2023, 14 GTs had a valid market authorization at the EU level. In Bulgaria, Kymriah® was the only GT included in the Positive Drug List (PDL), with an official list price of EUR 335,636.94. Similar results were found in Romania, whereas five GTs were included in Greece's PDL. Additionally, Zolgensma® was found accessible in Bulgaria through an alternative individual access scheme at an estimated price of EUR 1,945,000.00. In conclusion, this study emphasized targeted policy interventions to address health inequalities and to ensure timely access to GTs within the EU.

Regulatory Framework, Challenges, and Initial Strategic Planning for Advanced Therapy Products (PTAs) Development in Brazil

Advanced Therapies are a class of innovative complex biological products used for therapeutic purposes, encompassing cell therapy, tissue engineering, and gene therapy products. These are promising therapeutic strategies for several complex diseases with low or non-existent therapeutic alternatives. The proper transposition of basic research in this area into medicinal products must comply with regulatory requirements. Here we review the main regulatory recommendations, emphasizing on the Brazilian regulation. The critical points are the manufacturing process, challenges in characterizing the product, development of non-clinical trials, lack of adequate animal models representative of the clinical situation, and absence of valid and measurable therapeutic endpoints. Based on that, we propose a framework for strategic planning of pre-clinical studies in this field. The detailed example involves producing a nonviral vector-based gene editing product, but the regulations and methods may be extrapolated for developing different types of advanced therapies.

History and current status of clinical studies using human pluripotent stem cells

The Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Registry established a database of clinical studies using human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) as starting material for cell therapies. Since 2018, we have observed a switch toward human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from human embryonic stem cells. However, rather than using iPSCs for personalized medicines, allogeneic approaches dominate. Most treatments target ophthalmopathies, and genetically modified iPSCs are used to generate tailored cells. We observe a lack of standardization and transparency about the PSCs lines used, characterization of the PSC-derived cells, and the preclinical models and assays applied to show efficacy and safety.

A systematic review on the cost-effectiveness assessment of tisagenlecleucel for refractory or relapsing B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) treatment in children and young adults

BACKGROUND AIMS

The advanced therapy product tisagenlecleucel is a CD19-directed genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy that has brought hope for children and young adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel compared with conventional salvage therapies in pediatric and young adult patients with R/R B-ALL.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses parameters as registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021266998). Literature was searched using the MEDLINE databases via PubMed, EMBASE, Lilacs, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science in January 2022. Titles were screened independently by two reviewers. Articles deemed to meet the inclusion criteria were screened independently on abstract, and full texts were reviewed.

RESULTS

In total, 5627 publications were identified, from which six eligible studies were selected. The conventional therapies identified were blinatumomab (Blina), clofarabine monotherapy (Clo-M), clofarabine combined with cyclophosphamide and etoposide (Clo-C) and the combination of fludarabine, cytarabine and idarubicin (FLA-IDA). The discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for tisagenlecleucel compared with Clo-C and Blina averages was $38 837 and $25 569, respectively. In relation to the cost of the drug, the average of tisagenlecleucel was approximately 4.3 times, 10.8 times or 4.7 times greater than the Clo-M, Clo-C and Blina, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlighted that tisagenlecleucel is a much more expensive therapy than conventional alternatives. However, tisagenlecleucel performed well on the ICER, not exceeding $100 000/QALY. It was also found that the advanced therapy product was more effective than the conventional small molecule and biological drugs, in terms of life years and QALY gained.

Gene editing strategies to treat lysosomal disorders: The example of mucopolysaccharidoses

Lysosomal storage disorders are a group of progressive multisystemic hereditary diseases with a combined incidence of 1:4,800. Here we review the clinical and molecular characteristics of these diseases, with a special focus on Mucopolysaccharidoses, caused primarily by the lysosomal storage of glycosaminoglycans. Different gene editing techniques can be used to ameliorate their symptoms, using both viral and nonviral delivery methods. Whereas these are still being tested in animal models, early results of phase I/II clinical trials of gene therapy show how this technology may impact the future treatment of these diseases. Hurdles related to specific hard-to-reach organs, such as the central nervous system, heart, joints, and the eye must be tackled. Finally, the regulatory framework necessary to advance into clinical practice is also discussed.

The Current Status of Breakthrough Devices Designation in the United States and Innovative Medical Devices Designation in Korea for Digital Health Software

INTRODUCTION

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly utilized in the medical device industry as it can address unmet demands in clinical sites and provide more patient treatment options. This study aims to analyze the FDA's Breakthrough Device Program and MFDS' Innovative Medical Device Program, which support regulatory science for innovative medical devices today. Through this study, it is intended to enable prediction of current development trends of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) and Digital Therapeutics (DTx), which combine AI and technologies to be used in the clinical field soon.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic search was conducted on the broad topics of "FDA and MFDS Program's SaMD, DTx". A parallel review and update of PubMed, and the official websites were conducted to investigate the regulator's databases, review official press releases of regulatory agencies, and provide detailed descriptions of researchers.

EXPERT OPINION

The efforts of related stakeholders are needed to expand AI technology to diagnosis, prevention, and treatment technologies for diseases that are difficult to diagnose early or are classified as clinical challenges. It is important to prepare regulatory policies suitable for the rapid pace of technological development and to create an environment where regulatory science can be realized by developers.

Perspectives, Expectations, and Concerns of European Patient Advocates on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products

This paper presents the results of a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews of 10 expert patient advocates on several different issues around Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). The interviews were conducted between February and May 2020 based on a guideline with a list of 8 topics that covered concerns about safety and ethics, access problems and limitations, pricing of ATMPs and educational needs for patient communities. Overall, the interviewees expressed a high degree of convergence of opinions on most of the topics and especially on the identification of the reasons for concern. Conversely, when asked about possible solutions, quite a wide range of solutions were proposed, although with many common points. However, it highlights that the debate is still in its infancy and that there are not yet consolidated positions across the whole community. A general concern emerging from all the interviews is the potential limitation of access to approved ATMPs, both due to the high prices and to the geographical concentration of treatment centers. However, patients recognize the value of a model with a limited number of specialized clinical centers administering these therapies. On the ethical side, patients do not show particular concern as long as ATMPs and the underlying technology is used to treat severe diseases. Finally, patients are asking for both more education on ATMPs as well as for a more continuous involvement of patient representatives in the whole “life-cycle” of a new ATMP, from the development phase to the authorization, from the definition of the reimbursement scheme to the collection of Real Word Data on safety and long-term efficacy of the treatment.